End of an Era: Pro-Palestine Language Exposes Israel, Zionism
by Ramzy
Baroud Posted on June 07, 2024
If one were to argue that a top Spanish government
official would someday declare that “from the river to the sea, Palestine would
be free”, the suggestion itself would have seemed ludicrous.
But this is precisely how Yolanda Diaz, Spain’s Deputy
Prime Minister, concluded a statement on May 23, a few days before Spain
officially recognized Palestine as a state.
The Spanish recognition of Palestine, along with the
Norwegian and Irish recognition, is most important.
Western Europe is finally catching up with the rest of
the world regarding the significance of a strong international position in
support of the Palestinian people and in rejection of Israel’s genocidal
practices in occupied Palestine.
But equally important is the changing political
discourse regarding both Palestine and Israel in Europe and all over the world.
Almost immediately after the start of the Israeli war
on Gaza, some European countries imposed restrictions on pro-Palestinian protests, some
even banning the Palestinian flag, which was perceived,
through some twisted logic, as an antisemitic symbol.
With time, the unprecedented solidarity with Israel at the start of the war, however,
turned into an outright political, legal and moral liability to the pro-Israel
western governments.
Thus, a slow shift began, leading to a near-complete
transformation in the position of some governments, and a partial though clear
shift of the political discourse among others.
The early ban on pro-Palestinian protests was
impossible to maintain in the face of millions of angry European citizens who called on their governments to end their blind support
for Tel Aviv.
On May 30, the mere fact that French private
broadcaster TF1 hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu led to
large, though spontaneous, protests by French citizens, who called on their
media to deny accused war criminals the chance to address the public.
Failing to push back against the pro-Palestine
narrative, the French government has, on May 31, decided to disinvite Israeli military firms from
participating in one of the world’s largest military expos, Eurosatory, scheduled for June 17-21.
Even countries like Canada and Germany, which supported the Israeli genocide against Palestinians until
later stages of the mass killings, began changing their language as well.
The change of language is also happening in Israel
itself and among pro-Israeli intellectuals and journalists in mainstream media.
In a widely read column, New York Times writer Thomas Friedman attacked
Netanyahu late last March, accusing him of being the “worst leader in Jewish
history, not just in Israeli history”.
Unpacking Friedman’s statement requires another
column, for such language continues to feed on the persisting illusion, at
least in the mind of Friedman, that Israel serves as a representation, not of
its own citizens, but of Jewish people, past and present.
As for the language in Israel, it is coalescing into
two major and competing discourses: one irrationally ruthless, represented by
far-right Ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and
Bezalel Smotrich, in fact, by Netanyahu himself; and another, though
equally militant and anti-Palestinian, which is more pragmatic.
While the first group would like to see Palestinians slaughtered in large numbers or wiped out through a nuclear bomb, the other realizes that
a military option, at least for now, is no longer viable.
“The Israeli army does not have the ability to win
this war against Hamas, and certainly not against Hezbollah,” Israeli Army
Reserve Major General Yitzhak Brik said in an interview with the Israeli newspaper
Maariv on May 30.
Brik, one of Israel’s most respected military men, is
but one of many such individuals who are now essentially repeating the same wisdom.
Strangely, when Israel’s Minister of Heritage Amihai
Eliyahu suggested the “option” of dropping a nuclear bomb on the
Strip, his words reeked of desperation, not confidence.
Prior to the war, the Israeli political discourse
regarding Gaza revolved around a specific set of terminology: ‘deterrence’,
represented in the occasional one-sided war, often referred to as ‘mowing the
lawn’ and ‘security’, among others.
Billions of dollars have been generated throughout the
years by war profiteers in Israel, the US and other European countries, all in
the name of keeping Gaza besieged and subdued.
Now, this language has been relegated in favor of a
grand discourse concerned with existential wars, the future of the Jewish people, and the possible end of Israel if not Zionism itself.
While it is true that Netanyahu fears an end to the
war will be a terrible conclusion to his supposedly triumphant legacy as the
‘protector’ of Israel, there is more to the story.
If the war ends without Israel restoring its so-called
deterrence and security, it will be forced to contend with the fact that the
Palestinian people cannot be relegated and that their rights cannot be
overlooked. For Israel, such a realization would be an end to its
settler-colonial project, which began nearly a hundred years ago.
Additionally, the perception and language pertaining
to Palestine and Israel are changing among ordinary people across the world.
The misconception of the Palestinian ‘terrorist’ is being quickly replaced by
the true depiction of the Israeli war criminal, a categorization that is now
consistent with the views of the world’s largest international legal
institutions.
Israel now stands in near-complete isolation, due, in
part, to its genocide in Gaza but also to the courage and steadfastness of the
Palestinian people, and to the global solidarity with the Palestinian cause.
Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the
Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest
book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak
Out. His other books include My Father was a Freedom Fighter and The
Last Earth. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center
for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario