Week Five of the Russian Intervention in Syria: The Russians Are Digging
in
This column was originally
written for the Unz Review:
http://www.unz.com/tsaker/week-three-of-the-russian-intervention-in-syria/
The Saker
Whether
this tragedy was directly linked to the war in Syria or not, there is no doubt
that the downing of Kogalymavia Flight 9268 was the main event of the past
week. Since I have covered this issueelsewhere,
I shall not return to it in detail again here. I will just repeat here my
personal conclusion that this tragedy will not impact the Russian operation in
Syria or affect the political situation inside Russia. As for the cause of the
tragedy, there are increasing indications that both western and Russian
security services have come to a tentative conclusion that it was, indeed, a
bomb. On Friday, the head of the Federal Security Service has recommended
canceling all flights to Egypt and the evacuation of all the Russian citizens
in Egypt (roughly 70,000 people). Several EU countries have also taken similar
measures.
There
has, however, been another interesting but less noticed development this week
in the Russian operation in Syria: the Russians are quietly but very
effectively “digging in”.
For the
first time, Russia has officially declared that air-defense units were also
deployed with the Russian forces. Until now, the main burden for air defense
had fallen upon the Russian Navy and, specifically, the ships equipped with the
naval variant of the S-300 missile system. This was not an optimal solution not
only because it put the burden of defending land based assets from the sea,
tying down the Russian navy expeditionary force, but also because this solution
only “covered” about half of Syria.
The use
of the Moskva guided missile cruiser was a stop-gap
measure designed to protect the Russian force in Latakia, but now it appears that
dedicated air defense units have been deployed. These are most
likely the land-based versions of the S-300 missile, possibly in combination
with point defense systems such as the Pantsir-S1 and other, shorter range, MANPADs such as the 9K338 Igla-S and the advanced 9K33 Verba.
There are
also reports indicating that the Russians have deployed very sophisticated
electronic warfare units including top-of-the line Krasukhka-4 EW systems which are amongst the most sophisticated mobile EW systems ever built and they are reportedly capable of
jamming AWACS and satellites in space. Add to this the presence of SU-30SMs in
the skies, and you have a force capable of controlling the Syrian skies.
When
asked about this Russian officials gave a cute reply: they said that these
air-defense systems were deployed in case of a hijacked aircraft being used to
attack the Russian airbase in Latakia. Right.
The real
purpose of these efforts is becoming obvious: Russia is trying to deny the US
the control of the skies over Syria and, so far, there is very little the USA
can do about it (short of starting WWIII). Furthermore, the Russians are also
sending a message to Turkey, France and Israel – all countries which have, at
different times and in different ways, indicated that they wanted to use the
Syrian airspace for their own purposes.
There are
now also reports of Russian
special forces being sent to Syria. The WSJ suggested that these forces could be given the
tasks of liaising with Syrian intelligence and acting as forward air
controllers (FACs). I also personally see another important task for these
units: to pre-position hidden fuel caches for the Russian helicopters should
there be a need to send them to rescue downed Russian pilots in eastern Syria
(Russian Spetsnaz units did create such fuel cashes in southern Afghanistan
during the war).
Take a
look at the combat radius of Russian helicopters in Syria. Ideally, a search
and rescue mission would employ both a dedicated attack helicopter such as the
Mi-24 and a multi-role helicopter such as the Mi-17, the former provider cover
and protection for the latter. It would also be possible to have SU-25s
protecting Mi-17s, but the best possible version would be to have a covert
refueling base somewhere deep inside nominally Daesh territory to extend the
range of the rescue teams.
Some western
sources believe that
Russian special forces might also be given direct action
missions. This is absolutely possible and such missions are well
within the capabilities of the Spetsnaz GRU. Still, there primary mission is a special reconnaissance one and while they might be used to
destroy a high value Daesh target (material or human), we will probably never
hear about it.
What is
certain is that the Russians are steadily increasing their
capabilities in Syria and that their presence is rapidly growing from a small
and vulnerable force to a much more balanced and capable one.
The
Syrians, in the meanwhile, might be achieving their first real successes in
their counter offensive. While the Syrian government forces have been slowly pushing
back Daesh on many fronts, this progress had, until now, failed to yield an
operational breakthrough. This might be happening right now with the much
awaited reopening of the highway to Aleppo.
The main
problem for the Russians remains the fact that the Syrian military has not been
able to capitalize on the Russian intervention. This is due to a combination of
factors including the fact that the Syrian military is over-streched and unable
to concentrate enough forces in one location to achieve a significant
breakthrough and the fact that Daesh fighters are well dug-in and are, by all
accounts, resisting with determination and skill. Still, the Russian air
campaign is degrading the Daesh capabilities and it is possible that,
eventually, this will result in a sudden collapse of the Daesh lines in a
critical part of the front. For example, the Syrian army is, reportedly, only a
few miles from liberating the Kuweyres military airbase and even though its
progress is very slow it is likely that the Syrians will eventually break the
Daesh siege of this crucial objective. Likewise, in Djobar neighborhood of Damascus
is gradually being reconquered in, again, a slow moving but successful
operation.
All in
all, I am very cautiously optimistic and I keep hoping for an operational
victory for the Syrians. If it does not happen, the Iranians and Hezbollah will
have to move much larger forces in.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario