ICC judges stoic in face of US sanctions over Israeli war crimes cases
Staff at the International Criminal Court have
described the sweeping effect of US sanctions on their daily lives.
By Tim Hume and AP
12 Dec 2025
Judges and prosecutors at the International Criminal
Court (ICC) have been cut off by banks, credit card companies and tech giants
like Amazon as a result of sanctions brought by the United States President
Donald Trump administration over war crimes investigations into Israeli and US
officials.
The Associated Press news agency reported on Friday on
the sweeping and punitive effect of the US sanctions on nine staff members –
including six judges and the chief prosecutor – of The Hague court.
The measures, introduced in an executive order by
Trump earlier this year, block their access to basic financial services and
everyday activities like online shopping and email, and prevent them from
entering the US, subjecting them to the same restrictions as those brought
against figures like Russian President Vladimir Putin, who nevertheless was
allowed to visit the US state of Alaska for a summit with Trump in August.
“Your whole world is restricted,” Canadian judge
Kimberly Prost, one of the ICC officials targeted by the sanctions, told AP.
The ICC, the world’s permanent war crimes tribunal
with 125 member states, was targeted with the restrictions in February, with
the White House saying the move was in response to the “illegitimate and
baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel”.
The order followed the ICC’s move to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for “crimes against humanity and
war crimes” committed during its genocidal war on Gaza.
‘Now I’m on a list with those implicated in terrorism’
Prost, who was named in the latest round of sanctions
in August, told AP that she had lost access to her credit cards, had purchased
e-books vanish from her device, and Amazon’s Alexa stopped responding to her.
“It’s the uncertainty,” she said. “They are small
annoyances, but they accumulate.”
Prost had been sanctioned for voting to allow the
court’s investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity
committed in Afghanistan, including by US soldiers and intelligence operatives.
“I’ve worked all my life in criminal justice, and now
I’m on a list with those implicated in terrorism and organised crime,” she
said.
Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza, a sanctioned Peruvian
judge, said the US travel sanctions, which also extended to family members,
meant her daughters could no longer attend conferences in the US.
The sanctions threaten businesses and individuals with
substantial US fines and prison time if they provide sanctioned people with
“financial, material, or technological support”, driving them to withdraw
services to the targeted individuals.
“You’re never quite sure when your card is not working
somewhere, whether this is just a glitch or whether this is the sanction,”
deputy prosecutor Nazhat Shameem Khan told the AP.
Reports of threats over warrants
The sanctions are reportedly only one of the measures
that have been levelled against the court in an attempt to exert
pressure over the arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant.
In July, the Middle East Eye (MEE) website reported that the court’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan,
was warned that he and the ICC would be “destroyed” if the warrants were not
withdrawn.
The threat reportedly came from Nicholas Kaufman, a
British-Israeli defence lawyer at the court linked to a Netanyahu adviser. Khan
said the Israeli leader’s legal adviser told him he was “authorised” to make
Khan a proposal that would allow the prosecutor to “climb down the tree”, the
news website reported.
The site reported in August that Khan had also been
privately warned by then-British Foreign Secretary David Cameron in April the
previous year that the UK would defund and withdraw from
the ICC if it issued
the warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant, while in May 2024, US Republican
Senator Lindsey Graham also “threatened” Khan with sanctions if he applied for
the warrants.
In May, Khan’s office announced he had taken a leave of absence pending the conclusion of a UN-led investigation
into allegations of sexual misc
His lawyers said he rejected all claims of wrongdoing
and had only stepped aside temporarily due to intense media scrutiny.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario