NSA
Dissents From Other Agencies Over Russian Bounty Intel
Pentagon says 'no
corroborating evidence' to support NYT's report Dave DeCamp Posted on July 1, 2020
The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that the National
Security Agency “strongly dissented from other intelligence agencies’
assessment that Russia paid bounties for the killing of US soldiers
in Afghanistan.”
The Journal cites “people
familiar with the matter” and does not give much detail, but the story is
noteworthy, as the NSA has dissented from other agencies in the past over
allegations against Russia. January 2017
intelligence assessment that concluded Russia interfered in the 2016 election on President Trump’s behalf was given “high confidence” by the CIA and
FBI while the NSA gave “moderate confidence.”
Another account of the NSA
not giving much weight to this intelligence was given to CBS News reporter
Catherine Herridge on Monday. An unnamed intelligence official told Herridge that the NSA deemed a
report on the Russian bounties “uncorroborated.” The official said the report
“does not match well-established and verifiable Taliban and Haqqani practices”
and lacks “sufficient reporting to corroborate any links.”
The CIA is used as an
example in the Journal’s report of an agency the NSA allegedly
disagreed with over the intelligence. So far, the CIA has declined to comment
on the issue besides a vague statement from CIA Director
Gina Haspel. “When developing intelligence assessments, initial tactical reports
often require additional collection and validation … Leaks compromise and
disrupt the critical interagency work to collect, assess, and ascribe
culpability,” Haspel said.
The Journal’s disclosure reinforces
the Trump administration’s claim that the intelligence was not strong enough,
and there was no consensus among intelligence officials on the
information. The Pentagon said on Monday it has not
seen “corroborating evidence” to support The New York Times report
that alleged Russian GRU agents offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to
kill US troops.
Secretary of Defense Mark
Esper reiterated the
Pentagon’s claims in a statement on Tuesday. “Although the
Department of Defense has no corroborating evidence at this time to validate
recent allegations regarding malign activity by Russian personnel against the US
forces in Afghanistan, I want to assure all of our service members that the
Department takes very seriously any and all potential threats against the US
military personnel,” Esper said.
Even though the
intelligence remains unconfirmed, members of Congress from both sides of the
aisle are brainstorming ways to
punish Moscow over the allegations. Suggestions include
imposing new sanctions on Russia and even designating Moscow as a state sponsor
of terrorism. Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) said he wants to see a plan that will
put “Taliban and GRU agents in body bags.”
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario