A US War on Mexico Wouldn’t Win the US War on Drugs
by Thomas
Knapp Posted on July 07, 2023
“A violent drug cartel is suspected of leaving a
severed human leg found hanging from a pedestrian bridge Wednesday in Toluca,
just west of Mexico City,” CBS News reports. “[T]he trunk of the body was left
on the street below, near the city’s center, along with handwritten signs signed
by the Familia Michoacana cartel.”
Familia Michoacana, which apparently specializes in
the production and distribution of methamphetamine, “has become known for
carrying out ruthless, bloody ambushes of police in Mexico State and local
residents in Guerrero” to protect its lucrative business.
Meanwhile, over the last several months, opportunistic
US politicians have used increasing US drug overdose numbers linked to
increasing use of fentanyl as an excuse to get an “invade Mexico to fight the
cartels” bandwagon rolling.
Given the history of stupid US foreign policy ideas,
it seems like it should be incredibly hard to come up with one that out-stupids
the wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq combined, but with not so much as a
“hold my beer” warning, these idiots seem to have managed it.
If any of those past fiascoes could be said to have
had any saving graces at all, the main one was that they were conducted far,
far away, versus enemies who lacked much ability to bring the war home to
America.
Mexico, as you’re no doubt aware, shares a 2,000-mile
border with the US. Millions of people cross that border every year, with or
without permission from or even detection by the US government. And the major
cartels, as part of their drug distribution operations, already maintain a
permanent presence in the US.
Any “war on the cartels” would be fought at least
partly on US soil, and it would be fought by the kind of people who don’t quail
from things like leaving severed human legs hanging from bridges to send their
messages. Do we really want more of that kind of thing here? I have to ask,
because sending US troops barging into Mexico is how we get things like that
here.
The US government has been fighting – and losing – a
“war on drugs” for most of a century now.
That war created the cartels.
That war empowers the cartels.
Expanding that war would unleash the cartels’ most
vicious behaviors on US soil, while reducing unsafe drug consumption little if
at all.
Legalizing drugs, on the other hand, would devastate
the cartels’ profit and loss statements, put production and distribution of
substances Americans obviously want into the hands of reputable/peaceable
businesses, and reduce overdose deaths and other negative side effects of drug
use by bringing standardized dosage and quality to American consumers.
Whose side are the “invade Mexico” demagogues on? Not
yours.
Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news
analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian
Advocacy Journalism, publisher of Rational Review
News Digest, and moderator of Antiwar.com’s commenting/discussion community.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario