Which New War Next: Iran or Venezuela?
by Jacob G.
Hornberger May 7, 2019
Pity
President Donald “America First” Trump, Secretary of State (and former CIA
Director) Mike Pompeo, National-Security Advisor (and Cold War fanatic) John
Bolton, and Special U.S. Representative to Venezuela (and Cold War fanatic)
Eliott Abrams. Knowing that the American people have grown weary with their
forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Yemen, these four
interventionists can’t decide whether to initiate a new war against Venezuela
or against Iran or against both. They just know that they want a new war, an
exciting war, a winnable war against a poor Third World country, a war that
will cause Americans to forget about the ongoing fiascoes in the Middle East
and Afghanistan and that will hopefully restore America to greatness through
“mission-accomplished” conquest, bombing, death, destruction, and
regime-change. One can easily imagine the arguments that must be taking place
in the White House: “Iran! They ousted our Shah from power!” “No, Venezuela!
It’s part of the worldwide communist conspiracy to take over America!”
Ideally
from their standpoint, the choice will be made easier for them if either Iran
or Venezuela strikes first. After all, let’s not forget that the Constitution,
which is supposedly the law of the land, requires a congressional declaration
of war before the president and his army can wage war. Moreover, after World
War II, the Nuremberg War Crimes declared it to be a war crime for one nation
to initiate an attack on another nation.
Not
that any president concerns himself with the Constitution and with Nuremberg
principles. Trump knows that he can violate that section of the Constitution
with impunity. He knows that while Congress might impeach him for “collusion”
with the Russians or with the nebulous crime of “obstructing justice,” there is
no possibility that Congress will impeach him for intentionally violating the
declaration-of-war restriction in the Constitution. He also knows that there is
no possibility that the U.S. Supreme Court, whose responsibility is to enforce
the Constitution, will be anything but passive and deferential to any war
initiated by the president.
Nonetheless,
from the standpoint of these four interventionists, the ideal is for either
Venezuela or Iran to attack the United States or, as they’re now putting it,
attack “U.S. interests,” whatever that means. That way, they can exclaim, “We
have been attacked! We are shocked! We had no idea that this would happen! We
are innocent! We were just minding our own business! This is an act of
aggression! This is another day that will live in infamy! We now have no choice
but to engage in self-defense by dropping bombs and wreaking death and
destruction in order to achieve regime-change!”
Their
model, of course, is President Franklin Roosevelt, who finagled Japan into
attacking U.S. troops at Pearl Harbor. At that time, U.S. presidents were still
complying with the constitutional provision requiring a congressional
declaration war. FDR knew that he couldn’t secure a congressional declaration
of war, given that the American people were overwhelmingly opposed to
entering World War II, especially after the deadly, destructive, and useless the fiasco of World War I.
At
first, FDR did his best to provoke the Germans into attacking the United
States, so that he could exclaim, “We have been attacked! Now give me my
declaration of war!” But the Germans refused to take his bait. So, FDR went
into the Pacific and began provoking the Japanese, with the aim of securing a
“back door” to the European conflict. Among his principal means of provocation
were insulting and humiliating Japanese officials, freezing Japanese assets in
the United States, and most important, imposing an embargo on oil, which FDR
knew the Japanese needed to maintaining their war machine in China.
FDR’s plan worked brilliantly. Insulted, humiliated, and squeezed, the Japanese tried
to slip out of FDR’s ever-tightening noose by trying to knock out the U.S.
Pacific Fleet with their attack at Pearl Harbor, which would have, they hoped,
enabled them to secure oil from the Dutch East Indies without the U.S.
interference. The attack at Pearl Harbor enabled FDR to appear before Congress
and exclaim: We have been attacked! We are shocked! We are innocent! We had no
idea that this was going to happen! This is an act of aggression! This is a day
that will live in infamy! Now, give me my declaration of war!” Because Germany
declared war on the U.S. to honor its alliance with Japan, FDR had gotten what
he wanted — entry of the U.S. into World War II.
That
is the model that Trump, Pompeo, Abrams, and Bolton are now employing against
both Iran and Venezuela. They have announced that they will not permit any
nation to buy oil from Iran, with the aim of bringing as much economic
suffering and even death to the Iranian citizenry as possible. At the same
time, they have frozen assets of Venezuela here in the United States, decreed
an alternative president for the country inflicted massive harm on the
Venezuelan people though ever-tightening economic sanctions, and fomented
violent revolution within the country,
Time
will tell if Trump had his merry band of interventionists will be as successful
as Roosevelt was, or whether Trump and his interventionist cohorts will lose
patience and initiate a new undeclared war of aggression against Iran,
Venezuela, or both.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario