Gaza, Hamas, and the Odd Role of Netanyahu’s Likud
What Led to the Gaza-Israel Catastrophe?
by Dan
Steinbock Posted on October 24, 2023
The Hamas-Israel War is paving the way to the
destruction of Hamas, a hellish ground assault, the devastation of Gaza and
Palestinian expulsions from the West Bank. That’s the ultimate objective of
Netanyahu’s far-right cabinet members.
The Hamas-Israel War, as it is portrayed by
international media, reflects very poorly the realities in the region and even
less the structural forces that led to the disaster.
In contrast to the standard narrative, the Hamas war
is manna from heaven to Benyamin Netanyahu’s far-right government. Netanyahu
himself has contributed to the expansion of Hamas since the ‘90s.
Gaza’s nightmare and the rise of
Hamas
With a population of over 2 million on some 365 square
kilometers, the Gaza Strip is one of the world’s most densely populated areas
and “largest open-air prison.” After the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, it became an
Egyptian-administrated territory. Following the 1967 Six-Day War, it came under
Israeli occupation.
The precursor of Hamas, Al Mujamma al Islami (“The
Islamic Center”), was established in the Israeli-occupied Gaza in the 1970s
under the auspices of the Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood.
One of their adherents was the wheelchair-bound Sheik
Ahmed Yassin, the future leader of Hamas. Yassin concentrated the Mujamma’s
activities on religious and social services. Ironically, Israeli authorities
actively supported its rise, when their main antagonist was the late Yasser
Arafat’s Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). While PLO operatives in the
occupied territories faced brutal repression, the Islamists affiliated with
Egypt’s banned Muslim Brotherhood were allowed to operate in Gaza. Israelis
hoped to use the Islamists against PLO.
Yassin was jailed in 1984 on a 12-year sentence, but
released only a year later.
Netanyahu’s odd role
Around the same time, Netanyahu first made his mark in
the United States, particularly when he served as the Israeli ambassador to the
UN. In Fighting Terrorism (1986), he offered lessons on “how
democracies can defeat domestic and international terrorists.”
Fast, smart and slick, he represented a new generation
of Israeli politicians trained by American PR experts and his former employer,
global consultancy BCG. To the right-wing Likud Party, the ambitious politician
was manna from heaven.
Launched in 1988 amid the first intifada (uprising),
Hamas has always refused to accept the existence of the Israeli state. When the
peace process began between Rabin and Arafat, Yassin was again in prison. Hamas
launched a campaign of attacks against civilians, which contributed to the rise
of Netanyahu and the Israeli far-right in 1996.
Strange Bedfellows
Intriguingly, Netanyahu, as prime minister, ordered
Yassin to be released from prison (“on humanitarian grounds”), despite his life
sentence. He seems to have relied on the Islamists to sabotage the Oslo Peace
Accords. After having expelled Yassin to Jordan, Netanyahu allowed him to
return to Gaza as a hero in late 1997. Until his killing in 2004, Yassin
initiated a wave of suicide attacks against Israelis.
Yet, as Netanyahu told his Likud Party’s Knesset
members in March 2019, “anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a
Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to
Hamas. This is part of our strategy- to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from
the Palestinians in the West Bank.”
In the 1990s, as part of the Oslo Accords, most of
Gaza had been handed over to the Palestinian National Authority, alongside the
Israeli settlements, which were evacuated in 2005, despite intense opposition
by Israeli far-right. In 2007, after a legitimate Hamas election victory that
rankled both the West and Fatah, the Islamist group took over and began
administering Gaza. That led both Israel and Egypt to impose a land, sea and
air blockade, which has devastated the poor, ailing economy.
Toward Gaza’s catastrophe?
Before the global pandemic, Gazan Palestinians
organized widespread protests demanding Israel to end the blockade and address
the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Already two years ago, Gaza’s economy was on
the verge of collapse. Yet, those interests that had most to gain from such a
humanitarian crisis allowed it to proceed to its inflection point.
The strategic goal of Netanyahu government’s far-right
seems to be the devastation of Gaza and the twisted hope that this would cause
a mass emigration of Gazans away from the Israeli border. Hence, the preference
for the Dahiya Doctrine, outlined by former IDF Chief Gadi Eizenkot in the 2006
Lebanese War and in the 2008-09 Gaza War. It is premised on the destruction of
the civilian infrastructure of “hostile regimes.”
“What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006
will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on… We will apply
disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From
our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases… This
is not a recommendation. This is a plan. And it has been approved.”
Scholars of international law have called it “state
terrorism.” In view of the UN, it is a “carefully planned” assault intended “to
punish, humiliate and terrorize a civilian population.” In Gaza, it looks
increasingly like a war crime of historical magnitude.
After the Hamas offensive, Eisenkot was appointed as a
minister without portfolio in Netanyahu’s war cabinet.
In the first six days of the War Israel dropped 6,000
bombs on Gaza. That’s almost the number of bombs the U.S. used in
Afghanistan in one year. To understand the intensity of such
bombing, it is vital to recall that Afghanistan is almost 1,800 larger than the
besieged Palestinian enclave. And that bombing is just a prelude to the ground
assault.
If the Hamas War threatens to exacerbate Israel’s
social and economic tensions, it risks to turn Gaza into a desert and the West
Bank into a Jewish suburbia.
Dr. Dan Steinbock is the founder of Difference Group
and has served at the India, China and America Institute (US), Shanghai
Institute for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For
more, see https://www.differencegroup.net
This commentary is a part of the original 6,400-word
analysis, which was published by The World
Financial Review on
Oct 19.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario