USS Liberty Massacre: A Pivotal Moment in the Hostile Takeover of America
KEVIN BARRETT • JUNE 6, 2024
Did the feds seize Scott Ritter’s passport because Ritter was going to Russia for a conference—or
because Ritter has outspokenly supported the
Palestinian resistance? I suspect it’s the latter. After all, I (among
others) was prevented from traveling to Iran by
Zionists occupying the US Treasury Department, not by American patriots. (Our citizen diplomacy
with Iran benefited the US, but was bad for Israel.)
It’s increasingly obvious that the war on free speech
is almost entirely a Jewish-Zionist thing. Examples:
*The Washington Post just launched a Zionist-directed hit piece against
The Gray Zone—obvious
revenge for The Gray Zone’s taking the lead in exposing the fact that most of the atrocities of October 7
were committed by Israel, not Hamas.
*Zionist-Occupied
Washington is preparing to blackmail the Maldives for its anti-Israel stance.
We’ll discuss these stories,
and more, on Saturday’s
False Flag Weekly News.
How did we reach the point
that a hostile foreign nation’s fifth column has terminated the American free
speech experiment? Below is my new Crescent piece addressing that issue.
-KB
USS Liberty Massacre: A
Pivotal Moment in the Hostile Takeover of America
By Kevin Barrett, for Crescent
International
In corporate America, hostile
takeovers are commonplace. They occur when an aggressor—a larger corporation or
rich individuals—seizes control of a smaller corporation without asking
permission.
What few recognize is that the
United States itself has been subjected to a hostile takeover. Since the
aggressor, the illegitimate settler colony known as “Israel,” is much smaller
than the USA, the takeover has necessarily been surreptitious.
As of June, 2024, Israel’s
gradual takeover of the USA has become obvious and undeniable—a proverbial
“elephant in the living room.” In this election year, all three major
presidential candidates compete for Israel’s favor, even as the whole world
recoils from the Zionist genocide of Gaza. The Democratic incumbent, Joe Biden,
supplies the butcher Netanyahu with all the weapons he needs to massacre tens
of thousands of Palestinian women and children, uttering only occasional peeps
of pro forma protest in a lame attempt to mollify his base.
Biden’s Republican challenger, Donald Trump, openly supports the genocide and
calls on Israel to “finish the job” (of massacring Palestinians). Most
bizarrely of all, the independent challenger Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who offers
a refreshing alternative to mainstream approaches on other issues, has staked
out the most pro-genocide position of the three.
Kennedy’s position is puzzling
for many reasons. As the “alternative” candidate, he might be expected to take
an alternative position on Palestine, especially since it would markedly
enhance his slim chances of becoming president. Young Americans oppose genocide
and side with Palestine, as the ongoing campus protests demonstrate. If RFK Jr.
harnessed that youthful energy by reversing course and announcing his support
for Palestine, he would immediately gain tens or even hundreds of thousands of
enthusiastic youthful volunteers who would start ringing doorbells and
promoting his candidacy, just as anti-Vietnam-war students did for his father
in 1968. Since polls show that most Democratic voters oppose Biden’s pro-Israel
stance, and that American public opinion overall is following world public
opinion in the direction of ever-stronger support for Palestine, RFK Jr. could
conceivably win a plurality of votes, and the presidency, by leading that
shift. Instead, he has chosen to doom his candidacy by echoing the ultra-genocidal
ravings of his handler, Rabbi Schmuley Boteach.
Though Kennedy decries the
corrupt forces that have taken over America, and denounces the coups d’état
that killed his father (1968) and uncle (1963), he seemingly fails to recognize
who was behind the takeover and the killings. Kennedy knows and openly states
that his father was not killed by the hypnotized Palestinian patsy Sirhan
Sirhan. He acknowledges Sirhan’s innocence and has worked to free him from
prison. But the significance of the fact that the perpetrators chose a
Palestinian to falsely take the blame apparently escapes him.
In his blockbuster Brothers,
David Talbot presents convincing evidence that Robert F. Kennedy Sr. was
murdered because he was about to become president—and use the power of his
office to bring to justice the killers of his brother, President John F.
Kennedy. So who were those killers? Michael Collins Piper’s Final
Judgment makes a strong case that David Ben Gurion, the
Israeli Prime Minister who resigned under pressure from JFK, and Israel’s CIA
mole James Jesus Angleton, were the ringleaders. The motive: Prevent JFK from
shutting down Israel’s nuclear program, and insert Israel’s asset Lyndon B.
Johnson into office to oversee the 1967 land-grab war.
Anyone who doubts that Johnson
was an Israeli asset needs to read Peter Hounam’s Operation Cyanide:
How the Bombing of the USS Liberty Nearly Caused World War III. Hounem
discovered evidence that then-President Johnson scrambled US nuclear bombers on
highest-level alert more than one hour before the USS Liberty
was attacked by Israel on June 13, 1967. Then when the ship miraculously stayed
afloat, radioed for help, and identified its attackers as Israelis, the
President of the United States issued a treasonous order: “I want that goddamn
ship going to the bottom. No help. Recall the wings.”
Most Americans have no idea
that Israel attempted to sink the unarmed US spy ship USS Liberty and murder
its crew of 293 sailors so the attack could be falsely blamed on Egypt. Nor do
they realize that the Zionists succeeded in killing 34 sailors and wounding
171. Even less do they know that the sitting US president was complicit and
yearned for the death of every one of those 293 American servicemen.
Why don’t more Americans know
about the USS Liberty massacre? A draconian cover-up, in which surviving
sailors were told to keep quiet or bad things would happen to their families,
persisted for decades. Simultaneously the mainstream media published a smattering
of ludicrous assertions that the Israelis had attacked the ship by accident.
Those were rare exceptions to a general blackout on the topic.
Why would the media cover up
such a sensational story? That question raises an even more basic one: Who
controls the media? The president who followed Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, knew,
but was afraid to talk about it in public. Privately, he discussed the matter
with friends and advisors like the Rev. Billy Graham, who told Nixon that
powerful Jews “are friendly to me because they know that I’m friendly with
Israel. But they don’t know how I really feel about what they are doing to this
country.” “You must not let them know,” Nixon replied.
“This stranglehold has got to
be broken or the country’s going down the drain” Graham continued. Nixon: “Do
you believe that?” Graham: “Yes, sir.” Nixon: “Oh boy. So do I. I can’t ever
say that, but I believe it.”
Today, as we approach the 57th anniversary
of Israel’s massacre of American sailors aboard the USS Liberty, the United
States of America has gone even further down the drain than it was in 1972,
when Nixon’s conversation with Graham took place. Today, anyone who mentions
the extraordinary power of America’s 2% Jewish minority, specifically its
organized lobby groups and sway over media, finance, politics and organized
crime (which are not mutually exclusive categories) will be viciously smeared,
their careers and reputations ruined by a group so powerful that it has
prohibited any mention of its power.
Some try to avoid the smears
by speaking of the “Zionist lobby” rather than the “Jewish lobby.” But the
distinction is largely semantic. Virtually all of the power of organized Jewry
supports Zionism, including every one of the 50 groups represented at the
Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. Since the
Zionist entity defines itself as the “Jewish state” and its
presumptive citizens as all Jews on Earth, regardless of where they live,
calling its American contingent “the Jewish lobby” is reasonable and
accurate—just as Irish-Americans who lobby for Ireland, albeit without the
power of their Jewish counterparts, are an “Irish lobby.”
Others prefer the term
“Zionist” because it includes so-called Christian Zionists like Billy Graham.
But as the tapes of his conversations with Nixon show, Graham’s professed
Zionism was insincere. The only reason Graham pretended to support Israel was the
same reason Nixon pretended to support Israel: Both men were terrified by the
power of the Jews. And while there are no doubt some sincere Christian
Zionists, they are mere useful idiots in the quintessentially Jewish project of
building an ever-expanding, ever-more-powerful Jewish state representing not
just Israel’s Jewish citizens, but all the Jews of the world.
Looking back on the 1967 war
and its context, including the USS Liberty massacre, one is struck by the
Jewish state’s willingness to engage in risky and reckless behavior. Normally,
if a small nation of just a few million people murdered a sitting US president,
as Israel did in 1963, it might expect to be scrubbed from the face of the
Earth. “Oy vey, if we get caught!” Israeli leader Golda Meir was reported to
have said shortly after the JFK assassination. Meir also said, on two
occasions, that Israel would destroy the world with nuclear weapons rather than
accept military defeat. (The source for both statements was Meir’s personal
friend, former lead Mideast BBC correspondent Alan Hart.)
Today, the Zionist entity is
still taking enormous risks—and pushing the world toward nuclear armageddon.
Its genocide of Gaza has cast it as the enemy of all humanity. Its repeated
attacks on regional countries, and its assassinations of Iran’s top generals
and suspected assassination of the Iranian president and foreign minister, have
brought the Muslim East, and the world, to the proverbial precipice. And its
complete death grip on power in America has destroyed the American republic and
is driving the now-fascist US empire to destruction.
Like the brave soldiers on the
wounded USS Liberty, who cobbled together makeshift communications equipment
after the Zionists had bombed their antenna, and managed to broadcast a message
revealing the identity of their attackers, we need to piece together what is
left of our Enlightenment-era free communications network and use it to inform
the world who the enemy really is.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario