Declaring war on the West Bank will only sink Israel deeper
Israel’s aggressive expansion into the West Bank,
echoing the devastation in Gaza, reveals a broader strategy to crush the
Palestinian resistance, exert further control, and reshape the region – yet all
it does is hasten the collapse of the Oslo framework and the collaborative
Palestinian Authority.
SEP 2, 2024
https://thecradle.co/articles/declaring-war-on-the-west-bank-will-only-sink-israel-deeper
The current Israeli invasion of the
already-occupied West Bank has exposed the stark reality of Israel and its
decades-long occupation of Palestine: the extent of extremism within its
government, the repetitive and ineffective tactics of its army, the diminishing
‘authority’ of Mahmoud Abbas, the obsolescence of the Oslo Accords, the
increased pressure on the Jordanian monarchy, and the undeniable complicity of
the US in these daily atrocities.
This major offensive in the West Bank – the
occupation state’s largest since the Second Intifada, carries profound implications. As the Israeli
government continues its 11th month of war against the Gaza Strip, it has
expanded its genocidal campaign to another part of historic Palestine,
signaling a new phase of conflict akin to a ‘Gaza 2.0.’
Gaza 2.0
By attacking the West Bank, Israel has made clear that
its actions against Gaza were not solely a reaction to last year’s Hamas-led
resistance operation, Al-Aqsa Flood, but are part of a broader strategy to
“Judaize” all of Palestine, as Palestinian resistance groups have
continuously asserted since the latest war erupted.
During the latest session of the Israeli government’s
weekly meeting, Israeli Minister of Environmental Protection Idit Silman placed
the cities of Jenin and Nablus in the same category as the Gaza–Egypt border
and reiterated Israel’s right to all of Palestine, stating:
In the Philadelphi Corridor, in Jenin and
Nablus, we must attack in order to inherit the land. [Inheritance] is the term
that must be used, not the term’ occupation’ of the land.
The same day, Minister of Settlements and National
Missions Orit Strook called on Israel’s Military Secretary and security cabinet
to “declare a state of war in the West Bank.”
Indeed, the factors driving the current explosion in
the West Bank mirror those that ignited Gaza. Since the war on Gaza began,
Israel has intensified its brutal tactics in the West Bank: over 650
Palestinians have been killed, including over 150 children.
The occupation forces have conducted more than 10,300
operations, accompanied by an increase in settlement activity and the
distribution of tens of thousands of weapons to settler gangs, further
escalating attacks on indigenous Palestinian communities.
Even Ronen Bar, the head of Israel’s own security
agency, the Shin Bet, has warned of the rise in “Jewish terrorism,” cautioning
that such extremism could further damage Tel Aviv’s international standing and
regional alliances.
Despite these warnings, the occupation state has
learned little from its short past. Israel’s ongoing campaign in the West Bank
continues to employ familiar but futile tactics – assassinations (most recently and notably, Tulkarem’s Abu Shujaa), destruction (especially in Jenin and Tulkarem),
imprisonment, intimidation, land confiscation, and the demolition of homes and
infrastructure – all in a futile attempt to uproot Palestinian resistance,
which has been developing its capabilities despite harsh, repressive
conditions.
The current aggression, driven by the
ultra-nationalist factions within the Israeli government, is a calculated move
to exert control over the West Bank, similar to its brutal tactics in Gaza. As
Foreign Minister Israel Katz stated:
We must deal with the threat just as we deal with the
terrorist infrastructure in Gaza, including the temporary evacuation of
Palestinian residents and whatever steps are required. This is a war for
everything and we must win it.
At least for the short-term, Israel has been
emboldened by favorable conditions: widespread support among the Israeli public
for aggressive actions, the need for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s
government to claim an internal “victory,” and a sense of impunity bolstered by
the lack of effective US or Arab deterrence.
Opening the floodgates of resistance
The occupation state’s largest West Bank raid since
2002 reveals that its strategy is not just a reaction to isolated events but a
broader campaign to dismantle Palestinian society and resistance and deny their
right to self-determination and autonomy.
The invasion is not merely a continuation of the
response to Al-Aqsa Flood; rather, it is part of a larger effort to target
Palestinians wherever they are and break their morale. The tactics employed in
Gaza – destruction, devastation, and death – are being replicated, albeit to a
lesser degree, in the West Bank, despite the failure in Gaza and the resistance it has fomented.
The West Bank has witnessed not only a rise in
conventional resistance operations (coordinated by Hamas and the Palestinian
Islamic Jihad), such as shootings, stabbings, ambushes, and ramming attacks,
but also the return of martyrdom operations and car bombs and the emergence of the use of RPG shells for the first time.
Israeli leaders and ultra-nationalist factions have
long advocated for inflicting severe pain on Palestinians, and Netanyahu now
sees an opportunity to achieve this through a new wave of violence in key West
Bank cities like Jenin, Tulkarem, Tubas, Nablus, Ramallah, and most recently,
Hebron.
Jenin, in particular, the focal point of the 2002
battle (and the more recent ‘Battle of the Fury of Jenin’ in July 2023), is
seen as a persistent threat to the occupation entity, namely due to the camp’s
residents showing strong social cohesion, which, “Unlike many other cities and villages in the
West Bank, the camp is not characterized by political divisions.”
Abbas’ ‘authority’ hangs by a thread
However, Netanyahu may not have fully assessed
the risks. The situation in 2024 is not the same as in 2002;
Israel is already engaged on different fronts as it climbs the escalation ladder. If the West Bank is subjected to a ‘Gaza 2.0’
scenario – with systematic destruction, coordinated attacks, and massive
displacement – the fragile Palestinian Authority (PA) under Abbas could
collapse, burying the Oslo Accords indefinitely and further eroding any
prospects for the so-called two-state solution.
Abbas faces unprecedented challenges. He is besieged
by anger from Palestinians in the West Bank, who are frustrated by the ongoing
suffering of their brethren in Gaza, by the financial stranglehold imposed by
Israel, and by the relentless expansion of settlements. Criticism of Abbas has
reached a crescendo across the West Bank, highlighting a disillusionment with
the PA’s inability to protect Palestinian rights or halt repeated Israeli
incursions, as well as its unwavering security coordination with the occupation.
The collapse of the Oslo Accords would have
far-reaching consequences. The international community’s investment in the PA
as an alternative to armed struggle would be rendered useless. It would be
increasingly difficult to convince any Palestinian or Arab that peace is
possible with the current Israeli leadership, which is marked by its
ultra-nationalist and militaristic stance.
The war beyond the West Bank
The crisis is not limited to the Palestinian
territories. In Jordan, King Abdullah II faces growing challenges as the
Israeli invasion of the West Bank threatens to destabilize his kingdom. Amman,
much Ramallah, is caught in a web of conflicting pressures – unable to sever
ties with Israel or fully align with Palestinian resistance, and now
potentially facing a refugee crisis if Palestinians are displaced en masse from
the West Bank.
It is easy to envision the Jordanian king becoming
ensnared in a wave of public outrage if this scenario unfolds. This is not mere
speculation. Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz, for instance, has
underscored the strategic significance of Israel’s actions in the West Bank
by claiming that Iran is attempting to establish a “terrorist front”
there, similar to those in Gaza and Lebanon. Arming the West Bank resistance is
a long-standing ambition of the Islamic Republic, which has reportedly been conducting a covert smuggling operation
over the past two years.
Other Arab nations that have signed peace treaties or
normalized ties with Israel – i.e., Egypt, UAE, Morocco, Bahrain – can find
themselves in a similar position as Amman if the Israeli onslaught in the West
Bank continues, as Tel Aviv’s actions are a direct affront to the 2002 Arab
Peace Initiative, ratified by the Arab League as recently as 2017. This
initiative, which Saudi Arabia has placed at the heart of a long-sought Israel
normalization deal, calls for a full withdrawal of the Israeli army from the
occupied territories (including the West Bank, Gaza, the Golan Heights, and
Lebanon), a “just settlement” of the Palestinian refugee crisis based on UN
Resolution 194, and the establishment of a Palestinian state with East
Jerusalem as its capital.
Instead, the number of Jewish settlers in the West
Bank has skyrocketed from roughly 70,000 in 2002 to 800,000 in 2024, leaving no
room for the ‘Palestinian state’ that normalizing Arab countries so claim to be
are working towards.
What Netanyahu is doing now serves as nothing more
than a catalyst for Israel’s inevitable end, and this is demonstrated by his
true desire to bury the idea of a promised Palestinian state, as is shown
through Israel’s actions in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
As Israel pushes forward with its aggressive agenda,
the US stance has also come into sharper focus. With significant military
deployments in the region and continued support for Israeli actions,
Washington’s tacit approval – whoever ends up in the White House, gives Netanyahu the latitude to escalate the
conflict further, potentially at the expense of regional stability.
Netanyahu’s pursuit of power through forceful means
risks provoking a regional earthquake akin to the aftermath of the 1948 Nakba,
potentially destabilizing US-backed autocrats and igniting new waves of
resistance not just in the West Bank but across West Asia.
The ongoing violence in the West Bank is not just
another episode of this battle; it is a dangerous escalation that could reshape
the geopolitical order of the region.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario