Nostalgia
and British Politics
June 09, 2017 / Gilad Atzmon
gilad.co.uk
By Gilad
Atzmon
Three
days before the British election, The Independent’s
headline title read: “Majority of British voters agree with Corbyn's claim UK
foreign policy increases the risk of terrorism”
So,
seventy-five per cent of Brits realise that it is those immoral interventionist
wars in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Libya that have contributed to the terror
that now haunts their country.
But
‘interventionist wars’ is just a politically correct term for Israeli-driven
global conflicts promoted by the worldwide Zionist lobby: AIPAC in the USA,
CRIF in France and the LFI/CFI in Britain. So the next question is unavoidable.
How many of these Brits, who obviously know the truth about Britain’s
‘interventionist wars’, also grasp who it is who triggers these genocidal
conflicts?
Today’s
British election results provides us with a clear answer.
Theresa
May has been made a fool by the British voter while Jeremy Corbyn, who was
subject to constant smearing by the same lobby that pushed us into Iraq, Libya,
Syria and even Iran, came out as the big winner.
The
conclusion is inevitable: the more the Jewish and Zionist institutions (BOD, JC, Jewish Labour
Movement, LFI etc.) rubbished Corbyn, the more the Brits loved
him. The more the Daily Telegraph pointed
at Corbyn’s ties with so-called ‘Holocaust deniers’ the more the Brits saw him
as a genuine human being and an entirely suitable Prime Ministerial candidate.
This
should not surprise us. Exactly the same dynamic led to the election of Donald
Trump in the USA last November. The more the Jewish institutions and media
castigated Trump as an
‘anti-Semite,’ the more Americans saw him as a their liberator.
The truth
of the matter is that Trump is far from being an antisemite. On the contrary,
he is, as some Jewish journalists pointed out, probably the ‘first Jewish
president.’ The same applies to Corbyn. He is certainly no ‘racist’ nor an
‘antisemite.’ No, his crime is all-too-obvious: He thinks Jews are
ordinary, people like all other people. He refuses to buy into the ‘chosen
people’ mantra.
I have
been anticipating Corbyn’s imminent success for more than two weeks now, but
how did I know? Simple, the Jewish Chronicle and the Guardian of Judea changed
their tone. They began to accept the possibility that Corbyn may well take up
residence in 10 Downing Street for a while. Pretty much, out of the blue,
somehow, they decided to make friends.
Corbyn
performed very well in this election. But he could have won it just by pointing
at the lobby and the people behind the institutional smear campaign against
him. He could have done what Trump did and performed what the Jewish press
refer to as ‘dog whistling.’
He could have chastisedthe Israeli Sayanim within his party – after all, the
evidence was fully documented. He
could have taken a stand and stood for his party comrades who were
victims of the Jewish Labour purge. But he didn’t. Corbyn isn’t Trump.
Being an overwhelmingly nice person, he turned the other cheek -
something I myself find frustrating, probably due to my own Jerusalemite
origin.
In my new
book Being in Time – a Post Political
Manifesto I point out that for working people, utopia is but
nostalgia. It was Trump’s promise to ‘make America great again’ that
secured his election. Similarly, the surge in popularity of Jeremy
Corbyn, an old-style Lefty who speaks about a unity that goes beyond
sectarianism and identity politics is due to the nostalgic impact of his
message, that yes, once upon a time, we were united by the Left.
Is it really a coincidence that, in Britain, it is Labour that is
gaining power by marketing nostalgia while Theresa ‘conservative’ May is
punished for her attempt to frog-march Britain ‘forward’ into the brutal and
merciless hands of murky City mammonites and New World Order merchants?
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario