Brainwashed for War With Russia
by Ray
McGovern Posted on September 22, 2022
https://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2022/09/21/brainwashed-for-war-with-russia/
Thanks to Establishment media, the sorcerer
apprentices advising President Joe Biden – I refer to Secretary of State Antony
Blinken, national security adviser Jacob Sullivan, and China specialist Kurt
Campbell – will have no trouble rallying Americans for the widest war in 77
years, starting in Ukraine, and maybe spreading to China. And, shockingly,
under false pretenses.
Most Americans are oblivious to the reality that
Western media are owned and operated by the same corporations that make massive
profits by helping to stoke small wars and then peddling the necessary weapons.
Corporate leaders, and Ivy-mantled elites, educated to believe in U.S.
"exceptionalism," find the lucre and the luster too lucrative to be
able to think straight. They deceive themselves into thinking that (a) the US
cannot lose a war; (b) escalation can be calibrated and wider war can be
limited to Europe; and (c) China can be expected to just sit on the sidelines.
The attitude, consciously or unconsciously, "Not to worry. And, in any
case, the lucre and luster are worth the risk."
The media also know they can always trot out
died-in-the-wool Russophobes to "explain," for example, why the
Russians are "almost genetically driven" to do evil (James Clapper,
former National Intelligence Director and now hired savant on CNN); or Fiona
Hill (former National Intelligence Officer for Russia), who insists "Putin
wants to evict the United States from Europe … As he might put it:
"Goodbye, America. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out."
Absent a miraculous appearance of clearer heads with a
less benighted attitude toward the core interests of Russia in Ukraine, and
China in Taiwan, historians who survive to record the war now on our doorstep
will describe it as the result of hubris and stupidity run amok. Objective
historians may even note that one of their colleagues – Professor John
Mearsheimer – got it right from the start when he explained in the autumn 2014
issue of Foreign Affairs "Why the Ukraine Crisis is the
West’s Fault."
Historian Barbara Tuchman addressed the kind of
situation the world faces in Ukraine in her book "The March of Folly: From
Troy to Vietnam." (Had she lived, she surely would have updated it to take
Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and Ukraine into account). Tuchman wrote:
"Wooden-headedness…plays a remarkably large
role in government. It consists in assessing a situation in terms of
preconceived fixed notions while ignoring or rejecting any contrary signs. It
is acting according to wish while not allowing oneself to be deflected by the
facts."
Six Years (and Counting) of Brainwashing
Thanks to US media, a very small percentage of
Americans know that:
- 14 years ago, then US Ambassador to Russia (current CIA Director)
William Burns was warned by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov that
Russia might have to intervene in Ukraine if it were made a member of
NATO. The Subject Line of Burns’s Feb. 1, 2008, Embassy
Moscow cable (#182) to Washington makes it clear that Amb. Burns did not
mince Lavrov’s words; the subject line stated: "Nyet means
nyet: Russia’s NATO enlargement redlines."
Thus, Washington policymakers were given forewarning,
in very specific terms, of Russia’s redline regarding membership for Ukraine in
NATO. Nevertheless, on April 3, 2008, a NATO summit in Bucharest asserted:
"NATO welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for
membership in NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of
NATO."
- 8 years ago, on Feb. 22, 2014, the US orchestrated a coup in Kiev – rightly labeled "the most blatant coup in
history, insofar as it had already been blown on YouTube 18 days prior.
Kiev’s spanking new leaders, handpicked and identified by name by US
Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland in the YouTube-publicized
conversation with the U.S. ambassador in Kiev, immediately called for
Ukraine to join NATO.
- 6 years ago, in June 2016, Russian President Vladimir Putin told
Western reporters of his concern that so-called antiballistic missile
sites in Romania and Poland could be converted overnight to accommodate
offensive strike missiles posing a threat to Russia’s own nuclear forces.
(See this unique video, with English subtitles, from minutes 37 to 49.) There is a direct
analogy with the 1962 Cuban missile crisis when Moscow put offensive
strike missiles on Cuba and President John Kennedy reacted strongly to the
existential threat that posed to the US.
- On December 21, 2021, President Putin told his
most senior military leaders:
"It is extremely alarming that elements of
the US global defense system are being deployed near Russia. The Mk 41
launchers, which are located in Romania and are to be deployed in Poland, are
adapted for launching the Tomahawk strike missiles. If this infrastructure
continues to move forward, and if US and NATO missile systems are
deployed in Ukraine, their flight time to Moscow will be only 7–10 minutes or even five minutes for hypersonic systems. This is a huge challenge for us,
for our security." [Emphasis added.]
- On December 30, 2021, Biden and Putin talked by phone at Putin’s
urgent request. The
Kremlin readout stated:
"Joseph Biden emphasized that Russia and the US
shared a special responsibility for ensuring stability in Europe and the whole
world and that Washington had no intention of deploying offensive
strike weapons in Ukraine." Yuri Ushakov, a top foreign policy adviser
to Putin, pointed out that this was also one of the goals Moscow hoped to
achieve with its proposals for security guarantees to the US and NATO. [Emphasis added.]
- On February 12, 2022, Ushakov briefed the
media on the telephone conversation between Putin and Biden earlier that
day.
"The call was as a follow-up of sorts to the
… December 30 telephone conversation. … The Russian President made clear that
President Biden’s proposals did not really address the central, key elements of
Russia’s initiatives either with regards to non-expansion of NATO, or non-deployment
of strike weapons systems on Ukrainian territory … To these items, we
have received no meaningful response." [Emphasis
added.]
- On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine.
Unprovoked?
The US insists that Russia’s invasion was
"unprovoked". Establishment media dutifully regurgitate that line,
while keeping Americans in the dark about such facts (not opinion) as
are outlined (and sourced) above. Most Americans are just as taken in by the media
as they were 20 years ago when they were told there were weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq. They simply took it on faith. Nor did the guilty media
express remorse – or a modicum of embarrassment.
The late Fred Hiatt, who was op-ed editor at the Washington
Post, is a case in point. In an interview with the Columbia
Journalism Review [CJR, March/April 2004] he commented:
"If you look at the editorials we wrote
running up [to the war], we state an as flat fact that he [Saddam Hussein] has
weapons of mass destruction." "If that’s not true, it would have been
better not to say it."
(My journalism mentor, Robert Parry, had this to say
about Hiatt’s remark. "Yes, that is a common principle of journalism, that
if something isn’t real, we’re not supposed to confidently declare that it
is.")
It’s worse now. Russia is not Iraq. And Putin has been
so demonized over the past six years that people are inclined to believe the
likes of James Clapper to the effect there’s something genetic that makes
Russians evil. "Russia-gate" was a big con (and, now, demonstrably
so), but Americans don’t know that either. The consequences of prolonged
demonization are extremely dangerous – and will become even more so in the next
several weeks as politicians vie to be the strongest in opposing and countering
Russia’s "unprovoked" attack on Ukraine.
The Problem
Humorist Will Rogers had it right:
"The problem ain’t what people know. It’s
what people know that ain’t so; that’s the problem."
Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a publishing
arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. His
27-year career as a CIA analyst includes serving as Chief of the Soviet Foreign
Policy Branch and preparer/briefer of the President’s Daily Brief. He is
co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario