The Ethnic Cleansing of Masafer Yatta: Israel’s New Annexation Strategy in Palestine
by Ramzy
Baroud Posted on June 04, 2022
The Israeli Supreme Court has decided that
the Palestinian region of Masafer Yatta, located in the southern hills of
Hebron, is to be entirely appropriated by the Israeli military and that a
population of over 1,000 Palestinians is to be expelled.
The Israeli Court decision, on May 4, was hardly
shocking. Israel’s military occupation does not only consist of soldiers with
guns but elaborate political, military, economic, and legal structures,
dedicated to the expansion of the
illegal Jewish settlements and the slow – and sometimes not-so-slow – the expulsion
of the Palestinians.
When Palestinians state that the Nakba, or
Catastrophe – which led to the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948 and the
establishment of the state of Israel on its ruins – is a continuous, unfinished
project, they mean exactly that. The ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from East
Jerusalem and the endless torment of Palestinian Bedouins in the Naqab and, now
in Masafer Yatta, are all testaments to this reality.
However, Masafer Yatta is particularly unique. In the
case of occupied East Jerusalem, for example, Israel has made a fallacious,
ahistorical claim that
Jerusalem is the eternal and undivided capital of the Jewish people. It
combined its unsubstantiated narrative with military action on the ground,
followed by a systematic process that aimed at increasing the Jewish population
and ejecting the original native inhabitants of the city. Such notions as
"Greater Jerusalem"
and legal and political structures, like that of the Jerusalem Master Plan 2000,
have all contributed towards turning the once absolute Palestinian majority in
Jerusalem into a shrinking minority.
With the Naqab, Israel’s similar objectives were put
into motion as early as 1948, and again in 1951.
This process of ethnically cleansing the natives remains in effect to this day.
Though Masafer Yatta is part of the same colonial
designs, its uniqueness stems from the fact that it is situated in Area C of
the occupied West Bank.
In July 2020, Israel purportedly decided to
postpone its plans to annex nearly 40% of the West Bank, perhaps fearing a
Palestinian rebellion and unwanted international condemnation. However, the
plan continued in practice.
Moreover, a wholesome annexation of West Bank regions
would mean that Israel would become responsible for the welfare of entire
Palestinian communities. As a settler-colonial state, Israel wants the land,
but not the people. In Tel Aviv’s calculation, annexation without the expulsion
of the population could lead to a demographic nightmare; thus, Israel needs to
reinvent its annexation plan.
Though Israel has supposedly delayed the de jure annexation,
it continued with a de facto form of annexation, one that has generated little
international media attention.
The Israeli Court’s decision regarding Masafer Yatta,
which is already being carried out with the expulsion of
the Najjar family on May 11, is an important step toward the annexation of
Area C. If Israel can evict the residents of twelve villages, with a population
of over 1,000 Palestinians, unhindered, more such expulsions are anticipated,
not only south of Hebron, but throughout the occupied Palestinian territories.
The Palestinian villagers of Masafer Yatta and their
legal representation know very well that no real "justice’ can be obtained
from the Israeli court system. They continue to fight the legal war, anyway, in
the hope that a combination of factors, including solidarity in Palestine and
pressure from the outside, can ultimately succeed in compelling Israel to delay
its planned destruction and Judaization of the whole region.
However, it seems that Palestinian efforts,
which have been underway since 1997, are failing. The Israeli Supreme Court
decision is predicated on
the erroneous and utterly bizarre notion that the Palestinians of that area
could not demonstrate that they belonged there prior to 1980 when the Israeli
government decided to
turn the area into "Firing Zone 918."
Sadly, the Palestinian defense was partly based on
documents from the Jordanian era and official United Nations records that
reported on Israeli attacks on several Masafer Yatta villages in 1966. The
Jordanian government, which administered the West Bank until 1967, compensated some
of the residents for the loss of their "stone houses" – not tents –
animals, and other properties that were destroyed by the Israeli military.
Palestinians tried to use this evidence to show that they have existed,
not as nomadic people but as rooted communities. This was unconvincing to the
Israeli court, which favored the military’s argument over the rights of the
native population.
Israeli firing zones occupy nearly
18 percent of the total size of the West Bank. It is one of several ploys used
by the Israeli government to lay a legal claim on Palestinian land and, eventually, years later, claim legal ownership. Many of these firing
zones exist in Area C, and are being used as one of the Israeli methods aimed
at officially appropriating Palestinian land with the support of the Israeli
courts.
Now that the Israeli military has managed to acquire
Masafer Yatta – a region spanning
32 to 56 sq km – based on completely flimsy excuses, it will become much easier
in ensuring the ethnic cleansing of many similar communities in various parts of
occupied Palestine.
While discussions and media coverage of Israel’s
annexation scheme in the West Bank and the Jordan Valley have largely subsided,
Israel is now preparing for a gradual annexation scheme. Instead of annexing
40% of the West Bank all at once, Israel is now annexing smaller tracts of land
and regions, like Masafer Yatta, separately. Tel Aviv will eventually connect
all these annexed areas through Jewish-only bypass roads to larger Jewish
settlement infrastructures in the West Bank.
Not only does this alternative strategy allow Israel
to avoid international criticism, it will also permit Israel to eventually
annex Palestinian land while incrementally expelling Palestinians, helping Tel
Aviv prevent demographic imbalances before they occur.
What is happening in Masafer Yatta is not only the
largest ethnic cleansing scheme to be carried out by Israel since 1967, but the
move should be considered the first step in a much larger scheme of illegal land
appropriation, ethnic cleansing, and official mass annexation.
Israel must not succeed in Masafer Yatta, because if
it does, its original, mass annexation scheme will become a reality in no time.
Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and the Editor
of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six
books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is Our Vision for Liberation:
Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak out. Baroud is a
Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs
(CIGA). His
website is www.ramzybaroud.net.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario