Iconos

Iconos
Volcán Popocatépetl

martes, 31 de diciembre de 2024

How the US and Israel Destroyed Syria and Called it Peace

American interference, at the behest of Netanyahu’s far-right Israel, has left the Middle East in ruins, with over a million dead and open wars raging in Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine, and with Iran on the brink of a nuclear arsenal.

Jeffrey D. Sachs

Sybil Fares

Dec 12, 2024

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/us-israel-syria

In the famous lines of Tacitus, Roman historian, “To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, they call empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace.”

In our age, it is Israel and the U.S. that make a desert and call it peace.

The story is simple. In stark violation of international law, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ministers claim the right to rule over seven million Palestinian Arabs. When Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands leads to militant resistance, Israel labels the resistance “terrorism” and calls on the U.S. to overthrow the Middle East governments that back the “terrorists.” The U.S., under the sway of the Israel Lobby, goes to war on Israel’s behalf.

The fall of Syria this week is the culmination of the Israel-U.S. campaign against Syria that goes back to 1996 with Netanyahu’s arrival to office as Prime Minister. The Israel-U.S. war on Syria escalated in 2011 and 2012, when Barack Obama covertly tasked the CIA with the overthrow of the Syrian Government in Operation Timber Sycamore. That effort finally came to “fruition” this week, after more than 300,000 deaths in the Syrian war since 2011.

Syria’s fall came swiftly because of more than a decade of crushing economic sanctions, the burdens of war, the U.S. seizure of Syria’s oil, Russia’s priorities regarding the conflict in Ukraine, and most immediately, Israel’s attacks on Hezbollah, which was the key military backstop to the Syrian Government. No doubt Assad often misplayed his own hand and faced severe internal discontent, but his regime was targeted for collapse for decades by the U.S. and Israel.

Since 2011, the Israel-U.S. perpetual war on Syria, including bombing, jihadists, economic sanctions, U.S. seizure of Syria’s oil fields, and more, has sunk the Syrian people into misery.

Before the U.S.-Israel campaign to overthrow Assad began in earnest in 2011, Syria was a functioning, growing middle-income country. In January 2009, the IMF Executive Board had this to say:

Executive Directors welcomed Syria’s strong macroeconomic performance in recent years, as manifested in the rapid non-oil GDP growth, comfortable level of foreign reserves, and low and declining government debt. This performance reflected both robust regional demand and the authorities’ reform efforts to shift toward a more market- based economy.

Since 2011, the Israel-U.S. perpetual war on Syria, including bombing, jihadists, economic sanctions, U.S. seizure of Syria’s oil fields, and more, has sunk the Syrian people into misery.

In the immediate two days following the collapse of the government, Israel conducted about 480 strikes across Syria, and completely destroyed the Syrian fleet in Latakia. Pursuing his expansionist agenda, Prime Minister Netanyahu illegally claimed control over the demilitarized buffer zone in the Golan Heights and declared that the Golan Heights will be a part of the State of Israel “for eternity.”

Netanyahu’s ambition to transform the region through war, which dates back almost three decades, is playing out in front of our eyes. In a press conference on December 9th, the Israeli prime minister boasted of an “absolute victory,” justifying the on-going genocide in Gaza and escalating violence throughout the region:

I ask you, just think, if we had acceded to those who told us time and again: '"The war must be stopped"– we would not have entered Rafah, we would not have seized the Philadelphia Corridor, we would not have eliminated Sinwar, we would not have surprised our enemies in Lebanon and the entire world in a daring operation-stratagem, we would not have eliminated Nasrallah, we would not have destroyed Hezbollah's underground network, and we would not have exposed Iran's weakness. The operations that we have carried out since the beginning of the war are dismantling the axis brick by brick.

The long history of Israel’s campaign to overthrow the Syrian Government is not widely understood, yet the documentary record is clear. Israel’s war on Syria began with U.S. and Israeli neoconservatives in 1996, who fashioned a “Clean Break” strategy for the Middle East for Netanyahu as he came to office. The core of the “clean break” strategy called for the Israel (and the US) to reject “land for peace,” the idea that Israel would withdraw from the occupied Palestinian lands in return for peace. Instead, Israel would retain the occupied Palestinian lands, rule over the Palestinian people in an Apartheid state, step-by-step ethnically cleanse the state, and enforce so-called “peace for peace” by overthrowing neighboring governments that resisted Israel’s land claims.

The long history of Israel’s campaign to overthrow the Syrian Government is not widely understood, yet the documentary record is clear.

The Clean Break strategy asserts, “Our claim to the land—to which we have clung for hope for 2000 years—is legitimate and noble,” and goes on to state, “Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon…”

In his 1996 book Fighting Terrorism, Netanyahu set out the new strategy. Israel would not fight the terrorists; it would fight the states that support the terrorists. More accurately, it would get the US to do Israel’s fighting for it. As he elaborated in 2001:

The first and most crucial thing to understand is this: There is no international terrorism without the support of sovereign states.… Take away all this state support, and the entire scaffolding of international terrorism will collapse into dust.

Netanyahu’s strategy was integrated into U.S. foreign policy. Taking out Syria was always a key part of the plan. This was confirmed to General Wesley Clark after 9/11. He was told, during a visit at the Pentagon, that “we’re going to attack and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years—we’re going to start with Iraq, and then we’re going to move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.” Iraq would be first, then Syria, and the rest. (Netanyahu’s campaign for the Iraq War is spelled out in detail in Dennis Fritz’s new book, Deadly Betrayal. The role of the Israel Lobby is spelled out in Ilan Pappé’s new book, Lobbying for Zionism on Both Sides of the Atlantic). The insurgency that hit U.S. troops in Iraq set back the five-year timeline, but did not change the basic strategy.

The U.S. has by now led or sponsored wars against Iraq (invasion in 2003), Lebanon (U.S. funding and arming Israel), Libya (NATO bombing in 2011), Syria (CIA operation during 2010’s), Sudan (supporting rebels to break Sudan apart in 2011), and Somalia (backing Ethiopia’s invasion in 2006). A prospective U.S. war with Iran, ardently sought by Israel, is still pending.

Strange as it might seem, the CIA has repeatedly backed Islamist Jihadists to fight these wars, and jihadists have just toppled the Syrian regime. The CIA, after all, helped to create al-Qaeda in the first place by training, arming, and financing the Mujahideen in Afghanistan from the late 1970s onward. Yes, Osama bin Laden later turned on the U.S., but his movement was a U.S. creation all the same. Ironically, as Seymour Hersh confirms, it was Assad’s intelligence that “tipped off the U.S. to an impending Al Qaeda bombing attack on the headquarters of the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet.”

Operation Timber Sycamore was a billion-dollar CIA covert program launched by Obama to overthrow Bashar al-Assad. The CIA funded, trained, and provided intelligence to radical and extreme Islamist groups. The CIA effort also involved a “rat line” to run weapons from Libya (attacked by NATO in 2011) to the jihadists in Syria. In 2014, Seymour Hersh described the operation in his piece “The Red Line and the Rat Line”:

A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria.”

Soon after the launch of Timber Sycamore, in March 2013, at a joint conference by President Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu at the White House, Obama said: “With respect to Syria, the United States continues to work with allies and friends and the Syrian opposition to hasten the end of Assad’s rule.”

To the U.S.-Israeli Zionist mentality, a call for negotiation by an adversary is taken as a sign of weakness of the adversary. Those who call for negotiations on the other side typically end up dead—murdered by Israel or U.S. assets. We’ve seen this play out recently in Lebanon. The Lebanese Foreign Minister confirmed that Hassan Nasrallah, Former Secretary-General of Hezbollah had agreed to a ceasefire with Israel days before his assassination. Hezbollah’s willingness to accept a peace agreement according to the Arab-Islamic world’s wishes of a two-state solution is long-standing. Similarly, instead of negotiating to end the war in Gaza, Israel assassinated Hamas’ political chief, Ismail Haniyeh, in Tehran.

Similarly in Syria, instead of allowing for a political solution to emerge, the U.S. opposed the peace process multiple times. In 2012, the UN had negotiated a peace agreement in Syria that was blocked by the Americans, who demanded that Assad must go on the first day of the peace agreement. The U.S. wanted regime change, not peace. In September 2024, Netanyahu addressed the General Assembly with a map of the Middle East divided between “Blessing” and “Curse,” with Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Iran as part of Netanyahu’s curse. The real curse is Israel’s path of mayhem and war, which has now engulfed Lebanon and Syria, with Netayahu’s fervent hope to draw the U.S. into war with Iran as well.

The U.S. and Israel are high-fiving that they have successfully wrecked yet another adversary of Israel and defender of the Palestinian cause, with Netanyahu claiming “credit for starting the historic process.” Most likely Syria will now succumb to continued war among the many armed protagonists, as has happened in the previous U.S.-Israeli regime-change operations.

In short, American interference, at the behest of Netanyahu’s Israel, has left the Middle East in ruins, with over a million dead and open wars raging in Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine, and with Iran on the brink of a nuclear arsenal, being pushed against its own inclinations to this eventuality.

All this is in the service of a profoundly unjust cause: to deny Palestinians their political rights in the service of Zionist extremism based on the 7th century BCE Book of Joshua. Remarkably, according to that text—one relied on by Israel’s own religious zealots—the Israelites were not even the original inhabitants of the land. Rather, according the text, God instructs Joshua and his warriors to commit multiple genocides to conquer the land.

Against this backdrop, the Arab-Islamic nations and indeed almost all of the world have repeatedly united in the call for a two-state solution and peace between Israel and Palestine.

Instead of the two-state solution, Israel and the U.S. have made a desert and called it peace.

lunes, 30 de diciembre de 2024

Israeli forces ‘sexually assaulted, beat and insulted women’ during Gaza hospital raid

Eyewitnesses describe violence against women, girls, and patients in new report   

By MEE staff

Published date: 29 December 2024

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israeli-forces-sexually-assaulted-beat-insulted-women-during-gaza-hospital-raid

Israeli forces sexually assaulted Palestinian women and executed unarmed civilians during the Friday raid on Gaza’s Kamal Adwan Hospital, witnesses have said in a new report.

The violence against women included stripping off their clothes, touching them under the threat of violence, beating them and hurling sexual insults at them.

Their testimonies were collected by the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor and published on Saturday. 

According to the report, dozens of women and girls detained during the raid received degrading abuse that amounts to sexual violence. 

In one incident, a soldier tore the clothes of a woman, exposing her chest, after she refused to remove her hijab, or headscarf. 

Another victim said she was dragged by a soldier “who forced her to press against him”.

Recalling a different incident, an unnamed woman said: “A soldier forced a nurse to take off her trousers, then placed his hand on her. When she tried to resist, he struck her hard across the face, causing her nose to bleed.” 

Another eyewitness said a soldier told a woman: “Take it off, or we’ll force it off you.”

A hospital staff member told the monitor: “The soldiers ordered us to remove our hijabs, but we refused. They then turned to the girls under 20 years old and demanded they remove their hijabs, but they also refused.

"The soldiers decided to punish us by taking two women at a time and forcing them to lift their clothes and lower their trousers under threats and coercion.”

Field executions 

According to the Euro-Med monitor, eyewitnesses described other crimes by Israeli forces, such as executing patients and unarmed detainees, as well as detonating booby-trapped robots near homes. 

A 41-year-old volunteer paramedic, referred to by the initials AA, said he survived the booby-trapping of his residence.

He also said he saw Israeli forces shooting and killing a man carrying a white flag.   

When he was detained alongside around 300 other men, they were taken to an open area near a cemetery and forced to strip down to their underwear for hours despite the cold. 

“When a child with a psychological disorder stepped out, he ran towards an Israeli tank. I called out to him, but he didn’t respond. They shot him dead immediately,” he recalled. 

“There was an armoured personnel carrier and a tank in the area. A soldier ordered us to gather at a specific spot. Among us were five injured individuals who were forced to walk in front of the tank. Suddenly, they were shot dead without any questioning,” he added. 

Israeli troops stormed the Kamal Adwan Hospital, the last functioning health facility in north Gaza, on Friday. 

The incursion was preceded by nearly three months of a blockade preventing the entry of aid, medicine and food, as well as heavy bombardment in the hospital’s complex and vicinity.

During the raid, Israeli forces burnt different departments, killing patients and medical workers inside, according to health officials. 

The remaining doctors and patients, roughly 350 people, were forced out of the hospital at gunpoint, semi-naked. 

Some were later released but many remain in Israeli custody, including Dr Hussam Abu Safiya, the director of Kamal Adwan Hospital. 

The raid has left northern Gaza without any functioning healthcare centres.

It is part of the Israeli offensive on northern Gaza, launched on 5 October, which followed the presentation of a controversial proposal named the "Generals' Plan" to the Israeli government.

The plan calls for ethnically cleansing areas north of the "Netzarim corridor", which divides Gaza in two, so Israel would be able to establish a "closed military zone".

“The occupation is delivering the final blow to the remaining healthcare system in northern Gaza today,” the health ministry said on Friday, following the raid on Kamal Adwan Hospital.

“This aligns perfectly with the generals’ plan to eliminate the population in the northern Gaza Strip.”

domingo, 29 de diciembre de 2024

Trump's base goes to war with incoming officials over US visas for foreign talent

The US president-elect's 'government efficiency' team, led by Elon Musk, suggests American workers are simply not up to snuff

By Yasmine El-Sabawi

Published date: 27 December 2024 

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/trump-base-goes-to-war-officials-over-us-visas-foreign-talent

If you haven't been on Elon Musk's X platform lately, you may have missed some of the most heated - and most frank - public debate in recent memory by incoming Trump administration officials and other conservatives on the value of the highly coveted H-1B foreign worker visas.

President-elect Donald Trump has yet to weigh in[1], but his advisers and supporters appear to have very conflicting opinions on whether the H-1B visas are indeed "making America great again".

According to the US Department of Labor, the H-1B program is designed for "nonimmigrant aliens as workers in specialty occupations… of distinguished merit and ability".

A specialty occupation must include "the attainment of at least a bachelor's degree", and the programme is meant to "help employers who cannot otherwise obtain needed business skills and abilities from the US workforce".

A large portion of Trump's base is passionately opposed to greater immigration to the US, even if that means skilled labour, but some of Trump's most high-profile appointees to his incoming administration are staunchly in favour of it, deeming it a necessity, and want to increase its volume. 

The current debate began last week when the president-elect appointed Indian-American venture capitalist Sriram Krishnan as senior policy adviser for artificial intelligence on the incoming White House team. Krishnan previously worked at Microsoft and was one of the founders of Windows Azure.

Just before Christmas, one of Krishnan's earlier posts on X resurfaced, calling for an increase in skilled immigration - a reference to the H-1B program. He hoped Musk would tackle the issue in his new role.

DOGE, Krishnan said, should do "anything to remove country caps for green cards / unlock skilled immigration".

DOGE is the so-called Department of Government Efficiency initiated by the incoming Trump administration and will be c0-headed by South African immigrant, billionaire and Tesla CEO Musk, as well as Vivek Ramaswamy, a former Republican presidential contender and first-generation Indian immigrant.

Infighting

Krishnan was met with racist backlash from hundreds of Trump supporters, particularly after he was announced for the White House role. 

But both Musk and Ramaswamy lent him their support, agreeing that more foreign talent is necessary to fill what they feel are glaring gaps in US companies - and to keep the US the most competitive in the world. 

"The number of people who are super talented engineers AND super motivated in the USA is far too low," Musk wrote on his social media platform. "If you want your TEAM to win the championship, you need to recruit top talent wherever they may be. That enables the whole TEAM to win."

He added that he is "referring to bringing in via legal immigration the top ~0.1% of engineering talent as being essential for America to keep winning".

Ramaswamy took the argument a step further, calling out American society itself. 

"Our American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long (at least since the 90s and likely longer). That doesn't start in college, it starts YOUNG," he wrote on X.

"A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers," he added. "I know *multiple* sets of immigrant parents in the 90s who actively limited how much their kids could watch those TV shows precisely because they promoted mediocrity… and their kids went on to become wildly successful STEM graduates," referring to Science, Technology, Engineering or Mathematics degrees.

"'Normalcy' doesn't cut it in a hyper-competitive global market for technical talent. And if we pretend like it does, we'll have our asses handed to us by China," he added. 

The backlash was swift from Trump supporters.

"Turns out the 'waste' that DOGE wanted to cut from America was Americans," said Auron MacIntyre, a columnist at the conservative news site The Blaze.

Another user writing under a pseudonym said, "I'm still waiting on how this strategy benefits current Americans that worked to put [Ramaswamy] in this position."

The post also triggered a wave of rampant racism directed primarily at Indians, coming from Trump supporters and opponents of immigration. 

Other notable figures also weighed in.

Political analyst and founder of Eurasia Group, Ian Bremmer, responded: "It's hard to win over Americans on attracting the best and the brightest from abroad when so many feel their own elected leaders haven't invested in them at home. Prioritize that, walk the talk, you (eventually) get more support for legal immigration."

But it was the remarks from far-right political commentator and Trump loyalist Laura Loomer that may have been the most inflammatory, as she called Indians "third world invaders" and said that "the average IQ in India is 76".

Replying to another user who said they wouldn't want to live in India, she said "you'd likely get raped on arrival".

Loomer has 1.4 million followers on X.

Citing an H-1B salary database for tech workers, she wrote that "nobody can afford to live off $70,000 in today's America," suggesting that tech CEOs prefer foreign workers because they could pay them less. Loomer's account on X was then suspended for 12 hours.

As X users watched the feud play out over the holiday period, a self-described Democrat named Carlos Turnbull posted: "Loomer is noticeably not saying anything about Trump also bringing in H-1B workers to staff his clubs and Trump Vineyards. Probably just an oversight."

The H-1B visa

The American Immigration Council says only 65,000 H-1B visas are awarded yearly, with 20,000 more going to people whose postgraduate studies were at US institutions.

Most of these workers are in science, technology, engineering or mathematics, otherwise known as STEM.

The H-1B visa lasts three years and can be extended for six. The employer must petition the government for it on a prospective worker's behalf, and if successful, the employer can also later choose to sponsor that worker for a Green Card: a permanent US residency. 

Currently, some 700,000 people work in the US under H-1B status. Over 85 percent of H-1B petitions received go to people of Indian (75 percent) and Chinese (12 percent) origin with Canada, South Korea and the Philippines rounding out the top 5

The demand for H1-B visas far outstrips the supply and studies have shown that the programme fills employment gaps. 

Trump's first administration denied a larger portion of H1-B petitions compared to President Barack Obama's administration. 

The cities with the highest number of H1-B workers are in New York, San Jose, San Francisco and Dallas. 



[1] US President-elect Donald Trump appears to be siding with Elon Musk and other supporters in the tech industry in a dispute over immigration visas that has divided his supporters.

 

During an interview with the New York Post on Saturday, Trump praised the use of visas to allow skilled foreign workers into the United States. The issue has become a point of contention among his conservative base.

 

“I’ve always liked visas, I’ve always been in favor of visas. That’s why we have them,” Trump said.

sábado, 28 de diciembre de 2024

Manufacturing rebels: How the UK and US empowered HTS

A deep dive into the covert support the UK and US provided to HTS exposes the calculated, secretive Western strategies to support the Al-Qaeda-linked, UN-designated terror group that runs Syria today.

Kit Klarenberg

DEC 26, 2024

https://thecradle.co/articles/manufacturing-rebels-how-the-uk-and-us-empowered-hts

On 18 December, The Telegraph published an extraordinary investigation into how the UK and US trained and “prepared” fighters in the Revolutionary Commando Army (RCA). This “rebel” force collaborated with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) in the mass offensive toppling of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad weeks earlier. 

In an unprecedented disclosure, the outlet revealed that Washington not only “knew about the offensive” well in advance, but also had “precise intelligence about its scale.” Washington's now-confirmed “effective alliance” with HTS was described as “one of many ironies” emerging from the decade-and-a-half-long proxy war.

The Telegraph suggested this collaboration was inadvertent – simply a symptom of how Syria’s grinding, protracted civil war gave birth to “a bewildering array of militias and alliances, most of them backed by foreign powers.” 

US support of HTS: A ‘necessary’ alliance 

Alliances were fluid, with groups often splintering, merging, and shifting allegiances. Fighters frequently found themselves switching sides, blurring lines between factions. Yet, ample evidence indicates the UK, and the US maintained deliberate, long-standing ties with the dominant rebels of HTS.

For instance, in March 2021, President-elect Donald Trump’s former lead Syria envoy, James Jeffrey, gave a revealing interview to PBS, during which he disclosed that Washington secured a specific “waiver” from then-secretary of State Mike Pompeo to assist HTS. 

While this did not permit direct funding or arming of the UN/US-designated terrorist organization, the waiver ensured that if US-supplied resources “somehow” ended up with HTS, western actors “[could not] be blamed.” 

The fungibility of weapons on the Syrian battlefield was something Washington counted on heavily. In a 2015 interview, CENTCOM spokesman Lieutenant Commander Kyle Raines was quizzed about why Pentagon-vetted fighters’ weapons were showing up in the hands of the Nusra Front (precursor to HTS). Raines responded: We don’t ‘command and control’ these forces – we only ‘train and enable’ them. Who they say they’re allying with, that’s their business.”

This legal loophole enabled Washington to “indirectly” support HTS, ensuring the group did not collapse while maintaining its designation as a terrorist organization – a status complete with a now-rescinded $10 million bounty on leader Abu Mohammad al-Julani, who now goes by his real name Ahmad al-Sharaa. 

Jeffrey rationalized this strategy, calling HTS “the least bad option” for preserving “a US-managed security system in the region,” and thus worth “[leaving] alone.” HTS’s dominance, in turn, gave Türkiye a platform to operate in Idlib. Meanwhile, HTS sent unmistakable messages to their US patrons, pleading:

“We want to be your friend. We’re not terrorists. We’re just fighting Assad.”

‘Safe haven’

Since Assad’s fall, officials in London have markedly taken the lead in legitimizing the HTS-led interim administration as Syria’s new government. The group was added to the UK's list of proscribed terrorist organizations in 2017, its entry stating HTS should be considered among “alternative names” for the long-banned Al-Qaeda.

While UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared it “too early” to rescind the group’s designation, British officials met HTS representatives on 16 December – despite the illegality of such meetings.

This likely signals an impending, highly politicized Western rehabilitation of HTS. Throughout Syria’s dirty war, UK intelligence waged extensive psychological operations to promote “moderate rebels,” crafting atrocity propaganda and human-interest stories. 

These efforts were ostensibly aimed at undermining groups like HTS, ISIS, and Al-Qaeda. Yet leaked documents from UK intelligence reveal how HTS remained intertwined with Al-Qaeda post-2016, directly contradicting media narratives.

In other words, throughout the decade-and-a-half-long crisis, HTS was officially considered on par with the most fundamentalist, genocidal elements in the country. 

British documents also make a total mockery of the common refrain that HTS severed all ties with Al-Qaeda in 2016. A 2020 file described how Al-Qaeda “co-exists” with HTS in occupied Syrian territory, using it as a launchpad for transnational attacks. 

The document warned that HTS’s domination created a “safe haven” for Al-Qaeda to train and expand, fueled by instability. British psyops against HTS spanned years but ultimately failed. Instead, leaked files lament HTS’s growing influence, territorial gains, and rebranding as an alternative government.

“[Al-Qaeda] remains an explicitly Salafi-Jihadist transnational group with objectives and targets which extend outside Syria’s borders. [Al-Qaeda’s] priority is to maintain an instability fuelled safe haven in Syria, from which they are able to train and prepare for future expansion. HTS domination of northwest Syria provides space for [Al-Qaeda] aligned groups and individuals to exist.”

British-backed propaganda benefiting HTS

British intelligence psyops attempting to hinder HTS operated from the group’s founding until recently. Yet, they appear to have achieved nothing. Numerous leaked files reviewed by The Cradle bemoan how HTS’s “influence and territorial control” had “dramatically grown” over the years. 

Its successes allowed the extremist group “to consolidate its position, neutralize opponents, and position itself as a key actor in northern Syria.” But HTS's “domination” was partly secured by the group rebranding itself as an alternative government.

HTS-occupied territory was home to a variety of parallel service providers and institutions, including hospitals, law enforcement, schools, and courts. The group’s domestic and international propaganda specifically promoted these resources as a demonstration of an “alternative” Syria awaiting rollout across the entire country.

Ironically, many of these structures and organizations – such as the infamous White Helmets, who also operated in ISIS-run territories – were direct products of British intelligence, created for regime change propaganda purposes. Moreover, they were aggressively promoted by London at enormous expense.

Repeated references are made in leaked UK intelligence documents to the importance of “[raising] awareness of moderate opposition service provision,” and providing domestic and international audiences with “compelling narratives and demonstrations of a credible alternative to the [Assad] regime.” There is no consideration evident in the files that these efforts might be assisting HTS greatly in its own efforts to present itself as a “credible alternative” to Assad.

Nonetheless, it is acknowledged that Syrians in occupied territory would accommodate HTS “particularly if [they are] receiving services from it.” Even more eerily, the documents note, “HTS and other extremist armed groups are significantly less likely to attack opposition entities that are receiving support” from the UK government’s Conflict, Stability, and Security Fund (CSSF). 

This was the mechanism through which Britain’s Syrian propaganda war and organizations like the White Helmets and extremist-linked Free Syrian Police were financed.

These UK-run governance structures and opposition elements, which were allegedly intended to “undermine” HTS, operated in areas controlled by the group safe from violent reprisals for their foreign-funded work, as they “demonstrably provide key services” to residents of occupied territory.

There is also the darker prospect that HTS was well aware these “opposition entities” were bankrolled by British intelligence, and they were unmolested on that very basis.

Coordinated offensive

As The Telegraph's report explains, “the first indication that Washington had prior knowledge” of HTS’s offensive was when its RCA proxies were given a rousing pep talk by their US handlers three weeks prior. 

At a secret meeting at the US-controlled Al-Tanf air base close to the borders of Jordan and Iraq, the militants were told to scale up their forces and “be ready” for an attack that “could lead to the end” of Assad. A quoted RCA captain told the outlet:

“They did not tell us how it would happen. We were just told: ‘Everything is about to change. This is your moment. Either Assad will fall, or you will fall.’ But they did not say when or where, they just told us to be ready.”

This followed US officers at the base, swelling the RCA’s ranks by unifying the group with other UK/US-trained, funded, and directed Sunni desert units and rebel units operating out of Al-Tanf under joint command. 

According to The Telegraph, “RCA and the fighters of HTS … were cooperating, and communication between the two forces was being coordinated by the Americans.” This collaboration proved to be of devastating effect in the “lightning offensive,” with RCA rapidly seizing key territory across the country upon explicit US orders.

RCA even joined forces with another rebel faction in the southern city of Deraa, which reached Damascus before HTS. RCA now occupies roughly one-fifth of the country, pockets of territory in Damascus, and the ancient city of Palmyra. 

Hitherto “heavily defended” by Russia and Hezbollah, Moscow’s local base has now been taken over by RCA. “All members of the force continued to be armed by the US,” receiving salaries of $400 monthly, nearly 12 times what Syrian Arab Army (SAA) soldiers were paid.

It is uncertain whether this direct financing of the RCA and other extremist militias that toppled the Assad government continues today. What is clear, though, is that the UK and US supported HTS from the group’s inception, even if “indirectly.” In turn, this covert backing played a pivotal role in positioning HTS financially, geopolitically, materially, and militarily for its “lightning” swoop in Damascus and assumption of government today.

Reinforcing the interpretation that this was the objective of London and Washington all along, following Assad’s ouster, Starmer promptly declared that the UK would “play a more present and consistent role” in West Asia as a result. 

While Western and certain regional capitals may celebrate the apparent success of their lavishly funded, blood-soaked campaign to dismantle decades of Baathism, British intelligence had long cautioned that the outcome would grant Al-Qaeda an even larger “instability-fueled safe haven” for “future expansion.”

viernes, 27 de diciembre de 2024

THE NEW MANIFEST DESTINY

The Doctrine of Manifest Destiny, born in the United States in the first decades of the 19th century and originally promoted by President Andrew Jackson (1929-1837), established the moral superiority of Americans over other peoples and, therefore, the mission of redeeming the world and expanding freedom, mainly towards the lands of the West and towards the Caribbean and Central America.

It was the quasi-religious justification for undertaking an aggressive territorial expansion, which reached its climax in the war against Mexico (1846-48), through which the United States acquired most of the territory it now has beyond the Mississippi River.

As early as 1823, President James Monroe enunciated his doctrine of “America for the Americans,” through which he rejected the European powers' claims to recover their lost colonies in the new continent (mainly Spain) or to undertake new conquest adventures (France or England).

These ideas and "doctrines" established by the American rulers of the 19th century seemed to have been left behind, especially after the end of the Second World War, when a world order was formed based on Public International Law. Its main objective was to avoid new wars of aggression, and its main instrument was the United Nations Organization.

However, the great powers, especially those that comprise the UN Security Council, never felt constrained by this new international order that emerged from the Second World War. When they felt like it, they undertook military action against other countries, without the approval of the other great powers. For example, the USSR in Hungary in 1956, Czechoslovakia in 1968; the United States in the Dominican Republic in 1965, and Panama in 1989.

Now the president-elect of the United States, Donald Trump, has started a whole campaign for Canadians to “voluntarily” join as the 51st state of the American Union; to “buy” the island of Greenland from the kingdom of Denmark (something that Trump had already tried during his first presidential term, and which was rejected by Denmark); and to retake the Panama Canal, which through the Torrijos-Carter treaties of 1977 established a joint United States-Panama administration, after the Americans had control of the Canal since its inauguration in 1914, until it passed into the hands of Panama in 1999.

Why is Trump relaunching 19th-century American expansionism, as a kind of New Manifest Destiny?

There are several reasons for internal and external order.

Internal Reasons

Trump's victory in the presidential election, even beating the Democratic Party candidate, Kamala Harris, in the popular vote, coupled with the Republican Party's victory in the House of Representatives, in the Senate, and most of the governorships, has been considered by Trump and his inner circle as a mandate to make "America Great Again."

That means that American hegemony in the world should not be questioned; and that the will of the United States cannot be doubted; therefore, whatever America's ambitions may be, they must be pursued to their logical conclusion.

On the other hand, Trump knows that he will not be able to fully fulfill many of his campaign promises, such as completely pacifying the Middle East; achieving a quick agreement between Russia and Ukraine; deporting the 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States; eliminating the epidemic of deaths from fentanyl overdoses; permanently reducing inflation; getting most of the American manufacturing companies that have established their factories in other countries to return; etc.

Trump may be able to advance many of these policies, but he is not sure that he will achieve what he has promised; therefore, one way to keep his social base of support energized and focused on big goals is to reopen that ambition that characterized Americans during the first two centuries of their independence, which is the conquest of new frontiers; whether through “purchases” of land, “voluntary annexations,” “cessions” or even war. Hence Trump's proposal for a "space" military force or to take advantage of the natural resources of protected areas within the United States or the Arctic.

External Reasons

Trump and his advisors have correctly considered that at this moment the Canadian government is very weak, divided, and therefore vulnerable (Justin Trudeau's government is about to fall), which opens the possibility of starting this media war to "invite" Canadians to join the United States.

Trump has supporters and followers in Canada who are willing to follow this narrative, as far as it goes, and although it seems very difficult for this Canadian annexation to the United States can take place, Trump is willing to try, because as the saying goes, "there is no worse fight than the one that is not fought."

Trump also knows that Keir Starmer's government in the United Kingdom is very weak and is, in fact, seeking a free trade agreement with the United States after Britain has left the European Union. Therefore, he will do little or nothing to help Canada, which formally remains part of the British Commonwealth of Nations.

In the case of Greenland, which depends on Denmark, Trump knows perfectly well that if he decided to take Greenland by force, there would be no way for Denmark to prevent it. But that would mean the end of NATO since one country in the organization would be attacking another NATO country.

In that sense, the two main powers of the European Union, to which Denmark also belongs, namely France and Germany, find themselves in one of the most vulnerable historical moments in the last 60 years, given that the governments of Macron and Scholz are in political crisis, the former being unable to form a cabinet supported by the National Assembly, which can approve a budget; and the second, facing general elections in February, with the very high possibility of losing them.

The European Union has not expressed the slightest complaint to Trump for his gross intentions to buy or annex Greenland, which clearly reflects the European dependence on the United States in military, political, and even economic matters, so Trump can make these grotesque proposals with impunity, without the Europeans raising their voice in any way.

And in the Panamanian case, Trump is brandishing childish and false pretexts (high tariffs for US-flagged ships or the alleged presence of "Chinese soldiers" in the Canal), to launch his threat to recover it.

Latin America is divided between progressive and pro-American governments, so there is no united position to diplomatically confront aggression from the United States such as the one it proposes against Panama; so much so that so far the only leader who has even half-heartedly given her support to Panama was Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who also faces serious threats from Trump, such as his promise to declare drug cartels terrorist organizations, which would give him the possibility of taking military action against them on Mexican territory.

In short, Trump does not care about the international order, international organizations (he has already announced that he will withdraw from the World Health Organization), or Public International Law.

In this, he follows in the footsteps of his mentor, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court for the crime of genocide, who has demonstrated his total rejection of international laws, committing war crimes and crimes against humanity against Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, as well as ethnic cleansing of the population in those territories; as well as against Lebanese and Syrians, without suffering any consequences for his actions.

Hence, Trump feels emboldened to carry out his expansionist policies, without caring about destroying what little remains of the rules of the international order that emerged from the Second World War and the post-Cold War.

Trump knows that he has no rivals who can oppose him if he decides to annex Greenland or the Panama Canal, and in the Canadian case, he hopes that the weakness of his government can open an opportunity for him to subordinate Canada (even more) to the dictates of his imperial presidency.