Is ‘Autocracy’ America’s Mortal Enemy?
by Patrick J. Buchanan Posted on August 23, 2022
https://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2022/08/22/is-autocracy-americas-mortal-enemy/
In the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,
President Joe Biden declared to the nation and world: "We have engaged anew
in a great battle for freedom. A battle between democracy and autocracy."
On her trip to Taiwan, Speaker Nancy Pelosi echoed
Biden: "Today, the world faces a choice between democracy and autocracy.
America’s determination to preserve democracy here in Taiwan and in the world
remains iron-clad."
But is this truly the world struggle America is in
today?
Is this a great challenge and threat to the United
States?
Are autocracy and democracy in a climactic ideological
crusade to determine the destiny of mankind?
If that is the future, it is surely not America’s
past.
Indeed, autocrats have proven invaluable allies in the two-century rise of the United States to world preeminence and power.
When the fate of the Revolution hung in the balance in
1778, the decision of an autocratic French king to enter the war on America’s
side elated Gen. George Washington, and French intervention proved decisive in
the 1781 Battle of Yorktown that secured our independence.
A decade later, King Louis XVI would be overthrown in
the French Revolution and guillotined along with Queen Marie Antoinette.
In World War I in 1918, the U.S. sent millions of
troops into battle in France. They proved decisive in the victory over the
kaiser’s Germany.
Our allies in that Great War?
The British, French, Russian, Italian, and Japanese
empires, were the greatest imperial and colonial powers of that day.
In our war with Japan from 1941 to 1945, our foremost
Asian ally was the autocrat Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek of China.
In our war with Hitler’s Germany, America’s crucial
ally who did more fighting than any other to ensure victory, the USSR’s Joseph
Stalin, was the greatest tyrant of his age.
During the Korean War from 1950 to 1953, the leader of
the South Korean regime was the dictator-autocrat Syngman Rhee.
During four decades of the Cold War before the collapse
and breakup of the Soviet Empire and the Soviet Union, autocrats were allies of the
United States. The shah of Iran. Gen. Augusto Pinochet of Chile. Anastasio
Somoza of Nicaragua. Gen. Francisco Franco of Spain. Anwar Sadat of Egypt. The
kings and princes of Saudi Arabia.
During that Cold War, India was the world’s largest
democracy and sided most often with Communist Russia rather than the United
States. Autocratic Pakistan was our ally.
Gary Powers’ U-2 flight, shot down over the Soviet
Union, initiated in Pakistan, as did Henry Kissinger’s secret mission to China
in 1971 to set up the historic Nixon-Mao meeting of 1972.
Across the Arab and Muslim world during the Cold War,
many of our foremost friends and allies were kings, emirs, and sultans –
autocrats all.
The seven-year war in Yemen, in which US air support
has been indispensable, was waged by the Saudi monarchy to prevent Houthi
rebels from retaining the power they seized in a revolution.
U.S.-Saudi goal: restore a deposed autocrat.
This recitation is not to argue that autocracy is
superior to democracy, but to demonstrate that the internal politics of foreign
lands, especially in wartime, have rarely been America’s primary concern.
The crucial question, and rightly so, is usually this:
Is this autocrat enlisted in the exact cause as we, and fighting alongside us?
If so, the autocrat has almost always been welcome.
When the Arab Spring erupted, and the dictatorial
President Hosni Mubarak’s 30 years of rule came to an end, we cheered the free
elections that brought to power Mohamed Morsi, a leader of the Muslim
Brotherhood.
A year later, Morsi was ousted in a military coup and
power seized by Gen. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, causing Secretary of State John
Kerry to cheer that Egypt’s military was "restoring democracy."
Kerry explained that Morsi’s removal was at the
request of "millions and millions of people."
Since then, the number of political prisoners held by
Sisi has run into the tens of thousands.
If Pelosi and Biden see the world struggle as between
autocracy and democracy, a question arises: As leaders of the democracy camp in
this world struggle, why do we not insist that our allies in places like Egypt,
Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Yemen, the UAE, and Oman begin to hold regular
elections to bring to power legitimate democratic rulers, rather than the
autocrats that currently occupy the seats of power?
And there is a historical question about the
Biden-Pelosi description of the global struggle for the future between
autocracy and democracy.
When did the internal political arrangements of
foreign nations – there are 194 now – become a primary concern of a country
whose Founding Fathers wanted it to stay out of foreign quarrels and foreign
wars?
America "goes not abroad in search of monsters to
destroy," said Secretary of State John Quincy Adams. "She is the
well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and
vindicator only of her own."
And so it once was, long ago.
Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of Churchill, Hitler, and “The
Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World.
To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators
writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario