Report: post-9/11 era was one of the most militarily aggressive in US history
America has conducted nearly 400 interventions since
its founding, with more than a quarter in the last 30 years.
AUGUST 10,
2022
Written by
Nick Turse
The United
States has conducted nearly 400 military interventions since 1776, according to
innovative research by scholars Sidita Kushi and Monica Duffy Toft.
Half of
those conflicts and other uses of force – including displays and threats of
force as well as covert and other operations – occurred between 1950 and 2019,
the last year covered in a new dataset, introduced by Kushi and Toft in a Journal of
Conflict Resolution article published earlier this week. More than a
quarter of them have taken place since the end of the Cold
War.
The United
States has carried out 34 percent of its 392 interventions against countries in
Latin America and the Caribbean; 23 percent in East Asia and the Pacific
region; 14 percent in the Middle East and North Africa; and just 13 percent in
Europe and Central Asia, according to a newly refined version of the Military Intervention Project
(MIP) dataset — a venture of the Center for Strategic Studies at Tufts
University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.
In addition
to providing the most accurate count ever of U.S. military interventions —
doubling the number of cases found in existing data, while also employing
rigorous sourcing methods — the MIP offers 200 variables that allow for complex
analyses of drivers and outcomes of wars and other uses of force.
Crucially,
Kushi and Toft, the director of the Fletcher School’s Center for Strategic
Studies, found that U.S. interventions have “increased and intensified” in
recent years. While the Cold War era (1946–1989) and the period between
1868–1917 were the most “militaristically active” for the United States, the
post-9/11 era has already assumed the third position in all of U.S.
history.
Unlike
earlier eras in which displays and threats of force were employed, such
posturing short of military violence has been absent in recent years. The
United States, they found, has actually “engaged in 30 interventions at level 4
(usage of force) or 5 (war).”
Until the
end of the Cold War, note Kushi and Toft, U.S. military hostility was generally
proportional to that of its rivals. Since then, “the U.S. began to
escalate its hostilities as its rivals deescalate it, marking the beginning of
America’s more kinetic foreign policy.” This recent pattern of
international relations conducted largely through armed force, what Toft has
termed “kinetic
diplomacy,” has increasingly targeted the Middle East and Africa.
These regions have seen both large-scale U.S. wars, as in Afghanistan and Iraq,
and low-profile combat in nations such as Burkina
Faso, Cameroon, the
Central African Republic, Chad, and Tunisia.
The MIP data
incorporates confirmed covert operations and low-profile interventions by
Special Operations forces, but a combination of U.S. government secrecy and the
dataset’s scrupulous sourcing standards guarantees that the post-9/11 tally is an
undercount, according to Kushi, an assistant professor of Political Science at
Bridgewater State University and a non-residential fellow at Tufts’ Center for
Strategic Studies.
Recently,
for example, Alice Speri and I revealed the existence of low-profile
proxy war programs run across Africa, the Middle East, and the
Indo-Pacific region. While experts say that the Pentagon has likely used the
secretive 127e authority to carry out combat beyond the scope of any
authorization for use of military force or permissible self-defense, in
violation of the Constitution, such highly classified operations may evade
capture in the MIP dataset. While 127e programs in Somalia and Yemen for
example overlap with known U.S. military interventions, other uses of the
authority, such as in Egypt and Lebanon, may not. The same goes for even
lesser-known authorities like Section
1202, which provides support to foreign irregular forces aimed at near-peer
competitors.
As the MIP
is further developed and refined, Kushi and Toft hope that it will allow for a
more nuanced understanding of the conditions that cause the United States to
launch military interventions and the effects on the U.S. and the nations it
targets, including the economic and human toll and inadvertent
outcomes.
What, they
ask, “were the longer-term costs and unintended consequences of the
intervention in Afghanistan and how did that intervention influence U.S.
engagements in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen?” The answers, they hope,
will lead to improved data and, ultimately, a better U.S. foreign policy.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario