EXCLUSIVE: The US-Israeli plot to partition Syria's West
Tel Aviv and Washington have birthed a dangerous
geopolitical project uniting Israel, sectarian Salafist militias, and foreign
lobbying networks to reshape Syria and Lebanon under the guise of 'minority
protection.' Will the Levant fall for it?
AUG 13, 2025
https://thecradle.co/articles/exclusive-the-us-israeli-plot-to-partition-syrias-west
“When you look at the map of Syria, I mean, it looks
like a flat Rubik's cube because of the way that the country is divided up, and
what we are talking about is mainly the governance of the western part of the
country.” -Senator
James Risch during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on 13 February
It began with a seemingly offhand statement by US Senator James Risch, chair of the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee, just weeks ahead of the March coastal massacres in Syria against the Alawite minority.
“My idea,” he expounded, “is we need to focus on this
western part and continue to look at the others. But the first objective is if
you do not get a handle on this you are not going to get a handle on the rest
of the country.”
Testifying before the Committee on US policy
post-former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, managing director of the
Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Michael Singh, responded:
“I think that we can focus on what is happening in
western Syria, deal with the government there, while also trying to encourage
and maybe facilitate this process of coming together among these groups.”
But these remarks have since crystallized into a
structured, multi-front operation now moving steadily toward execution. The
“Western Syria” project has now shed any ambiguity, emerging as a concrete
blueprint that fuses sectarian engineering with foreign military coordination,
aimed at carving out new realities on both sides of the Syrian–Lebanese border
– under Tel Aviv’s supervision.
A plan spanning Syria and Lebanon
The scheme extends deep into Lebanon, where an
orchestrated campaign against Hezbollah is intended to disarm the resistance
movement while redeploying armed Syrian factions from Lebanon to the coastal
strip. The right-wing Israeli government, acting as both sponsor and chief
architect, directs the plan through two named coordinators –General “Yael” and
Captain “Robert.”
Marketed publicly as a mission to safeguard
minorities, especially Christians, the plan’s hidden mechanism is to stage
attacks on churches, monasteries, and heritage landmarks across the coast.
These provocations are designed to inflame sectarian tensions, creating the
pretext for an Israeli-led intervention.
One of the earliest signs emerged in Tartous, where
internal security announced the arrest of a cell accused of plotting to attack the Mar Elias Maronite Church in Safita, not to
be confused with the suicide bombing of the Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church
in Damascus in June. The revelation – delayed by three weeks
– sparked suspicions of Israeli infiltration of Syrian security
structures.
Internal Security Forces Chief in Tartous, Abdelal
Mohammad Abdelal, said the plot was foiled in a “high-level security operation”
after extensive surveillance and was based on “precise intelligence indicating
that an outlaw group affiliated with remnants of the deposed regime was
surveilling Mar Elias Maronite Church in the village of Khreibet, in the Safita
countryside.”
However, many saw it as a calculated move to unsettle
Christian communities and justify external involvement.
Two days before that announcement, partisan media
channels circulated an unverified statement claiming the formation of a
so-called “Christian Military Council” under the name Elias Saab – a figure
absent from any credible public record.
The declaration spoke of organizing Christian fighters
who had defended their communities against extremist factions like Hayat Tahrir
al-Sham (HTS), who are now integrated into the state’s security forces.
It called for uniting fighters from Mhardeh,
Al-Suqaylabiyah, Sadad, Maaloula, and Tartous under one legal and military
umbrella, documenting crimes against Christians for presentation to
international bodies, ensuring their representation in any political
settlement, and opposing partition while defending a unified, secular Syria.
While this narrative has circulated in partisan
outlets, there is no independent verification of its authenticity or the
council’s existence. Its sudden appearance, timed just before heightened
tensions in the coastal region, has fueled speculation about its role as a
manufactured proxy front to justify foreign involvement under the guise of
‘minority protection.’
The US-Israeli scheme takes shape
On 5 August, in the US capital, the government
relations and strategic advisory firm Tiger Hill Partners announced it would serve as the official representative of
the “Foundation for the Development of Western Syria.”
Specializing in government relations and strategic
lobbying, Tiger Hill pledged to advocate for Christians, Druze, Alawites,
Kurds, and “moderate Sunnis” while working with US policymakers to shape
Syria’s political transition. The one-year contract, valued at roughly $1 million, was filed publicly and framed as a mission to ensure
minority rights remain central to Washington’s Syria policy.
In late July, a coastal faction calling itself “Men of Light – Saraya al-Jawad” made its debut. The group’s statement attacked Abu
Mohammad al-Julani (Ahmad al-Sharaa), Qatar’s emir, and Turkiye’s president,
while offering thanks to Egypt, Israeli journalist Eddy Cohen, and notable
expatriate Alawite, Druze, and Christian figures – including Sheikh Hikmat
al-Hijri, Mazloum Abdi, and Patriarch John al-Yaziji. Although ridiculed for
its unusual tone, its appearance dovetailed with coordinated moves behind the
scenes.
That coordination became more visible on the 17 July,
when the Tel Aviva Hotel in Israel hosted a closed meeting between government
officials, Syrian Alawites, and Syrian Druze figures. The attendees included
seven long-exiled Alawites and Druze linked to Sheikh Muwafaq Tarif’s circle –
the Druze leader in Israel – both Syrian and Israeli nationals. A second
meeting followed on the 21st–22nd, just before Saraya
al-Jawad’s unveiling and the release of its operational footage.
An Alawite–Druze alliance
On 6 August, Eddy Cohen, an Israeli journalist
and commentator on Arab affairs, announced on his Arabic-language Facebook page the
preparation of an Alawite–Druze alliance in the US. Observers have paired this
with an alleged leaked audio recording of a Syrian woman – said to be related
to a former senior officer with Israeli ties – speaking to another participant
in the Tel Aviv meetings.
In the recording, she reportedly described
coordination between a secular Syrian expatriate network and Israeli
intermediaries, noting specifically that one of the councils involved held
shares in Tiger Hill. The recording also alleged plans to covertly deploy some
2,500 foreign fighters into Syria, dispersing them across Homs and the coastal
region.
Despite the project’s determined momentum, domestic
and external actors are moving to block it, even offering intelligence support
to the Sharaa administration despite disputing its legitimacy. This
counter-effort has already thwarted the Safita church attack and prevented a
major bombing in Damascus.
A partition map in the making
As one credible regional security source informs The
Cradle:
“Israel seeks to exploit Syria’s sectarian and ethnic
divisions to use minorities as political and military tools, serving its plan
to partition the country and open two strategic corridors: an eastern one
linking Suwayda to Hasakah, and a western one running from Syria’s coast to
Afrin, securing multi-front influence and encircling the Turkish axis from
within.”
“Western Syria” may remain in the shadows or step
fully into the open, but its trajectory is unmistakable: a deliberate
dismantling of Syria’s territorial cohesion, draped in the language of minority
protection and enforced through foreign-backed militias and political
fronts.
For Damascus, Beirut, and the wider region, this is no
distant or hypothetical threat, but an active campaign already reshaping the
map to the advantage of outside powers.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario