Israeli extremists are terrorizing Palestinian Christians and their holy sites
28 June 202
With Religious Zionism dominating key institutions of
the Israeli state, police and courts fail to hold its adherents accountable for
attacks on Christian communities.
The frequency and intensity of hate crimes and
terrorist acts against Palestinian Christians - including pilgrims, worshippers, clergy, nuns,
Christian property, holy sites and religious symbols - carried out by Israeli
extremists are steadily increasing.
These attacks are not the isolated or spontaneous
incidents that Israel portrays them as to evade responsibility as a
government and a state. They are premeditated crimes, committed by individuals
and groups - including members of the police and military - who draw their
ideological framework from extremist Religious
Zionist doctrine,
particularly the Hardal (Haredi Leumi, or nationalist Haredi) movement, an
ultra-Orthodox nationalist current whose leading figures form part of the
current governing coalition headed by Bezalel Smotrich. This ideology also has
historical and biblical roots.
These crimes include verbal abuse; spitting at
worshippers, holy sites and their entrances; physical violence; storming holy
places and cemeteries and vandalising or desecrating them; destroying statues,
gravestones and graves; writing racist slogans; throwing stones; theft, looting
and arson against property; and occupying buildings and converting them for
other uses.
These attacks are carried out across all areas under
Israeli control but are particularly concentrated in the Old City of Jerusalem and its quarters, especially the Via Dolorosa
and the Armenian Quarter. They also affect other Christian towns in the West Bank, the Palestinian communities within Israel's 1948
borders, and Gaza.
The scale and geographical spread of these attacks
have expanded, as seen recently in southern Lebanon. There, in April 2026, an Israeli soldier decapitated a
statue of Christ,
and another soldier desecrated a statue of Mary by placing a cigarette in its
mouth.
Between these two incidents, a nun in Jerusalem
was violently
assaulted on 28 April
2026 by an extremist who deliberately shoved her from behind, causing her to
fall face-first onto the ground. Not content with an act that nearly cost her
her life, he returned while she lay wounded and repeatedly kicked her, with the
clear intention of causing further harm.
Recent years have witnessed an escalation in
the targeting of
the Palestinian Christian presence. According to a report by the Higher Presidential Committee for Church
Affairs in Palestine, 157 attacks were carried out between 2018 and 2023. In
2025 alone, more than 130 attacks took place, while 14 were documented in the
first two months of 2026.
These crimes have also targeted Palestinian Christians
in the 1948 areas and their holy sites. Among them were the attacks on St Elijah's
church in Haifa
between June and August 2023, involving several repeated assaults by followers
of Religious Zionism. In August 2023, the Latin Monastery of the Archangel
Gabriel in al-Mujaydil was also attacked and stoned.
In and after 1948, many Christian or mixed towns were depopulated or
completely destroyed. In some cases, churches were left standing and limited
permission was granted for religious services and for the burial of the dead,
while this was denied in other towns.
It was only in 2026 that the people of al-Bassa succeeded in
securing the right to
pray in the town's two churches. In the destroyed village of Ma'lul, however,
residents were denied access to the cemetery after it was enclosed within a
military zone and declared closed. Only after a long legal struggle did the
military authorities permit, in very rare and highly restricted cases, visits
to some of the graves.
The people of Gaza have not been spared. The report of
the Higher Presidential Committee documented several incidents in 2023, most notably
the targeting of
al-Ahli al-Arabi Baptist Hospital on 17 October 2023, which killed around 500
Palestinians. On 16 December 2023, a woman and her daughter were shot dead by
snipers while inside the Holy Family Catholic Church.
An ideology of supremacy
This escalation in individual and collective Religious
Zionist terrorism has been fuelled by the rise of leading figures from the
movement to central positions and ministerial posts within the current Israeli
government.
The Religious Zionist worldview combines historic
theological hostility with modern nationalist politics, in which Christianity
and its history are viewed as enemies of the Jewish people. This hostility is
reflected in the ideology of the movement's leaders, foremost among them
Smotrich, head of the Religious Zionist Party (formerly National
Union-Tkuma party). It
is regarded as the most extreme current within Religious
Zionism and is
ideologically rigid in both its Zionist and religious dimensions.
Smotrich serves as the finance minister and as a
minister within the defence ministry responsible for the Civil Administration
in the West Bank. He and his movement promote an ideology that fuses Jewish
religious supremacy with an absolute rejection of any Christian influence in
the so-called "Greater Land of Israel", refusing to concede any part
of it. The movement seeks to transform Israel into a state governed by "Torah law" - a halachic, or theocratic, state.
Under this vision, non-Jews are not granted equal
rights and are instead relegated to the status of "resident
strangers", conditional upon their recognition of absolute Jewish
sovereignty.
Smotrich's party also adopts a hardline stance against
any Christian activity in Jerusalem and Israel, opposing what it describes as
"missionary work". While it accepts financial and political support
from evangelical
groups, it insists this
support must be treated cautiously and must not be allowed to spread evangelical
beliefs.
Within this framework, hostility towards Christian symbols and the Christian
presence is both highlighted and justified. By eradicating the Christian religious and
ecclesiastical presence, the conflict can be reframed before the West as one
solely with Islam, thereby reinforcing anti-Muslim hostility and Islamophobia.
This movement has increasingly come to dominate the
security apparatus - including the police, Israel Border Police and Prison
Service - all of which fall directly under the authority of Itamar Ben Gvir,
leader of the extremist Jewish Power (Otzma Yehudit) party and an ally of
Smotrich.
Above the law
The Zionist extremist understands that, by committing
crimes against Christians and their symbols across areas under Israeli control,
he is unlikely to face legal accountability.
He perceives himself as above the law, if not the law
itself. Even if charges are brought, the incident is treated as an isolated
case, divorced from the broader context of extremist Religious Zionist
ideology. Nor is it classified as terrorism or as a hate crime.
Israeli law, if the police and prosecution were to
enforce it, allows for severe penalties for religiously motivated hate crimes.
The Counter-Terrorism Law of 2016 defines crimes committed on religious
grounds, or against places of worship, cemeteries and holy sites, as acts of
terrorism, and stipulates that offences motivated by hatred should carry double
the standard penalty.
The definition of a hate crime within the Penal Code
also includes assaults against a person's body, liberty or property on racist
grounds, or out of hostility towards a religious group, likewise prescribing
enhanced penalties.
The law further contains an entire section on offences
against the religious sentiments of a community, including the desecration or
destruction of a place of worship, a religious building, or a sacred statue, as
well as the deliberate disruption of religious rituals or attacks on
cemeteries. These offences carry prison sentences ranging from one to three
years. Yet such penalties are, regrettably, not enforced in the frequent
attacks against Christian holy sites.
Spitting is also classified under Israeli law as a
form of assault, with penalties doubled if carried out on religious grounds.
The Religious Freedom Data Centre documented 110 incidents of assault in the first half of
2025 alone, including 83 cases of spitting.
It is worth recalling that the Israeli prosecution
previously used charges of hate-motivated and racially aggravated assault
against Palestinians during the May 2021
uprising. Arabs accounted
for 85 percent of those indicted. Terrorism charges motivated by racism were
brought against 95 defendants, 87 percent of whom were Arab, while racist
motives were attributed to 50 defendants, 70 percent of whom were Arab.
Yet the authorities do not bring indictments against
Jewish extremists from settler groups who attack Christians and their holy
sites in Jerusalem, the West Bank and elsewhere - even though surveillance
cameras cover virtually every alleyway in Jerusalem, making it entirely
possible to identify the perpetrators.
Nor do the police fulfil their legal obligation to
open a criminal investigation once they become aware that a crime has occurred.
Under the law, no formal complaint is required for the police to act.
Nevertheless, they do not, and attacks against Christians and their holy sites
continue to increase.
Two standards
The soldier who assaulted the statue of Christ could
have been charged under military law with terrorism or hate crimes, with the
corresponding penalties. He could also have been charged with "conduct
unbecoming", which carries a sentence of up to one year's imprisonment.
Instead, the army dealt with the offence in an extremely lenient manner, and it is likely
that no punishment would have been imposed at all were it not for the media
outcry. The soldier was sentenced to 30 days of confinement in a military
detention facility - a disciplinary punishment less severe than actual
imprisonment. As for the six soldiers who witnessed the act, they were merely
summoned for a "clarification discussion", despite the possibility of
treating them as accomplices through their silence.
The state and its institutions - foremost among them
the police, which report directly to Ben Gvir - apply two different standards
to Israeli extremists and to Palestinians.
While the Latin patriarch was prevented from
entering the Church
of the Holy Sepulchre on Palm Sunday, and restrictions were imposed on
worshippers under the pretext of a "state of emergency" - with Muslim
worshippers likewise barred from entering Al-Aqsa Mosque - Ben Gvir himself was
permitted during the same period in April 2026 to storm the courtyards of
Al-Aqsa under heavy police protection, despite the same declared emergency.
Violations committed by the Israeli state and its
institutions against Christians, their property and their holy sites, as
documented in the report of the Higher Presidential Committee, also
include the freezing of accounts, as was carried out against the Orthodox patriarchate
in Jerusalem, and the imposition of heavy taxes on church property in August
2025.
Earlier, in February 2025, property belonging to the
Armenian patriarchate in Jerusalem was seized.
Violations have also occurred through settlement expansion and encroachment on church land, as seen with
the Orthodox church around the Monastery of Saint Gerasimos (Deir Hajla) near
Jericho, where new outposts were established. This constitutes a direct threat
to the historical and religious character of the region and to the Christian
presence in the country, and forms part of a broader plan to erase the
Christian and historical identity of Palestine.
Following the destruction of the statue of Christ in
southern Lebanon, the Assembly of Catholic Ordinaries of the Holy Land issued a
statement calling for swift and firm measures to ensure accountability. Yet
instead of a severe punishment proportionate to the crime, a lenient sentence
was handed down.
When Israel found itself internationally embarrassed
by the spread of a video documenting the crime, Foreign Minister Gideon Saar
announced the appointment of a "special envoy to the Christian world"
in April 2026, selecting a Palestinian Christian from Jaffa for the post. The
church, however, issued no statement welcoming the appointment, which
effectively amounted to a policy of silence and disregard.
The government's decision appears to be a cosmetic
attempt to mask policies that operate according to double standards.
Externally, Israel seeks to present itself as respectful of religions, eager to
deepen relations with the Christian world and to expand Religious Zionist
propaganda internationally. Internally, however, it neither punishes nor deters
extremists, allowing hate crimes, attacks on holy sites and the desecration of
Christian religious symbols to continue unabated.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario