Israel Sets ‘Red Lines’ for Lebanon Ceasefire: No Withdrawal and No Ceasing of Fire
Israeli officials reiterate that troops will remain in
southern Lebanon indefinitely
by Jason Ditz | June 21, 2026
Massive Israeli attacks against Lebanon over the
weekend managed to derail the US-Iran peace deal, and the ceasefire announced on Friday went so predictably poorly that US officials are
organizing another round of Israel-Lebanon talks to try to come up with another
deal.
While most aren’t getting their hopes up for the next
round doing any more than the last several rounds, Israel has a growing image
problem, with even historically war-supportive outlets like the Jerusalem Post running editorials questioning the Israeli strategy, particularly
the lack of an obvious endgame strategy.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seems to be going
into the talks with little sign of doing anything different, setting “red lines” for the future ceasefire that include Israel not
being willing to withdraw from Lebanon, and wanting US guarantees that they’ll
continue to be allowed to attack Lebanon.
Many will quickly notice that looks pretty much like
the status quo. Indeed, it seems to not be materially different from the last
several ceasefires the US has brokered, and similarly doesn’t offer any
timetable for Israel ever withdrawing troops from Lebanon.
Netanyahu insists Israel will remain in Lebanon “as long as necessary,” and Defense Minister Israel Katz similarly said
that not only will IDF troops remain within the ever-expanding “security zone”
in Lebanon, but that they will have no restrictions on their operations, to
preserve “all of the IDF’s achievements in the
campaign in Lebanon.”
What those achievements are remains unspoken. The IDF
has killed over 4,000 people and wounded
some 12,000 others, and
has occupied Lebanon up to the Litani River, and in some places beyond that.
The UN estimates some 1.4 million Lebanese have been displaced by the war,
and Amnesty International says it
amounts to an illegal forced population transfer.
Within the Israeli polity, the stances are either to
maintain an open-ended war and occupation, or to escalate dramatically, with
National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir leading a call to “burn” the
entirety of Lebanon, leading to international
condemnation. As
ever, the chances of Israel agreeing to end the war in the near-term in any
meaningful way seem remote.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario