Iconos

Iconos
Volcán Popocatépetl

miércoles, 11 de noviembre de 2026

IRGC Unveils New Underground Missile City in Show of Power

By Mahmoud Mahmoudian

‘We are fully prepared to confront any threat in the region and beyond,’ IRGC aerospace chief warns

November 10, 2026

https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/532026/IRGC-Unveils-New-Underground-Missile-City-in-Show-of-Power

TEHRAN – On Tuesday, the IRGC Aerospace Force unveiled a new underground missile city, displaying an array of ballistic and cruise missiles and their launch systems. 

The unveiling came as Iran highlights the expansion of its domestic missile-production capabilities and the resilience of its military infrastructure in the face of repeated U.S. threats to resume military aggression against the Islamic Republic.

The unveiling ceremony was attended by military chief Ali Abdollahi and IRGC Aerospace Force Commander Majid Mousavi.

The facility showcases a range of missile systems and launch platforms, underscoring the Aerospace Force’s emphasis on developing, storing and deploying strategic weapons through an increasingly extensive underground infrastructure.

The unveiling comes as Iran marks IRGC Aerospace Force Week and follows an announcement by IRGC spokesman Brigadier General Hossein Mohebbi that the force would introduce a new underground missile city alongside several other military achievements.

Mohebbi said the Aerospace Force had accelerated the transfer of its missile and drone production lines from surface facilities to underground locations, moving beyond conventional underground storage complexes to establish “underground missile production cities.”

He emphasized that Iran’s domestic technological expertise, extensive geographical territory, and flexible industrial infrastructure would enable the country to sustain weapons production even under intensive aerial bombardment.

Speaking at the unveiling ceremony, General Mousavi declared Iran's readiness to confront any threat, warning that any aggression would end in defeat.

Mousavi said the capabilities inherited from the distinguished commanders had become a robust and reliable instrument of defense.

"Today, we are fully prepared to confront any threat in the region and beyond, with capabilities that are both credible and reliable," he stated.

“If necessary, we will bring all of their (enemies’) capabilities across the region and beyond under fire, leaving the enemy with nothing but defeat and rout,” Mousavi declared.

Major General Abdollahi also said the Islamic Republic will destroy the Zionist regime, emphasizing that the US and Israel have already failed to achieve their objectives despite deploying their full military capabilities against Iran.

He said available figures indicate that the United States has never deployed such a large quantity of advanced munitions and military equipment in any war over a comparable period. However, he stressed that Washington's failure in its war of aggression against Iran was determined not by the scale of its weaponry or military hardware, but by the resolve and determination of Iranian fighters.

General Abdollahi went on to say that the Armed Forces were duty-bound to stand firm against the enemy, emphasizing that neither the enemy's numerical superiority nor its military capabilities would dictate Iran's decisions.

He identified the spirit of resistance as the decisive factor behind Iran's successes, declaring: "We neither accept the enemy's calculations nor allow them to influence our determination."

Abdollahi also dismissed the statement by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that either Israel must destroy Iran or Iran would destroy Israel as nothing new.

"It is clear that we will ultimately destroy them," the senior military commander asserted.

He stressed that the Israeli regime and the United States had emerged as the definitive losers on the battlefield.

Abdollahi also warned about future confrontation, saying: "Surprises in the next war will emerge one after another."

Domestic missile production and technological independence

Brigadier General Ali Balali, an adviser to the commander of the IRGC Aerospace Force, also emphasized the extent of Iran’s self-sufficiency in missile manufacturing, describing the industry as “more indigenous than the making of Persian carpets.”

In an interview marking Aerospace Force Day, Balali traced the development of Iran’s missile industry, highlighting the pioneering role of the late Major General Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam, widely regarded in Iran as the founder of the country’s modern missile program.

He said Iran had moved beyond dependence on foreign suppliers and now possessed the expertise and industrial capacity to design and manufacture the various missile systems required by its armed forces.

According to Balali, even the raw materials used in the production of solid- and liquid-propellant fuels are sourced and processed domestically. Iran’s mineral resources and petroleum derivatives have provided an important foundation for achieving independence in this strategically significant sector, he added.

Balali rejected suggestions that Iran’s missile reserves had been exhausted following the second and third wars, arguing that the country's missile industry had reached a level of maturity that allowed production to continue on the basis of domestic resources and infrastructure.

He said Iranian specialists were also developing weapons specifically tailored to operational requirements, rather than merely reproducing existing systems.

As an example, he cited the Hormuz missile designed to engage radar installations by homing in on the electromagnetic emissions they produce.

The system's radar-seeking capability, he said, reflects the progress Iranian specialists have made in developing weapons adapted to the requirements of modern battlefield operations.

Western assessments acknowledge the scale of Iran’s missile capabilities

Iran's missile program has attracted considerable attention from Western military and security analysts, some of whom have acknowledged the scale, diversity and strategic significance of the country's missile capabilities.

Fabian Hinz, a missile and military technology analyst who has worked with the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), wrote in a June 2025 analysis that Iran possessed a substantial missile force, including shorter-range systems that could be deployed in its immediate neighborhood.

Although Hinz identified vulnerabilities in Iran’s missile stockpiles and production capacity following the June 2025 Israeli attack, his assessment nevertheless underscored the central role of missile capabilities in Iran’s military strategy, particularly given the country's limited conventional air power.

In a separate assessment published in June 2026, Chuck Freilich, a senior researcher at the Middle East Institute and a former Israeli deputy national security adviser, acknowledged that despite substantial damage to Iran's missile inventory and industrial infrastructure during the US-Israeli war, the country retained significant residual capabilities, along with the expertise, infrastructure and motivation needed to rebuild.

Freilich also pointed to Iran's geographically dispersed industrial base, underground missile facilities and mobile launch systems as important elements of the country's capacity to preserve and reconstitute its missile force.

His assessment underscores a central feature of Iran's missile strategy: its military capabilities cannot be measured solely by the number of missiles currently in storage but must also be considered in terms of the industrial infrastructure, technical expertise and production capacity that sustain the program.

Missile capabilities as a pillar of deterrence

Meanwhile, IRGC Ground Force Commander Brigadier General Mohammad Karami praised the Aerospace Force's contribution to Iran's national security, describing its missile and drone capabilities as important elements of the country's deterrence strategy.

In a message marking Aerospace Force Week, Karami said the force's performance during the US-Israeli wars of aggression and in the period that followed had disrupted the adversaries' calculations and frustrated their military ambitions.

He attributed Iran's advances to the efforts of domestic scientists, military commanders and young specialists who had transformed scientific knowledge into practical technologies and turned security challenges into opportunities for technological development.

Karami also highlighted the importance of indigenous expertise, advanced research, and the design and production of sophisticated missile and drone systems in strengthening Iran's defensive and air-defense capabilities.

He paid tribute to those who had lost their lives in the defense of the country, particularly the martyred Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, and stressed the importance of faith and adherence to the directives of the current Leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei.

The latest unveiling and the statements by IRGC commanders come amid continued emphasis by Iran on strengthening its military deterrence through domestic technological development, underground infrastructure, and the ability to maintain production under wartime conditions.

martes, 10 de noviembre de 2026

The vindication of Marjorie Taylor Greene

Trump called her crazy and a traitor when she was just telling the truth: That Americans saw his Iran war and arming Israel a betrayal of 'America First'

Jack Hunter

Nov 09, 2026

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/majorie-taylor-greene-trump-elections/?mc_cid=1215073f64&mc_eid=944feb3e1c

Ten weeks ago, Donald Trump called Marjorie Taylor Greene, his former ally and a former Georgia Republican congresswoman, a “LOSER.”

Greene shot back that Trump was a “neocon puppet for Israel.” Both of them do this a lot these days.

Last week, it was Republicans who were big losers in the midterm elections. The president might have been the biggest loser of them all.

Greene knew why.

“Look, if you're in the administration and you're ready to… run for president, you need to continue taking in the lessons that were sent by the American people on Tuesday, and it was really the same lesson that was sent in 2024,” she advised in a video post the day after the midterms.

Greene laid out what she considered core issues that led to the 2024 re-election of Trump, and then, as borne out in the exit polls and vote counts, the Democrats’ 2026 sweep.

“No more foreign wars, (Americans) don't support the war in Iran,” Greene said. “We don't want to fund foreign countries and foreign wars. We don't want to fund Israel, we don't want to fund killing children in Gaza.”

“And we want to put Americans first,” she added.

The deeply unpopular Iran war was at the center of why Republicans performed so poorly on Tuesday. Even before that, voters in both major parties were already souring on the U.S. backing of Israel and particularly the bloodshed in Gaza at the hands of the Israel Defence Forces, a policy that Trump has been fully invested in, as was President Joe Biden. This anger was particularly salient among younger voters and even most young Jewish-Americans.

Among Republicans, Greene was ahead of the curve on this.

In mid-2025, then-Rep. Greene, who the New York Times described at the time as “an avatar of MAGA politics on Capitol Hill,” became the first congressional Republican to call the Gaza crisis a “genocide.”

“It’s the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct. 7 in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,” Greene said in a social media post on July 28, 2025.

As her vocal opposition to the war grew, so did her criticism of foreign aid, which she saw as prioritizing Israel over U.S. interests. She also demanded the administration release the Epstein files, an original MAGA promise. It was then that Trump began machine-gunning MTG with new names: calling her “wacky,” “lunatic,” and even “Marjorie Traitor Greene,” insisting that the once avid MAGAite had turned against him and his movement.

When she was elected to Congress in 2020, Greene was presented regularly by legacy media as merely the QAnon candidate, reportedly dabbling in rightwing conspiracy theories. In that same period, Trump called Greene “a future Republican star.”

Five years later, after she resigned from Congress, it was Trump who was calling Greene crazy. By then, the feeling was mutual.

Yet it was also Trump who went from promising no new wars on the campaign trail, often flanked by Greene, to later justifying his own war of choice by conjuring up questionable, but familiar, propaganda about Iran being weeks away from having a nuclear weapon and the U.S. having to end the war with Tehran after “47 years.”

In November 2025, Greene announced that she would not run for re-election, saying she refused to be a “battered wife,” seemingly referring to Trump’s reneging on his campaign promises combined with increased attacks on her personally. Trump had already vowed to back a primary challenger against her.

"I have too much self-respect and dignity, love my family way too much, and do not want my sweet district to have to endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the president we all fought for, only to fight and win my election while Republicans will likely lose the midterms," Greene explained a year ago.

Greene was in a similar position to that of her friend and fellow antiwar Republican ally, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who did run for re-election this year and was defeated in his Kentucky GOP primary in May by Trump-aligned, billionaire pro-Israel donors in the most expensive House primary race in U.S. history.

Greene never surrendered her antiwar, anti-genocide posture, and in fact has probably become more fierce since she decided not to seek re-election. Nor has she abandoned the America First brand that defined Trump’s 2016, 2020 and 2024 presidential campaigns, a message that some Democrats successfully capitalized on after Trump discarded it.

And Greene noticed.

When Zohran Mamdani, the self-described democratic socialist mayor of New York City, participated in a debate during his 2025 campaign, the candidates were asked if he or she would like to visit Israel. Popular rightwing populist Tucker Carlson remarked to Greene during an interview that Mamdani, “was the only person in the New York City mayor’s debate to say he wanted to focus on New York City.”

Carlson noted that unlike the other candidates, Mamdani said “I’m running New York. That’s my job.”

“He gave the right answer,” Greene responded. Carlson agreed. How prescient both were.

In late October, Greene said the best way the Trump administration could ensure a win for Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed over reliably hawkish Republican Mike Rogers would be to attack Iran again before the midterms.

It’s a stupid senseless war and America hates it,” she posted on X

“We also hate neocons,” Greene added. “This is not an endorsement, I’m not a Democrat, but I’m also not a neocon Republican.”

El-Sayed himself was asked in July about a potential crossover between his philosophy and Greene’s, known to many as just “MTG.”

“So I talked to a former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene on this podcast in April and it's kind of remarkable how similar some of your positions are. Like, she also has condemned AIPAC's influence and politics, called for no more US taxpayer dollars to Israel, said that the cost of health insurance needs to go down,” Dasha Burns posited to El-Sayed on her POLITICO podcast, “The Conversation.”

“Do you think you could build this new coalition with people like MTG?” the Democrat was asked.

“When you ask me about why establishment elite Democrats are so worried about me? It's because there are a lot of people who listen to her who are going to vote for me in the general election,” he replied.

Many who once voted for Trump in 2024 went for Democrats in 2026.

Democrat El-Sayed handily defeated his Republican opponent last Tuesday by running his own version of an “America First” campaign. “And when it comes to the question of foreign policy, the difference is usually AIPAC money. And if we got that money out, maybe our political consensus would match our public consensus,” El-Sayed said of the formidable pro-Israel lobby.

Greene said after the election, “I think America spoke very loudly that we don't want politicians that are loyal to AIPAC and loyal to a foreign country.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene began her Washington career as the most devoted Trump loyalist, who would go to the wall for his America First message. She still does.

It was Trump who reversed course, leading so many in the same coalition that delivered him the election two years ago to now reject him and his latest iteration of the GOP.

“Marjorie is strong on everything and never gives up - a real WINNER!,” Trump wrote in 2020.

“We never changed, Trump did,” Greene wrote in August.

Donald Trump was right. Marjorie Taylor Greene never gave up.

But he did.

lunes, 9 de noviembre de 2026

Thomas Massie’s Revenge

The Kentucky congressman opposed the very policies that doomed Republicans in the midterms.

Jack Hunter

Nov 7, 2026

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/thomas-massies-revenge/

The reason we lost is the war,” Vice President J.D. Vance admitted Wednesday on X, explaining the Republicans’ disastrous midterm election loss the day before. He listed the top four things the GOP could do, according to a pollster with whom he spoke, to win back voters who had defected to the Democrats. These were:

1) End the war

2) Focus on cost of living/inflation

3) Put America First

4) Change our relationship to Israel

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) replied to Vance’s post, “Thanks for acknowledging these things. Better late than never.” Massie included an image of a red, MAGA-style hat. Instead of “Make America Great Again,” it said “Massie Was Right About Everything.”

“I’ll send you the hat,” he added.

Massie had a point.

“Donald Trump will put Americans first by securing our liberties at home and preventing needless wars abroad,” declared Massie in his endorsement of President Donald Trump in October 2024.

At the time, Massie’s praise for Trump expressed the most basic hope of many in the original MAGA movement, and certainly of its ideological core.

After his inauguration, Trump’s early promises of radical DOGE spending cuts and a break from interventionist foreign policy withered more quickly and completely than even his political adversaries had expected, and by March 2026, the administration had launched a war with Iran that seemed to serve Israel’s interests, first. That war cost Americans at home, at the gas pump and beyond. So did massive federal spending. So did the other wars.

Massie resisted all of this. He has remained a fiscal hawk throughout the entire Trump era, which has enraged Trump in both terms. And he has been a stalwart “America First” Republican, one who is not afraid to challenge Israeli influence and question policy (which also irked the president). Massie understood that financial and foreign policy restraint were related, something many Americans are now experiencing firsthand.

The Kentucky congressman never abandoned the old MAGA message from his original Trump endorsement. He refused. For that reason, Trump teamed with pro-Israel billionaires to defeat Massie in his primary this May—the most expensive House primary in U.S. history.

This week Republicans suffered one of the most humiliating defeats in modern American political history. And it was a loss that differed in important respects from prior reversals. “Past midterm blue waves largely involved angry Democrats and independents beating up on jittery swing-seat Republicans who weren't totally comfortable with what their president was doing, with a few genuine upsets sprinkled in,” observed Jim Antle of the Washington Examiner. “This one hit the GOP’s center of gravity.”

Indeed.

Massie tried to warn his party. After the off-year 2025 elections in which Democrats did exceptionally well, he told Republicans what they might need to do to survive the 2026 midterms. “To avoid a repeat of last night’s shellacking in the 2026 midterms,” Massie urged, “Republicans should: quit covering for pedophiles; put America before Israel; put farmers before corporations; quit funding wars abroad; reduce spending to control inflation; quit attacking independent voices.”

Take out Massie’s efforts for more transparency on the Epstein Files, also a part of original MAGA, and this sounds like Vance’s midterm postmortem list. In fact, in this election a number of Democrats ran with the “America First” message sounding more like Trump from two years ago than the president today—and sounding more like Massie on any day than the current Lindsey Graham–ified MAGA.

Resharing his November 2025 warning post, Massie wrote on Wednesday, “Instead of correcting course, the GOP chose to shoot the messenger and double down on stupid.”

Trump’s Republican party did shoot Massie the messenger, and it definitely doubled (tripled? quadrupled?) down on stupid.

But now, who looks stupid?

In the broadest sense, the America First message still remains viable and has been largely untried.

That isn’t due to Thomas Massie’s lack of trying. But judging by the midterm results, the voters believe it’s due to Trump’s.

domingo, 8 de noviembre de 2026

The American people have spoken, and across the political spectrum they don’t like Israel

“Everyone knows why we lost,” J.D. Vance said after the Republican wipeout in the midterm elections, and among the reasons he cited was Israel. For decades, the Israel lobby worked to keep Zionism’s bigotry off voters’ radar. Those days are over.

By Philip Weiss November 6, 2026

https://mondoweiss.net/2026/11/the-american-people-have-spoken-and-across-the-political-spectrum-they-dont-like-israel/

“Everyone knows why we lost,” J.D. Vance said yesterday. “The reason we lost was the war.” The post distancing the Vice President from Trump is the most quoted postmortem of the election. But as usual the media have not told the whole story.

Vance also blamed Israel for the Republican debacle. He said that former Trump voters switched sides on Tuesday for four reasons, according to a smart pollster he knows. One was “Change our relationship to Israel.”

Vance’s post echoes the charge by Trump’s former counterterrorism chief, Joe Kent, who resigned after Trump and Israel launched the illegal and murderous war against Iran in February. Kent was appalled that Israeli officials who were promoting all the supposed benefits of a war had greater access to Trump than American officials. Prime Minister Netanyahu was in the White House situation room weeks before the war was launched, making a “hard sell” for regime change, The New York Times reported, and as Hillary Clinton later said, Netanyahu pushed the same war throughout the Obama administration. He finally found someone stupid enough to do it.

Trump got “pulled into” the war by Netanyahu, “let’s be clear about that,” Kamala Harris said. Harris understands the dangerous politics better than anyone. Joe Biden committed war crimes by supplying Israel with endless bombs and political support when it was carrying out a genocide in Gaza, killing over 70,000 people including at least 20,000 children. Gaza complicity played a role in Harris’s defeat by Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election.

Now J.D. Vance is doing his utmost to escape Harris’s fate by turning on his president on Israel, well before 2028.

Vance is obviously thinking of Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan. El-Sayed is a Muslim epidemiologist who Trump did everything to smear and libel. El-Sayed barely defeated Rep. Haley Stevens in the Democratic primary in August. But in the general election Tuesday El-Sayed crushed Republican Mike Rogers by 52-45, even after Stevens endorsed Rogers in the closing days of the campaign saying that El-Sayed was unfit for the Senate. The reason El-Sayed was supposedly unfit is that he said many critical things about Israel and the Iran war. Israel is “taking us to a war we don’t need to fight,” he said in the spring. And then in a signature moment in a debate with Rogers last month, El-Sayed declined to say which was a “bigger threat” to the United States, Iran or Israel.

For decades, such a statement would have destroyed a candidacy. And this time around, AIPAC and other branches of the Israel lobby spent over $31 million to make sure that no one ever heard El-Sayed’s name again. But the Israel lobby failed miserably, and J.D. Vance took notice.

On CNN last week, the pollster Harry Enten said that bashing Israel wasn’t hurting El-Sayed, it was helping him. Because American attitudes are so negative on Israel. Over 54 percent of all Michigan voters want to reduce or end military aid to Israel. 61 percent of Independent voters back that move.

Enten says that “nationally as well” – voters think we give too much money to Israel, especially military aid. (So when Joel Rubin the Obama aide says on i24 that only the “far left” of the Democratic Party wants to end military aid to Israel, he’s wrong.) For years, this is all that my side has been asking for. For Israel to be an explicit issue in a political race. For Democratic candidates not to be bought by the lobby out of the gate. For the American people to get to weigh in on the question of supporting Israel.

El-Sayed framed the Israel question and he won. The American people spoke, and the American people don’t like Israel.

They have good reason not to do so. Israel committed genocide for years using American weapons and aid. Israel helped push the United States to an illegal and hateful war that began with the slaughter of over 100 children in Minab, and the assassination of the entire political leadership of a foreign country. (Not to mention the escalation of oil prices, which is all that Americans care about, according to the newspapers.)

These attitudes are not being driven by the New York Times’ or Dana Bash and Wolf Blitzer’s “dreamcastle” view of Israel on CNN. They are being driven by the videos coming out of Gaza and the West Bank of the slaughter of children and goats. They are being driven by European opinion, with such leaders as the British defense secretary Wes Streeting saying that Israel is a “pariah state” that espouses “ethnic cleansing” even as it commits “calculated brutality” against women and children.

Everyone in the Democratic Party understands that the ground is slipping under their feet. Liberal Zionists are trying to restrain the anti-Israel currents in American politics. They have urged us not to blame the war on Israel. They are trying to prop up Israel’s image as a supposed democracy even as its leading Jewish parties once again say they want nothing to do with Palestinian voters and all the human rights groups say that Israel is practicing apartheid.

The Israel lobby is trying to make sure that the bigotry of Zionism is never an issue for American voters.

Those days are over. Many young voters were surely thrilled when they heard El-Sayed refuse to say whether Israel or Iran is a greater threat. They see Israel as the greater threat, for good reason.

Support for Israel has damaged too many American presidents and policies for it not to be controversial – from Jimmy Carter and the first George Bush losing second terms in part over opposition to illegal settlements, to the second Bush launching the calamitous Iraq war in part for Israel, to Obama trashing his promise to oppose settlements so as to get a second term, to Genocide Joe Biden, to Trump breaking all his promises to his base to join the war on Iran.

No doubt Israel is in a desperate place. That’s why it is addicted to war. The only way to save its people and Palestinians from further bloodshed is for the U.S. to cut off support and treat it like a normal country. Politicians are finally getting the message.

sábado, 7 de noviembre de 2026

Hegseth doubles down on defense of war on Iran amid threat of impeachment

The war secretary seeks at least $350 billion in new funding for the war, dismissing the impeachment push against him as 'doomed to fail'

News Desk

NOV 6, 2026

https://thecradle.co/articles/hegseth-doubles-down-on-defense-of-war-on-iran-amid-threat-of-impeachment

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth doubled down on the war on Iran in a video message on 5 November, even as top cabinet officials conceded that the war cost Republicans the midterm elections and speculation mounts over his possible dismissal.

“Regardless of how people feel about the war, which I believe is a courageous and historic effort that will ensure Iran never gets a nuclear weapon, we need to continue, as President Trump did in his first term, to rebuild our military,” Hegseth said in the video taken in front of the Pentagon.

He went on to urge lawmakers to approve a reconciliation bill of at least $350 billion for his department, calling the funding essential for keeping the US “ahead in a dangerous world.”

Hegseth also dismissed the impeachment articles filed against him as baseless, predicting they would collapse just as both attempts to remove US President Donald Trump had. 

Republican Congressman Thomas Massie plans to reintroduce the impeachment articles next week, warning that Hegseth faces hearings and trials once Democrats take control of Congress next year. 

Trump defended Hegseth in the Oval Office, crediting him with the US operation to abduct Venezuela’s president and boasting that seven months into the war on Iran, Washington controls “everything that we’ve wanted to control” in the country.

Despite Trump’s backing, sources say the president could still replace his war chief, and one advisor has warned that the Iran war has put Hegseth’s job at risk. 

The war secretary’s message comes after Vice President JD Vance admitted on 4 November that the war on Iran was the driving force behind the Republicans’ crushing midterm defeat, conceding that Trump himself had reached the same verdict and that many of the party’s 2024 voters had deserted it for the Democrats.

Vance said those voters demanded an end to the war, relief from the soaring cost of living, a return to “America First,” and an overhaul of Washington’s relationship with Israel as the price of their return. 

In his message, the US vice president challenged the war’s backers to make the case that “losing the Senate for the next six years was worth it.”