Iconos

Iconos
Zapata

miércoles, 31 de enero de 2024

¿Por qué Israel es considerado ‘refugio’ de criminales como Andrés Roemer? Esto sabemos

El Estado de Israel ha sido señalado por organizaciones y activistas de brindar protección a criminales a través de su Ley del Retorno.

Por Redacción

enero 30, 2024

https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/mundo/2024/01/30/por-que-israel-es-considerado-refugio-de-criminales-como-andres-roemer-esto-sabemos/

Andrés Roemer logró salir de prisión a pesar de enfrentar cargos por abuso sexual agravado y violación. Este martes se dio a conocer que las autoridades de Israel permitieron que continuara su proceso judicial en casa desde el 15 de diciembre del año pasado, apenas 76 días después de haber sido detenido.

“En contra de las estadísticas más robustas, salí de la cárcel. Parece ser el primer caso de arresto domiciliario en mi circunstancia. Israel descubrió mil falacias mexicanas y evaluó a detalle que yo tengo de peligroso, lo que un peluche conlleva. Falta mucho aún. La política sigue estando por encima de la justicia”, escribió en su cuenta de X.

Sin embargo, el caso de Roemer no parece ser inédito, al menos en ciertos aspectos. Activistas, medios y organizaciones han señalado en diversas ocasiones al Estado de Israel por brindar refugio a criminales -pedófilos, asesinos, abusadores- que escapan de los países donde radican y de protegerlos de la extradición, bloqueando los procesos para la obtención de justicia.

Esta protección se garantiza en los hechos mediante la Ley del Retorno, la cual regula el derecho de los extranjeros a recibir la nacionalidad o la residencia permanente en Israel. A través de esta ley, todas las personas judías y sus descendientes hasta la tercera generación pueden ingresar al país y recibir la ciudadanía junto con sus beneficios, derechos y obligaciones.


Si bien dicha ley fue modificada en 1954 para impedir la conversión de personas con antecedentes penales, hay algunos casos que dejan al descubierto su laxa aplicación. Uno de esos, fue el del adolescente estadounidense-israelí, Samuel Sheinbein, quien junto a su amigo Aaron Benjamin Needle, asesinó a Alfredo Enrique Tello en Maryland en 1997.

Sheinbein huyó a Israel cuando las sospechas en su contra comenzaron a aumentar, siendo elegible para obtener la ciudadanía. Tras un caso legal que tensó las relaciones entre Estados Unidos e Israel, se evitó que fuera extraditado, aunque fue sentenciado a 24 años de prisión en una cárcel israelí, donde murió tiempo después en un tiroteo.

Israel, el país donde pedófilos buscan protección

CBS News reveló en febrero de 2020 que un número considerable de estadounidenses acusados de abusar sexualmente de niños huían a Israel para escapar de la justicia.

Los hallazgos se basan en una investigación de Jewish Community Watch, una organización con sede en Estados Unidos que comenzó a rastrear a los pedófilos acusados desde 2014. En cuatro años, la organización identificó a 60 personas con ese perfil y estimaba que el número real fuera aún mayor.

Tras la publicación de la investigación, The Times of Israel afirmó que tanto hombres como mujeres judías de otros países podían escapar a Israel utilizando la Ley del Retorno.

martes, 30 de enero de 2024

US, UK, France blast Israeli confab on Gaza resettlement attended by PM’s allies

White House takes particular issue with ‘incendiary’ rhetoric on displacing Palestinians, saying it goes against what Netanyahu claims is government policy

By JACOB MAGID

https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-france-blast-israeli-confab-on-gaza-resettlement-attended-by-pms-allies/

(Jeremy Sharon/ The Times of Israel)

The White House on Monday slammed a conference on Sunday night in Jerusalem aimed at encouraging the reestablishment of Israeli settlements in the Gaza Strip, which was attended by nearly one-third of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet.

A statement issued by a National Security Council spokesperson said the US is “troubled” by the gathering, particularly due to the host of controversial statements by participants calling for the mass displacement of Gaza’s Palestinian population.

“We have also been clear, consistent, and unequivocal against the forced relocation of Palestinians outside of Gaza,” the White House statement said.

“This rhetoric is incendiary and irresponsible, and we take the prime minister at his word when he says that Israel does not intend to reoccupy Gaza,” the statement added, implicitly urging Netanyahu to crack down on such calls by his coalition partners.

Netanyahu said Saturday that the agenda advanced at the conference does not represent his government’s policy, but the decision by 11 ministers and 15 coalition lawmakers to attend the gathering has raised eyebrows both in Israel and around the world.

While the IDF insists the directive at the start of the war for Palestinians in northern Gaza to evacuate from their homes was issued in order to ensure they would not be caught in the crossfire, calls by ministers for Palestinians to be encouraged to emigrate from Gaza and for settlements to be reestablished there may well paint the evacuations in a different light.

France also condemned the Sunday conference, with its foreign ministry saying in a statement that it expected the Israeli government to “clearly denounce the positions” championed at the gathering.

“In this respect, France recalls that the International Court of Justice recently set out Israel’s obligation to take all measures within its power to prevent and punish this kind of rhetoric,” the foreign ministry statement added, referring to the ICJ initial ruling regarding South Africa’s allegation that Israel is perpetrating genocide in Gaza.

“It is not up to the Israeli government to decide where Palestinians should live on their land. The future of the Gaza Strip and of its inhabitants falls within the framework of a unified Palestinian state living in peace and security alongside Israel,” France added.

The UK Foreign Office said Tuesday that it was “alarmed” by the conference.

“The UK’s position is clear: Gaza is occupied Palestinian territory and will be part of the future Palestinian state,” its statement said. “Settlements are illegal. No Palestinian should be threatened with forcible displacement or relocation.”

Thousands of attendees from the religious Zionist community attended Sunday’s boisterous conference.

Several of the lawmakers who addressed the event, including far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, spoke about “encouraging voluntary emigration” of Palestinians from Gaza, as well as resettling the Strip, which Israel withdrew from in 2005. Participants broke into singing and dancing, with Ben Gvir among those seen joining the celebrations. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party, went further, suggesting that the emigration need not be voluntary during wartime.

Netanyahu did not condemn the presence of senior government officials at Sunday evening’s event, but ministers from the National Unity party did, blasting the gathering as divisive and harmful to the country’s war effort.

Meanwhile, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has reportedly promised the US that he will not allow any resettlement on his watch.

According to a report in Axios Monday citing four US and Israeli officials, Gallant told US officials last week he wouldn’t allow settlements to be built in Gaza.

The report said Washington has rising concerns that a one-kilometer buffer zone Israel plans to establish inside Gaza could be used to rebuild settlements. These concerns were expressed during a meeting between Gallant and US Ambassador to Israel Jack Lew and US envoy for humanitarian affairs David Satterfield, Axios reported.

Gallant assured them that the buffer zone would be temporary and would be for security purposes only, according to the report.

The Monday condemnation from the Biden administration was the latest break with Israel over the latter’s prosecution of the war in Gaza.

While the US has supported Israel from the outset, the differences of approach between the two countries have grown, as the fighting has progressed, over planning for after the war. Washington is pushing for a reformed Palestinian Authority returning to govern Gaza as part of a broader initiative that would see Saudi Arabia normalize ties with Israel, while Jerusalem would agree to take steps to establish a pathway toward an eventual Palestinian state.

Netanyahu reportedly rejected the framework earlier this month. He has also dismissed allowing the PA to return to governing Gaza, while refusing to articulate a viable alternative.

Also on Monday, a US official told The Times of Israel that Israeli officials have told their American counterparts in recent days that the buffer zone the IDF is establishing on the Gaza side of the border with Israel is only meant to be temporary and will be removed once Hamas is completely removed from power.

Over the past several weeks, the IDF has been razing Palestinian homes along the border to establish the buffer zone, sparking alarm in Washington, which has insisted that there be no reduction in Gaza’s territory after the war.

The US official said that the Biden administration is not on board with even a temporary buffer zone and has voiced that stance with Jerusalem.

Washington believes that once established, Israel will not agree to withdraw from the buffer zone, the US official added.

Lazar Berman contributed to this report.

Vis-a-vis fentanyl issue, the US should cherish China's goodwill: Global Times editorial

By Global Times Published: Jan 30, 2024

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202401/1306318.shtml

On January 28, a senior US official revealed that the first joint counternarcotics working group meeting would take place in Beijing on January 30. The focus of the discussions will be the issue of effectively reducing the flow of precursor chemicals that fuel the manufacture and distribution of synthetic drugs, including fentanyl, which has been a long-standing concern for the US. The official said the working group will provide "a platform for ongoing coordination to support concrete enforcement actions," and referred to it as a "critical and pivotal moment." Establishing the China-US Counternarcotics Working Group is one of the outcomes of the summit in San Francisco between the top leaders of the two countries. It is widely believed in the US public opinion that there has been a noticeable increase in high-level communication and engagement between China and the US since the summit in San Francisco, indicating a warming trend in bilateral relations. It can be said that the cooperation between the two countries in combating drugs is one positive aspect of the increased communication.

Before the joint meeting takes place, there has been a relatively positive expectation from the US public opinion regarding its outcome, something not commonly observed in recent years. On one hand, the overall atmosphere between China and the US has maintained a stable and upward trend since the San Francisco summit. Communication in various aspects is following the blueprint outlined in the "San Francisco vision," with some long-standing issues gradually being resolved. This has provided the public with a more confident basis for expecting practical solutions to be reached between the two countries. On the other hand, the more the US perspective on China and bilateral relations shifts toward rationality, the more it will feel the weight of China's responsible attitude in handling the relationship between the two countries.

The US is seeking cooperation with China to jointly address its fentanyl issue, but the process has taken a considerable detour. The US initially attempted to force China through aggressive confrontation and extreme pressure, imposing sanctions on Chinese companies and launching a media campaign that unfairly smeared China with baseless accusations. These actions, together with other attempts to contain China, completely disrupted the atmosphere of cooperation between the two countries. The cost and lessons learned from such actions by the US are profound. Valuable time and energy that could have been used to address the problem have been wasted.

Drugs are a public hazard to humanity, and China has always had a "zero tolerance" attitude toward drugs. The intensity of the fight against drugs has never fluctuated because of changes in China-US relations. The control of fentanyl-like substances represents an unprecedented practice in China's drug control regulations and is a concrete manifestation of China's commitment to global drug control. Since China implemented the classification-based control of fentanyl-like substances on May 1, 2019, China has taken a series of effective measures, playing an important role in preventing the illegal production, trafficking, and abuse of such substances. These efforts have been fully recognized by the international community.

China's commitments are always followed through. From the reactions of the US media and public opinion, it is clear that many people understand the situation. Some US experts have warned that excessive focus on the supply side and solely attempting to restrict the entry of drugs from abroad may backfire, as traffickers will always find alternatives. US netizens are more straightforward, saying that the US "has not done enough to reduce the demand," while "blaming the Chinese is much easier." From cocaine and heroin to fentanyl, "the US has been playing a game of whack-a-mole domestically and internationally for 50 years," yet drugs can still be found on any street corner. In short, China-US cooperation in drug control is of great significance, but for the US, it is ultimately an external factor. To rescue American society from the crisis of drug and substance abuse, it ultimately relies on the US itself.

In the 45 years since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the US, the fentanyl issue is a new problem. However, we still cannot understand why so much emotion has been directed toward China, when it is clearly a problem caused by drug abuse and inadequate regulation within the US. This can only indicate that it is the result of the US' habitual blame-shifting mind-set. How did the fentanyl issue arise? How did the US handle and respond to it? And how did it end up on the negotiation table between China and the US? The entire process forms a big circle, resembling a microcosm of the China-US relationship in recent years, leaving behind many lessons and reflections.

For China, fentanyl itself is not a major issue, but for the US, it threatens the lives of nearly 100,000 people every year. China sympathizes with the pain suffered by the American people due to fentanyl and has shown sufficient sincerity and efforts to help the US resolve the crisis. This action is taken with the overall picture of China-US relationship in mind. Hopefully, in the future, when dealing with China-US relations, the US can also adopt a more empathetic approach, like China, and extend it beyond the fentanyl issue to all aspects of the bilateral relationship.

lunes, 29 de enero de 2024

Genocide in Gaza as an Opportunity: What Ben-Gvir Wants in the West Bank

by Ramzy Baroud Posted on

January 29, 2024

https://original.antiwar.com/ramzy-baroud/2024/01/28/genocide-in-gaza-as-an-opportunity-what-ben-gvir-wants-in-the-west-bank/

If what is currently happening in the occupied Palestinian West Bank took place before October 7, our attention would have been completely fixated on that region in Palestine.

The ongoing Israeli genocide in Gaza, however, has devalued the important, if not earth-shattering events underway in the West Bank, which is now a stage for the most violent Israeli military campaign since the Second Palestinian Uprising (2000-05).

As of the time of writing of this article, since October 7, more than 360 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank, while thousands have been wounded and thousands more arrested.

These numbers exceed, by far, the total number of Palestinians killed in 2022, which was already designated by the United Nations as the most violent year on record since 2005.

But how are we to understand the logic behind the Israeli violence in the West Bank, considering that it is already under Israeli military occupation and the joint ‘security’ control of the Israeli army and the Palestinian Authority?

Moreover, if the Israelis are honest in their claim that their war in Gaza is not genocide against the Palestinian people but a war on Hamas, why are they attacking the West Bank with such ferocity, killing people from all different political and ideological backgrounds, and many civilians, including children as well?

The answer lies in the growing political power of the Jewish settlers.

Historically, there are two types of Israeli violence meted out routinely against Palestinians: violence carried out by the Israeli army, and another carried out by illegal Jewish settlers.

Palestinians fully understand that both phenomena are intrinsically linked. The settlers often attack Palestinians under the protection of the Israeli army, and the latter often launches violent raids on Palestinians for the sake of the illegal settlers.

In recent years, however, the relationship between these two violent entities began to change, thanks to the rise of the far right in Israel, which is situated mostly within illegal settlements, and their supporters inside Israel.

Therefore, it should not be a surprise that both far-right ministers in the extremist government of Benjamin Netanyahu, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, are themselves settlers.

As soon as Ben-Gvir claimed the role of the National Security Minister, he began promoting the idea of establishing a National Guard. After October 7, he managed, with direct support from Netanyahu’s government, to establish so-called civilian security teams.

Even Israeli officials, like Yair Lapid, have described Ben-Gvir’s new army as a “private militia”. And he is right.

Though Ben-Gvir is insisting that the war on Gaza must continue, his actual aim out of its continuation – aside from the ethnic cleansing of the Gaza population – is to use this rare opportunity to fulfill all the wishes of Israel’s political extremists, all at once.

Let us remember that Ben-Gvir came to power based on the lofty promises of annexing the West Bank, expanding settlements, seizing control of Palestinian holy sites in East Jerusalem, among other extremist ideas.

Al-Aqsa Mosque was a major target for Ben-Gvir and his followers, who believe that only by building a Third Temple on the ruins of Islam’s third holiest shrine would Israel be able to reclaim total control over the Holy Land.

Ben-Gvir’s bizarre political language could have been dismissed as the extremism of a fringe politician. Far from it. Currently, Ben-Gvir is arguably the most powerful politician in Israel, due to his ability, using six seats in the Knesset, to make or break Netanyahu’s coalition.

While Netanyahu is behaving largely out of desperation, his Defense Minister Yoav Gallant is fighting to redeem the tattered reputation of his army. Others, like War Council Minister, Benny Gantz, are walking a political fine line so as not to be perceived as the ones who have broken Israel’s fragile political unity during a most decisive war.

None of this applies to Ben-Gvir. The man, who sees himself as the political descendant of the likes of the notorious Meir Kahane, is a fervent advocate of a religious war.

And since religious wars can only be the outcome of chaotic social and political circumstances, he is keen to instigate these very events that could ultimately lead to this coveted war.

One of the prerequisites is unhinged violence, where people are killed based on the mere suspicion of being ‘terrorists’. For example, on January 18, Ben-Gvir told Israeli border police officers during a visit to a base in the West Bank, “You have complete backing from me”, urging them to shoot at every ‘terrorist’, even if they do not pose a threat.

Of course, Ben-Gvir perceives all Palestinians in the West Bank as potential terrorists, the same way that Israel’s ‘moderate’ President Isaac Herzog perceives all Gazans as “responsible” for Hamas’ actions. This essentially means that the Israeli army in the West Bank is expected to kill Palestinians there with the same impunity as those being killed in Gaza.

Even though security and intelligence officials in Israel have warned Netanyahu against launching another war front in the West Bank, the Israeli army has no other option but to fight that supposed ‘war’ anyway. Why?

The Israeli army is already seen by a large constituency in Israel as a failure for their inability to prevent or to respond successfully to the October 7 attacks, even after over 100 days of war in Gaza. To redeem their tarnished honor, they are happy to fight a less challenging ‘war’ against isolated and under-equipped Palestinian fighters in small parts of the West Bank.

Ben-Gvir is, of course, ready to manipulate all these elements in his favor. And he is getting precisely what he wants, expanding the war to the West Bank, ethnically cleansing Palestinians, torturing prisoners, demolishing homes, torching properties and all the rest.

Perhaps Ben-Gvir’s greatest achievement, so far, is his ability to create a perfect amalgamation between the political interests of the settlers, the government and its security apparatus.

His aim, however, is not merely stealing yet more Palestinian land, or expanding a few settlements. He wants a religious war, one which will ultimately lead to the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, not just from Gaza but from the West Bank as well.

The war in Gaza is a perfect opportunity for these sinister goals to be achieved. For now, this genocidal war continues to create opportunities for religious Zionism to acquire new followers, and to lay deeper roots within Israel’s political establishment.

A sudden end to the war, however, could represent the marginalization of religious Zionism for years to come.

Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out. His other books include My Father was a Freedom Fighter and The Last Earth. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net.

UNRWA cannot come to a standstill in Gaza because of this: Global Times editorial

By Global Times Published: Jan 29, 2024

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202401/1306250.shtml

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), has become the latest focus of the Israel-Palestine conflict, with allegations of its staffers' involvement in October's attack on Israel. The allegations have complicated the already fragile humanitarian situation in Gaza. So far, 10 countries, including the largest donor, the US, have announced the suspension of funding for UNRWA. On January 28, the spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres released a statement disclosing the investigation into the incident. It stated that "any UN employee involved in acts of terror will be held accountable, including through criminal prosecution," but urged donor countries to "guarantee the continuity of UNRWA's operations" to maintain the much-needed assistance to Gaza. 

The international community, including the UN itself, has taken the allegations of UN employees being involved in the attack seriously. It is believed that the UN will conduct a thorough investigation and take appropriate action, providing a responsible account to the international community. It is necessary to emphasize that both the ongoing probe and the future investigation results should be handled on a case-by-case basis, without politicizing or exaggerating the issue. In particular, precautions should be taken to prevent any serious secondary humanitarian disaster resulting from this incident. 

UNRWA is one of the oldest UN agencies and the largest UN agency in Gaza. Since the start of this conflict, 1.7 million people have sought refuge or received services in over 150 UNRWA shelters and distribution sites. Food, water, education, and healthcare in Gaza largely depend on UNRWA. It is not an exaggeration to say that it is the last lifeline for 2.2 million people.
The funding of this agency is almost entirely provided by donors, and it has been in a financially tight or even crisis state for many years. The countries that have currently announced the suspension of funding are important donor countries, with their donations accounting for a significant proportion of the organization's funds. Although most countries currently claim to suspend funding during the "investigation period," the concept of the "investigation period" is vague, and it is still unknown how long the funding will be suspended.

The UN announced on Sunday that UNRWA's current funding will not allow it to meet all requirements of the aid recipients in February. At that time, the agency may find it difficult to maintain its previous operational status, and may even face the possibility of a shutdown. It is particularly noteworthy that Israel has previously stated that the Israeli government will implement a policy to prevent UNRWA from operating in the Gaza Strip after the current round of Israel-Palestine conflict ends. Considering UNRWA's pivotal position in local organizations within the UN, this will restrain the UN's role in Gaza and the Middle East, and deal a major blow to the increasingly dire humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip.

During the era of the Trump administration, the US temporarily suspended donations to the agency and even planned to propose alternative solutions. However, after the Biden administration took office, it gradually resumed funding and adopted a cooperative attitude toward UNRWA. Apart from Washington's change in stance, the main reason for this is that there is currently no alternative to UNRWA, and it remains the only hope for Palestinian refugees. The international community has broad consensus that "collective punishment" against the Gaza population for condemning and combating terrorism is unacceptable and humanitarian needs should be guaranteed. It is completely unnecessary to take sides on this matter. 

The alleged involvement of UN employees in the October 7 attack should be dealt with objectively and fairly, and the international community should increase support for UNRWA rather than reduce it. As for the complex situation in the Gaza Strip, the two-state solution is the only viable option that can achieve a comprehensive, fair, and lasting resolution to the Palestinian issue. In the slow progress of the "two-state solution," UNRWA has played an indispensable role in providing much-needed assistance to Palestinian refugees. It is a shared responsibility of all parties to continue supporting and maintaining the authority and status of the UN.

domingo, 28 de enero de 2024

Artificial island to nuclear bomb: Israel’s controversial plans to take over Gaza

Rights groups, legal experts and UN officials have repeatedly warned that Israel intends to ethnically cleanse Gaza

Emre Basaran  |25.01.2024 

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/artificial-island-to-nuclear-bomb-israel-s-controversial-plans-to-take-over-gaza/3118734

  • Rights groups, legal experts and UN officials have repeatedly warned that Israel intends to ethnically cleanse Gaza
  • Threats from Israeli officials to expel the enclave’s over 2 million population range from nuclear strikes to relocating Gazans to an artificial island

ISTANBUL

Apart from the deadly bombardment that has now killed nearly 26,000 people since Oct. 7, a constant theme of Israel’s ongoing Gaza offensive has been the dehumanization of Palestinians and statements explicitly conveying an intent to expel the entire population of the besieged Palestinian territory.

These statements have been repeatedly denounced by rights groups, legal experts and UN officials as plans for ethnic cleansing of Gaza.

Other incendiary remarks about the total annihilation of Gaza and its people are also a key part of South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which is scheduled to rule on the request for provisional measures on Friday.

The common denominator of all these controversial plans is to decrease the number of Gazans living in the Strip – whether through forcibly deporting them to the bordering Egypt’s Sinai peninsula or an artificial island in the Mediterranean, through permanent occupation of Gaza with illegal Jewish settlements, or straight-out calls for dropping a nuclear bomb.

They have even been rejected by Israel’s staunchest ally, the US.

“Washington has made it clear that civilians must not be pressed to leave Gaza under any circumstances,” Linda Thomas-Greenfield, US envoy to the UN, said in a recent statement.

“We unequivocally reject statements by some Israeli ministers and lawmakers calling for a resettlement of Palestinians outside of Gaza. These statements, along with statements by Israeli officials calling for the mistreatment of Palestinian detainees or the destruction of Gaza, are irresponsible, inflammatory, and only make it harder to secure a lasting peace,” she added.

Dropping a nuclear bomb on Gaza

Without a doubt, the most damning of all Israeli threats was revealed on Wednesday, when Israel’s far-right Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu renewed his call for destroying the Gaza Strip with a “nuclear bomb.”

“Even in The Hague they know my position,” he said in an interview, in reference to the ICJ.

Eliyahu had earlier said in November that dropping a nuclear bomb on the Gaza Strip is “an option.”

The hardline minister, who uses extremist rhetoric against Palestinians, also called for encouraging Gaza’s population to migrate from the enclave.

The South African legal team at the ICJ has also included Eliyahu's statements in its filing to the top UN court.

David Campbell, an associate professor at the University of Vienna, criticized Eliyahu’s remarks as “completely unjustifiable.”

“Those plans are totally unacceptable,” he told Anadolu, also referring to Israel’s plans to relocate Gazans from their territory.

Campbell also emphasized that the minister belongs to a far-right ideology and has drawn ire from the Western world.

“The reaction to his remarks from the Western world was utmost critical and negative,” he said.

Relocation to ‘artificial island’

Another recent plan was made public by Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz, who displayed a video titled “The Gaza Artificial Island Initiative” at an EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting on Monday.

“Construction of an artificial island with a port and civilian infrastructure installations off the coast of Gaza will provide the Palestinians a humanitarian, economic and transportation gateway to the world, without endangering Israel’s security,” the video’s narrator said.

The presentation has drawn vehement criticism from Palestinians and others around the world.

Josep Borrell, the EU’s high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, told reporters that Katz “could have made better use of his time to worry about the security of his country and the high number of deaths in the Middle East and the high death toll in Gaza.”

Displacement to Sinai

An Israeli Intelligence Ministry proposal revealed in late October included three options for post-war Gaza, including relocating its residents to Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula.

The document said the expulsion would yield strategic benefits but needs support from the US and other allies of Israel, according to Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

It also mentioned the possibility of initially relocating the population to temporary tent cities before establishing permanent communities in northern Sinai.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi have strongly opposed the idea, while the US has also publicly and privately expressed opposition to the idea, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken calling it a “non-starter.”

US President Joe Biden and al-Sisi also emphasized in a discussion that Palestinians in Gaza should not be displaced to Egypt or any other nation.

With regards to the Sinai plan, Campbell said it was a “no-go,” both for the EU and the US, adding that “there can be no justification for this.”

Occupation through settlements

Israeli ministers have also voiced support for reestablishing Jewish settlements in Gaza.

Israel has already set up many settlements in the occupied West Bank, which are not recognized by international law and are therefore illegal.

Israel has not had any settlements in the Gaza Strip since 2005, but Foreign Minister Katz floated the idea in recent remarks.

He said it would be a “resolute message to our murderous enemies,” claiming that most of the Israeli public agrees that “only settlement brings security.”

The US factor

Campbell, the University of Vienna academic, said the Israeli government led by Prime Minister Netanyahu might be pushed to act quickly on such controversial ideas because of the upcoming US elections.

There is a possibility that “Netanyahu is speculating the departure of Biden,” he said, mentioning the unusual US backlash to some of Israel’s moves despite the fact that it has wholly supported the brutal offensive on Gaza.

“Perhaps, former US President Donald Trump will come to power again,” he said, emphasizing that the possibility of Biden being on the way out might be a catalyst to Israel’s current actions.

“But you know, Trump can be unpredictable,” he added, saying that the businessman-turned-president might want to cozy up to “wealthy Arab states in the Gulf” when he comes to power again.

“So, Netanyahu might be thinking, ‘If I don’t get along with Biden, he won’t stay that long in the office, anyway.’ But Trump might not be so interested in engaging with the conflict in the Middle East and not be so in favor of sending his troops there,” Campbell concluded.

sábado, 27 de enero de 2024

NORMAN G. FINKELSTEIN

El intelectual judío que lo perdió todo por criticar a Israel

UNA VOZ SILENCIADA

Ricardo Mir de Francia

Nueva York 03 de junio del 2018.

https://www.elperiodico.com/es/internacional/20180603/norman-finkelstein-el-intelectual-judio-que-lo-perdio-todo-por-criticar-a-israel-6834345

Norman Finkelstein vive solo en un pequeño apartamento de Coney Island, un barrio obrero de población inmigrante a una hora de Manhattan. Es la una de la tarde cuando suena el timbre. Una voz quebradiza pregunta quién llama y abre la puerta en pantalón de pijama y sin camiseta. "Estoy agotado, me había olvidado de la entrevista", dice disculpándose. Apenas ha dormido en toda la noche y parece desorientado. A las tres de la mañana estaba en pie para leer sobre los últimos acontecimientos en Gaza, territorio al que ha dedicado su último libroGaza, investigación sobre su martirio. El libro es número uno en ventas de Amazon en dos categorías. Ha sido aclamado por los grandes referentes en la materia, pero después de décadas combatiendo la narrativa que Israel y sus aliados propagan para seguir sometiendo a los palestinos, Finkelstein parece un hombre derrotado.

En Estados Unidos, denunciar sin eufemismos las políticas de Israel es un ejercicio de alto riesgo. Un campo de minas plagado de tabús y líneas rojas. Y este académico judío de 64 años, hijo de supervivientes del gueto de Varsovia y los campos de exterminio nazi, las ha pisado todas. "Tengo reputación de ser un inconsciente y un salvaje, pero hago las cosas de forma muy premeditada. Sé exactamente cuáles serán las consecuencias de cada palabra que digo", dice en el comedor de su casa. Su estilo combina un rigor casi forense por los hechos con la indignación moral de los viejos intelectuales. En sus libros ha detallado las violaciones israelís de los derechos humanos en los territorios ocupados y ha impugnado lo que llama la ‘Industria del Holocausto’, su obra más polémica.

Así ha descrito a una serie de instituciones e individuos a los que acusa de haberse apropiado de las atrocidades nazis para enriquecerse y explotarlas con fines ideológicos para "victimizar a Israel", “justificar sus políticas criminales” y blindarlo ante la crítica. No ha dejado tótem sin descabezar. Ha acusado de “corrupción moral” al escritor Elie Wiesel, el historiador Bernard Lewis, el abogado Alan Dershowitz, la Liga Antidifamación o el Congreso Mundial Judío. El precio ha sido altísimo. Le han llamado "veneno", "asqueroso judío que se odia a sí mismo" o "negacionista del Holocausto", cuando toda su familia (salvo sus padres) fue vapuleada en los campos. Pero, sobre todo, han logrado condenarle al más profundo ostracismo.

Campaña demoledora

Tras una demoledora campaña de presión por parte del lobi proisraelí, la Universidad de DePaul (Chicago) en la que daba clases decidió cesarle en el 2007. De nada sirvió el apoyo mayoritario del resto de profesores o las huelgas de hambre de algunos estudiantes. La propia universidad llegó a reconocer tácitamente que el cese respondía a motivos políticos al describir a Finkelstein como un "académico prolífico y un extraordinario profesor".

Desde entonces no ha podido volver a enseñar en las universidades de su país y ha sido expulsado del circuito de conferencias. El que era junto a Noam Chomsky y Edward Said la voz más respetada de los derechos palestinos en EEUU ha acabado ninguneado como un paria. “He pagado un doble precio”, reflexiona ahora. "Llevo desempleado 11 años. Solo di clases durante cuatro semanas en Turquía, lo que financieramente y moralmente es muy duro porque me encanta enseñar".

El otro tiene que ver con su completa exclusión del debate público. Su libro sobre Gaza salió en enero y, aunque la situación en la Franja ha copado semanas de titulares por la matanza de palestinos desarmados en sus fronteras, la prensa estadounidense le ha ignorado completamente. "A tenor de las principales autoridades en la materia, mi libro es el mejor nunca publicado sobre el tema, pero no he recibido una sola reseña en los medios. La única llegó hace tres semanas. Tampoco me ha llamado un solo periodista para preguntarme mi opinión". (El noticiario Democracy Now le llamó el mismo día de nuestra entrevista).

Gaza un campo de concentración

Lo más paradójico de todo es que las posiciones de Finkelstein sobre el conflicto no son particularmente radicales. Defiende los dos estados, critica la campaña de boicot contra Israel y promueve el uso de la no violencia contra la ocupación. “El problema no son mis posiciones políticas, sino mi rechazo a diluir los hechos para que sean más digeribles para el público. De ahí que no diga que Israel usa una fuerza desproporcionada en Gaza. Digo que dispara deliberadamente contra civiles, que no tiene derecho a encerrar a su población en un campo de concentración o que está envenenando a un millón de niños. Es así, son hechos”.

Su análisis raramente aventura conclusiones gratuitas. Bebe de los informes de la ONU, el derecho internacional y las declaraciones de los protagonistas del conflicto. Finkelstein recuerda que fue el británico David Cameron quien definió Gaza como "una cárcel al aire libre" tras la imposición del bloqueo en el 2006, ilegal según la ONU por ser una forma de castigo colectivo. O que el 97% del agua de la Franja está contaminada, según varios estudios. La prestigiosa economista de Harvard, Sara Roy, ha escrito que, a consecuencia de la periódica destrucción israelí y el veto a la entrada de materiales para la reconstrucción, "seres humanos inocentes, la mayoría jóvenes, están siendo lentamente envenenados por el agua que beben".

Hechos como estos o que Gaza será "inhabitable" en el 2020 si no se abren las fronteras, pasan de puntillas o no se publican en la prensa norteamericana. Finkelstein lo atribuye parcialmente a las mismas fuerzas que han arruinado su carrera. "Hay un lobi proisraelí muy efectivo y bien financiado que es absolutamente despiadado. Es la vieja mafia que te rompía las rodillas, pero lo hace de una forma nueva. Destruye tu reputación, te calumnia, te difama y te humilla de la forma más abyecta".

Dejar de escribir

En su caso, lo ha conseguido. Dice que ha dejado de escribir. Y no hay que ser psiquiatra para adivinar el momento por el que atraviesa. "Lo más difícil es levantarte por las mañanas porque tienes que buscar una excusa para tu vida". Tampoco puede viajar a Palestina porque Israel le prohibió la entrada en el 2008 tras expresar su solidaridad con la milicia libanesa de Hizbulá. "Estoy muy resentido por lo que ha pasado, pero volvería a hacerlo. Me siento libre y digo lo que pienso", dice recuperando el fuego con el que se enfrentó a gigantes y fariseos sin achicarse ante las consecuencias.

Antes de despedirse, busca un vídeo en Youtube con imágenes de su trayectoria y música de Pete Seeger al clásico alemán Die gedanken sind frei (Los pensamientos son libres). Y ya de pie, como si lloviera finalmente sobre el desierto, canta como un profeta desnudo liberado de su martirio. "Mis pensamientos me dan poder/ Ningún erudito puede cartografiarlos/ Ningún cazador puede atraparlos/ Ningún hombre puede negarlos".

La industria del Holocausto

La industria del Holocausto, un libro vehemente, iconoclasta y polémico, es la denuncia de dolorida voz que alza el hijo de unos supervivientes contra la explotación del sufrimiento de las víctimas del Holocausto.
En esta obra fundamental, el eminente politólogo Norman G. Finkelstein expone la tesis de que la memoria del Holocausto no comenzó a adquirir la importancia de la que goza hoy día hasta después de la guerra árabe-israelí de 1967. Esta guerra demostró la fuerza militar de Israel y consiguió que Estados Unidos lo considerara un importante aliado en Oriente Próximo. Esta nueva situación estratégica de Israel sirvió a los líderes de la comunidad judía estadounidense para explotar el Holocausto con el fin de promover su nueva situación privilegiada, y para inmunizar a la política de Israel contra toda crítica. Así, Finkelstein sostiene que uno de los mayores peligros para la memoria de las víctimas del nazismo procede precisamente de aquellos que se erigen en sus guardianes.
Basándose en una gran cantidad de fuentes hasta ahora no estudiadas, Finkelstein descubre la doble extorsión a la que los grupos de presión judíos han sometido a Suiza y Alemania y a los legítimos reclamantes judíos del Holocausto y denuncia que los fondos de indemnización no han sido utilizados en su mayor parte para ayudar a los supervivientes del Holocausto, sino para mantener en funcionamiento «la industria del Holocausto».

Dr. Norman Finkelstein on Israel-Hamas war

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF3EE3g8COI

viernes, 26 de enero de 2024

International Court of Justice: Israel must cease killing Palestinians.

World BEYOND War 

The International Court of Justice has ruled that Israel must cease its warmaking in Gaza — cease committing and inciting genocidal acts — and that the case charging Israel with genocide must proceed.

DETAILS OF THE RULING:

1.   By 15-2: Israel shall take all measures within its power to prevent all acts within the scope of Genocide Convention article 2

2.   15-2: Israel must immediately ensure that its military does not commit acts within the scope of GC.2

3.   16-1: Direct and punish all members of the public who engage in the incitement of genocide against Palestinians

4.   16-1: Ensure provision of urgently needed basic services, humanitarian aid

5.   15-2: Prevent the destruction of and ensure the preservation of evidence to allegation of acts of GC.2

6.   15-2: Israel will submit report as to how they’re adhering to these orders to the ICJ within 1 month

This is Article 2 of the Genocide Convention:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Therefore, Israel must cease killing Palestinians.

This was a make or break moment for international law, or rather a break or make-a-first-step moment. There is hope for the idea and reality of international law, but this is only a beginning.

The president of the International Court of Justice, who read the ruling, is Judge Joan Donoghue, former top legal advisor under Hillary Clinton at the U.S. State Department during the Obama Administration. She previously was the lawyer for the United States in its unsuccessful defense before the ICJ against charges by Nicaragua of minining its harbor.

The court voted for portions of this decision by 15-2 and 16-1. The “No” votes came from Judge Julia Sebutinde of Uganda and Ad Hoc Judge Aharon Barak of Israel.

The case presented by South Africa was overwhelming (read it or watch a key part of it), and Israel’s defense paper-thin. And the case just grew more overwhelming during the bizarre delay (yes, courts are slow, but this genocide is swift).

People all over the world built the pressure to move South Africa to act and other nations to add their support. Over 1,500 organizations signed a statement. Individuals signed a petition by CODEPINK, and sent almost 500,000 emails to key governments’ United Nations consulates through World BEYOND War and RootsAction.org. Click those links because more emails are needed now. While several nations have made public statements in support of South Africa’s case, we need them to file papers officially with the International Court of Justice. To reach out to additional national governments, go here.

Governments that have made statement in support of the case against genocide include MalaysiaTurkeyJordanBoliviathe 57 nations of the Organization of Islamic CountriesNicaraguaVenezuelaMaldives, Namibia, and PakistanColombiaBrazil, and Cuba.

Germany has backed Israel’s defense against the charge of genocide, which has been denounced by Namibia, victimn of a German genocide. Prominent Jews have denounced Germany’s shameful action.

Mass demonstrations in the streets of the world have continued in support of peace and justice, and to a far greater extent than major media outlets have reported.

Here’s a discussion of this campaign for justice with Sam Husseini on Talk World Radio.

Prior to today’s ruling from the International Court of Justice, the U.S. government pointedly refused to say whether it would comply with ruling, despite insisting that other nations comply with rulings by the ICJ.

Hamas said that it would cease fire if Israel does, and release all prisoners if Israel does

Germany, to its credit, reportedly said that it would comply.

Arming a genocide is complicity in genocide. While Israel gets most of its weapons from the United States, other weaponry comes from Germany, Italy, the UK, and Canada — at least some of which nations also provide parts to U.S. weaponsmakers that provide weapons to Israel. Italian opposition demanded an end to it. And then the Foreign Minister claimed Italy had stopped shipments on Oct 7. Meanwhile, Canada is coming under pressure to cease shipments and prevarications. In Canada, Members of Parliament are among over 250 people hunger striking for an arms embargo on Israel.

People in the United States can tell Congress to stop arming Israel here or here.

President Joe Biden already faces a lawsuit for aiding and abetting genocide in Gaza. In November 2023, Palestinian human rights organizations, along with Gaza- and U.S.-based Palestinians, filed suit in a U.S. federal court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Biden Administration for failing to prevent genocide, and for aiding and abetting genocide. The plaintiffs seek an order to end U.S. military and diplomatic support to Israel. A hearing to address the government’s motion to dismiss will be held at 9 a.m. PT / 12 noon ET today, Friday. The hearing will be webstreamed to the public. You are encouraged to tune in and witness the U.S. government’s attempts at avoiding accountability and justify its support for the genocide that is happening in Gaza.