Sens. Sanders, Warren called for ‘restricting’ US aid to Israel at J
Street confab
Progressive lawmakers urge
Israel to help vaccinate Palestinians, say foreign assistance shouldn’t be used
to advance policies that ‘violate Palestinian rights’
By JACOB MAGID 20 April
2021
The Republican Jewish
Committee lashed out at Warren’s remarks, calling them “disgusting.”
Prominent progressive
senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren both used their Monday addresses
at the J Street lobby’s national conference to call for regulating US aid to
Israel, asserting that such assistance should not be allowed to bankroll
Israeli policies in the West Bank that damage prospects for a two-state
solution.
The stances appeared to
mark a shift by more left-wing Democrats away from talk of “conditioning” aid
to Israel to “restricting” it.
The former term was used by
several candidates during the recent US presidential campaign, including
Sanders and Warren — implying that some or all of the $3.8 billion in aid that
the US has agreed to give Israel over a 10-year period should potentially be
withheld based on actions taken by the Israeli government.
In shifting to talk of
“restricting” aid, progressive Democrats, with J Street’s backing, is not calling
to limit the amount of already-agreed-upon aid, but are rather seeking greater
control of how it may and may not be used.
“If we’re serious about
arresting settlement expansion and helping move the parties toward a two-state
solution, then it would be irresponsible not to consider all of the tools we
have at our disposal,” Warren told J Street in prerecorded remarks played on
the second day of the left-wing, pro-Israel lobby’s virtual conference.
“One of those is
restricting military aid from being used in the occupied territories. By
continuing to provide military aid without restriction, we provide no incentive
for Israel to adjust course,” she added.
The Republican Jewish
Committee lashed out at Warren’s remarks, calling them “disgusting.”
“To advocate, as Sen.
Warren does, that the US pressure Israel to make concessions to the
Palestinians while the Palestinian Authority condemns Israel’s existence,
incites violence against Israel and Jews everywhere, and continues its ‘Pay for
Slay’ salaries to terrorists and their families, is disgusting,” said RJC
executive director Matt Brooks.
For his part, Sanders also
declared himself in favor of the US using its aid as leverage.
“I strongly believe that we
must also be willing to bring real pressure to bear, including restricting the US
aid, in response to moves by either side that undermine the chances for peace,”
he said.
“The truth is that the
United States gives an enormous amount of military aid to Israel. It also
provides some humanitarian and economic aid to the Palestinians. It is totally
appropriate for the United States to say what that aid may and may not be used
for,” Sanders argued.
“In terms of aid to Israel,
in my view, the American people do not want to see that money being used to
support policies that violate human rights and treat the Palestinian people as
second-class human beings,” he added.
Sanders insisted the
strategy is not about “singling out any one country” but rather “acting in an
evenhanded way” to advance American values in the region.
Warren also used the
opportunity to chastise both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian
Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.
On Netanyahu, she said that
if the long-serving prime minister fails in the task of forming a government,
“the majority [in the Knesset] that opposes him must decide what to do next.
Will they continue to fight among themselves and, in the process, prop up a
corrupt leader who puts his own interests ahead of those of his country? Or
will they join together to begin the difficult task of rooting out corruption
and reinstating the rule of law?” she asked.
As for the Palestinian
leadership, Warren said that “the West Bank is ruled by a corrupt and
increasingly authoritarian leadership under President Abbas” while Gaza is
governed by “Hamas — a terrorist organization that has yet to renounce
violence.”
Both Warren and Sanders
called on Israel to do more to ensure that Palestinians are vaccinated.
“Jewish settlers in the
West Bank are receiving vaccinations, while few Palestinians have any access to
life-saving shots,” Warren said.
While Israel has been a
world leader in inoculating its citizens, Palestinians in the West Bank and
Gaza lags well behind. So far, only around 3.44 percent of them have received a
coronavirus vaccine, with supplies rapidly depleting in the Gaza Strip.
Palestinians received
72,000 doses of AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine through the international COVAX
initiative on Monday. But even with that shipment, Palestinians are still far
from herd immunity. Ramallah has received some 196,200 doses from various
sources, far fewer than it needs to vaccinate the nearly 3 million Palestinians
who live in the West Bank.
Israel has immunized
105,000 West Bank Palestinians who hold permits to work in Israel and the
settlements. It has also transferred several thousand more of its own doses to
Palestinian officials and medical workers.
Nonetheless, the Jewish
state has come under criticism for not vaccinating Palestinians, many of whom
live under Israeli military rule. Human rights groups charge that international
law requires Israel as an occupying power to provide vaccines for Palestinians.
Israel rejects the
characterization that it occupies Palestinian territory, deeming the West Bank
“disputed.” Israeli officials have also pointed to the Oslo Accords between
Israel and the Palestinians, which assign responsibility for health care to the
PA. However, the agreement also states that the sides should cooperate on such
issues.
While Sanders and Warren typically receive warm receptions at J Street
conferences, it is unclear whether their more critical approach on Israel will
reign supreme in the Democratic Party.
US President Joe Biden is similarly supportive of a two-state solution
and has already acted to restore aid to the Palestinians slashed by his
predecessor Donald Trump, but as a candidate, he pushed back against efforts by J Street and others in the
progressive wing of the party to insert language more critical of Israel onto
the party platform.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario