Who Really Makes US Foreign Policy? Who Benefits and Who Loses?
06/29/2022
https://mises.org/wire/who-really-makes-us-foreign-policy-who-benefits-and-who-loses
In a piece of news that shocked the mainstream media,
but which shocked no one familiar with the academic industry writ large,
retired US Army General John Allen was forced to
resign as president of the Brookings
Institution after it was revealed the FBI was investigating him for lobbying on
behalf of the Qatari monarchy.
Of course, the real news, scarcely noted by the Washington
Post, New York Times, or any other purported paper of record,
is that Allen was only really in trouble because he hadn't fulfilled the pro
forma legal requirements for those lobbying the US government on behalf of a
foreign agent or government.
The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA),
under which such activities are regulated, includes several exceptions that
allow for such activities without declaring a conflict of interest. Think
tanks, a misnomer if ever there was one, operate under an "academic
exception" that allows for engagement in
"bona fide religious, scholastic, academic, or scientific pursuits or the
fine arts."
Anyone who has ever picked up one of the many deadly
dull social science journals where actual, bona fide empirical academic work is
done knows this constitutes perhaps a fraction of what think tanks almost daily
churn out.
Rather think tank commentary, touted as
objective analysis, is regularly featured or cited by publications
and outlets as apparently diverse as the Wall Street Journal and
NPR.
Of course, think tanks are hardly alone. As Ben Freeman,
a specialist on foreign influence on US policy has documented, such democratic
bastions of liberal values as the UAE and Saudi Arabia donate hundreds of
millions, even billions, to universities around the country.
Of course, from a libertarian perspective, who is to
say who should be giving money to whom and for what? Further, FARA's
provisions are so nebulous that virtually anyone could be targeted for
virtually any reason, an obvious opportunity for unaccountable federal
officials to impinge on Americans' civil liberties.
But the blatant hypocrisy of it all is what really
stands out, as the same universities and think tanks regularly decry the
apparently perfidious influence of countries like China, which they breathlessly
warn uses our "open institutions" for its own gain. Should any of
their number dare to go off message and report, for example, on the
well-documented and wholly negative influence of countries like Israel on
US foreign policy, they are tarred as anti-Semites, racists, or foreign agents
themselves!
The truth is powerful Israel and Saudi
Arabia lobbies have been able to steer US policy in directions clearly at
odds with the best interests of the American people for
decades. Unsurprisingly, perhaps nowhere has the deleterious effect of
their money been more felt than in US policy toward Iran, with the Saudis,
Israelis, and Emiratis dumping literally billions of dollars into attacks on a
country the United States should have normalized relations with decades ago.
The Uyghur lobby is another such interest group that
enjoys an open door in Congress and the op-ed pages of prominent papers—this
while its nakedly paramilitary
arm advocates the violent overthrow of the Beijing
government! And what are we, or foreign governments like China, to think when
the parent organization of such extremists, the World Uyghur
Congress, takes funding from the US government itself?
We aren't supposed to think about it at all.
Just like we aren't supposed to question any of the
other nakedly self-serving policies. Who, for example, is surprised to learn
there is a large and active Ukraine lobby in
Washington? That has paid off handsomely, with our government now handing
over $130 million
daily to Kyiv with little to no oversight.
And of course, most maddeningly, any critically
thinking American who even dares to question the US government's obviously
dangerous and counterproductive policies bought and paid for by literal
foreign agents, are themselves accused of being in the pay of Moscow, Beijing,
or Tehran.
Never mind that all the evidence points in the
opposite direction.
Again, the American people aren't expected to think at
all, only to stay in line and keep the money flowing.
This is the sad state of foreign policy in America,
and it happens right out in the open.
Author:
A graduate of Spring Arbor University and the
University of Illinois, Joseph Solis-Mullen is a political scientist and
graduate student in the economics department at the University of Missouri. An
independent researcher and journalist, his work can be found at the Ludwig Von
Mises Institute, Eurasian Review, Libertarian Institute, Journal
of the American Revolution, Antiwar.com, and the Journal of
Libertarian Studies. You can contact him through his website http://www.jsmwritings.com or
find him on Twitter @solis_mullen.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario