France's U-turn on Netanyahu's ICC immunity criticized as a 'lie' and 'double standard'
Lawyers, rights groups and politicians accuse Paris of
misrepresenting the Rome Statute after its volte-face on obligation to arrest
and surrender Israel's PM to the ICC
By Elodie
Farge
Published date: 28 November 2024
France's claim that Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could benefit
from immunity from international arrest after a warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) has
drawn strong criticism from prominent human rights organisations, lawyers and
political leaders.
Asked on French radio about the possibility of an
arrest in France of the Israeli prime minister, Foreign Affairs Minister
Jean-Noel Barrot mentioned possible “questions of immunity” for “certain
leaders” provided for by the Rome Statute, which created the ICC.
“It is ultimately up to the judicial authority to
decide,” Barrot said.
In a statement published later on Wednesday, the foreign
affairs ministry stated that France would respect its international obligations
and fully cooperate with the ICC, but it added that the Rome Statute
governing the ICC provided that a state cannot be required to act "in a
manner incompatible with its obligations under international law with regard to
the immunities of states not party to the ICC”.
Israel is not a signatory to the ICC and has claimed
that it cannot be held to account under the Rome Statute.
The Quai d’Orsay added that “such immunities apply to
Prime Minister Netanyahu and the other ministers concerned and will have to be
taken into consideration if the ICC were to ask us for their arrest and
surrender.”
"In accordance with the historic friendship that
binds France to Israel, two democracies committed to the rule of law and
respect for professional and independent justice, France intends to continue to
work closely with Prime Minister Netanyahu and other Israeli authorities to
achieve peace and security for all in the Middle East," the ministry
added.
The statement represented a volte-face from the initial French
reaction to the
ICC's decision last week to issue arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his
former defence minister Yoav Gallant, on charges of war crimes and crimes
against humanity committed against Palestinians in Gaza since October 2023.
Last Thursday, France emphasised its commitment to the
court's rulings. According to the Rome Statute, all 124
state parties,
including all EU members, are now under a legal obligation to arrest the pair
and surrender them to the court.
While it can be argued that Netanyahu as a serving
prime minister is entitled to immunity before national courts, the rules under
international courts are unequivocal in rejecting immunity for individuals under
their jurisdiction, experts told Middle East Eye last week.
‘Harmful double standard’
It is the first time a member of the ICC has argued that Netanyahu is
covered by immunity as a sitting head of government because Israel is not a
member of the ICC.
France has never publicly raised the issue of immunity
for Russian President Vladimir Putin and former Sudanese head of state Omar al-Bashir - who have been
issued arrest warrants by the ICC for, respectively, the war crime of deporting
Ukrainian children and crimes against humanity in Darfur - although these
countries are not ICC states parties.
For specialists, the French position does not hold up.
“The heads of states do not enjoy immunity before the
ICC, period, irrespective of whether they belong to state parties or also to
non-party states,” international law professor at Leiden University, Giulia
Pinzauti, told MEE last week.
Amnesty International secretary general Agnes
Callamard declared on X that France's statement “runs counter to
France's fundamental obligations as a member state of the ICC”.
“A cornerstone principle of the ICC Statute is that no
one is above the law, including heads of state sought for arrest, such as
Vladimir Putin or Benjamin Netanyahu. This has been confirmed in a decision by
the Court's Appeals Chamber in jurisprudence which is binding on all member
states,” she explained.
“France's position is deeply problematic. Rather than
inferring that those indicted by the ICC may enjoy immunity, France should
expressly confirm its acceptance of the unequivocal legal duty under the Rome
Statute to carry out arrest warrants, and affirm that all persons subject to
ICC arrest warrants will be arrested and surrendered to the Court if they find
themselves in France's jurisdiction,” Callamard stressed.
For the France director of Human Rights Watch (HRW),
Benedicte Jeannerod, the French position is "shocking".
“Has French diplomacy misread Article 27 of the Rome
Statute, which clearly states that there is no immunity for the most serious
crimes under the ICC?” she asked on X.
“They apparently read it differently regarding Putin.
Harmful double standard," she added.
The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
also called the move a "complete disgrace”.
"The arrest warrants of the ICC are
non-negotiable,” FIDH wrote in a statement, adding that the French position "dangerously
undermines” international law “at a time when it is urgently needed”.
“Such remarks are unacceptable and fall short of the
rigour and competence expected of French diplomacy,” said the Human Rights
League (LDH), FIDH’s member organisation in France.
“There was no question of immunity for Mr Putin:
this double standard is damaging to France’s reputation, particularly in
relation to the countries of the South."
French lawyer and political activist Juan Branco explained on X that immunities relating to heads of
non-member states mentioned in Article 98 of the Rome Treaty “are not applicable in our
country”.
“There is, today, in French law and according to its
own judges, no incompatibility between our international obligations and the
execution of the arrest warrant targeting Mr Netanyahu,” he wrote.
“It is inconceivable that the Legal Affairs Department
of the Quai, among the most renowned in the world, did not warn the minister
that the Paris Court of Appeal had, on 26 June 2024, ruled that the personal
and functional immunities of heads of state and government were irrelevant
concerning the commission of crimes punishable by customary international law,
including obviously all those covered by the Rome Statute.”
Last June, the Paris Court of Appeal validated an arrest warrant for Bashar al-Assad, accused
by French investigating judges of complicity in crimes against humanity for the
deadly chemical attacks of August 2013 attributed to the Syrian president. The decision decisively changed the
French case law on the immunity of sitting heads of state, recognising for the
first time that the personal immunity of a sitting head of state is not
absolute.
The ‘deal’ behind the deal
According to Branco, the statement by the Quai
d'Orsay "is clearly the result of maximum political pressure."
On Wednesday, Israeli media Haaretz and Maariv suggested that France’s statement on Netanyahu’s
possible immunity had been linked to negotiations with Israel to accept a ceasefire in Lebanon.
Macron has been deeply involved in ending the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in recent months.
At the end of September, Paris and Washington proposed a 21-day ceasefire plan
at the United Nations which was publicly dismissed by Netanyahu.
An Israeli source told Haaretz that the French government, according to
the prime minister's circle, agreed to publish this statement only in light of
an Israeli ultimatum and a threat to otherwise leave France out of the
ceasefire negotiations process and mechanism.
While cautioning about the veracity of this “spin”, as
it called it, the Hebrew newspaper added that “a likelier explanation is that France
offered this as a sweetener, knowing that Netanyahu often places his personal
interests above those of the state.”
According to the US news site Axios, US President Joe Biden called Macron on Friday to
tell him of Netanyahu's anger after hearing the first reaction of the Quai
d'Orsay to apply the ICC decision. Macron then reportedly spoke with Netanyahu.
"France agreed to take steps to improve its
relations with Israel, and Israel agreed that France would play a role in
implementing the [ceasefire] agreement," a US official told Axios on
Monday.
Statement denounced as 'shameful'
In France, several political figures, mainly on the
left, have strongly criticised the Foreign Affairs Ministry's announcement and
the possibility of a behind-the-scene agreement with Israel to boost Paris’
stance on the international diplomatic scene.
The leader of the Ecologists party, Marine Tondelier,
called the ministry’s statement “shameful”.
“France once again bows to Benjamin Netanyahu's
demands by choosing him over international justice. Surely this was the ‘deal’
so that France would be cited in the official communique announcing the
ceasefire in Lebanon published jointly by France and the United States
yesterday,” she wrote on X.
Tondelier denounced “a historic error, a very, very
serious one”.
“We are taking down international justice and the
multilateral system that we have patiently built for decades. But also, quite
simply, what is left of our international credibility. It is tragic,” she
added.
Manuel Bompard, coordinator of left-wing party France
Unbowed (LFI), adopted a play on words after sharing a news piece titling that
“Netanyahu enjoys ‘immunity’, according to French diplomacy”.
"Isn't it rather 'impunity'?" he asked on X.
“The government's complicity in the genocide of the
Palestinians is total,” tweeted LFI MP Louis Boyard.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario