Iconos

Iconos
Volcán Popocatépetl

viernes, 17 de abril de 2020

Spreading the Virus of Occupation: Spitting as a Weapon in the Hand of Colonial Israel
Spitting at someone is a universal insult. In Israel, however, spitting at Palestinians is an entirely different story.
Now that we know that the deadly coronavirus can be transmitted through saliva droplets, Israeli soldiers and illegal Jewish settlers are working extra hard to spit at as many Palestinians, their cars, doorknobs, and so on, as possible.
If this sounds to you too surreal and repugnant, then you might not be as familiar with the particular breed of Israeli colonialism as you may think you are.
In all fairness, Israelis have been spitting at Palestinians well before the World Health Organization (WHO) lectured us on the elusive nature of the COVID-19 disease and on the critical need to apply "social distancing".
Indeed, if you Google the phrase "Israeli spitting", you will be inundated with many interesting search results, the like of “Jerusalem Judge to Jews: Don’t Spit On Christians“, “Christians in Jerusalem want Jews to Stop Spitting on Them“, and the more recent, “Israel Settlers Spitting on Palestinian Cars Raises Concern over 
over Attempt to Spread Coronavirus”.
Interestingly, most of these coverage throughout the years has been carried out by Israel’s own media, while receiving little attention in Western mainstream media.
One could easily classify such degrading acts as yet another example of the Israelis’ false sense of superiority over Palestinians. But the deliberate attempt at infecting occupied Palestinians with the coronavirus are beneath contempt, even for a settler-colonial regime.
Two particular elements in this story requires a pause:
First, that acts of spitting at Palestinians and their properties, by both occupation soldiers and settlers have been widely reported in many parts of occupied Palestine.
This means that, within a matter of days, the Israeli army and settlers’ cultures so swiftly adopted their pre-existing racism to employ a deadly virus as the latest tool in subjugating and harming Palestinians, whether physically or symbolically.
Second, the degree of ignorance and buffoonery that accompany these racist and degrading acts.
The power paradigm that has governed the relationship between colonial Israel and colonized Palestinians has, thus far, followed a typical trajectory, where Israel’s bad deeds often go unpunished.
Those racist Israelis who are deliberately trying to infect Palestinians with the COVID-19 are not only criminal in their thinking and behavior, but utterly foolish as well.
When Israeli soldiers arrest or beat up Palestinian activists, they are as likely to contract the coronavirus as they are to transmit it.
But, of course, Israel is doing much more to complicate, if not entirely hinder, Palestinian efforts aimed at containing the spread of the coronavirus.
On March 23, a Palestinian worker, Malek Jayousi, was tossed out by Israeli authorities at the Beit Sira military checkpoint, near Ramallah, after he was suspected of having the coronavirus.
Video footage of the poor worker huddling near the checkpoint, after he was "dumped like trash", has gone viral on social media.
As shocking as that image was, it was repeated in other parts of the West Bank.
Of course, the Palestinian workers were not tested for the virus but had merely exhibited flu-like symptoms, enough to make Israel dispose of them as if their lives did not matter in the least.
Two weeks later, the Palestinian Governor of the occupied city of Qalqiliya, Rafi’ Rawajbeh, told reporters that the Israeli army has opened several wastewater tunnels near the northern Palestinian city, with the aim of smuggling Palestinian workers back to the West Bank, without prior coordination with the Palestinian Authority.
Without testing hundreds of those smuggled workers, the PA, already operating with limited capacity to confront the disease, will find it impossible to contain the spread of the virus.
Palestinian claims of Israel’s deliberate attempt at worsening the spread of the coronavirus in Palestine was further confirmed by the Geneva-based Euro-med Monitor, which, on March 31, called on the international community to investigate the "suspicious behavior" of Israeli soldiers and Jewish settlers.
During Israeli army raids on Palestinian homes, soldiers "spat at parked cars, ATMs and shop locks, which raises fears of deliberate attempts to spread the virus and cause panic in the Palestinian society," Euro-Med stated.
Article 56 of the Fourth Geneva Convention does not say anything about the need for members of the Occupying Power to stop spitting at occupied and subjugated communities; most likely, because it is a given that such sordid behavior is completely unacceptable and does not require a separate textual reference.
However, Article 56, as was recently emphasized by UN Special Rapporteur for the situation of human rights in the Palestinian Territory, Michael Lynk, does require Israel, the Occupying Power, to "ensure that all the necessary preventive means available to it are utilized to ‘combat the spread of contagious diseases and epidemics.’"
Israel, however, is failing its legal mandate, and horribly so.
Even the Israeli mayor of Jerusalem, Moshe Leon, has himself stressed the inequality in the official Israeli response to the spread of the coronavirus.
In his letter of April 7 to the Israeli Health Ministry Director-General, Moshe Bar Siman Tov, Leon warned against "the serious shortage of medical equipment at (Palestinian) hospitals in (occupied) East Jerusalem, particularly protective equipment and equipment to conduct coronavirus testing."
Despite the severe shortages in East Jerusalem and West Bank hospitals, the situation  in the besieged Gaza Strip is simply disastrous, as Gaza’s Health Ministry has declared on April 9 that it has run out of its coronavirus test kits, which never amounted to more than few hundred, in the first place.
This means that the many Gazans who are already under quarantine will not be released any time soon, and that new cases will not be detected, let alone cured.
We have repeatedly warned in the last few weeks that this terrifying scenario was going to happen, especially as Israel is using the coronavirus as an opportunity to further isolate Palestinians and to barter potential humanitarian aid with political concessions.
Without immediate and sustainable intervention from the international community occupied Palestine, and especially impoverished and besieged Gaza, could become a hotbed for COVID-19 for years to come.
Israel will never relent without international intervention. Without being held accountable, even a deadly virus will never alter the habits of a vile military occupation.
Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and editor of The Palestine Chronicle.  He is the author of five books. His latest is These Chains Will Be Broken: Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons (Clarity Press, Atlanta). Dr. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA), Istanbul Zaim University (IZU). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net.
He is the author of five books. His latest is These Chains Will Be Broken: Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons (Clarity Press, Atlanta). Dr. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA), Istanbul Zaim University (IZU). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net.

jueves, 16 de abril de 2020


LÓPEZ OBRADOR
Los opositores al presidente Andrés Manuel López Obrador están intensificando su campaña para convencer a la mayor parte de la ciudadanía de que es tiempo de sacarlo del poder, pues su manejo de la pandemia del coronavirus no ha sido el adecuado, principalmente en el tema económico, al considerar que no está utilizando todos los elementos a disposición del Estado mexicano para apoyar a las micros y pequeñas empresas que son las que aportan el 70% del empleo del país.
Si bien, López Obrador ha tratado de mantener una comunicación constante con los grandes oligarcas beneficiarios[1] del modelo neoliberal imperante en el país (aún hasta la actualidad) la realidad es que la mayoría de ellos le tienen una enorme desconfianza, no sólo por su discurso político, que desde hace treinta años los culpa de la mayoría de las desgracias económicas y sociales del país, sino también porque en el año y cuatro meses que lleva en el gobierno les ha cortado diversos mecanismos mediante los cuales estos multimillonarios han aumentado aún más su riqueza (consolidación fiscal, eliminada; devolución de impuestos, casi eliminada; concesiones de obras públicas y compras de gobierno, ya no están aseguradas para sus empresas, etc.).
Sin embargo, López Obrador no es un marxista-leninista y sabe muy bien que sin el concurso de los oligarcas y de la iniciativa privada en general, el sistema económico no puede funcionar pues aunque tilden sus opositores de izquierdista al presidente mexicano, la realidad es que está muy lejos de ser un impulsor del socialismo o el comunismo
Lo que le queda mejor es la cantaleta de populista, ya que su muy limitado programa de gobierno está enfocado a detener la sangría enorme de los recursos públicos de la corrupción y el favoritismo a ciertos grupos empresariales y político-empresariales, para redireccionarlos hacia los sectores pobres del país (que según cifras oficiales comprende al 50% de la población; según cifras de expertos en pobreza, más apegadas a la realidad, es el 70% de la población).
De ahí su frase de “primero los pobres” que sin embargo en medio de la crisis económica inducida por el obligatorio confinamiento social, provocado por la pandemia del coronavirus, está implicando que la atención del gobierno federal vaya a los sectores más necesitados (programas sociales, apoyos directos, préstamos con tasas bajas, etc.), dejando de lado cualquier apoyo a las grandes empresas e incluso a medianas y pequeñas, así como a gremios de profesionistas y trabajadores, que se podrían agrupar en la clase media, a la cual también ha dejado sin atender el gobierno en sus planes y programas económicos y sociales.
López Obrador está tratando de apuntalar su gobierno en tres apoyos fundamentales, para contrarrestar la animadversión de los oligarcas; crecientemente de la clase media (por el alejamiento de su gobierno respecto a este segmento), y las trasnacionales, que no han avalado algunas políticas de López Obrador, como la energética (deteniendo las rondas de concesión de contratos de exploración y extracción de hidrocarburos; la construcción de una nueva refinería; la disminución de las importaciones de gasolina; el aumento de recursos públicos para Pemex, etc.); la cancelación del aeropuerto internacional en Texcoco; la consulta mediante la cual se rechazó que continuara la construcción de la cervecera Constellation Brands en Mexicali, y el impulso de ciertas obras públicas, como el Tren Maya, al cual no le ven una utilidad y rentabilidad claras.
Esos tres apoyos son: sus bases sociales, que reciben las transferencias directas de recursos de su gobierno (becas para estudiantes, apoyo para discapacitados, adultos mayores, madres solteras; para la siembra de árboles, entre otros), que suman alrededor de 22 millones de personas (López Obrador recibió treinta millones de votos en las elecciones presidenciales del 2018); las fuerzas armadas (que están siendo involucradas en una serie de tareas como la construcción del Aeropuerto Felipe Angeles en Santa Lucía; la dirección de una red de hospitales públicos durante la pandemia; la creación de la Guardia Nacional con elementos del Ejército y la Marina, para el combate a la inseguridad; más sus tareas en materia de apoyo en desastres naturales y en defensa de la seguridad del país). Y el gobierno de Donald Trump (al que se le han hecho todas las concesiones que ha demandado en lo comercial, con un tratado muy favorable a Estados Unidos como el T-MEC; en lo migratorio, aceptando a todos los solicitantes de asilo en la Unión Americana de cualquier nacionalidad, en territorio mexicano y el despliegue de la Guardia Nacional en la frontera sur para detener el flujo migratorio irregular; y en la seguridad, atendiendo los reclamos para detener los cargamentos de fentanilo que pasen ilegalmente por México y extraditando a todos los narcotraficantes mexicanos que el gobierno estadounidense demande).
Y con todo y esos tres importantes apoyos, en estos momentos el gobierno de López Obrador está contra la pared debido a que por la pandemia y las medidas para combatirla (el confinamiento social), el Fondo Monetario Internacional prevé una caída de hasta 5.9% de la economía mexicana, del orden del que se vivió durante la Gran Recesión del 2008-9. Además de que el desempleo se ha disparado y se presume que seguirá creciendo durante el año.
Así también, sigue incontrolada la inseguridad en el país, sin que las autoridades federales, estatales y municipales, hayan podido hacer algo para evitarlo, aún con las medidas de confinamiento social, que teóricamente tendrían que haber incidido en una disminución de los hechos delictivos en el país.
López Obrador señaló desde el principio de su administración que a mitad del periodo presidencial preguntaría a la población si debía continuar o no en su cargo. Ya se aprobó la reforma constitucional para la realización de tal consulta, por lo que en marzo del 2022 se llevará a cabo dicho ejercicio democrático.
Sin embargo, ante el aumento de la campaña de los opositores de López Obrador en su contra, el presidente les propuso adelantarla al 2021, coincidiendo con las elecciones intermedias, lo cual fue rechazado por la mayoría de los partidos de oposición.
López Obrador está apostando a que en la segunda mitad de este año, y especialmente en la primera mitad del 2021, la economía del país comience a recuperarse (el FMI considera que podría crecer el próximo año hasta en un 3%), con lo que las penurias de este 2020 quedarían atrás, y eso sumado a sus programas sociales y los apoyos a microempresas y grupos vulnerables, generarán un gran apoyo para su gobierno e incluso para la muy mal ensamblada y organizada coalición partidista que le apoya, lo que le daría una mayoría ampliada en las elecciones para renovar la Cámara de Diputados y en varias elecciones para gobernador.
En cambio, los oligarcas, los partidos de oposición y las trasnacionales que están en contra de López Obrador, sienten que están en un muy buen momento para acabar por separar a la clase media de López Obrador (quizás entre 5 y 8 millones de los votos que obtuvo López Obrador en 2018 vino de este segmento), pues los altos niveles de aprobación del presidente en su primer año de gobierno (del orden del 75%), ahora han comenzado a descender a entre 55 y 60% debido a un creciente desgaste de la figura presidencial por su sobreexposición a los medios (todos los días aparece en sus conferencias de prensa “mañaneras”), los estragos que la pandemia están ocasionando en la población; la falta de insumos médicos para hacer frente a la misma; la permanencia de los altos niveles de inseguridad en el país; y en especial los devastadores efectos económicos que el confinamiento social y productivo está teniendo en la economía nacional.
El problema radica en que si los opositores a López Obrador logran su cometido de que se le revoque el mandato al presidente en el 2022, quedaría como presidente un substituto nombrado por el Congreso, que en caso de tener mayoría favorable a López Obrador, designaría a algún cercano colaborador suyo, así que parece un exceso de voluntarismo de los opositores de López Obrador creer que su campaña en contra del presidente tendrá un resultado que los favorezca, más allá de que puedan disminuir algunos puntos más la todavía alta popularidad presidencial.
Lo que es un hecho indiscutible es que el país seguirá por la ruta de la mediocridad, ya que el programa de gobierno de López Obrador no resuelve, ni por mucho, los grandes problemas nacionales.
Si bien ha atacado la corrupción, no lo ha hecho a través de mecanismos institucionales que puedan asegurar el mantenimiento de esta política en el tiempo, es decir, un nuevo presidente puede revertirla sin mucho problema; la inseguridad no ha disminuido con la creación de la Guardia Nacional, pues se requiere una transformación a fondo de las policías, el aparato de procuración y administración de justicia y el sistema carcelario del país, algo que ni remotamente se ha planteado este gobierno; la pobreza no se terminará solamente con las transferencias monetarias a una parte de los sectores pobres del país, y unas cuantas obras públicas tampoco van a cambiar de fondo la estructura desigual del sistema productivo nacional, que está concentrado en unas 10 o 12 entidades federativas y está volcado a cubrir las necesidades de un 30% de la población y de la potencia hegemónica, dejando en el olvido al resto del país, que debe debatirse en condiciones precarias y en la economía informal (56% de la población económicamente activa); además, con todas las concesiones hechas a Trump, México se ha convertido en un protectorado estadounidense, dejando al país enormemente vulnerable ante la potencia hegemónica; el desastre medioambiental es imparable, y se ha profundizado en este gobierno, que no ha tomado en serio las implicaciones del cambio climático, pues una cosa es que discursivamente se reconozca el riesgo, y otra muy distinta que eso se refleje en el presupuesto y en políticas públicas. Lo mismo vale para ciencia y tecnología, que han quedado fuera de las prioridades gubernamentales, con presupuestos raquíticos y poca prioridad en la agenda gubernamental.
La desgracia es que los opositores no proponen algo mejor, sino regresar a las políticas de favorecer a ciertos grupos económicos y políticos y olvidar a la mayoría, lo que por supuesto no va a sacar al país de su mediocridad.
Pero por supuesto, nadie aceptará que sus “propuestas” son más de lo mismo y por el contrario, todos los partidos, sectores y grupos de interés se consideran los salvadores de México, cuando en realidad solo les interesa salvarse a si mismos, a costa de los demás.

miércoles, 15 de abril de 2020


Trump goes after WHO(m)?
April 15, 2020
After days of criticizing the World Health Organization for being too lenient with China over Beijing's opaque mismanagement of the initial coronavirus outbreak, and too slow to communicate the risk for the rest of the world, US President Donald Trump said late Tuesday that the US plans to stop funding the WHO for 60-90 days.
Why does it matter?
The US is by far the largest single funder of the 194-member World Health Organization, contributing as much as $500 million every two years in dues and voluntary contributions.
Why is he doing it?
First, there are important and legitimate questions here about whether the WHO was too credulous of China's early claims, and whether it moved too slowly to declare a global pandemic. To be fair, cutting funding to the WHO in the middle of a global health emergency might not be the wisest way to get that accountability, but it's bold. The WHO, for its part, says it has limited leverage over individual nation-states anyway, and that it acted in line with the available data.
Second, there's a US-China angle. The Trump administration, with significant bipartisan support, sees China as a global rival these days. One big beef is China's growing clout at UN-affiliated international organizations. By cutting off the WHO, even for two or three months, Washington is sending Beijing a message that it's willing to play hardball with organizations that seem to cut China slack. But this can backfire too: when the US pulls back from these organizations, China gets a bigger vacuum to fill.
Third, there's domestic politics. Trump knows that the coronavirus pandemic has hurt his chances of re-election (his critics say that's because he's bungled the crisis, while he's mainly worried about the collapsing economy). He knows that hitting out in China is good politics with his base. His move here comes right as Senate GOP bigwigs open their own investigations into the WHO and China.
Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, the virus doesn't care what Trump thinks of the WHO. For Trump to really make political hay out of this, he has to be reasonably confident that the US is moving past the "peak" of coronavirus deaths. If the public health crisis takes another turn for the worse, that will overshadow any political benefit to him and his re-election campaign.

lunes, 13 de abril de 2020

SIGN THE OPEN LETTER
To the Government of the United States
and the United Nations
April 9, 2020
Dear Friends of Peace, Justice and Human Rights Around the World,
The global spread of COVID-19 has exposed the illegal and immoral practice of imposing unilateral coercive measures (economic sanctions) by the United States government against more than thirty nations. The economic war against those nations had already resulted in the unimaginable suffering of the people in the targeted nations even before the COVID-19 pandemic.
With the devastation of the global pandemic, the targeted countries — especially Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, Syria, and Zimbabwe — are finding it prohibitively difficult to protect and save the lives of their citizens in the face of the ongoing global emergency. These sanctions constitute crimes against humanity.
Instead of helping these countries fight the devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the government of the United States is now using the public distraction caused by the pandemic to intensify its military actions against the targeted nations. It is increasing its threats against Iran and Syria by engaging in a silent buildup of its military forces in Iraq again and has dispatched its Naval warships to the shores of Venezuela, demanding the total surrender of the Venezuelan government to the United States.
Only a global wave of popular protest can stop these anti-human policies and actions.
Please use the link provided below to sign the Open Letter to the Government of the United States and the United Nations, addressed to the President of the United States and Secretary-General of the United Nations, demanding that all U.S. and UN sanctions against the targeted nations be lifted, and all U.S. military threats and actions against them are stopped immediately.
We are dealing with a global emergency and must act quickly.
Sanctions Kill!
Click Here to Sign the Open Letter
(in several languages)
  • Tim Anderson, Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies
  • Noam Chomsky, Professor Emeritus, MIT; Professor, U. of Arizona
  • Gerald Horne, Historian, University of Houston, Texas
  • Vijay Prashad, Tricontinental Institute for Social Research
  • Cornel West, Harvard University
  • Iraklis Tsavdaridis, World Peace Council
  • Bahman Azad, U.S. Peace Council
  • Ajamu Baraka, Black Alliance for Peace
  • Medea Benjamin, CODEPINK
  • Jackie Cabasso, United for Peace and Justice
  • Nathaniel Chase, International Action Center
  • Omowale Clay, December 12th Movement
  • Gerry Condon, Veterans for Peace
  • Darien De Lu, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom — US Section
  • Sara Flounders, International Action Center
  • Miguel Figueroa, Canadian Peace Congress
  • Margaret Flowers, Popular Resistance
  • Bruce Gagnon, Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
  • Roger Harris, Task Force on the Americas
  • Chuck Kaufman, Alliance for Global Justice
  • Margaret Kimberley, Black Agenda Report
  • Joe Lombardo, United National Antiwar Coalition
  • Alfred Marder, U.S. Peace Council
  • Makasi Metoma, People’s Power Assemblies
  • Teri Mattson, CODEPINK
  • Nancy Price, Alliance for Democracy (US)
  • Cindy Sheehan, March on the Pentagon
  • David Swanson, World BEYOND War
  • Emily Thomas, IFCO Pastors for Peace
  • Gail Walker, IFCO: Pastors for Peace
  • Yasemin Zahra, US Labor Against the War
  • Kevin Zeese, Popular Resistance

***

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT SANCTIONS PLEASE VISIT:

SanctionsKill.org

***

U.S. Peace Council • P.O. Box 3105, New Haven, CT 06515 • (203) 387-0370 • USPC@USPeaceCouncil.org
• https://uspeacecouncil.org • https://www.facebook.com/USPeaceCouncil/ • @USPeaceCouncil
Action Network
Sent via Action Network, a free online toolset anyone can use to organize. Click here to sign up and get started building an email list and creating online actions today.
Action Network is an open platform that empowers individuals and groups to organize for progressive causes. We encourage responsible activism and do not support using the platform to take unlawful or other improper action. We do not control or endorse the conduct of users and make no representations of any kind about them.
You can unsubscribe or update your email address or change your name and address by changing your subscription preferences here.

domingo, 12 de abril de 2020


Trump aprovecha la pandemia para nutrir la xenofobia
Alerta FBI sobre el aumento de crímenes de odio
David Brooks
Corresponsal
Periódico La Jornada
Domingo 12 de abril de 2020, p. 23
Nueva York., La pandemia sin precedente en Estados Unidos no sólo está contagiando a inmigrantes que realizan labores esenciales, sino que también es aprovechada por el gobierno de Donald Trump para impulsar medidas aún más severas contra los migrantes y nutrir la xenofobia.
Las políticas de Trump ya habían impuesto un régimen de terror entre comunidades migrantes, donde a pesar de la emergencia de salubridad continúan las redadas de agencias migratorias, como el ICE, que a mitad de la pandemia de coronavirus genera temor de solicitar asistencia médica o económica o acudir a servicios médicos como hospitales y clínicas ante la preocupación de ser identificados por la Migra.
Una y otra vez Trump ha hecho referencia a el muro como parte de su respuesta al coronavirus y con ello insiste en su narrativa de que este enemigo invisible, como otras amenazas, proviene del exterior.
Trump, al culpar a extranjeros de esta pandemia está multiplicando los crímenes de odio por todo el país, no solo contra mexicanos o latinoamericanos, sino ahora también contra asiáticos. El presidente y varios de sus secretarios han insistido en bautizar al Covid-19 como el virus Wuhan y virus chino, a pesar de directivas explícitas de la Organización Mundial de Salud y del propio Centro de Control de Enfermedades de Estados Unidos (CDC) de no aplicar etiquetas geográficas o de etnias a los virus.
Como resultado, se han multiplicado incidentes racistas contra asiáticos, incluyendo ataques físicos y verbales. La Agencia Federal de Investigaciones (FBI, por sus siglas en inglés) emitió una alerta confidencial sobre el incremento de crímenes de odio contra asiático-americanos, señalando que pueden poner en peligro a comunidades de descendencia asiática por todo el país, reportó ABC News.
Agrupaciones de derechos civiles denuncian que el uso de retórica racista por políticos genera incidentes de odio de costa a costa, incluyendo agresiones, como por ejemplo en el Metro de Nueva York, los gritos a una mujer asiática: ¡Regrésate a China!, y en otro ¡Ustedes son los culpables, que chequen tu temperatura!, además de incidentes donde hay violencia potencialmente letal.
“El asalto contra la migración ocurrió mucho antes de que llegara el virus a nuestras costas. Las políticas de Trump construyen la idea de que los extranjeros están atacando a Estados Unidos y que necesitamos poner a ‘America primero’”, comentó Erica Lee, directora de historia de inmigración en la Universidad de Minnesotta, en entrevista con PBS.
Por otro lado, la pandemia es utilizada por el actual gobierno para poner en marcha nuevas medidas antimigrantes con el pretexto de la emergencia de salud, incluyendo anular en los hechos el derecho al asilo en la frontera con Mexico.
La administración de Trump ha expulsado a casi 10 mil migrantes desde el 21 de marzo, empleando medidas de emergencia de salud. Con ello ha logrado deportar de inmediato, sin ninguna evaluación, a casi todo indocumentado que cruza la frontera, reporta el Washington Post.
El comisionado del Servicio de Aduanas y Patrulla Fronteriza, Mark Morgan, informó al periódico que Estados Unidos cerró casi por completo sus fronteras a solicitantes de asilo, incluyendo a los que intentan ingresar de manera legal en un cruce oficial. Pero insistió en que todo esto no tiene que ver con la política de migración, sino que la causa es la crisis de salud pública en Estados Unidos; y señaló que México da apoyo a estas medidas al aceptar a migrantes de origen centroamericano que están siendo expulsados.
Por su parte, Amnistía Internacional acusa al gobierno de Trump de no ofrecer protección adecuada a los casi 40 mil migrantes que están detenidos, incluidos los que están en centros donde ya hay brotes de coronavirus. Estados Unidos ha confirmado más casos de Covid-19 que ningún país del mundo, pero el ICE sigue sin adoptar medidas eficaces para evitar la pandemia en los centros de detención de todo el país, poniendo así en peligro la seguridad de todos, afirmó Erika Guevara Rosas, directora para las Américas de Amnistía Internacional.
Varias agrupaciones están exigiendo la liberación de los detenidos en los centros de detención, donde se está propagando el contagio y son potenciales hornos de la muerte, comenta el reverendo Juan Carlos Ruiz a La Jornada.
Diversas organizaciones exigen que como tantos migrantes están haciendo trabajo designado oficialmente como esencial en medio de esta emergencia, cesen las redadas y deportaciones, además, que los trabajadores sean dotados con más equipo de protección y acceso a seguros de salud, entre otras cosas. [https://www.jornada.com.mx/ 2020/04/11/mundo/024n1mun].
Ante esta pandemia... que estamos viviendo, el Frente Indígena de Organizaciones Binacionales (FIOB) expresa y exige enérgicamente a los gobiernos estatales y federal poner atención a las necesidades económicas y humanas que en este momento enfrentan los trabajadores considerados esenciales, declaró la organización, y junto con otras organizaciones de migrantes indígenas hicieron un llamado nacional [https://medium.com/@PrensaComunitar/ los-pueblos-ind%C3%ADgenas-en-la-diáspora-denuncian-una-respuesta- discriminatoria-ante-covid-19-727be2ec3bfe ].
“En estos momento en que trabajadores migrantes están brindando servicios esenciales –desde producción de alimentos a salud– es indignante que este gobierno se enfoque en aterrorizar a migrantes para sus propósitos electorales de 2020… la crueldad es el punto”, afirmó Frank Sharry de America’s Voice.
Por otro lado, los efectos de las políticas de Trump y las consecuencias económicas devastadoras para la comunidad migrante tendrán efectos en todos los países de la diáspora, incluyendo a Mexico.
Un nuevo informe de BBVA calcula que las remesas a México se desplomarán 17 por ciento este año o más, dependiendo de la evolución de la crisis, y que posiblemente se recuperarán a los niveles anteriores en una década. Los tres entidades más afectadas serán Michoacán, Oaxaca y Zacatecas, ya que las remesas representan más de 10 por ciento del PIB estatal.
Para mayor información y actualizaciones: https://www.jornada.com.mx/sinfronteras


viernes, 10 de abril de 2020


APRIL 10, 2020
As people come to grips with the announcement today that Bernie Sanders has suspended i.e. dropped out of, his campaign, a myriad of collective feelings will have to run their inevitable course.
My first reactions are that I feel profoundly let down. In the middle of Holy Week, for God’s sake! While the virus is peaking and people are losing things right and left, how does it help that he does this now?
Bernie has always had terrible timing, a consequence of having bad advisors from the beginning. He always seemed to be reluctant to agree to anything people were crying out for him to say, especially to stop calling Biden a ‘good and decent’ man, his good friend, Joe Biden, the party’s only remaining nominee: an old man with a credible sexual assault allegation recently come to light; a serial plagiarist, a promoter of the worst policies the centrists had to offer.
Let me put this in clear terms: Joe Biden, the Democratic Party choice for President- a man with diminished mental capacities is going against one of the most ruthless contenders in Presidential history, Donald J. Trump. On Bernie’s watch, and with his participation by concession, the Democratic Party will be utterly destroyed in November, and will have richly deserved it.
Bernie would also not fight back against Warren and her outrageous sexism charge. He wanted his kindly reputation to endure in a campaign that was not supposed to be about him.
In the end, this campaign was all about Bernie. This may not sound very charitable. I could not believe, however, that there were no admissions of any missteps in his concession speech. No mention that he could have done more to address the concerns of many people.
For instance, although he said he was inclusive, he did not pay any particular regard to those not in the minority segments or youth age brackets that he was trying to romance. He would not stray from the talking points hammered into our brains, trying to burn a legacy into place, to make the case that he was the originator of these ideas, and, in my view, trying a little too hard to rewrite history.
His last speech as a contender showed him once more taking credit for these ideas becoming mainstream. Although he clearly was a defender or at least a constant repeater of these ideas, was he helping “build a movement” by stamping his brand all over them? The progressive ideas that he embraced did not belong to him. Occupy was involved in income inequality long before Bernie hitched his wagon to that star.
Bernie did not come up with a tax on speculation on Wall Street (an idea that I supported in my run as an Independent from Maine for US Senate in 2008). It actually came from James Tobin, an economist who won the Nobel Prize. Tobin originated the concept of the STT (Securities Transaction Tax), which would be an optimal way to fight back against the tax breaks and cuts that Congress has showered on the rich for several decades. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1981/press-release/]
The fight for minimum wage has been a progressive effort since I was young, hardly a new idea. Not a Sanders idea, although to be fair, he has strongly endorsed the idea for a long time. The same goes for single-payer or healthcare for all. Others, notably Physicians for a National Health Plan (PNHP) have fought these fights on behalf of the progressive cause.
Bernie adopted those ideas into the progressive platform he ran on. The need was evident, but the ideas are not new and are not his alone. Maybe he has fought for these things in the Senate and as an Independent from Vermont, which would be a reasonable thing to do to stay in power, since they are among the most popular ideas for change in the country.
I am not impressed that Bernie could not summon the willpower to respond to the efforts of those who wanted him to go to battle. I wrote many columns trying to appeal to him to suit up. I attended ten of his campaign events in New Hampshire this time out and wrote and made videos to support his efforts from the beginning of this second campaign. I have tried to reach the campaign to no avail, to urge them to heighten their response and sharpen their attack on substandard candidates’ ideas.
Bernie was staggeringly passive; he let one opportunity after another go whizzing past with weak responses, if any, in the face of a growing Democratic resurgence determined to destroy him. His silences emboldened the corporate centrists, and confused supporters, who thought he would take the huge advantage they gave him and surge forth, brandishing fury and determination. Instead, he endlessly equivocated.
I have to own my part in this: I was stunned in 2016 when he said Hillary was right and that nobody cares about her damn emails. From the beginning, I saw him back down. Everything since then has been consistent: he never went full tilt. He wanted to be loved more than being right at all costs. He was able to be loved again, and forgiven again, and able to let us down again. Yet I went along with it; I still worked on his behalf.
Despite his recent abdication (and, for some of us, his serial betrayal) Bernie Sanders will be remembered fondly, and he will likely be forgiven by the majority of his followers. Jacobin Magazine has written an article entitled “Thank You, Bernie,” making the case that Sander's two campaigns have made it possible to talk about socialism in America. It’s now okay apparently that he will be endorsing and campaigning for Joe Biden, who shamed Anita Hill and is now shaming Tara Reade. I have lived to witness the day this has happened. It is not a joke.
After losing last time, Bernie did an amazing job of trying to convince his hardcore supporters to stay in the Democratic Camp to support Clinton. Why would he not support Dr. Stein in 2016, who endorsed his platform? If he wanted a Revolution, she and the Green Party were the logical choices.
Why does he stay in the race now, collecting delegates which may still come his way this time around? He hasn’t succeeded in explaining this, which leads to the speculation that he is doing this to keep all the possible votes and funding he can collect, turn them over to the Democrats for political gain, retain his Senatorial standing, and not be hated later like Ralph Nader. That’s why. He says it is to oppose Trump. We must keep following him on this, apparently, even in his absence. I guess he will be out there making Joe’s case for him since he cannot make a compelling case anymore.
This time, he has left the race early, in April, with half the States not having even voted yet, with supporters that sent him money, who are now without a leader. Bernie can claim that he did not stay and fight his ‘good friends.’
In 2016 I was a Bernie candidate for State Rep. and a Bernie delegate and caucus captain and helped to start and run a pop-up office in York County, Maine and taught area workers how to fight in the caucus for him.
When he dropped out last time and supported Hillary, I protested at a rally and his rally people had me arrested for waving a green scarf in support of Jill Stein. I was literally dragged out by two policemen.
Bernie Sanders has caused me more effort and personal grief for the least amount of satisfaction of anyone I have ever known. No one else has asked so much of me and done so little, and not followed through on their promises.
He said he would stay in the fight. He wants people to support his platform and fight for his delegates at the convention. He just will not do it himself.
He is a consummate politician. He has saved himself and bowed out while we are struggling through a pandemic. Who told him this would be a good idea? He could have just said that he would be there on the ballots so the Democratic Party had an alternative in the event that Biden could not survive the allegations of rape and the demands of leading in a pandemic and staying mentally capable. These are real liabilities.
Sanders dropped out at the last possible point for Joe to make some bizarre case that he could credibly be the Democratic nominee; any longer and Joe would, and will, spectacularly bomb out, leading to four more years of Trump.
Bernie, you were the alternative. You ran the race, you did the work, you deserved to hang in there. You should have fought hard for a better deal and not sold us out in the stimulus package. That was a disaster. Your bright colors are starting to fade in the reality of this crisis. You did not call for an explanation for the allegations of rape against your “good friend.”
You never called out for Julian Assange to be dealt with decently. You sidestepped that issue of conscience. So many missed opportunities to do some good while you had the floor.
I am on a rant. Others will come after, and say other things. We are all pretty mad at you. More than most, I spent time and treasure to help you do the job. Why couldn’t you finish what you began? Not from the Senate. From the Presidential campaign that we contributed funds to, hoping you would lead.
Why, why, why? I will go to my grave wondering what the hell happened that I could believe in you again, be duped the same way again, and still want to see some good in all you did.
It’s just time to pick up and move on, a rather hard thing to do while we are all imprisoned in our own homes because of a bug. The man that could speak for us has just folded his tents. Gone, like a thief in the night. Good grief! Good night and good luck.
LAURIE DOBSON, a new member of the ThisCantBeHappening! news collective, is a veteran political activist, and current Democratic Convention ‘Bernie’ delegate for the Cranberry Isles, Maine, writes for various blogs and is an EMT, USCG-certified captain, landscape design business owner, and columnist. See her website: EndUSWars.org.