Resistance Axis: a calculated, simultaneous strike on Israel
A Hezbollah source tells The Cradle that Iran,
Lebanon, and Yemen will launch simultaneous retaliatory strikes against Israel,
intended to overwhelm the Iron Dome. Let's wait and see.
AUG 5, 2024
https://thecradle.co/articles-id/26276
West Asia stands on a knife’s edge as the region’s
Axis of Resistance prepares to retaliate against a series of recent Israeli
assassinations and aggressions.
Iran, Hezbollah, and Yemen’s Ansarallah-aligned armed
forces have vowed to make the occupation state pay a heavy price following the
targeted killing of Hamas political bureau chief Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran and Hezbollah senior commander Fuad Shukr in southern Beirut.
Additionally, Israel bombed the Hodeidah port in Yemen
following Sanaa’s successful ‘Yafa’ drone operation in Tel Aviv on 19 July.
An official from the Lebanese resistance has
informed The Cradle that “The response will come at once from
Iran, Hezbollah, and Yemen,” adding that the goal was to “inflict a painful
blow to Israel which may not be achieved should separate retaliations be
pursued.”
Executing the ‘Unity of Fronts’
Retaliation is all but certain and could happen within
hours, according to senior US officials. A report yesterday by Axios claims that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken
informed his G7 counterparts that the response could begin as early as within
the next 24 hours.
Just yesterday, Ali al-Qahoum, a member of the
political bureau of Ansarallah, emphasized that the response to Israel will not just come
from Tehran:
We affirm our commitment to the battle, steadfastness,
awareness, honor, and pride in standing with Palestine, the cause of the
nation.
The critical question now is the scope and severity of
the retaliation. Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah has promised a painful yet calculated blow to Tel Aviv.
During Shukr’s funeral procession, Nasrallah warned that Israel had crossed the
line, promising “a real and well-calculated response” – distinct from the
cross-border operations Hezbollah has conducted against Israel since 8 October.
Flattening the Iron Dome
Other well-informed sources
agree that the response could be coordinated, suggesting that retaliation from
multiple fronts simultaneously is likely. They tell The Cradle that
such an approach could take Israel’s primary air defense system, the Iron Dome,
out of commission by preventing it from rapidly rearming. They believe this is
achievable given Hezbollah’s capacity to launch a significant barrage of
missiles and given Lebanon’s geographical proximity to potential Israeli
targets.
These assessments appear to be
consistent with those made by US officials who have warned that
the Iron Dome could be overwhelmed by Hezbollah’s missile and drone arsenal
should a full-scale war erupt.
Senior US military officials,
meanwhile, have gone on the record cautioning that
Washington would probably be unable to provide Tel Aviv with sufficient
protection even in a single front, full-scale war with Hezbollah.
US Joint Chief of Staff Charles Brown said as much in his remarks to the press
in late June.
From our perspective, based on
where our forces are, the short-range between Lebanon and Israel, it’s harder
for us to be able to support them [Israel] in the same way we did in April
[with Operation
Truthful Promise].
Unwilling US support for Tel
Aviv
Although much has been said
about the US and its allies successfully thwarting Iran’s response to the
Israeli attack on its consulate last April, it is noteworthy that all
targeted Israeli
military bases were hit during the Iranian retaliatory strikes.
Operation Truthful Promise was intended more as a message,
indicating that Tehran would no longer tolerate Israeli aggression against its
interests.
US military reinforcements in
the region may help intercept missiles and drones coming from Lebanon,
while Jordan could
also play
a part as it did during Iran’s retaliatory strikes. However, this also
makes US military assets and those of its partners legitimate targets for the
Resistance Axis.
As former Pentagon analyst
Michael Maloof explains to The Cradle:
Hezbollah would likely target
US warships in the region that would take part in intercepting missiles
directed at Israeli targets.
“As in 2006, I envision US
involvement focused more on evacuating many of the 86,000 Americans now in
Lebanon who would want to leave,” adds Maloof.
Washington’s top military
officials also appear firmly opposed to being drawn into an active offensive
role should a wider war erupt with Hezbollah, let alone a dreaded multi-front war. This stance
is supported by statements from US Joint Chiefs of Staff Charles Brown,
indicating the Pentagon’s limited willingness to protect Israel.
Note that Washington’s pledges
to defend Israel have made no mention of potential offensive action,
reflecting an American desire
to avoid a wider war. Experts doubt the US will become heavily involved in
any full-scale war, supported by public statements underscoring the importance
of avoiding regional escalation – and voiced more privately, the desire to keep
US military targets safe from retaliatory strikes.
Military risk and political
calculations
As Brown said at the time,
Washington’s main message is:
To think about the second
order of effect of any type of operation into Lebanon, and how that might play
out and how it impacts not just the region, but how it impacts our forces in
regions as well.
The general – the most senior
ranking US military official and the senior military advisor to the White House
– was delivering a message that carries special significance amidst the recent
developments.
By stating that an
Israeli-initiated war on Lebanon put US troops at risk, Brown was essentially
saying that a wider regional war was not seen as helping US interests by the
Pentagon’s top brass.
Given these statements, it
remains possible – though far from guaranteed – that the outgoing Biden
administration may rein in Israel regardless of how painful a blow is delivered
to it by the Axis of Resistance.
The upcoming US election in
November is another factor that may prevent a regional conflagration. “The US
getting more militarily involved with Israel,” warns Maloof, “would lead to
riots in the streets of Chicago at the Democratic Convention later this month.”
These realities suggest a
scenario where Washington might force Tel Aviv to absorb the Axis of
Resistance’s retaliation, however severe it may be.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario