Is
Trump At Last Ending Our ‘Endless Wars’?
The backstage struggle
between the Bush interventionists and the America-firsters who first backed
Donald Trump for president just exploded into open warfare, which could sunder
the Republican Party.
At issue is Trump’s
decision to let the Turkish army enter Northern Syria, to create a corridor
between Syrian Kurds and the Turkish Kurds of the PKK, which the U.S. and
Turkey regards as a terrorist organization.
"A disaster in the
making," says Lindsey Graham. "To abandon the Kurds" would be a
"stain on America’s honor."
"A catastrophic
mistake," said Rep. Liz Cheney.
"If reports about the US
retreat in Syria are accurate," tweeted Marco Rubio, Trump will have
"made a grave mistake."
"The Kurds were
instrumental in our successful fight against ISIS in Syria. Leaving them to die
is a big mistake," said ex-U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley, "we must
always have the backs of our allies. " But of our NATO ally of almost 70
years, Haley said, "Turkey is not our friend."
Sen. Mitt Romney called it
a "betrayal":
"The President’s decision to abandon our Kurd allies in the face of an assault by Turkey is a
betrayal. It says that America is an unreliable ally; it facilitates ISIS
resurgence; and it presages another humanitarian disaster."
Trump tweeted this defense
of his order to U.S. forces not to resist Turkish intervention and the creation
of a Turkish corridor in Syria from the eastern bank of the Euphrates to Iraq:
"The Kurds fought with
us, but were paid massive amounts of money and equipment to do so. They have
been fighting Turkey for decades. … I held off this fight for … almost 3 years,
but it is time for us to get out of these ridiculous Endless Wars, many of them
tribal, and bring our soldiers home."
When, in December, Trump
considered ordering all U.S. troops home from Syria, Defense Secretary James
Mattis resigned in protest.
Behind this decision is
Trump’s exasperation at our NATO allies’ refusal to take back for trial their
own citizens whom we and the Kurds captured fighting for ISIS.
The U.S. has "pressed
France, Germany, and other European nations, from which many captured ISIS
fighters came, to take them back, but they … refused," said a Sunday White
House statement. "The United States will not hold them for what could be
many years and great cost. … Turkey will now be responsible for all ISIS
fighters in the area captured over the past two years."
What are the arguments
interventionists are using to insist that U.S. forces remain in Syria
indefinitely?
If we pull out, says
Graham, the Kurds will be forced, for survival, to ally themselves with Bashar
Assad.
True, but the Kurds now
occupy a fourth of Syria, and this is not sustainable. We have to consider
reality. Assad, the Russians, Iranians, and Hezbollah have won the war against
the Sunni rebels we and our Arab friends armed and equipped.
We are told that the Kurds
will be massacred by Turkey’s President Recep Erdogan, who sees them as
terrorist allies of the PKK.
But the Turks occupied the
Syrian border west of the Euphrates and the Kurds withdrew without massacres.
And how long must we stay in Syria to defend the Kurds against the Turks?
Forever?
If we depart, ISIS will
come back, says Cheney: "Terrorists thousands of miles away can and will
use their safe-havens to launch attacks against America."
But al-Qaida and ISIS are
in many more places today than they were when we intervened in the Middle East.
Must we fight forever over there – to be secure over here? Why cannot Syria,
Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf States deal with ISIS and
al-Qaida in their own backyard?
Why are ISIS and al-Qaida
over there our problem over here?
"This will throw the
region into further chaos" says Graham.
But if Trump’s decision
risks throwing the region into "further chaos," what, if not
wholesale U.S. intervention, created the "present chaos"?
Consider. Today, the
Taliban conduct more attacks and control much more territory than they did in
all the years since we first intervened in 2001.
Sixteen years after we
marched to Baghdad, protests against the Iraqi regime took hundreds of lives
last week and a spreading revolt threaten the regime.
Saudi Arabia is tied down
and arguably losing the war it launched against the Houthi rebels in 2015. Iran
or its surrogates, with a handful of cruise missiles and drones, just shut down
half of the Saudi oil production.
Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman is awakening to his nation’s vulnerability and may be looking to
negotiate with Tehran.
Among those objecting most
loudly to an American withdrawal from the forever wars of the Middle East are
those who were the most enthusiastic about plunging us in.
And, yes, there is a price
to be paid for letting go of an empire, but it is almost always less than the
price of holding on.
Patrick J. Buchanan is the
author of Churchill, Hitler, and
“The Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World. To find out more about
Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists,
visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario