Iran’s supposed threat to the U.S. is a scam Israel and its lobby
promote to change the subject from Palestine
BY PHILIP WEISS MARCH
11, 2021
Some
day historians will scratch their heads over the fact that for the better part
of 20 years U.S. presidents were engaged as a leading foreign policy question
in how to restrain Iran, a small country half the world away that has not
attacked the U.S., that does not have nuclear weapons, that is the seat of
ancient civilization and whose contribution to regional instability doesn’t
look any worse than Israel’s or Saudi Arabia’s.
It
is hard to see any American interest at all in Iran, and yet four presidents
have now expended an immense amount of political capital on the country.
The
answer to this question is actually simple. It is in Israel’s interest for the
U.S. to treat Iran as a supposed “existential” threat to the world. Having the
U.S. so engaged in Israel’s cold war with Iran serves Israel by keeping the
world’s attention on a supposed dire threat to world peace instead of on the
Israeli apartheid system for Palestinians. And it serves a master Israeli
politician Benjamin Netanyahu in his effort to stay in power and out of jail by
manufacturing one enemy after another and bragging of his closeness to an
American president.
Israel’s
lackeys in the Congress on both sides of the aisle pipe the Israeli line.
Senators Bob Menendez and Lindsey Graham sent Biden a letter containing the
astounding claim:
“[O]utside of its nuclear
program, Iran continues to pose a threat to the U.S. and international security.”
The
Israel lobby group AIPAC tweeted
the same garbage Wednesday:
Iran’s determination to
further, destabilize the Middle East, develop nuclear weapons, and build
ballistic missiles bring the world closer to war.
Sadly,
Joe Biden appears to be dithering on Iran because of the pro-Israel pressure,
lately wielded by Senator Bob Menendez. “[I]f Biden thinks he can make foreign
policy decisions without consulting New Jersey’s Robert Menendez, he’s got
another thing coming,” Politico
says, which quotes fulsome praise of Menendez by
Biden and national security adviser Jake Sullivan.
Iran
is more important than Russia in Menendez’s
world view, as he made clear in the
hearing for Wendy Sherman, Biden’s choice for deputy secretary of state.
Sherman helped negotiated the Iran deal or JCPOA, but Menendez lectured:
“[R]eturning to the JCPOA without concrete actions to address Iran’s other
dangerous and destabilizing activities will be
insufficient.”
This
is of course insane. The Iran deal was a signal accomplishment of the Obama administration
in setting us on the path toward a “just and amicable” relationship with Iran
(to quote George Washington on international relations). It took years for
Obama to build the deal, and it has been destroyed not just by Donald Trump and
his late patron Sheldon Adelson but by a bunch
of conservative Democrats like Menendez.
The
Israel lobby group AIPAC
is using Democrats to try to paint Biden into a
corner on Iran, and it’s working. Responsible Statecraft reports:
[Graham
and Menendez] are asking for more offices to sign onto their letter. It comes
as 70 Democrats in the House of Representatives joined a Republican-led
letter warning that the JCPOA has failed to stop “the full range of Iran’s
threats” and calling for Biden to seek an “agreement or set of agreements” that
secures more Iranian concessions.
“We have knowledge that
AIPAC was behind this letter,” said Dylan Williams, advocacy director at the
left-leaning pro-Israel group J Street, referring to the House letter. “All of
these vehicles on Iran and the Senate letter on the ICC are AIPAC
asks that would normally be made around their annual policy conference, which
is not being held this year. However, they are still making a number of
legislative asks as they usually would at this time.”
If
Biden gets back into the deal, as we all must hope, it’s going to take many
months or years and a lot of political capital. The liberal branch of the
Israel lobby is working hard on Biden’s behalf, but as you can see, they can’t
get unanimity inside the Democratic Party. No, the AIPAC implant in the
Democratic Party — Democratic Majority for Israel, — is campaigning
against the Iran deal.
The
only thing to be said about all the efforts to destroy the deal is that they
originate from the Israel lobby. Because it was such a “strong deal,” there was
only one nation on earth that opposed it, Israel, as Obama
said in a famous speech when he
was trying to seal the deal in summer 2015. But the president said it would be
an “abrogation of my constitutional duty” as American president to take
Israel’s side.
I
recognize that Prime Minister Netanyahu disagrees — disagrees strongly…
And as President of the
United States, it would be an abrogation of my constitutional duty to act
against my best judgment simply because it causes temporary friction with a
dear friend and ally.”
The
pity is that the U.S. media and political system fall again and again for the
Iran scam. Two Sundays ago, “60 Minutes” aired a segment highlighting
Iranian-backed attacks on American troops in Iraq as a grave insult to our
national honor. Without ever questioning the American presence in Iran’s
neighbor, let alone our criminal invasion of Iraq.
I’m
no political philosopher but the vulnerability of an advanced information-based
democracy to fall for such propaganda speaks to deep flaws in our system. And
of course, one that George Washington warned about in his farewell address when
he deplored “passionate attachments” to other nations– or “inveterate
antipathies.”
[P]ermanent, inveterate
antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others,
should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings
towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a
habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave.
We’ve
become that slave, with an inveterate antipathy for Iran.
It
is amazing that Netanyahu was able to address a joint session of Congress in
opposition to the deal back in 2015. But many Democrats were in loving
attendance. As Obama said, all foreign policy touching on Israel was domestic
politics:
When the Israeli government
is opposed to something, people in the United States take notice.
Or
as Bill Clinton put it
in anger, after a meeting with an “especially brash and
insistent Benjamin Netanyahu:” “Who’s the fucking superpower here?”
Netanyahu
is able to make such demands because as Ben Rhodes, Obama’s former foreign
policy aide explained
recently, the center-right Israel lobby
organizations are deeply enmeshed in policymaking. Ten to twenty American Jews
who invariably took the Israeli government’s position came in and out of the
White House all the time, Rhodes said. While Congresspeople parroted an Israeli
script on the latest radioactive isotopes found in the Parchin military
facility, and when the deal actually got close, they warned Rhodes that AIPAC
was going to cancel their fundraisers. Political money was at the heart of the
influence. Rhodes:
We’re never supposed to
name the issue of money. But like when it became very acute and AIPAC is
spending money and threatening people that they’re going to cancel fundraisers,
suddenly you’re having that conversation in a way where you’re not even allowed
to allude to it in normal circumstances.
When
Benjamin Netanyahu said in
Hebrew 20 years ago that he didn’t worry about
the peace process because “America is a thing you can move very easily,” he was
talking about the power of the Israel lobby.
The
United States was easily played, at the highest level. When Obama clashed with
Netanyahu not over Iran but the creation of a Palestinian state, Democrats in
Congress bailed on Obama and Rhodes
wrote in his memoir, “I was given a list of
leading Jewish donors to call to reassure them of Obama’s pro-Israel bona
fides.” Now Rhodes tells
us that he feels “shame” that the Obama
administration “pretended” that Netanyahu supported the creation of a
Palestinian state, when he never did. Because it was politically dangerous to
alienate the right-wing Israeli P.M.
I
know why these politics are not openly discussed. Because a political analysis
that presupposes Jewish influence, even when it’s backed by a top White House
aide, is verboten in U.S. discourse. No, it’s always the evangelicals who push
these bad policies. As if they have influence in the Democratic Party.
Today
the leading Israel lobby groups, AIPAC, American Jewish Committee, and the
Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, can’t stop
talking about Iran. As a threat to America.
And
Antony Blinken echoed that foolish idea in his testimony
yesterday. While Biden is letting
“Netanyahu ritually walk all over him,” and also posturing on Iran. And
routinely disappointing progressives
on the Hill with his compromises on
Middle East policy.
The
good news is that the Israel lobby is split and liberal Zionist organizations
such as J Street and Americans for Peace Now have vigorously supported
the Iran deal and are trying to give Joe Biden some of the Jewish political
capital he needs to take on Menendez and thread the needle here. Let’s hope.
The fact that Biden’s three top appointments at the State Department are Jewish
is his way of trying to move the Jewish community to liberal Zionism.
Biden
is also hoping that Netanyahu is replaced, even by another right-wing Israeli.
Because a different Israeli leader is likely to choose “cautious… compromise
with the US regarding Iran” (as Yossi
Alpher tells Americans for Peace Now).
But
Israel is setting the terms for U.S. foreign policy… Just as it did when we
needed Israel as our battleship in the Middle East against the Soviet Union…
Just as it did when the cold war ended and we
needed the only democracy in the
Middle East in our war against “radical Islam”… There’s always some
geopolitical agenda that Israel is advancing. Israel gets to determine the
narrative.
Palestinians
are the biggest victims of the Iran shell game. For nearly 75 years the world
has been promising them self-determination in their own land, and the U.S. has
made sure that that would not happen, while Israel takes more and more of the
country for expansion. There is growing
recognition that what has resulted in
an “apartheid regime” of Jewish supremacy. But Israel has always been able to
change the subject.
H/t Scott Roth.
P.S.
We’ll be having a discussion of related issues raised by the documentary, “The
Occupation of the American Mind,” at a salon held by Voices from
the Holy Land this Sunday.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario