Beinart’s Jewish double-bind: Support oppression or you’re out of the
family
Peter Feld on April 28, 2016
Mondoweiss.net
Even when he’s
serving up a soul-crushing ultimatum, you have to give
Peter Beinart some credit. By comparing Israel to “your violent, drug-addicted
brother,” but saying that if you call the cops– i.e., support Boycott,
Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)– to “make them change their destructive and
self-destructive behavior” you are putting your “personal morality” ahead
of family loyalty, he’s enraged Israel defenders and anti-Zionists alike. In
this way, he becomes the personification of the untenable situation he writes
about.
“When you boycott
Israel, or reject the ideology on which it was founded [my
emphasis], you are estranging yourself from much of the Jewish world” runs
a pull-quote from Beinart’s Haaretz piece.
On social media,
the paper’s slug and headline is: “For Jewish BDS
supporters, personal morality trumps Jewish solidarity.” Those words were
likely not of his choosing but they crystallize the implicit threat of
ostracism and accusation of treason.
The ideology on
which Israel was founded assigned Jews the goal of a nationalist state on
Palestinian land. Palestinians were erased from all the founders’ early
visions: Theodor Herzl wrote about Jewish policemen arresting Jewish sex
workers, while Chaim Weizmann told the 1919 Paris peace conference he
envisioned a state that would be “as Jewish as England is English.”
To maintain
our good standing inside the Jewish family, Beinart implies, we need to swallow
all that — even though this ideology entered Jewish life only recently, and
deeply divided Jewish communities in the decades before 1948.
Equality and
justice are universal values, not personal or selfish ones. As Beinart
knows well, they’re often claimed to be “Jewish” values; he
emphasizes that Jewish BDS activists “see their embrace of BDS as an
expression of their Jewishness.”
As a person, not
just as a Jew, I’m offended to hear that opposing segregation,
colonialism, exile, massacres and the ongoing brutality necessary to repress a
captive indigenous population, or supporting the internationally mandated
return of refugees, means I’m selfishly imposing my personal morality at the
expense of “family consensus.”
Of course, there’s
been much debate as to whether values like justice and civil rights are really
part of the Jewish tradition. I don’t want to add to our
self-flattery; all I know is what I was taught when I was little. Fighting
oppressors is a common thread running through so many of the stories Jewish
children are raised on, whether it’s Pharoah in the fictitiousPassover story (Jews were never
slaves in Egypt), the Maccabees and zealots who resisted Greek and Roman-era
tyrants like King Herod, through the Middle Ages and Inquisition up through the
Tsar and the Nazis.
It’s a narrative
designed to instill a strong desire for justice: a universal, not “Jewish”
value, but one we have embraced. Jews were heavily represented in the Russian
revolution, civil rights and the antiwar movements, as we are now in
the push for justice in Palestine.
The only way for
anyone raised on this tradition to support the kind of ethnic supremacism
now on full display in Israel is through denial, extreme filtering of facts,
and the construction of an elaborate counter-narrative that morphs oppressors
into victims (of hostile Arab neighbors, anti-Semitism, “terrorism,” “double
standards,” campus radicals, Barack Obama, and ultimately, the
Palestinians who didn’t and still don’t accept a Jewish state on their
land). Something needs to puncture that; Beinart’s essay helps, whether he
wants it to or not.
Beinart perhaps
unintentionally shows that American Jewry has created what family therapist
Gregory Bateston identified as a “double
bind“:
an emotionally
distressing dilemma in communication in which an individual (or group) receives
two or more conflicting messages, and one message negates the other. This
creates a situation in which a successful response to one message results in a
failed response to the other (and vice versa), so that the person will
automatically be wrong regardless of response. The double bind occurs when the
person cannot confront the inherent dilemma, and therefore can neither resolve
it nor opt out of the situation.
So Jews who have
been taught to hate oppression but taught that we must support Israel are in a
classic double bind, of our own making:
Double binds are
often utilized as a form of control without open coercion—the use of confusion
makes them both difficult to respond to as well as to resist…
Further
complications arise when frequent double binds are part of an ongoing
relationship to which the person or group is committed [my emphasis].
The double bind,
Wikipedia explains, is not a “no-win situation,” but worse: “the subject has
difficulty in defining the exact nature of the paradoxical situation in which
he or she is caught.”
Beinart accepts the
burden of the double bind onto himself, so he deserves sympathy instead of pure
castigation. Though he also rationalizes the ostracism of pro-BDS Jews by the
Jewish establishment, saying they
“are excluded for
taking positions that rupture the bonds of peoplehood. Israel is the world’s
only Jewish state. It contains close to 40 percent of the Jews on earth.”
Fine. Who are
these kinfolk whose connection I’m supposed to prize above my concerns for
equality and my hatred for tyranny (that I first absorbed in Hebrew
school)? The religious zealots storming al Aqsa? Half a million West Bank
settlers? The 48% of Jewish Israelis who want to expel the
remaining Palestinians, or the 79% who say Jews should be favored under Israeli
law (which matches the Rome Statute definition of apartheid)? Or the 95% who
supported the 2014 Gaza massacre? I may not have a lot in common with them.
Israel will blow up
everybody’s spot, that’s been one of my expressions. In the Middle East, it’s
been a poison pill: it blew up the long, happy relations between Arab Jews and
Palestinian Muslims and Christians in Palestine during the many centuries
before 1882. It blew up European promises of Arab autonomy for
the Middle East after World War I, when the British carved off Saudi Arabia
and handed it to the only family willing to acquiesce to their Balfour
Declaration promise of a Jewish home in Palestine. It blew up entire Jewish
communities throughout the Arab world, who were transferred to Israel following
the 1947-48 Nakba.
Israel has blown up
Beinart’s spot. He would like to see it as a glowing ideal, the redemption of
the Jewish people’s history. But he’s uncomfortable insisting on preferential
treatment for Jews, even as he claims it’s necessary. He wants to stand up for
the “Jewish values” exemplified by young BDS activists, but he has to warn them
that they’re estranging themselves from the Jewish community. He wants to be a
progressive leader, but he understands many people will never consider Israel
consistent with progressive values.
Israel blew up
Bernie Sanders’s spot: he wanted to avoid foreign policy but in the end
couldn’t avoid taking the heat for at least gesturing in the direction of
Palestinian equality and dignity. It’s blown up the spot of Barack Obama, John
Kerry, sundry official spokespersons and their likes: they know what’s going
on, but they’re not allowed to say what they know. It’s got to sting for the
first black president to pay endless lip service to our “shared values”
with a hyper-militarized Jim Crow society. And yes, a lot of young Jews arguing
with relatives at Passover last weekend had their spot blown up by Israel — as
has anyone whose family or friendship connections have frayed or severed over
support for Israel.
But more than
anyone else, Zionism and Israel blew up the Palestinians’ spot. Whatever pain
and disruption to relationships takes place among Jews who reject Zionism
and support BDS, it’s minuscule compared to the price paid by Palestinians, all
11 million of whom live in either exile or under Israeli apartheid and
occupation. A new essay on this site by Nada Elia is an important
challenge to Jewish ex-Zionists like myself. It’s time, she says, for the
Palestine solidarity movement to stop celebrating Jewish dissent. She is so
right: all this focus on what Zionism has done to Jews has the perverse
effect of making Jews victims once again, while erasing the people whose
suffering is at the center of the problem.
We Jews need to
stop wallowing in our own issues. Our family dysfunction isn’t that interesting
to others, particularly the ones we’re oppressing. And we need to
extinguish the offensive exceptionialism.
The paradox is that
the Jewish establishment desperately needs to be challenged — by Jews, of
course, young ones in particular — which means it will be exactly the kind of
insular Jewish conversation that Palestine activists rightly find infuriating.
We’re the ones who need to call the cops on our abusive sibling. But we need to
do it without patting ourselves on the back, without dragging the rest of the
Palestine solidarity movement into our family dysfunction.
Liberal Zionism is
the solar plexus of the occupation. Making it untenable to be any kind of
a “liberal” or progressive while supporting a supremacist, segregated state;
and getting American Jews to “break up with Israel” could be one of the
quickest and most powerful tools in cutting down what now props up Israeli
apartheid. Once it’s become impossible for the type of (obviously very
privileged) Jews who Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton see at Passover — the
Michael Chabons of the world — to support or defend Israeli Jim Crow, and
it’s just down to the neocons and Christian end-timers, US policy toward
Israel might change very quickly. Without the perception that Jewish
voters demand this kind of thing, the massive military aid, veto protection at
the UN, one-sided “peace talks” mediation might come to an end. Media
coverage would change too. This is already happening, but not fast enough.
This is the main
reason that while I lovingly support Jewish Voice for Peace, I prefer
to channel my own activism through other groups like Students for Justice in
Palestine and the broad BDS movement that have a clear Palestine focus. Still,
the communications strategist in me knows the P.R. value of a Chabon defection, or
of young IfNotNow activistsgetting arrested at a “Liberation Seder”
sit-in at the office of Islamophobia lobby group Anti-Defamation League.
Or of a Broad City episode that skewers
Birthright propaganda/mating tours and Israeli militarism from a Jewish
perspective. These do more than help protect non-Jewish Palestine
solidarity activists from phony antisemitism charges; they show the
self-appointed American Jewish leadership that they don’t represent our
people’s future. Instead of papering over our objections, we expose them for
all the world to see and undermine the myth of solid Jewish support for Israel
— which is the basis for US support.
And, not that it
should be of any interest to Palestinians, who have much bigger concerns, but I
refuse to accept the double bind. I refuse to be read out of the Jewish family
just because I reject colonialism and segregation. The burden of moral failure
falls entirely on those who support discrimination.
About Peter Feld
Peter Feld is a writer, editorial consultant, market researcher and
former political strategist at Democratic polling firms. He is @peterfeld on
Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram.
Other posts by Peter Feld.
Posted In:
- See more at:
http://mondoweiss.net/2016/04/beinarts-jewish-double-bind-support-oppression-or-youre-out-of-the-family/#sthash.GAPXxGZM.dpuf
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario