Iconos

Iconos
Volcán Popocatépetl

miércoles, 8 de abril de 2026

NYT: Trump Launched Iran War After Being Briefed by Netanyahu at the White House

The Israeli leader insisted Iran was ripe for regime change

by Dave DeCamp | April 7, 2026

https://news.antiwar.com/2026/04/07/nyt-trump-launched-iran-war-after-being-briefed-by-netanyahu-at-the-white-house/

President Trump launched the war against Iran a little more than two weeks after he was briefed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, The New York Times reported on Tuesday.

Sources told the Times that the briefing took place in the White House Situation Room during Netanyahu’s visit to Washington on February 11.

“Mr. Trump sat down, but not in his usual position at the head of the room’s mahogany conference table. Instead, the president took a seat on one side, facing the large screens mounted along the wall. Mr. Netanyahu sat on the other side, directly opposite the president,” the report reads.

Other senior Israeli officials, including Mossad chief David Barnea, appeared on the screens behind Netanyahu during the hour-long briefing, where the Israeli leader made the “hard sell” for the US and Israel to launch another war against Iran.

The report said Netanyahu made a series of predictions about the potential war that proved to be wrong, including the idea that Iran was ripe for regime change, that its ballistic missile program could be destroyed within weeks, that it would be too weak to close the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran’s missile strikes on US interests in regional countries would be minimal.

Israeli officials also said that the Mossad assessed that an uprising against the government could start, with the help of Mossad operations on the ground, and that airstrikes could help topple the government. Netanyahu also presented several possibilities of people who could take power in Tehran, including Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s last shah, who had been pushing hard for the US and Israel to launch the war.

The briefing was the opposite of what US intelligence agencies concluded around the same time: that a major US-Israeli war would not result in regime change and would likely harden the Islamic government in Tehran, which is what has happened since the start of the conflict on February 28.

The Times report said that even Trump’s senior officials, including CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, told the president that they were skeptical of Israel’s claims. Sources told the paper that US officials assessed that the US and Israel could kill Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and cripple Iran’s ability to project power, but did not think there would be an uprising or regime change.

The report said that Trump asked Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, what he thought about Israel’s claims. “Sir, this is, in my experience, standard operating procedure for the Israelis. They oversell, and their plans are not always well-developed. They know they need us, and that’s why they’re hard-selling,” the general reportedly said.

Despite the advice, the report said that Trump was very hawkish on the issue and closely aligned with Netanyahu for many months. Sources told the Times that Vice President JD Vance was the administration’s most vocal opponent of the war, but he told the president he would support any decision he made.  Publicly, Vance has not criticized the conflict and has backed Trump’s threats to escalate.

 

martes, 7 de abril de 2026

An eclectic, bipartisan group suddenly calls for removing Trump using the 25th Amendment

Aaron Blake

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/07/politics/25th-amendment-trump-iran-war

The 25th Amendment talk is back.

Lawmakers have repeatedly floated the method for removing a president, as laid out in the Constitution, in recent years. And Donald Trump’s Cabinet apparently discussed the option more earnestly than many initially realized after the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack.

To successfully remove Trump, a majority of his Cabinet and his vice president would have to be supportive. And there are no indications any Cabinet officials are considering it right now, or that Vice President JD Vance would be on board. But Trump’s comment Tuesday morning that a “whole civilization will die tonight” unless Iran makes a deal spurred increasing calls — among a somewhat odd amalgamation of voices — to invoke the amendment.

Less than two hours before his 8 p.m. deadline for Iran, Trump announced he’d agreed to a two-week ceasefire, conditional on Tehran opening the Strait of Hormuz.

Democratic lawmakers and right-wing voices had spent the previous 24 hours expressing concerns about just how far the president was willing to take things in the Iran war. His threats to strike power plants and other civilian infrastructure have been decried as war crimes, and some even said they feared the administration’s threats alluded to the potential use of nuclear weapons (which the White House has denied considering).

It’s mostly Democrats who have called to invoke the amendment — dozens of them, in fact. That includes potential presidential hopefuls like Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker. (Of course, they have little to no power at the moment to initiate removal proceedings.)

But notably, some conservatives and other recent Trump allies have taken up the call, as well.

How do we 25th Amendment his ass?” conspiracy theorist Alex Jones asked his guest on Monday’s show.

By Tuesday morning, right-leaning advocates for the step spanned from more-extreme influencers to former Trump White House official Anthony Scaramucci to more-moderate Never Trumpers.

25TH AMENDMENT!!!” former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, posted on X about an hour after Trump’s post about Iran’s civilization dying. She called it “evil and madness.”

Some congressional Democrats re-posted Greene’s words.

“The 25th amendment needs to be invoked,” right-wing podcaster Candace Owens added later in the morning.

Scaramucci, who served briefly as Trump’s communications director during his first term, advocated for Trump’s removal and claimed Trump was threatening to use nukes.

“Wake up: he is calling for A NUCLEAR STRIKE,” Scaramucci said. “Seek his removal immediately.”

When others suggested online that Vance had implied Tuesday morning that Trump could order a nuclear strike, the White House denied he was saying anything of the sort. The vice president had talked about using “tools in our toolkit that we so far haven’t decided to use.”

Some Never Trump conservatives like New York Times columnist David French were also calling for the 25th Amendment.

“This is obvious 25th Amendment territory, but people are so desensitized that they can’t see it,” French said.

Others didn’t go quite so far, but have begun raising new levels of concern about Trump’s intentions.

One of them is former Trump ally Tucker Carlson, who on his show Monday criticized Trump like never before. The former Fox News host said Trump was threatening to commit “a war crime, a moral crime” in Iran by attacking infrastructure in ways that would lead to mass death, and he even seemed to suggest Trump might be the antichrist.

Also on Tuesday, GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has been a loyal Trump ally in Congress, told the Wall Street Journal that Trump “loses me if he attacks civilian targets” like infrastructure. Johnson signaled he saw such attacks as indeed illegal.

None of it means the 25th Amendment is around the corner. The option is difficult to invoke, requiring those closest to Trump to determine he is unfit for office and opt to remove him against his will. Vance happened to be in Hungary on Tuesday, and he called Trump on the phone so the president could address a political rally.

But it’s significant even as a brushback pitch from some erstwhile Trump allies and from Democrats. They seem to be saying that Trump had better think carefully about his next actions in the war.

It’s also worth reflecting on where things stand now.

When this was floated in Trump’s first term, it was almost universally the domain of Democrats. When some in his Cabinet apparently considered it after January 6, they did so quietly. The public didn’t find out until much later how seriously they’d been weighing it.

Today, even some recent former Trump allies have apparently been so fearful of what he might do that they’re publicly calling to oust him.

With his 'Stone Age' threat to Iran, Trump has unleashed a new age of savagery

Soumaya Ghannoushi

7 April 202

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/with-his-stone-age-threat-iran-trump-unleashed-new-age-savagery

So US President Donald Trump wants to return Iran to the "Stone Ages where it belongs".

A line intended to project force and intimidate.

Instead, it reveals something far more telling: not strength, but a profound illiteracy of history, of civilisation, and of the very region he threatens to dismantle.

Little does the brutish real estate mogul, confined to the shallow logic of deals and property, understand that Iran, historically Persia, was shaping the foundations of organised civilisation long before the modern West existed in any meaningful form, and centuries before the United States was born.

This is not rhetorical flourish. It is a historical fact.

In the sixth century BCE, under Cyrus the Great, Persia established one of the largest empires the world had ever seen, stretching from Central Asia to the Mediterranean. It developed systems of governance, taxation, infrastructure, and communication that would later shape imperial models, including Rome. 

The Cyrus Cylinder articulated principles of religious tolerance and the protection of communities, concepts that stand in stark contrast to the language of annihilation now being invoked.

Engines of civilisation

Persia did not vanish with antiquity. It endured conquest, absorbed upheaval, and regenerated itself with remarkable continuity. The campaigns of Alexander the Great did not erase it. Nor did the devastation wrought by Genghis Khan.

What was shattered was rebuilt. What was fractured was reassembled.

It found new expression under the Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258 CE), within the orbit of a rising and radiant Islamic civilisation. Baghdad may have been the imperial capital, but its energy coursed through a constellation of Persian cities at the forefront of human development. Nishapur, Rayy, Merv, Balkh, Tus, and Isfahan were not peripheral outposts. They were engines of civilisation.

They produced scholars, physicians, poets, and mathematicians who shaped entire disciplines. Poet, mathematician, and astronomer Omar Khayyam in Nishapur, Abu Bakr al-Razi in Rayy, and Ferdowsi in Tus represent only a fragment of this intellectual landscape.

These cities were bound not merely by trade routes, but by the circulation of ideas, manuscripts, and scholars, forming a dense and dynamic ecosystem of knowledge.

At the heart of this world stood institutions such as Bayt al-Hikma (the House of Wisdom), where Greek, Persian, and Indian knowledge was translated, studied, critiqued, and expanded, later helping to form the foundations of the European Renaissance.

It was here that Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi formalised algebra and gave the modern world the concept of the algorithm. Ibn Sina produced medical works that would dominate European universities for centuries. Al-Farabi and Al-Ghazali engaged deeply with Aristotle and reshaped his thought.

At a time when Baghdad, Nishapur and Merv sustained complex urban life through advanced systems of water management, healthcare, and learning, much of medieval Europe remained rudimentary, defined by poor sanitation, overcrowding, and fragile infrastructure.

This is not polemic. It is a historical fact. And yet, this is the civilisation Trump aims to reduce to the "Stone Age".

The danger lies not in the phrase itself, but in the logic that follows. Because this "Stone Age" is not metaphor, it is method.

A systematic destruction

It is already being ruthlessly enacted. Research centres lie in ruins. At Shahid Beheshti University, a major scientific hub in Tehran, advanced laboratories have been struck.

Across the country, universities, including leading engineering institutions such as the Iran University of Science and Technology, have been bombed.

Medical infrastructure has not been spared. The Pasteur Institute of Iran, central to vaccine development and public health, has been hit.

Laboratories, universities, and medical centres are not incidental casualties. They are targets. This is not accidental destruction. It is systematic.

A strategy not simply to weaken a state, but to dismantle the foundations of civilian life itself. To drag a society backwards by design.

In Israeli media spaces, the unthinkable is increasingly aired with disturbing ease. Panels have entertained, even joked about, the use of nuclear or neutron weapons against Iran, with the chilling premise that populations could be eliminated while infrastructure remains intact.

This is not strategy. It is the normalisation of annihilation.

The objective is not only the destruction of the present, but the erasure of the past. It is the demolition of history itself, and its rewriting.

In this worldview, Palestine is not the exception. It is the model.

The destruction of Palestine has always been accompanied by a narrative, a myth: "a land without a people for a people without a land".

A place dense with history, culture, and civilisation recast as empty and waiting to be claimed. This is not historical error. It is colonial strategy.

This is how erasure works.

Not only by changing reality and redrawing maps, but by wiping out the past, rewriting history, and reconstructing memory.

Military power alone is never enough. It advances hand in hand with mythology. The logic of Amalek, not merely to defeat an enemy but to exterminate it.

A demonising discourse

At a recent White House gathering of evangelical leaders, the Book of Esther was invoked, casting modern Iranians as the heirs of an ancient enemy, before declaring that God has raised up Trump for this moment: to annihilate the wicked Persians and fulfil divine prophecy, Trump has gone further by justifying the destruction of civilian infrastructure by dismissing Iranians as "animals"; the same people he claims to liberate with his bombs.

Of course, once you strip a people of their humanity, anything you do to them becomes justifiable.

Two decades ago, during the Iraq war, the same demonising discourse was used of Arabs. Two years ago, during the Gaza genocide, of Palestinians. Today, of Iranians.

The war machine does not simply fight enemies. It manufactures them. It produces and reproduces its demons, its monsters; each one necessary to justify the brutality that follows.

Nor is this merely a reaction to Iranian defiance. A week into the war, Trump spoke casually of Iranians having "horrible genes", not like "our own", resurrecting the most violent language of racial extermination.

Layered onto all this is the old colonial doctrine once called the white man’s burden. Today, it is recast as an American and Israeli civilising mission imposed upon a region framed as backward, subhuman, chaotic, and expendable.

Trump draws from this instinctively.

To him, the Middle East is not a civilisation, but a ledger: oil, energy, trillions to be extracted.

And wherever there are centres of history, knowledge, and continuity, they are to be demolished, returned to the "Stone Age".

And this logic does not stop at Iran.

Because to destroy Iran’s infrastructure, its energy systems, industrial base, and scientific institutions is to wreck the entire Gulf region, supposedly America’s ally and the guardian of its dollar.

Modern Gulf states, built on the oil boom of the 1970s, depend on deeply interconnected systems: energy flows, trade routes, financial markets, and infrastructure networks.

Strike Iran, and the shock reverberates around: ports, pipelines, markets, supply chains; all exposed. Not Iran alone, but its neighbours too are threatened with being dragged into the same abyss. 

And if Iran, the state Trump threatens to demolish, is millennia old, these states are recent constructs, far more fragile, and far more vulnerable.

In the Middle East, "America First" is a myth.

The operative logic is "Israel first".

A vision of managed collapse

American power is deployed in service of a broader regional vision articulated by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his defence minister Israel Katz, and his national security minister, Itamar Ben Gvir.

A vision of fragmentation and managed collapse. A region broken into pieces.  A landscape of wrecked entities where Tel Aviv rises as everything around it is driven into ruin, a single "city on a hill", expanding in every direction, a "New Jerusalem" monopolising prosperity, while everything else lies shattered. 

And yet, this model has already revealed its limits.

The United States toppled Saddam Hussein in three weeks. And then spent years trapped in the chaos it created.

What forced its withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan was not defeat in battle. It was the disorder it unleashed.

The United States and Israel have demonstrated that they are capable of immense destruction. They can assassinate, bomb, and level entire cities. But destruction is not success, or victory, nor is it worthy of applause.

You can pulverise a city, but you cannot subdue a people.

To speak of returning Iran to the Stone Age is not a mark of strength. It is a confession of political failure and moral bankruptcy.

Trump cannot return Iran to the Stone Age, because it has not been there for thousands of years.

What he is doing instead is dragging America into one. 

Into an age of savagery.

Into the logic of the Stone Age.

lunes, 6 de abril de 2026

Iran Rejects Temporary Ceasefire, Says It Has Already Laid Out Terms for Agreement

Senior Iranian official tells Drop Site that Trump is pushing for a deal but the new proposal is “detached from the realities on the ground.”

Jeremy ScahillMurtaza Hussain, and Jawa Ahmad

Apr 6

https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/iran-trump-war-ceasefire-pakistan

Tehran rejects any agreement for a temporary ceasefire to end the war with the U.S. and Israel, a senior Iranian official told Drop Site, saying that Iran would only accept an agreement that leads to a permanent end to the fighting. The official, who was not authorized to make public statements and spoke on condition of anonymity, said recent proposals for a temporary pause in exchange for resumption of full access to the Strait of Hormuz were “detached from the realities on the ground.”

In the face of new threats by President Donald Trump to escalate the war on Iran, Reuters reported Monday on a Pakistani-led framework to end the fighting that had been shared with both Washington and Tehran. The framework reportedly calls for a temporary ceasefire in exchange for a resumption of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, with 15-20 days given to reach a final settlement that would address Iran’s nuclear program, sanctions relief, and a regional framework for administering the strait.

The senior Iranian official who spoke with Drop Site confirmed that Tehran had received the proposal but reiterated that Iran rejects any agreement based on a temporary ceasefire. “It is our assessment that the Trump administration, owing to legal constraints within the United States concerning the prosecution of the war as well as the need to maintain control over financial markets, requires a short-term pause in the conflict,” said the official. He added that Iran would only accept an agreement that ended the war against Iran conclusively, and which could then be used as a basis for broader talks. The official also pointed to Iran’s February proposal in Geneva that included significant concessions on its nuclear program and a non-aggression pact as a basis for a permanent agreement.

“Our assessment indicates that this [new, temporary] proposal has been drafted solely on the basis of the mediators’ perception of the minimum demands of the parties for halting the war,” the official said. “Tehran does not consider a temporary ceasefire to be a logical course of action, inasmuch as the window for the United States’ exit from the conflict has already been delineated. Should the requisite political will exist, the parties are in a position to establish a permanent ceasefire and thereafter concentrate their efforts on diplomacy.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. An administration official speaking to CNN on Monday said Trump has yet to sign off on the proposal, and that it is “one of many ideas.”

Prior to the outbreak of the war, Tehran proposed unprecedented concessions on its nuclear program during February talks in Geneva that both UK and Omani participants considered sufficient for making progress towards a final agreement. In a dramatic intervention, Omani foreign minister Badr Albusaidi said in an interview with “Face the Nation” that a “peace deal is within our reach” and asked for more time to continue the talks. Shortly after that last round of negotiations, however, rather than engaging with the concessions, the U.S. and Israel launched a surprise attack on Tehran that included the assassination of the country’s head of state and many other senior officials.

Special envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner were later accused by nuclear experts of failing to understand the significance of the technical concessions Iran was proposing in Geneva. Notably, while Iran brought a team of technical experts to the negotiations, Witkoff and Kushner did not.

The senior Iranian official who spoke to Drop Site indicated that the framework for negotiations in February could still serve as a basis for a durable agreement between Tehran and Washington. “The latest proposal put forward by Iran prior to the commencement of the unlawful US-Israeli war would fully address the United States’ concerns regarding nuclear weapons through a posture of maximum flexibility on the part of Iran, accompanied by extensive monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency,” he said.

As Drop Site has previously reported, Iran’s terms for permanently ending the war include a long-term guarantee that the U.S. and Israel will not attack Iran again and that any ceasefire also apply to Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine; reparations for the damages done to Iran during the war; sanctions relief; and that Iran retain control over the Strait of Hormuz.

On Easter morning, Trump posted a profanity-laced statement on Truth Social laying out a Tuesday deadline for Iran to capitulate to U.S. demands to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. “Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah.”

Throughout the war, as global economic harm continues to mount, Trump has repeatedly claimed in public speeches and posts on Truth Social that Iran is “begging” for a deal, only to follow with threats to attack oil and infrastructure targets after Iranian denials.

Trump’s recent public statements regarding the Strait of Hormuz reflect a shifting timeline of deadlines and escalating warnings: an initial 48-hour ultimatum on March 21 to reopen the strait was paused on March 23 for “productive” talks—a claim Tehran rejected, labeling it “fake news” intended to manipulate markets. The deadline was later extended on March 26 by ten days, with Trump expanding his threats on March 30 to include oil wells, Kharg Island, and desalination plants . On April 1, he again claimed that Tehran was seeking a ceasefire, despite repeated Iranian denials, issued another 48-hour warning on April 4, and pushed the deadline once more.

“This threat isn’t new, and Iran has already made its position clear if such a crime were to happen,” the official said regarding Trump’s frequent threats. Iran has repeatedly said that it will retaliate to such attacks by targeting U.S.-linked infrastructure across the region—potentially including critical energy and water desalination facilities in both Israel and the Gulf Arab states.

The Pakistani framework, aimed at heading off the Tuesday deadline, was reportedly developed in the context of messages exchanged “all night long” between Pakistani army chief Asim Munir, Vice President J.D. Vance, Witkoff, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. The putative agreement would be known as the “Islamabad Accords,” providing a temporary end to the fighting and arrangements for final status talks in the future between the U.S. and Iran.

Yet the staged nature of the proposal would leave Iran open to future attacks by the U.S. and Israel—both of which have repeatedly used prior negotiations as a means to prepare assets for attacks against Iran, even targeting and killing negotiators themselves.

In late March, the Trump administration reportedly issued a 15-point plan for an agreement with Iran, including a 30-day ceasefire, the total dismantlement of the Iranian nuclear program, limits on Iran’s ballistic missile program, an end to Tehran’s support for armed resistance groups, and immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. That reported plan matched much of what Washington had demanded even before the war started and was dismissed as “extremely maximalist and unreasonable” by Iranian officials.

Amid a general lack of trust in Washington’s willingness or even ability to negotiate an agreement, Iran issued its own list of conditions for a peace deal—including guarantees that the war would not resume, an end to attacks in Lebanon, Gaza, and Iraq, reparations for war damages suffered during the fighting, and recognition of Iranian right to exercise authority over the Strait of Hormuz.

The issue of the strait has now become a core point of contention between the two sides. While the strategic waterway was open before the U.S.-Israeli attack, Iran has now managed to assert de facto sovereignty over it—controlling access to which ships may transit and even charging fees for passage to those that meet its criteria. Iran has also stated that ships associated with hostile countries will not be allowed to pass.

While an accumulating global oil shock has continued to build due to the disruption of energy shipments, the Iranian parliament has already passed measures aimed at normalizing its control of access to the strait going forward. The proposed Pakistani deal calls for opening the waterway immediately in exchange for a temporary end to the fighting—a proposal that Tehran said it rejects.

“The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the establishment of a temporary ceasefire is not acceptable. Tehran has finalized a new mechanism for oversight, inspection, and secure navigation in the Strait and will shortly present it to the countries of the region for their participation. At present, Iran’s bilateral arrangements with various states have already established the necessary groundwork for the safe passage of a number of vessels, serving as a pilot project for the exercise of Iranian sovereignty,” the senior Iranian official told Drop Site.

The official added that Tehran would be willing to negotiate renewal of access to U.S.-linked ships as part of a broader peace agreement. “Naturally, the passage of vessels associated with the United States can constitute a subject for discussion between the parties within the framework of comprehensive Iran-United States negotiations, wherein a shared understanding on the matter may be reached,” he said.

Initially described as a short “excursion” that would be wrapped up within days, the war with Iran has increasingly come to look like a major quagmire for the Trump administration. In addition to asserting control over one of the world’s most vital maritime shipping routes, Iran has managed to maintain a steady rate of fire at Israel and the Gulf Arab states over more than a month of fighting—inflicting increasing damage as limited stocks of missile interceptors have been drained, and forcing the U.S. to transfer critical munitions from East Asia to the Middle East.

In addition to killing thousands of civilians, the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran has done tremendous damage to Iranian infrastructure, including recent attacks on universities, bridges, and petrochemical facilities.

In the face of repeated threats of regime change, and attempts to cause the dissolution of the country through attacks on civilian infrastructure and support for violent separatist groups, Iranian officials say that they have now prepared for a longer war of attrition and will not accept any agreement that merely serves as a pause to enable Israel and the U.S. to recover and prepare for future attacks.

The U.S. “appears to envisage the pursuit of the collapse of Iranian sovereignty by repeating this war-ceasefire cycle until the third year of [Trump’s] presidency,” the senior Iranian official told Drop Site. “For this reason, we consider it probable that President Trump may unilaterally declare a temporary ceasefire, in which event the Strait will continue to be administered by Iran through the new mechanism.”

domingo, 5 de abril de 2026

Iran claims destruction of US aircraft following reported recovery of second F-15 airman

The US and Iran have made conflicting claims surrounding the destruction of military aircraft involved in the rescue operation

News Desk

APR 5, 2026

https://thecradle.co/articles/iran-claims-destruction-of-us-aircraft-following-recovery-of-second-f-15-airman

Iran announced on 5 April the destruction of multiple US aircraft, including two military helicopters and two C-130 transport planes carrying US special forces seeking to rescue a downed US fighter pilot.

The alleged rescue operation "ended in complete failure with the timely presence of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran," a statement issued by the spokesman for the Khatam Al-Anbiya Central Headquarters said.

The statement said that US President Donald Trump was in a "state of panic" and trying to hide the operation's failure, "through lies and psychological warfare."

It also added that the helicopters and transport planes were shot down in a joint operation involving the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC), Army, Basij paramilitary forces, and police commandos.

Iran released images and video Sunday showing the charred wreckage of US military aircraft destroyed at an abandoned airport south of Isfahan. US forces had apparently used the airport as a makeshift base to launch the operation to rescue a US pilot whose F-15 warplane was shot down on Friday.

Footage showed the destruction of at least two C-130 transport planes and one MH-6 Little Bird special operations helicopter. The C-130 is a specially equipped plane used to carry out covert infiltrations and extract troops from behind enemy lines. The MH-6 is a lightweight helicopter used by elite commando units.

Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf posted an image from the wreckage site on X with a pointed message: "If the United States gets three more victories like this, it will be utterly ruined."

Saturday's special forces operation was launched after Iranian forces shot down an F-15E warplane on Friday. It was the first US fighter jet lost to enemy fire in over 20 years.

US officials claimed both F-15 crew members were successfully rescued in an operation behind enemy lines and that all US personnel had successfully exited Iran.

The first was rescued shortly after the crash, US officials claimed, while the second was allegedly rescued after hiding in the mountains for two days from Iranian forces searching for him.

Trump claimed that the second service member, a colonel, "sustained injuries," but will be "just fine."

US Central Command (CENTCOM) has not issued a statement regarding the pilot's fate.

CNN's national security analyst Alex Plitsas said that had the second crew member been captured, he would have become a "strategic bargaining chip" for Tehran.

US officials cited by the Wall Street Journal and other US outlets also claimed that two transport planes got “stuck” at the remote base during the rescue operation. After they were deliberately destroyed, three additional US aircraft were dispatched to extract all personnel involved in the rescue operation.

According to Fox News, at least one aircraft, possibly a C-130 Hercules, had become "stuck in the mud."

The IRGC's public affairs office issued a statement accusing Trump of fabricating a successful rescue to conceal "a heavy defeat."

"Trump the gambler, the God of the sands of Tabas is still here," the statement said.

"Tabas" is a reference to the failed US operation ordered by US President Jimmy Carter to rescue US embassy employees taken captive in Tehran shortly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution toppled the Shah.

In that operation, eight US special forces were killed when two of their helicopters collided in the air over the Iranian desert. The operation was an embarrassment for Carter, contributing to his defeat by Ronald Reagan in the 1980 presidential election.

The Reagan White House went on to broker the sale of Israeli weapons to Iran for use in the war against Iraq. The US also sold weapons to Iraq in a bid to prolong the war and weaken both countries. According to some estimates, over a million Iraqis and Iranians were killed in the eight-year war.

This incident of the destroyed aircraft comes as Trump's deadline for Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz approaches.

The US president claimed that "hell" will be unleashed if Iran does not open the strategic waterway by Monday.

"Open the F***in' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH!" wrote the president, adding: “Praise be to Allah.”

US and Israeli warplanes have been bombing Iran since 28 February. According to the Pentagon, the US and Israel have struck over 12,300 targets. Iran has retaliated with multiple waves of drone and ballistic missile strikes against Israel, as well as US bases and assets in the Persian Gulf.

sábado, 4 de abril de 2026

US intel says Iran retains significant launch capability, able to ‘wreak havoc’: Report

Tehran escalated its ballistic missile attacks after US officials claimed recently that Washington’s strikes brought Iranian launches down by 90 percent

News Desk

APR 3, 2026

https://thecradle.co/articles/us-intel-says-iran-retains-significant-launch-capability-able-to-wreak-havoc-report

US intelligence assessments have concluded that Iran “maintains significant missile launching capability” despite Washington and Tel Aviv’s attacks across the country, sources told CNN on 3 April.

The informed sources said assessments say “Roughly half of Iran’s missile launchers are still intact and thousands of one-way attack drones remain in Iran’s arsenal despite the daily pounding by US and Israeli strikes against military targets over the past five weeks.”

One of the sources said Iranian forces are “still very much poised to wreak absolute havoc throughout the entire region.”

“The US intelligence assessment total may include launchers that are currently inaccessible, such as those buried underground by strikes but not destroyed,” the report adds. 

CNN also claims 50 percent of Iran’s drone capabilities remain intact. 

US President Donald Trump said this week that US operations in Iran would finish in two to three weeks. 

One of the sources who reviewed the intelligence assessments said this goal was “unrealistic” because a lot “remains on the playing field for Iran to use.”

“We can keep f**king them up, I don’t doubt it, but you’re out of your mind if you think this will be done in two weeks,” the source went on to say.

Sources also pointed to the difficulty in targeting Iran’s deeply entrenched network of ballistic missiles.

“The ability to go underground is a primary reason why launchers have not been further degraded. Iran has long hid its launchers in extensive networks of tunnels and caves, preparing for conflict like this for decades – making them particularly difficult to target. Iran has had success in shooting and moving the mobile platforms, making it difficult to track the launchers, similar to the challenges the US has had with the Houthis in Yemen,” sources explained.

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said recently that Iran’s missile launches were down 90 percent. 

Tehran escalated its strikes in the days that followed. One of Iran’s missiles hit an Israeli drone manufacturing facility near Tel Aviv on Thursday.

Over 2,000 Iranians have been killed by the US and Israel since the start of the war in late February.

The attacks have also damaged more than 90,000 homes and nearly 1,000 schools. Key infrastructure, such as bridges and medical facilities, has also been widely targeted. 

Meanwhile, Tehran has continued to escalate its unprecedented retaliatory campaign of strikes on Israel and US military bases across West Asia.

“Hundreds of US personnel have been killed or injured in the region since the US launched a war on Iran just over a month ago,” The Intercept reported this week. 

Western media reports have confirmed that US bases have suffered severe damage, prompting the military to relocate troops to civilian hotels and office spaces. As a result, Tehran has accused Washington of using human shields.