Exclusive: Hillary Clinton State Department Emails,
Mexico Energy Reform and the Revolving Door
By Steve Horn • Friday, August 7, 2015 -
Emails released on
July 31 by the U.S. State Department reveal more about the origins of energy reform efforts in Mexico.
The State Department released them as part of the once-a-month rolling release
schedule for emails generated by former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, now a Democratic
presidential candidate.
Originally stored on a private server,
with Clinton and her closest advisors using the server and
private accounts, the emails confirm Clinton's State Department helped to
break state-owned company Pemex's (Petroleos Mexicanos) oil and gas
industry monopoly in Mexico, opening up the country to international oil
and gas companies. And two of the Coordinators helping to make it happen, both
of whom worked for Clinton, now work in the private sector and stand to gain
financially from the energy reforms they helped create.
The appearance of the
emails also offers a chance to tell the deeper story of the role the
Clinton-led State Department and other powerful actors played in opening up
Mexico for international business in the oil and gas sphere. That story begins
with a trio.
The Trio
David Goldwyn, who was the first International Energy
Coordinator named by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in
2009, sits at the center of the story. As revealed by DeSmog, the State
Department redacted the entire job description document
for the Coordinator role.
Goldwyn now runs an
oil and gas industry consulting firm called Goldwyn Global Strategies, works of counsel as
an industry attorney at the law firm Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, and works as a fellow at the industry-funded think tanks Atlantic Council and Brookings Institution.
The emails show that,
on at least one instance, Goldwyn also used his private “dgoldwyn@goldwyn.org” (Goldwyn Global Strategies) email
address for State Department business.
It remains unclear if
he used his private or State Department email address on other instances, as
only his name appears on the other emails. But Cheryl Mills, a top aide to
Secretary Clinton at the time, initiated the email that he responded to on his
private account.
Carlos Pascual, Goldwyn's successor as International Energy
Coordinator, who oversaw
the creation of the State Department's
Bureau of Energy Resources as mandated by the Department's 2010
Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, serves as
another key character.
So too does Neil Brown, a former top-level staffer for
Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN) who now works at the private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR).
Brown now works with
former CIA Director David Petraeus at the KKR Global Institute, where he serves as Director
of Policy and Research, and formerly served as senior-level staff for the U.S. Senate
Committee on Foreign Relations. He also stillserves as a senior advisor for Goldwyn Global Strategies,
according to the firm's website.
Energy Dipomacy and
Security Act
A May 2009 email written
by top Clinton advisor Cheryl Mills, in
which she shared an early draft of the job description for International Energy
Coordinator (redacted in the email), points to the origins of the idea behind
the job. That is, it actually came from Lugar and Mills wrote that it would
continue to “fulfill the mission outlined by the legislation”
he introduced.
Mills was referring
to the Energy Diplomacy and Security Act
of 2006 and 2007, bills introduced
by Lugar and co-sponsored by then-Senators Barack Obama, Joe Biden
and Chuck Hagel, among others. Defense Secretary Hagel formerly served as Chairman for the
Atlantic Council and sat on the Board for Chevron,
one of Atlantic Council's top
funders.
That bill called for
the creation of the International Energy Coordinator position.
Neither of those
bills passed. Instead, the measure was inserted into the broader Energy Independence and Security
Act of 2007 as Section 931. Lobbying records show Marathon Oil, ExxonMobil and Goldman Sachs all lobbied
for both the original bill and the omnibus bill, with scores of other oil and gas companies also lobbying for
the latter.
Lugar announced the bill for the first
time at a Brookings Institution event in
March 2006 at an convening moderated by Carlos Pascual, then
Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy Studies for Brookings.
In October 2006,
Gregory Manuel — who now works at MNL Partners, a clean energy project development
and finance shopfocused on China — became the first ever International Energy
Coordinator for the Bush Administration State Department. The
Manuel announcement occurred the same month as the powerful Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR), heavily funded by the oil and gas
industry, published a report advocating for the creation
of a similar position within the White House's National
Security Council.
David Goldwyn, future
International Energy Coordinator, sat on the task force (with current Secreatry
of Energy Ernest Moniz) that authored the report and called for creation of
the job.
Goldwyn also
co-wrote a two-page “Additional View” section, which reads “We subscribe to the
report’s analysis and recommendations, but the report understates the gravity
of the threat that energy dependence poses to U.S. national
security…All told, an incremental approach to the challenge—as advocated in
this report—will not be adequate.”
At her 2009 confirmation
hearing in front of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, then-Committee
Chair Lugar asked Clinton if she intended to continue funding the position. She confirmed she did, and
not long thereafter followed through on the promise — by
hiring Goldwyn.
Both Clinton and
Goldwyn did not respond to repeated requests for comment for this
story.
“Mexico Rising”
An October 2009 email written
by Mills mentions “engaging with…Mexico” as among Goldwyn's top “energy
security priorities.” Congressional testimony he
delivered in April 2013 confirmed Goldwyn initiated energy
reform efforts in Mexico while at the State Department, as did a story published a couple weeks
later by Reuters.
A State Department
diplomatic cable unearthed by Wikileaks sheds further light on Goldwyn's
efforts in Mexico.
“Mexico officials
remain extremely sensitive about any public - especially US - comments
regarding energy reform and production,” reads a February 2010 “scenesetter”
cable written by the U.S. Embassy in Mexico for Goldwyn's
upcoming trip to Mexico. “We should retain the [U.S. government's] long-standing
policy of not commenting publicly on these issues while quietly offering to
provide assistance in areas of interest to the [Mexican government].”
At the time that
cable was published, Carlos Pascual served as U.S. Ambassador to Mexico, a job he would
eventually leave to become Goldwyn's successor as International
Energy Coordinator. After leaving the State Department, Goldwyn continued
that effort “to provide assistance” for energy reform alongside Neil Brown in
the private sector.
One of the last
things Brown did in the Senate before getting a job with Goldwyn was to co-author a December 21, 2012 U.S.Senate Committee on Foreign Relations report on
the then-proposed and since-passed U.S. Mexico
Transboundary Hydrocarbon Agreement.
That agreement served
as the first step of Mexico's energy reform efforts, which opened up offshore
oil in the Gulf of Mexico to international oil and gas companies, and was lobbied for by the
likes of ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, the American Petroleum Institute,
Independent Petroleum Producers of America and others.
Brown “worked on the
[Mexico energy reform] issue…as lead Republican international energy aide in
the Senate,” according to Reuters and
also went on a taxpayer-funded trip to
Mexico during his last few months as a Foreign Relations
Committee staffer.
Pascual also worked
on the Transboundary issue when he was Ambassador, another Wikileaks
cable reveals.
“Publicly, the
[government of Mexico] will emphasize that the negotiations allow Mexico to
defend its natural resources,” reads the Pascual-authored cable titled, “Transboundary Reservoirs - A Window
of Opportunity.” “[M]any Mexicans consider oil a part of the
country's DNA. A treaty would address these concerns and avoid any unnecessary
irritants between the two countries.”
Pascual then stated
that, while the government of Mexico would posture one way to the people of
Mexico, it intends to act in an entirely different way in terms of the policy
it would push.
“[While the
government of Mexico] will portray negotiations on trans-boundary reservoirs to
the Mexican public as an effort to defend the country's natural resources, the
government sees a treaty as an important opportunity for PEMEX to work withIOCs and gain expertise
in deepwater drilling,” he wrote. “For the first time in decades, the door to
the USG's constructive engagement with Mexico on oil has opened a crack. It
would be in our interests to take advantage of this opportunity.”
Not long after Brown
left his Foreign Relations Committee job, Goldwyn and Brown co-authored a
report for the Brookings Institution in August 2013, “Time to Implement the U.S.-Mexico
Transboundary Hydrocarbons Agreement — Congress: Drop the Poison Pill.”
The bill would pass months later and be signed into law by President Obama.
They also co-authored
a report a year later for the Atlantic Council, “Mexico's Energy Reforms: Ready to
Launch.” Goldwyn also published a December 2013 Atlantic
Council report, “Mexico Rising: Comprehensive Energy
Reform At Last?,” which came out just one week after Mexico's legislature passed constitutional
reforms opening up its oil and gas spigot to
international drillers.
Cashing In
Goldwyn, Pascual and
Brown now stand to gain financially from the Mexico energy reform architecture
they helped envision and construct.
Goldwyn
Goldwyn works
of-counsel for Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, a firm that helped the Enterprise Product Partners become the
first company to get a permit to export processed oil condensate from the U.S. Department of
Commerce in June 2014. In a biography appearing at the end of a September 2014
presentation he delivered to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Sutherland
partner Jacob Dweck disclosed
he is presently “assisting clients” looking to
export crude oil “as part of an exchange or swap.”
Doing a “swap” means
exporting U.S.-produced crude oil to Mexico and trading it with
Mexican-produced oil, serving as a way to wedge open the door on the current
ban on U.S. oil exports.
Dweck and his
Sutherland colleague Shelley Wong both sat on
the Brookings Institution Crude Oil Task Force co-chaired by Goldwyn. All three
of them contributed to a September 2014 Brookings report calling for
increased exports of U.S.-produced crude oil, which was written in reaction to
another report they funded and released simultaneously written byNational Economic Research Associates (NERA).
Just months later,
Columbia University's Adrián Lajous released a 13-page white paper
calling for U.S. crude oil exchanges with Mexico. In the acknowledgements for the
paper, he thanked Dweck for “comments and suggestions that
helped improve” it.
Pascual
Pascual now sits as a Fellow at
an outfit many believe is industry-funded, but which does not disclose its
funding on its website: Columbia University's Center on
Global Energy Policy. The Center does, however, disclose it “welcomes support” from corporations. Both
officials at Columbia and its spokesperson at BerlinRosin did not respond to
repeated requests for comment on funding sent by DeSmog.
Besides Columbia,
Pascual also works as Senior Vice President of
Global Energy Affairs at IHS Inc., a for-profit consultancy business that
provides analysis on behalf of corporate clients.
IHS has a unit
devoted to “evaluating future options in Mexico with a scenarios-based approach
built on quantitative and qualitative data to help shape a successful upstream
entry strategy for Mexico that centers on the client’s specific needs,” its
website explains. “A variety of foreign companies – ranging from the Majors to
Independents to service sector firms – are expressing interest in capitalizing
on Mexico’s largely untapped resource potential in six major plays, including:
deepwater, offshore gas, shale and marginal PUDs in conventional areas.”
The Center on Global
Energy Policy has also proven a friendly forum to promote energy
reform efforts, which has both published pro-reform reports and also
housed panels on the topic. Adrián Lajous, another Fellow at the center,
formerly served as CEO for Pemex and wrote his own pro-reform paper in June 2014
bankrolled by none other than Goldman Sachs.
Pascual recently
testified in front of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee
in support of energy reform efforts in Mexicowearing his IHS Inc. hat, with his placard referring to him
as “Ambassador Pascual.”
He had previously
done the same thing on multiple occasions as head of the State Department's Bureau of
Energy Resources when he was officially serving as an Ambassador.
Pascual denied
comment for this story. But Jeff Marn, energy and natural resources spokesman
for IHS, told DeSmog “We do research on several topics around the world, energy
among them. But we don’t have a 'stake' in any development or outcome.”
IHS, though, does take
huge batches of industry funding for its reports. A case in point: its two recent studies on U.S. oil exports, both of which were
funded by companies ranging from ExxonMobil, Chesapeake Energy, ConocoPhillips,
Chevron, Halliburton and many other companies.
Brown
KKR, where Brown now
works, has already put its feet on the ground to profit from energy reform
efforts in Mexico. This may explain why Brown and Petraeus co-wrote a July 2014
opinion piece published by the Houston Chronicle titled, “Mexico's miracle: Political productivity.”
In December 2014,
Petraeus and colleagues from KKR took a trip to Mexico and
expressed excitement over the “promise that the financial community sees in
this country.”
“Obviously we’re
looking very closely at the energy space, upstream and downstream production,
the entire gamut of that,”Petraeus told Bloomberg at the time.
His trip to Mexico came just two months after he co-authored a CFR report with Robert Zoellick (former head of the World Bank, now a chairman of international advisors at Goldman Sachs) calling for the “integration” of North America's energy markets.
His trip to Mexico came just two months after he co-authored a CFR report with Robert Zoellick (former head of the World Bank, now a chairman of international advisors at Goldman Sachs) calling for the “integration” of North America's energy markets.
Just months later, KKR announced
the launch of a joint venture with Monterra Energy, a new start-up created in the aftermath of Mexico's energy reforms. KKR will serve
as financier for the development of midstream oil and
gas assets (like pipelines and related delivery infrastructure) owned
by Monterra in Mexico.
Brown and KKR did not respond
to repeated requests for comment.
“Integration”
“Integration” is where
the story comes full circle. In March 2009, Lugar introduced legislation that
would create a “Western Hemisphere Energy
Cooperation Forum,” a concept recycled from section six of the initial Energy
Diplomacy and Security Act.
That Forum, had the
bill passed, would have served to “strengthen integration among countries in
the Western Hemisphere through closer cooperation.” It was lobbied for by Marathon Oil, one
of only 26 companies approved to bid for
shallow water oil and gas reserves in Mexico during its recent July auction.
Lugar introduced the
concept of the Forum, like the International Energy Coordinator idea, during his 2006 Brookings address moderated
by Pascual.
Although it never
became a piece of congressional legislation, it did become the de facto law of
the land as a chapter in theU.S. Department of Energy's
recently-released Quadrenial Energy Review (QER).
Most recently,
Goldwyn, Pascual and Brown all sat on Atlantic Council's Task Force on the U.S. Energy Boom and
National Security. That Task Force, co-directed by Godlwyn, released
a report pointing to the QER to advocate for “infrastructure and policy integration” with Mexico.
Hillary Clinton recently released her energy and climate plans for her
presidential campaign, lauded by some.
But to date, she has
not commented on the energy reform efforts in Mexico her State Department
helped spearhead, which will usher in more deepwater offshore drilling in the
Gulf of Mexico and onshore fracking in Mexico's portion of the Eagle Ford Shale basin.
It will also flood the electricity grid with fracked gas emanating from the U.S.,
a fact proudly proclaimed by Goldwyn and the U.S. Department of Energy.
“[A]s secretary of
state, we know that there was quite a revolving door between the oil and gas
lobby and her people at State and on her previous campaign staff,” Naomi Klein,
author of the book “This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate,” said
in a recent appearance on Democracy Now! “And I think there’s
real reason for concern about whether or not she would be willing to stand up
to the oil and gas lobby on Keystone, on Arctic drilling, [or] on
any…other issues.”
One thing appears
certain: those who laid the groundwork for energy reforms in Mexico have
created a perfect climate to profit from the fruits of their labor.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario