Countries froze Unrwa funds without seeing evidence of Israeli claims
A number of donors have suspended their funding to
Unrwa based on nothing more than Israel's allegations against a dozen refugee
agency employees
By Dania
Akkad
Published date: 8 February
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-us-eu-unrwa-funding-dossier-evidence
Almost two weeks after the United States suspended funding to the United Nations Relief
and Works Agency (Unrwa), swiftly followed by a host of other donors, Middle
East Eye has learned that in a number of cases the decision to withold funding
was based solely on Israel's assertions.
At least two countries that followed in the footsteps
of the US - the
Netherlands and
Latvia - did not see evidence of Israeli allegations that employees at the
agency for Palestinian refugees played a role in the Hamas-led 7 October
attacks before they made their decisions, Middle East Eye has established.
An informed source told MEE this
week that British
Foreign Secretary David Cameron suspended funding “only on the basis of
information in the public domain”. The Foreign Office declined to answer
whether this was true and on what basis it had made its decision.
Reports have also emerged in Canada and Australia in the past 24 hours suggesting their foreign
ministries did not see evidence - or "all of the evidence" in the
case of Australia - ahead of making their decisions to suspend aid.
Additionally, MEE understands that the European Union,
Unrwa’s third largest donor, which has said it is awaiting the outcome of a UN
investigation before its funding is due at the end of the month, also received
no information from Israel to corroborate its claims.
A source who has been in contact with EU diplomats in
recent weeks told MEE that the Europeans have been saying, "we have
nothing, and others say they have nothing".
"So governments are taking these decisions
impacting hundreds of thousands of people because others did it and based on
press reports," the source said.
An EU spokesperson did not respond to MEE’s request
for comment on the matter.
A second source told MEE that in a recent meeting of
EU members states, including some that suspended Unrwa funding, diplomats said
they had neither received evidence from Israel, nor had they asked for any.
These revelations come as Unrwa, the main UN agency
that supports Palestinians and the largest relief agency operating in Gaza,
says it will have to suspend operations by the end of this month or in early
March as a result of the funding freeze.
“People are going to die if the agency is not
supported and if the agency is forced to take very tough decisions that no
humanitarian agency or organisation should take," Juliette Touma, Unrwa's
director of communications, told MEE on Thursday.
"We call on all of these countries that have
suspended the funding to reconsider their decisions because the lives of
millions of people not only in Gaza but in the region depend on that assistance
and that funding."
Israel and Unrwa
There have been longstanding tensions between Israeli
officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanayahu, and Unrwa, even while
Israel counts on the agency to provide services to Palestinians in Gaza and the
occupied West Bank it would otherwise have to provide itself.
Unrwa has said it first learned about the allegations
that a dozen of its roughly 13,000 employees based in Gaza were involved in the
7 October attack on Israel in which 1,200 people were killed, in an 18 January
meeting between Unrwa Commissoner General Philippe Lazzarini and Israeli
officials.
The Israeli officials told Lazzarini about the
allegations during the meeting, including verbally sharing the names of 12
employees alleged to have been involved, but did not share any documents or
reports, Unrwa told MEE.
On 26 January, Lazzarini announced that "to protect the agency's ability to
deliver humanitarian assistance", Unrwa had terminated the contracts of
the staff members in question and would "launch an investigation in order
to establish the truth without delay".
That same day, the US announced its decision to
suspend funding from Unrwa. Within 24 hours, eight more countries had
followed suit.
Currently, 20 donor countries have placed a hold
on funding commitments to Unrwa or said they would reassess future pledges. The
agency says these donors account for around half of its operational budget.
A Channel
4 report on Monday
revealed details of a six-page Israeli dossier said to have been shared with
donor countries.
The dossier, which MEE has seen, alleges that 12 Unrwa
employees were involved in the 7 October attacks, including kidnapping,
coordinating weapons movements and taking part in raids on the border
communities of the Be’eri and Re’im kibbutzim.
The document, written in Hebrew, also says it is
“possible to flag” around 190 employees who are Hamas or Palestinian Islamic
Jihad operatives.
It says the information is based on intelligence and
documents and identity cards seized since 7 October, and includes names and
photos of the 12 employees and the activities they are said to have carried
out, but provides no further evidence.
Since the dossier was reported on, politicians and journalists, among others, have questioned why governments
relied on the unproven details presented in the document.
But it remains unclear to MEE how many governments saw
the dossier - or any other evidence beyond what has been reported in the media
- before they made their funding decisions.
'I have not seen any evidence'
MEE asked the foreign ministries of more than a dozen
countries that have suspended or delayed funds whether they received the
dossier, on what basis they had made their decision and whether they asked for
or had received further information from Israel.
Only Latvia made clear how it had come to its decision
to temporarily suspend its annual payment, which a foreign ministry
spokesperson told MEE was “based on the information publicly confirmed by the
UN Secretary General and other UN officials”.
The Netherlands did not respond to MEE’s request, but
on 31 January, Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Geoffrey van Leeuwen
told the Dutch House of Representatives he had seen no evidence.
“I have not seen any evidence yet,” Van Leeuwen
said, according to
an official transcript. “But
Unrwa itself has already fired those people. They are apparently very serious
about the allegations.”
On Wednesday, the CBC reported that Canadian government sources told the outlet
that Israel had still not shared evidence to substantiate its claims about
Unrwa staff.
On Thursday, Australia's foreign minister, Penny Wong,
told ABC News that she had sought further information from Israel
while admitting that she "does not yet have all the evidence to
hand".
US officials have said Israel gave them a dossier on
the day they announced the suspension of funds, but it remains unclear to MEE
whether the US was given the six-page dossier which has been shared with media
or something more or different.
During a 31 January press conference, US Secretary of
State Antony Blinken told reporters that while the US had not been able to
confirm the allegations, they were "highly, highly credible".
MEE asked the State Department whether Blinken was
referring to the six-page dossier with his comments and whether the US had
asked for further evidence beyond what it was given on 26 January, but did not
get a response.
US uses firing as reason
In a press briefing on 1 February, State Department
spokesperson Matthew Miller said that the US based its decision on both the
dossier that officials received as well as Unrwa’s decision to fire the
employees.
"I should make it very clear our decision to
temporarily pause funding was not just based on the strength of Israeli
evidence, but it was based on Unrwa's own conclusion that those allegations
were credible," Miller told reporters.
On Thursday, Touma told MEE that, until now,
Unrwa has "never received in writing any information about these
allegations".
She further underlined that staff contracts were
terminated not as a result of evidence before Unrwa, but rather "in the
best interests of the agency due to the huge reputational risk that these
allegations have on the agency and also the risk that such allegations have on
the humanitarian operation in Gaza".
The Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), the
UN's internal investigation authority, is currently looking into the
allegations, which former OIOS investigators have said could take between six
months and a year.
An independent review led by former French foreign
minister Catherine Colonna, which will assess whether the agency is doing
"everything within its power" to ensure neutrality and to respond to
allegations of serious breaches when they are made, is to begin work on 14
February with an interim report expected by late March.
As famine looms in Gaza, several of the countries that have
suspended funding to Unrwa have chanelled money to other organisations working
in the war zone.
But aid experts, former Unrwa officials and others,
including Sigrid Kaag, the UN senior humanitarian and reconstruction
coordinator for Gaza, have said there are no other organisations in Gaza right
now that have the capacity to deliver the immediate humanitarian aid that is
required, and was ordered by the International Court of Justice last month.
Chris Gunness, a former spokesperson for Unrwa, told
MEE: "All of the agencies in Gaza - the World Food Programme, the World
Health Organisation, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs -
that does not add up to more than about 100 or 200 people. It’s
tiny."
He estimated that if Unrwa was abolished, it would
take three years to hire, vet and train another 13,000 employees and twice the
amount of money to establish an equivalent agency.
Meanwhile, he warned of mass starvation if the funding
is not put back in place or new donors, potentially in the Gulf where
Lazzarini has visited this week, are not found.
"We have worked with these very same donors time
and time again to depoliticise Unrwa. What have they done? They’ve weaponised
Unrwa," he said. "It’s unforgivable what they are doing."
This article is available in French on Middle East
Eye French edition.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario