The Madness of US Militarism
Where
are today's Eisenhowers, Butlers, and Shoups?
by William J. Astore Posted on January 11, 2023
https://original.antiwar.com/William_Astore/2023/01/10/the-madness-of-us-militarism/
Reprinted from Bracing Views with the author’s
permission.
As a teenager in the 1970s, I recall talking to my dad
about fears of nuclear war between the United States and the Soviet Union. My
dad took a broad view, suggesting that if U.S. and Soviet leaders were stupid
enough to blow each other to smithereens, a billion Chinese people would be
left to pick up the slack and move the world forward.
My dad was right about many things, but what he didn’t
realize was that US nuclear war plans (known as SIOPs) often called for the
elimination of the USSR and China, even if China had had no involvement in
events leading up to the war. The ruling US nuclear war philosophy
was: If you’re red, you’re dead.
Daniel Ellsberg wrote about this in his book, The
Doomsday Machine. As I wrote in my review of that book:
“US nuclear war plans circa 1960 envisioned a
simultaneous attack on the USSR and China that would generate 600 million
deaths after six months. As Ellsberg notes, that is 100 Holocausts. This plan
was to be used even if China hadn’t directly attacked the US, i.e. the USSR and
China were lumped together as communist bad guys who had to be eliminated
together in a general nuclear war. Only one US general present at the briefing
objected to this idea: David M. Shoup,
a Marine general, and Medal of Honor winner, who also later objected to the
Vietnam War.”
What’s truly startling is that only one US military
leader present, General David Shoup, objected to the SIOP that would lead to
the death of 600 million people in six months. A decade later, scientists
learned that such a huge nuclear exchange would likely cause a nuclear winter
that would kill billions due to famine. Truly, the (few) living would envy the
(many) dead.
Mentioning David Shoup’s name leads me to this fine article:
“The Marine Corps legend who tried to stop the Vietnam War,” by James Clark.
Shoup was a remarkable American who helped to prevent the Cuban Missile Crisis
of 1962 from escalating to a nuclear war. Once he retired from the Marines, he
became a vocal opponent of the Vietnam War and militarism in general, a worthy
successor to General Smedley Butler.
I urge you to read Clark’s article on Shoup, who
quotes Shoup’s hard-won wisdom here:
About the Vietnam War, Shoup said “I believe that if
we had and would keep our dirty, bloody, dollar-crooked fingers out of the
business of these nations so full of depressed, exploited people, they will
arrive at a solution of their own.”
In the Atlantic Monthly, Shoup, echoing
the warning Eisenhower about the military-industrial complex, wrote bluntly
about America’s war culture and its anti-democratic nature:
Somewhat like a religion, the primary appeals of anti-Communism,
national defense, and patriotism provide the foundation for a powerful creed
upon which the defense establishment can build, grow, and justify its cost.
More so than many large bureaucratic organizations, the defense establishment
now devotes a large share of its efforts to self-perpetuation, justifying
its organizations, preaching its doctrines, to self-maintenance and
management.
You would think that a Medal of Honor recipient who’d
proved his bravery and patriotism at Tarawa during World War II would be immune
from charges of being unpatriotic or weak on defense, but you’d be wrong.
Where are today’s Shoups among the US military brass?
Where are the leaders who are against genocidal nuclear war and who are willing
to speak out against it? Where are the leaders who reject a new cold war with
China and Russia? Where are the leaders with the courage to advocate for peace
whenever possible in place of more and more war?
Have we fallen so far under the spell of militarism
that America no longer produces leaders like Dwight Eisenhower, Smedley Butler,
and David Shoup, generals who truly knew war, despised it, and wanted above all
to put an end to it?
William J. Astore is a retired lieutenant colonel
(USAF). He taught history for fifteen years at military and civilian schools. He writes at Bracing Views.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario