Iconos

Iconos
Volcán Popocatépetl

sábado, 6 de diciembre de 2025

THE RECONQUEST OF AMERICA BY THE UNITED STATES

The strategy of the Donald Trump administration to remove Nicolás Maduro from power in Venezuela and replace him with a ruler “friendly” to the United States (presumably the opposition candidate in the 2024 presidential elections, Edmundo González) has a larger objective: to “reconquer” the United States’ undisputed dominance in the Americas.

Trump and his key collaborators have redesigned the United States’ hegemonic policy in the world, acknowledging that they cannot maintain their dominance over the entire planet. The excessive military presence (more than 900 military bases worldwide) and the associated economic costs are too burdensome for the American economy and society. Therefore, they have decided to concentrate their resources and attention on their geographically closest areas: the Americas, Europe, and the Pacific.

While Trump has not relinquished the American presence in the Middle East (as evidenced in Gaza); Central Asia and Africa, it has undoubtedly established that its priority is in what it considers the traditional area of ​​influence of the United States, that is, America, Europe and part of the Asia-Pacific region.

And of course, Trump cannot accept the existence of Latin American countries outside the US sphere of influence, such as Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, or those with overly “independent” foreign and/or economic policies, like Brazil or Colombia.

Thus, Trump is using the Venezuelan situation to send a clear message first to Cuba and Nicaragua, but also to other Latin American countries that resist following the lines dictated from Washington.

Trump wants all of Latin America to fall in line with Washington in its strategic competition against China, to unconditionally support key US allies, such as Israel in the Middle East (hence the new initiative by Trump's ally, Javier Milei of Argentina, to launch the so-called “Isaac Agreements” in Latin America); and for the region to be favorable for US investment and trade, given the significant advances China has made in the region over the last two decades (for example, Brazil, Chile, Peru, Uruguay, and Bolivia have larger trade relationships with China than with the United States). It remains to be seen whether the military, economic, and diplomatic pressure on the Maduro regime will finally force him to relinquish power and allow the United States to reconquer Venezuela as another piece on its hegemonic chessboard.

The fact is that if Maduro remains in power in the coming months, rejecting the "exit" demanded by Trump (exile in Cuba, Russia, or even Iran), then the US president will have to make a crucial decision. Whether or not to directly attack the Venezuelan government and armed forces, with all the implications this would have on the international community, the global oil market, the way the United States relates to Latin America, and even the diplomatic response of its European allies; anticipating, of course, the condemnation that China and Russia would express for such a blatant violation of international law.

Furthermore, a segment of the movement that supports Trump (MAGA) opposes continued armed interventions in various parts of the world, and the pretext that the attack on Venezuela is to stop the flow of drugs to the United States is untenable, given that practically 70% of that flow arrives through Mexico.

So, Trump found himself between a rock and a hard place, because if Maduro does not give in to the blackmail, it will force Trump to take military action, and such an action could have many unforeseen consequences for the United States and the world.

viernes, 5 de diciembre de 2025

The billionaire family poised to rewire U.S. media in Israel’s favor

Having acquired Paramount and CBS and eyeing TikTok and CNN, the Ellisons are constructing a pro-Israel information empire with unprecedented reach.

By Will Alden December 4, 2025

https://www.972mag.com/ellisons-paramount-tiktok-israel-media-empire/

In early September, the Hollywood producer Lawrence Bender — known for his work with Quentin Tarantino on films including “Pulp Fiction” and “Inglourious Basterds” — had what he later described as “a really tough conversation” with the investors in “Red Alert,” an Israeli miniseries that dramatizes the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023.

With just weeks remaining before the anticipated release on the second anniversary of the attacks, the show, produced by Israeli mass media company Keshet Media Group, was struggling to secure distribution outside of Israel. The news environment was far from favorable: Israeli fighter jets had just attacked a residential compound in Qatar, and a pledge to boycott Israeli film institutions that were “implicated” in the genocide in the Gaza Strip had collected thousands of signatures in Hollywood.

“No one’s going to want to buy something from the Israelis,” Bender, an executive producer of “Red Alert,” told the investors, as he recalled on stage at a Jewish National Fund–USA conference the following month. Among those investors was the Israel Entertainment Fund, which JNF–USA established last year with the Israeli streaming service Izzy to produce television and film for international audiences, with a focus on projects filmed in the “Gaza Envelope” region of southern Israel. “We were pretty stressed about what we were going to do,” Izzy CEO Nati Dinnar‏, interviewing Bender on stage, recalled.

According to its backers, “Red Alert” is essentially a work of Israeli propaganda at a moment when a majority of Americans view Israel’s government unfavorably. The Israel Entertainment Fund, in a slide deck featuring “Red Alert,” says that its projects benefit Israel by “educating viewers and altering perceptions.” Bender said that “our purpose” in making the show was to “change the conversation” about Israel among Americans, Europeans, and other viewers abroad.

A deal to reach that crucial international audience materialized only after Bender encountered David Ellison, the upstart Hollywood mogul, at a memorial service in September. With financing from his tech billionaire father, Oracle executive chairman Larry Ellison, David Ellison had recently merged his Skydance Media with the old-line movie studio Paramount. “It would be my honor to be a partner in this,” he emailed after watching “Red Alert,” according to Bender. “In Hollywood, that’s a rare thing,” Bender said at the JNF–USA conference, describing the studio head as “a big supporter of Israel.”

Ellison’s “fast ‘yes,’” as he put it, to an Israeli government-aligned drama offers a window into his thinking as the 42-year-old mogul and his octogenarian father — the largest shareholder in his son’s business and among the richest individuals in the world — construct an empire across TV, film, news, and social media. After acquiring Paramount for $8 billion over the summer, and the broadcast network CBS along with it, he finalized a $150 million deal for reactionary online outlet The Free Press in October and installed its CEO, the Zionist pundit Bari Weiss, as the top editor of CBS News. Ellison was drawn to Weiss in part because of her “pro-Israel stance,” according to The Financial Times. 

Under Ellison, Paramount Skydance (as it is now known) has also been vocal in its opposition to any boycott of Israeli films and filmmakers: In response to the September pledge, which was signed by celebrities including Emma Stone and Javier Bardem, Paramount was alone among major studios at the time in publicly condemning the effort as “silencing individual creative artists based on their nationality.” (A month later, after a group called UK Lawyers for Israel issued a legal warning, Warner Bros. Discovery said in a statement that “a boycott of Israeli film institutions violates our policies” on discrimination.) At the same time, according to reporting by Variety, Paramount leadership has blacklisted individual artists deemed to be “overtly antisemitic.” 

If, as Bender seemed to suggest, David Ellison’s embrace of a work of hasbara is “rare” in today’s Hollywood, the Trump-aligned Ellisons appear set to expand their media empire in the coming weeks. Paramount Skydance is reportedly favored by the Trump administration in the auction for Warner Bros. Discovery — a far bigger conglomerate that includes a news network in CNN and a premium TV asset in HBO Max, in addition to the Warner Bros. movie studio. And Larry Ellison’s Oracle is among the group of investors slated to acquire the American operations of Chinese social media platform TikTok, in a deal blessed by the White House.

Should these deals go through, the result will be a degree of media control by a single family without parallel in modern American history, and potentially a singular opportunity for Israel advocates to reach a broad U.S. audience. In the words of a publicity spot for “Red Alert” on Israel’s Keshet 12, after Ellison’s Paramount+ streaming service had acquired the worldwide rights to the series, “Tens of millions of people around the world are finally going to see our story.

Israel’s ‘most important weapon’

It is the TikTok deal in particular that analysts say could markedly change the information that millions of Americans receive about Israel. After two years of livestreamed genocide — including numerous TikTok videos posted by IDF soldiers themselves — the political views of a generation of young people “have been shaped by what they’ve seen” online, explained Lara Friedman, the president of the Washington, D.C.-based Foundation for Middle East Peace.

“You have TikTok just smashing our young people’s brains all day long with video of carnage in Gaza,” Sarah Hurwitz, a former speechwriter for President Obama, said at a Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA) conference in November. Hurwitz lamented that, when she tries to persuade young Jews of her pro-Israel beliefs, “they are just seeing, in their minds, carnage, and I sound obscene.” And at a conference this week organized by the right-wing Israeli newspaper Israel Hayom, Hillary Clinton called it “a serious problem” that young people were learning about October 7 and what came after “from social media, particularly TikTok.”

Faced with the evidence of genocide, Zionist apologists “can’t explain that away,” Friedman told +972. “So what they’re going to do now is get hold of the means by which that information is spread.” Meeting with social media influencers in New York in September, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel’s “most important” “weapons” were “on social media,” and he described the deal for TikTok, with its 170 million American users, as “the most important purchase that is going on right now.”

In addition to acquiring an ownership stake in the U.S. app, Oracle is expected to run data security for the platform and oversee changes and updates to the algorithm. Most likely, Larry Ellison and his billionaire co-investors will come under immediate pressure from Zionist groups including JFNA, whose CEO recently described TikTok as “the largest and worst offender” in “spreading hate and antisemitism online,” and said that “the deal engineered by President Trump presents us with a moment of great hope.”

Yet Ellison probably won’t need much persuading to align with Israel-friendly priorities. A major Republican donor and political ally of President Trump, the Oracle co-founder is also a major supporter of Israeli causes, having given $16.6 million to Friends of the IDF in 2017, then the largest gift in the organization’s history. In 2021, Oracle’s then-CEO Safra Catz told the Israeli outlet Calcalist that the company’s “commitment to Israel is second to none.” If Oracle employees “don’t agree with our mission to support the State of Israel,” she said, “then maybe we aren’t the right company for them.” That same year, Netanyahu, Israel’s opposition leader at the time, vacationed on Ellison’s privately owned Hawaiian island.

The billionaire also enjoys a close relationship with former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair, having poured at least $130 million into the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change — which, in turn, has promoted Oracle’s services across the Global South. Blair was named as a leader of the Gaza transitional authority in the Trump ceasefire plan that was approved by the UN Security Council in November.

In predicting how the new TikTok might operate, free-expression advocates point to Elon Musk’s apparent suppression of his critics and other disfavored accounts on X, and the attendant flourishing of far-right voices there. The official X policy is “Freedom of Speech, not Freedom of Reach,” which advocates say gives Musk leeway to effectively censor content deemed objectionable by making it harder to find.

Tech journalist Taylor Lorenz wrote recently that TikTok’s new owners “will undeniably leverage the platform to push pro-MAGA messaging.” Israel, too, will likely be a major subject of censorship and control, Lorenz told +972. “You’re not going to hear from Palestinians,” she said. “You’re just going to be exposed to more and more propaganda. It’s going to be harder and harder to find accurate information.” 

The Ellisons’ likely domination of a broad swath of U.S. media, Lorenz argued, has no analogue in the United States. “Parallels that come to mind are places like Russia or China or India — places where there is no free press, no free speech, no ability to speak truth to power.”

‘We have a Gen Z problem’

The strategies used by the Israeli government and its supporters over the years to cultivate a positive image in traditional media — including expenses-paid press junkets and hasbara efforts to portray Gaza-based journalists as undercover Hamas operatives — fall short when it comes to TikTok, which is a regular source of news for 43 percent of American adults under 30, according to a recent Pew survey. “You’ve got a generation that is going to see a headline, and rather than look at that headline, they’re going to say, ‘I’m going to go look for the video. I want to see it for myself,’” Friedman told +972. “It’s very hard to control the narrative in that kind of era, and it creates a new imperative to control what information is able to be spread.”

When former U.S. President Joe Biden signed a bill in April 2024 to ban TikTok in the United States absent a sale by its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, the official rationale was lawmakers’ concern about the Chinese government’s potential access to Americans’ data. But support for the legislation, which necessitated the currently pending takeover by U.S. firms, can also be traced to Zionist anxiety over Israel’s image on the platform.

At the Munich Security Conference in February of this year, former Republican Congressmember Mike Gallagher — who introduced the sell-or-ban bill with his Democratic colleague Raja Krishnamoorthi in 2022 — said that the bill was “dead until October 7. And people started to see a bunch of antisemitic content on the platform, and our bill had legs again.” 

“Some wonder why there was such overwhelming support for us to shut down potentially TikTok or other entities of that nature,” then-Senator Mitt Romney said at a McCain Institute forum in Arizona in May 2024, not long after the bill’s passage. “If you look at the postings on TikTok and the number of mentions of Palestinians relative to other social media sites, it’s overwhelmingly so among TikTok broadcasts.”

By that point, American Jewish groups including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) had been sounding the alarm about TikTok for months. ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, on a Zoom call in the fall of 2023, was recorded saying, “We really have a TikTok problem, a Gen Z problem. And our community needs … to put our energy toward this, fast.” (The ADL has confirmed the authenticity of the recording.)

On March 6, 2024 — one day before the House Energy and Commerce Committee voted unanimously to advance the TikTok bill to the House floor — the leaders of JFNA said in a letter to the committee, “Our community understands that social media is a major driver of the rise in antisemitism, and that TikTok is the worst offender by far.” Referring to the legislation by its bill number, the letter said, “A vote for HR 7521 is a vote against antisemitism.”

David Ellison has pushed back on the idea that politics plays a role in his business decisions. “I’m not going to be in the position of ever making political statements. We’re an entertainment company first,” he said at a Bloomberg conference in Los Angeles in October, adding that Paramount’s official statement about the boycott was “a statement that discriminating based on where somebody is from is wrong” and that he stood by it.

At the same time, Ellison allowed that the “value system” of The Free Press “really does align with the value system that we believe in.” Later in the conversation, he described President Trump’s just-announced Gaza ceasefire plan — which, according to the Palestinian analyst Muhammad Shehada, would “entrench permanent Israeli control” of the Strip — as “a historic accomplishment and one that we should all be happy” about.

A changing of the guard

Owners do not typically exercise direct editorial control over American news media, and analysts caution against overstating the Ellisons’ influence even as they seek to extend their reach from CBS to CNN. Complicating matters further, the latest bid by Paramount Skydance for Warner Bros. Discovery includes minority financing from the sovereign wealth funds of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Abu Dhabi, according to Variety — three governments that might push back on a staunchly pro-Israel agenda. 

What’s more, CNN is hardly a bastion of left-wing politics to begin with. As one staffer told The Guardian in early 2024, the cable network has a “systemic and institutional bias” in favor of Israel. CNN hosts Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, for example, have frequently relied on Israel-friendly talking points in their coverage of U.S. campus protests. At the same time, CNN has produced hard-hitting journalism about Gaza, including a report this week detailing how the Israeli military has bulldozed corpses into unmarked graves, in apparent violation of international law. 

It is such coverage that may be at risk, with the Ellisons having demonstrated a willingness to make major personnel changes that — as with the promotion of Bari Weiss to run CBS News — could entrench political biases at the media properties under their control. In a late October round of layoffs at CBS News, Variety reported, “the ax conspicuously fell on those whose reporting featured an anti-Israel bent.” Among those terminated was the seasoned foreign correspondent Debora Patta, who had reported vividly on the killing in Gaza and, according to The New York Post, had recently signed a new three-year contract. 

Patta’s work had come under attack in August by U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, who, in claiming that a video interview he’d given her had been misleadingly edited, echoed President Trump’s 2024 lawsuit against CBS (filed before his return to the White House) over the editing of a “60 Minutes” interview; Paramount, with its acquisition by Skydance under federal review, settled that suit for $16 million. Weiss herself reportedly added Patta’s name to the dismissal list, while saving the job of a Rome-based correspondent who professed pro-Israel views and asked to be assigned to cover Gaza.

Whatever the Ellisons’ intentions, their moves are being greeted as evidence of a new approach friendly to both Israel and Trump. “They let the Zionists into Hollywood tonight,” Eve Barlow, a pro-Israel social media personality and writer, said on Instagram after attending the L.A. premiere of “Red Alert” on the Paramount lot. 

In an interview with “60 Minutes” on Oct. 31, two days after the CBS layoffs, Trump praised Weiss as “a great new leader.” Reminding the interviewer, Norah O’Donnell, that “‘60 Minutes’ was forced to pay me a lot of money,” Trump said that CBS’s “new ownership” was “the greatest thing that’s happened in a long time to a free and open and good press.” And Larry Ellison has reportedly discussed, in a recent conversation with a senior White House official, firing CNN hosts whom Trump does not like.

The same week as Trump’s “60 Minutes” interview, David Ellison schmoozed with fellow Hollywood bigwigs at a dinner honoring Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav, the executive he may soon dethrone. The glittery event at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel was hosted by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which, through its film division, co-produced “One Day in October,” an October 7 anthology drama that debuted in the U.S. on Zaslav’s HBO Max. Like “Red Alert,” one reviewer noted, “One Day in October” leaves out Israel’s oppression of Palestinians to “focus almost entirely on the survivors of the attack,” and in so doing, imply that “overwhelming force is a justified response.”

With Warner Bros. Discovery on the auction block, the gala for Zaslav had valedictory undertones. Presenting the studio boss with an award for his philanthropy and efforts to fight antisemitism, Steven Spielberg said that Zaslav “shares a certain ethos with the moguls that built Hollywood.” In his own speech, Zaslav shared an insight from his experience owning a broadcast network in Poland and resisting attempted censorship there: “When the government controls the news, that is the end of democracy.”

jueves, 4 de diciembre de 2025

The Former Israeli Spies Overseeing US Government Cyber Security

Nate Bear

https://www.donotpanic.news/p/the-former-israeli-spies-overseeing

A company with deep ties to Israeli intelligence oversees cyber security across more than seventy US government agencies, including the Department of Defense and Homeland Security.

Axonius was founded by former spies in Israel’s Unit 8200 and its software, which allows an operator ‘visibility and control over all types and number of devices,’ collects and analyses the digital data of millions of US federal employees.

The stated aim of the Axonius platform is to centralise IT tools to identity and fix security breaches. As a product of Israeli intelligence, however, the scale of Axonius’s use across the US government raises serious questions.

Axonius was founded and is currently run by Israelis Dean Sysman, Ofri Shur and Avidor Bartov, who met in the 2010s while working on the same team within Israel’s Unit 8200 spy service. On his LinkedIn profile, Sysman offers few details of their work for the IDF, describing it simply as having ‘far-reaching implications.’

Sysman left the IDF in 2014 after five years and set up a cyber hacking outfit, while Shur and Bartov stayed on until 2017, a period which encompassed Israel’s 2014 war of aggression against Gaza, during which the IDF murdered more than two thousand Palestinian civilians.

Axonius was established with curious speed. After leaving the IDF in 2017, Shur and Bartov teamed back up with Sysman and immediately received $4 million in seed funding from Yoav Leitersdorf, a San Francisco-based Israeli-American and fellow Unit 8200 veteran, to start Axonius. Leitersdorf, the managing partner at US-Israeli venture capital firm YL Ventures, is a prolific early-stage investor in Unit 8200 cyber start-ups.

The same year Sysman, Shur and Bartov also received millions in seed financing from Israeli firm Vertex Ventures which is run by veterans of Israel’s spy units. Tami Bronner, a partner at Vertex, spent four years in Israeli military intelligence.

Following this early financing from investors close to Israel’s intelligence establishment, the company went on to receive hundreds of millions in investment from a network of US venture capital firms with intelligence links to Israel.

These include Palo Alto-based Accel Partners, which has invested in more than thirty Israeli tech companies, including another Unit 8200 cyber spin-out, OasisNir Blumberger, an Israeli who served in the IDF, was recruited by Accel from Facebook to open its Tel Aviv office in 2016.

Other Axonius backers include San Francisco-headquartered Bessemer Venture Partners which employs former Israeli intelligence operatives in a Tel Aviv office led by Adam Fisher. An American who emigrated to Israel in 1998, Fisher has acted as an intermediary between Zionists in Silicon Valley and the IDF, and during the genocide gave a presentation on how Israel can win the online war. Israeli Amit Karp, a partner at Bessemer Ventures and another former Israeli intelligence officer, sits on the Axonius board.

Menlo Park-based Lightspeed Venture Partners, which has backed Axonius with around $200 million over numerous funding rounds, also has significant ties to Israeli spy units. Yonit Wiseman, a partner at Lightspeed, spent six years in Israeli military intelligence, leaving in 2018. Her colleague, Tal Morgenstern, was a special forces commander in the IDF.

Given the evidence that Axonius is an Israeli intelligence cut-out, the scale of its penetration within the US federal government structure is extraordinary.

The company says its platform is ‘deployed in more than 70 federal organizations’ and is used by four of the five major US Department of Defense service agencies. The US federal government contract award website shows Axonius awards for the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps, which in itself means millions of personnel and their devices.

In November 2024, the company was selected by the Department of Homeland Security to modernise its cybersecurity abilities by centralising ‘data coming from hundreds of separate data sources residing across dozens of federal, civilian, and executive branch agencies.’ Just a month later, in December 2024, the company was contracted by the Department of Defense to upgrade its system of 24/7 surveillance which oversees all on-site and off-site DoD computers and IT networks, a capability known as ‘continuous monitoring and risk scoring.’ And in April this year Axonius obtained authorisation for any US federal agency to use its cloud-based cyber surveillance system.

Other federal departments integrating Axonius software include energy, transportation, the US Treasury and many others. Data from the US spending awards site shows the US Defence Logistics Agency, responsible for managing America’s global weapons supply chain, is the single largest Axonius customer, spending $4.3 million in 2023 alone. The Department of Agriculture has paid nearly $2 million for Axonius tools and the Department of Health and Human Services has spent $1.3 million since 2021.

Axonius is commonly described as an American company. While its headquarters and administrative functions are in New York, its founders, senior executives, and its primary financiers are all Israeli, and, critically, its software and engineering functions are based in Tel Aviv. Axonius has more than eight-hundred employees, and a search of LinkedIn profiles confirms that a majority of Axonius’s engineers in Tel Aviv have a background in Israeli military intelligence.

The pitch for the Axonius system is that it centralises data from all the security and IT tools an organisation uses into one place for easier analysis, control and fixes. And that place is Tel Aviv, where the hundreds of former Israeli spies working as engineers for Axonius have unprecedented access and visibility into the habits and movements of millions of US federal government employees.

With this visibility an Axonius operator can connect individual devices with individual IDs as well as seeing all login/logoff data and website usage. An operator can also order an account to be disabled, a device to be quarantined, or a user to be removed from a group.

In addition to this, Axonius has a separate R&D division within the company known as AxoniusX, a skunkworks unit focused on developing new cyber tools, run by another Unit 8200 spook, Amit Ofer.

Perhaps none of this matters, and Axonius is simply indicative of the sleazy, symbiotic nature of the relationship between the US and its colonial outpost.

This would be a fair argument if it wasn’t for Israel’s long history of espionage in the United States. From recruiting Hollywood producers who ran front companies that stole nuclear technologies, to selling bugged software to foreign governments, spying (especially cyber spying), has been central to Israel’s foreign policy. Robert Maxwell, the father of Ghislaine Maxwell, was a spy for Israel, and a significant amount of circumstantial evidence suggests Jeffrey Epstein was also an Israeli military intelligence asset. More recently, during Trump’s first term, Israel planted miniature spying devices around the White House and other US government buildings in Washington DC to monitor US officials.

US authorities, then, have allowed former spies from a country with a known history of espionage within the United States to establish a framework of cyber intelligence access across almost the entire federal government apparatus.

To put it another way, the US has effectively subcontracted its federal-level cyber security infrastructure to Israeli intelligence.

Whether Axonius has used, or has any intent to use its unprecedented access maliciously, is impossible to know. For anyone with knowledge of Israel’s history of spying, however, the embedding of cyber software made by former Israeli spies within the US federal computer system network should raise serious alarms.

More broadly, Axonius shows how a militarised Israeli state takes billions in American funding every year to build its digital architecture of apartheid and genocide, and then sells these capabilities back to the US. American taxpayers, then, effectively pay Israel twice. And when the US buys back the technologies their taxpayers funded in the first place, they are inviting in trojan horse capabilities and making Israeli war criminals rich in the process.

The good news is that millions of ordinary Americans are wising up to the reality that Israel is not the great deal for the US that political leaders have, for so long, sold it as.

The Axonius story confirms, once again, just how bad this deal is.

 

miércoles, 3 de diciembre de 2025

Israeli genocide made 2025 deadliest year for Palestinians since 1967: rights groups

Figures released by the Israeli rights groups showed that the death toll from the Israeli war reached over 36,000 in March 2024 and rose to 67,173 by October 2025.


December 2, 2025

https://www.trtworld.com/article/7d218ce080d6

Israeli human rights organisations have deemed 2025 the “deadliest and most destructive” year for Palestinians, with Israel doubling its killing and forced displacement of civilians in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

This came in a joint report released on Tuesday by 12 Israeli human rights groups: Bimkom, Gisha, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, HaMoked, Yesh Din, Combatants for Peace, Ir Amim, Emek Shaveh, Physicians for Human Rights Israel, Breaking the Silence, and Torat Tzedek.

“In 2023 and 2024, grave violations were documented in Gaza during the Israeli genocide, but the outcomes in 2025 reveal a sharp deterioration, with the death toll nearly doubling, displacement becoming almost across the entire enclave, and hunger becoming a cause of mass death,” the report said.

“Violations that were considered exceptional at the start of the war became part of daily practice” in the current year, the rights groups said.

“The second year of the war in Gaza was the deadliest and most destructive for Palestinians since 1967.”

Figures released by the Israeli rights groups showed that the death toll from the Israeli war reached over 36,000 in March 2024 and rose to 67,173 by October 2025, including more than 20,000 children and around 10,000 women, in addition to an estimated 10,000 bodies still under the rubble. The number of wounded surpassed 170,000.

According to the report, Palestinian displacement in 2025 reached 1.9 million people, around 90 percent of Gaza’s population, up from about 1 million in 2024.

Many were displaced multiple times, the report said, as entire neighbourhoods and vital infrastructure, including water and electricity, collapsed.

Regarding Israeli-induced starvation, the report said that 461 people, including 157 children, died of hunger by October 2025.

The rights groups said that 2,306 Palestinians were killed and 16,929 wounded while waiting for aid delivery in a “daily tragedy” created by the Israeli mechanism in 2025.

Illegal settler violence

According to the rights groups, about 1,200 attacks by illegal settlers were recorded between 2023 and 2024 in the occupied West Bank, while large-scale violence escalated in 2025.

The report found that 44 Palestinian herding communities were fully displaced, and 10 communities were partially emptied, taking the total number of displaced Palestinians to 2,932, including 1,326 children.

It added that the number of administrative detainees, who are held without charge, rose from 1,000 in 2023 to 3,577 in 2025, three times the prewar average.

The report documented at least 98 Palestinian deaths in Israeli custody due to torture, denial of medical treatment, and inhumane detention conditions.

“2025 revealed a reality previously unimaginable: a state operating without limits, systematically violating international law, dismantling the very values it claims to uphold. Israel cannot claim morality or self-defence.”

Palestinian and Israeli rights organisations have repeatedly reported torture of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, including beatings, starvation, and sexual abuse.

The Israeli forces have escalated their attacks in the occupied West Bank since October 2023.

More than 1,085 Palestinians have since been killed, and 10,700 others wounded in attacks by the army and illegal Israeli settlers in the occupied territory.

Over 20,500 people have also been arrested.

In a landmark opinion last July, the International Court of Justice declared Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory illegal and called for the evacuation of all settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

 

martes, 2 de diciembre de 2025

Israel-Turkey rift dampens Gaza force plans as allies get cold feet

Israel's opposition to Turkish deployment is causing potential partners such as Pakistan and Azerbaijan to hesitate, putting the US scheme at risk

By Ragip Soylu in Ankara

Published date: 2 December 2025

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-turkey-rift-dampens-gaza-force-plans-allies-pull-back

The United States is struggling to create an international stabilisation force for Gaza, as stipulated by the UN Security Council, due to disagreements with Israel over Turkey’s participation, two people familiar with the issue told Middle East Eye.

The Security Council last month approved a resolution to create the force, securing official support from Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Pakistan and Jordan.

However, little progress has been made since then, the sources said.

Turkish officials have repeatedly stated that Ankara is ready to contribute to the force, but Israel has consistently indicated that it will not tolerate the presence of Turkish troops in the Gaza Strip.

Despite Israel’s opposition, Middle East Eye reported last month that the Turkish government had finalised plans to deploy a contingent of at least 2,000 soldiers to Gaza.

The force would be composed of personnel from multiple branches of the military with previous peacekeeping and conflict-zone experience.

Now, however, Turkey’s participation in the force appears increasingly uncertain.

“Without Turkey’s participation, countries like Saudi Arabia, Azerbaijan, Pakistan and Indonesia are not inclined to deploy troops,” one person familiar with the negotiations told MEE.

The UAE, on the other hand, announced last month that it would not join the force “for now”, citing the lack of a clear framework.

It remains unclear whether the Security Council resolution has convinced Abu Dhabi to reconsider its stance.

An Israeli report suggested that the UAE refused to join the Gaza force due to concerns over Qatari and Turkish influence, intimating that their involvement could empower groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.

“There are elements belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood who are taking a central role in the plan to reconstruct Gaza,” a source familiar with Abu Dhabi’s position 
told i24NEWS.

The UAE is expected instead to focus on humanitarian aid, reconstruction and supporting the establishment of an effective local government.

Israeli anger

A second person familiar with the issue told MEE that Ankara still expects the United States to persuade Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to accept Turkey’s participation.

“Washington remains insistent on deploying Turkish troops,” the source said.

The source added that Turkey’s sudden decision to issue an arrest warrant for Netanyahu last month on charges of crimes against humanity did not help the negotiations.

“Obviously, the Israelis are angered by this in the middle of the talks,” they said.

One person familiar with US planning told the Washington Post that the goal is for the force to consist of three brigades, perhaps up to 15,000 troops.

Another source said the international stabilisation force could include as many as 20,000 soldiers.

The Post reported a US official and saying the objective is to deploy the force in “early 2026”, although discussions about which countries will participate remain “a fluid process”.

Another US official told Israel’s Channel 14 this week that operations are expected to begin as early as January.

In November, Israel also blocked the entry of dozens of Turkish search and rescue personnel into the Gaza Strip. The team had been sent to help recover the remains of Israeli soldiers.

Tensions between Turkey and Israel have been running high due to Ankara’s actions against Netanyahu’s government at the International Court of Justice and a trade ban imposed since the spring of 2024.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has called Israel’s war on Gaza a genocide and repeatedly urged the international community to hold Israeli leaders accountable.

The two countries are also at odds in Syria.

Netanyahu’s government reportedly wants to maintain control over certain territories in the south of the country as a buffer zone and opposes the deployment of any Turkish radars or sophisticated systems south of the T4 air base near Homs.