Iconos

Iconos
Volcán Popocatépetl

domingo, 12 de abril de 2026

Trump announces Strait of Hormuz blockade after US-Iran peace talks end

US Navy to enforce blockade, Trump says after condemning Iran for blocking waterway and complaining no agreement reached in Islamabad.

By Al Jazeera Staff

Published On 12 Apr 2026

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/12/trump-announces-strait-of-hormuz-blockade-after-us-iran-peace-talks-end

President Donald Trump says the United States Navy will begin blockading the Strait of Hormuz “immediately” after peace talks between the US and Iran in Pakistan ended without an agreement.

Trump, in a social media post on Sunday, accused Iran of “extortion” and said the US Navy would hunt down and interdict ships in international waters that have paid Iran a toll to traverse the strait.

“So, there you have it, the meeting went well, most points were agreed to, but the only point that really mattered, NUCLEAR, was not,” Trump said. “Effective immediately, the United States Navy, the Finest in the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING any and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz.”

Iran has essentially taken control over the Strait of Hormuz, a vital chokepoint for the global energy market, since the US and Israel launched a war on Iran on February 28.

Traffic through the narrow strait has slowed to a trickle, nearly paralysing about one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments and sending shockwaves through the global economy.

Iran has denied US claims that two of its warships recently passed through the strait for mine-clearing operations, warning that any military vessels seeking to do so would receive a “strong response”. Trump called Iran’s control over the waterway “world extortion” in his social media post and added that any Iranian forces who fire at US forces or “peaceful vessels” would be “BLOWN TO HELL”.

He added that the blockade would involve unspecified “other countries” and he would not allow Iran to benefit from the closure of the strait.

Iran has continued to send its own ships through the strait since the war began and has allowed a handful of vessels from other countries to pass through. Iranian officials have also discussed setting up a toll system after the fighting ends whereby users would pay a fee to Iran for traversing the strait.

“I have also instructed our Navy to seek and interdict every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran,” Trump said on Sunday. “No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas.”

 

sábado, 11 de abril de 2026

Iran says it ‘would be dumb’ for US to let Netanyahu kill diplomacy

In an implicit response to JD Vance, Iran’s Abbas Araghchi warns of the repercussions of Israel’s attacks on Lebanon.

By Al Jazeera Staff

Published On 9 Apr 2026

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/9/iran-says-it-would-be-dumb-for-us-to-let-netanyahu-kill-diplomacy

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has said that it would be “dumb” for the United States to allow Israel to jeopardise the regional ceasefire by continuing its intense attacks on Lebanon, which have killed hundreds of people since the truce came into effect.

On Thursday, Araghchi noted that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption trial will resume on Sunday. He suggested that the Israeli leader has an ulterior motive for continuing the fighting.

“A region-wide ceasefire, incl in Lebanon, would hasten his jailing,” Araghchi wrote on social media.

He then added a message for the US, which has denied that Lebanon was included in the original ceasefire.

“If the US wishes to crater its economy by letting Netanyahu kill diplomacy, that would ultimately be its choice. We think that would be dumb but are prepared for it,” Araghchi wrote.

His comment mirrors language used by US Vice President JD Vance on Wednesday. Vance had warned against Iranians letting the ceasefire fall apart over Lebanon, saying, “We think that would be dumb, but that’s their choice.”

Since the ceasefire was announced on Tuesday, the disagreement over whether it applies to Lebanon has become a major threat to the future of the truce.

Iranian officials and media outlets have suggested that Tehran may respond militarily to the Israeli assault on Lebanon or block the Strait of Hormuz to ensure the ceasefire applies to Lebanon.

On Thursday, Trump said he told the Israeli government to scale back its operations in Lebanon.

“I spoke with Bibi [Netanyahu], and he’s going to low-key it. I just think we have to be sort of a little more low-key,” he told NBC News.

Vance also said on Wednesday that the Israelis agreed to “check themselves a little bit in Lebanon”.

But after one of the bloodiest days in Lebanon’s history, there appears to be no letup in the Israeli assault. The death toll from the recent Israeli bombardment has already exceeded 300 people.

Israel launched several new deadly attacks in Lebanon on Thursday, including a strike that killed four rescuers in the southern town of Borj Qalaouiye.

Israeli forces have also issued a displacement order for Beirut’s Jnah area, home to two of the largest hospitals in the country, as well as tens of thousands of residents and displaced people.

The US has a history of claiming that Israel has agreed to curb its military attacks, only to see further strikes unfold.

For example, in 2024, the administration of former President Joe Biden insisted for months that Israel was only launching a “limited” operation in the southern Gaza city of Rafah.

But the Israeli military ultimately destroyed nearly every structure in Rafah — a scorched-earth strategy that Israeli officials now say they want to replicate in south Lebanon to ensure the permanent displacement of the population.

The conflict in Lebanon turned into an all-out war in early March, after Hezbollah fired rockets in response to Israeli strikes, as well as the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on February 28.

Israel has launched near-daily attacks in Lebanon since a separate November 2024 ceasefire, including widespread attacks on civilian infrastructure.

viernes, 10 de abril de 2026

For peace with Iran to work a reckoning with Israel is in order

Trump must get back to basics, and his promises to the American people. In order to do that he must put this relationship in its proper place.

James R. Webb

Apr 09, 2026

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/israel-ceasefire/

The two-week ceasefire between Tehran and Washington — at least for right now — is allowing a collective global exhale following an intense month of war. As of Wednesday, oil markets were rebounding, with prices dropping significantly from their record highs above $150 per barrel.

Domestically, perhaps a rare sigh of relief from coast to coast, as the most unpopular U.S. war in a century headed for a pause instead of the unprecedented escalation promised by President Donald Trump’s “a whole civilization will die tonight” Truth Social post.

But a durable peace and an end to this war are not guaranteed. Cracks are already showing over what was agreed and what was not by both sides, and accusations of violations are afoot.

Furthermore, America’s relations and reputation are severely damaged worldwide. Ensuring peace and fixing these relationships is where the hard work begins.

Arguably, the most important part of preventing a restart of the war before May is ensuring that our relationship with Israel returns to its rightful order. The U.S. is not a tool to be used to further Israeli regional ambitions. It should never go to war on behalf of any foreign government.

The most recent escalation by Israel in Lebanon, which should be noted, shows a flagrant lack of respect for Washington, and also underscores a pattern that is as evident as it is problematic: a seemingly deliberate attempt to prevent or undermine the ability of the U.S. to negotiate with Iran. Thus, it prevents the administration from acting independently and in the sole interest of the American people, which the Constitution charges it to do.

It is important to note two facts that underpin the dire need for U.S. foreign policy to move in this direction.

First, the U.S. did not go to war in the interest of of the American people. Rather, the stated rationale by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, and others, on Feb. 28, was that Israel was going to attack Iran; therefore, we needed to join them to protect our troops stationed in the region (Rubio has since walked his remarks back). But Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had made several visits to the U.S. seeking Trump's buy in for new strikes since Operation Midnight Hammer in June 2025.

Especially egregious was the conflict, which was launched in the middle of U.S.-Iranian negotiations, opened with the targeted killing of Iran's head of state Ayatollah Khomeini and several members of his immediate family.

Second, Israel’s track record of adhering to ceasefire agreements, especially as of late, has been abysmal. Since the declaration of a ceasefire in Gaza on Oct. 10, 2025, Israel has violated the ceasefire agreement at least 2,073 times, and this data only runs through March 18, 2026. Coupled with this fact is the government's proclivity for assassination. In this war alone, the Israelis have taken out no less than 12 Iranian leaders.

Simply put, this presents a pattern that is not only inconsistent with American values and historical precedent but also at odds with how we fight wars. Each one of these targeted actions appears at face value to not only prevent de-escalation, but more importantly, to entrench the U.S. in a conflict by eliminating those within Iran who are moderate enough to negotiate. Despite what Trump says about a new, more “reasonable” crop of leaders replacing their dead counterparts, experts say the opposite is the case.

Further, they are actions that contradict the Pentagon's Laws of Armed Conflict Manual (Sec. 5.21, Overview of Good Faith, Perfidy, and Ruses). More importantly, it runs in contrast to the entire Western-based system of war that is rooted in 1648’s Treaty of Westphalia. The U.S. has not only followed this precedent but agreed to be party to numerous other agreements, including, but not limited to, the New York Convention of 1973, which criminalizes assassinating leaders and other “internationally protected persons.”

Part of the rationale is obviously simple: killing leadership makes it more difficult to negotiate.

In short, the assassination campaign, along with following a client state to war, is not a feature of American warfare or policy. But instead, it is a bug inserted into our operating system that must be removed, both to ensure a durable peace and to reclaim our national honor and reputation. Doing so will not necessarily be easy, but it is straightforward.

Israeli leadership must be reminded where their financial and military aid comes from and that this relationship is not a blank check. The U.S. and its taxpayers are their financial and military guarantors. Without our backing, their security is in serious jeopardy. Therefore, to maintain their security, they need to play by our rules and adhere to our principles. Otherwise, this relationship could end.

As a note, the U.S. public opinion of Israel has a low point, and a new generation of Americans is coming of age politically with a very cynical mindset of this relationship. It is very much in Netanyahu's interest to correct this through action rather than messaging.

Once our relationship with Israel is put into proper order, we can move on to repairing key global relationships that the war with Iran has severely damaged. Perhaps the most important and least discussed are those in Asia.

While there was much discussion about how closing the Strait of Hormuz negatively impacted China, as if Trump were playing some form of 4D chess, the reality is quite different. Trump’s lambasting of Australia, South Korea, and Japan for not helping open Hormuz militarily has undoubtedly negatively impacted U.S. influence in that region. Further, the impacts of economic disruption on these three countries, which are key players in the U.S. security strategy vis-a-vis China, cannot be overstated.

Despite the challenges ahead for the U.S. in securing a durable peace, there is perhaps a massive potential political opportunity for President Trump to fulfill a campaign promise.

A core promise that attracted independents and conservatives, and arguably was the single biggest driver of both of his electoral victories, was the removal of American troops from the Middle East. Preventing the continuation of, or yet another war with the U.S. is arguably Iran's most meaningful demand, and perhaps the most valuable for the U.S. at the bargaining table.

At this juncture, American basing across the region only serves to pressure and threaten Iran, whose existence is not and never has been an existential threat to the U.S. homeland. Further, what better way for President Trump to demonstrate victory than to publicly declare that our objectives have been met and that the troops are coming home, thus making a splash heading into midterms?

Conversely, this move would give the Iranian leadership a face-saving card to play with their own people, demonstrating that their sacrifice is justified.

The road to a durable peace between the two countries will not be easy. It requires leadership in Washington to make tough decisions and exert power to restrain Israel, which they have not been apt to do. However, for the political survival of this administration, it is necessary and if done correctly, provides ample opportunity both heading into the midterms and in restoring international faith in Washington as a good-faith partner.

jueves, 9 de abril de 2026

Iran to boycott Islamabad talks with US if Israeli strikes on Lebanon persist: Report

Iranian officials and media outlets said Tehran is preparing a heavy response to Israel’s violent attacks on Beirut

News Desk

APR 8, 2026

https://thecradle.co/articles/iran-to-boycott-islamabad-talks-with-us-if-israeli-strikes-on-lebanon-persist-report

The Islamic Republic of Iran has told Pakistani mediators that it will not attend the talks with Washington in Islamabad this week unless there is a ceasefire in Lebanon, according to sources speaking to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) on 8 April following massive and deadly Israeli strikes on the Lebanese capital, Beirut. 

The report coincided with official Iranian warnings to maintain closure of the Strait of Hormuz and carry out missile strikes if attacks on Lebanon do not halt. Israel killed and injured hundreds in its assault on Lebanon and its capital on Wednesday. 

According to the Lebanese Civil Defense, at least 250 were killed, and over 1,600 were injured. 

“Iran has told regional mediators its participation in talks with US officials in Islamabad is conditional on a ceasefire in Lebanon,” the sources said. “It might also reverse its decision on reopening the Strait of Hormuz,” they added.

“Iranian mediators have also warned they would continue to carry out attacks on regional countries, including Israel, if attacks on Lebanon and Iran by Israel continue,” the sources went on to tell WSJ. 

“An attack on the proud Hezbollah is an attack on Iran. The field is preparing a heavy response to the regime’s savage crimes. My dear people, the real fuel of the missiles is your united presence in the streets,” Commander of the Aerospace Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), General Majid Mousavi, said

A senior Iranian official also told Al Jazeera that Iran will “punish” Israel in response to the aggression against Lebanon and the violation of the ceasefire conditions.

According to a security source cited by Iran’s Fars News Agency, Iran is preparing to carry out a deterrent operation against Israeli military positions following a violent bombing campaign all over Beirut and other parts of Lebanon. 

The source stressed that in Tehran, the view is gaining ground that the continuation of attacks despite an agreement on all fronts indicates either that the US is unable to control Netanyahu or that freedom of action has been granted to Israel by CENTCOM.

“The Lebanese have made sacrifices for us, and we must not leave them alone for a single moment,” said Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesperson for the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee. “Either a ceasefire on all fronts, or no ceasefire at all.”

The Israeli army renewed its attacks on Beirut on Wednesday evening, striking a building in the Tallet al-Khayyat neighborhood hours after killing at least 254 and injuring over 1,110 others in the capital and elsewhere.

Israeli strikes also hit parts of Iran earlier on 8 April, after heavy Iranian missile strikes on Tel Aviv overnight. 

The deadly wave of strikes on Lebanon on Wednesday comes after the US agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran, following US President Donald Trump’s acceptance of a 10-point plan from Tehran as a basis for further negotiations. 

A round of negotiations in Islamabad, Pakistan, has been planned for Friday.

Iran’s 10-point plan includes a US non-aggression commitment, Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz, acceptance of uranium enrichment, full sanctions removal, compensation to Iran, withdrawal of all US combat forces from the region, and cessation of war on all fronts, including Lebanon.

However, a White House official told CNN that the 10-point proposal Iran released to the media differed from the one Trump described as a “workable basis” for negotiations.

“Because of Hezbollah. They were not included in the deal. That’ll get taken care of too. It's alright. [Lebanon getting bombed is] part of the deal. That’s a separate skirmish,” Trump was quoted as saying by PBS News White House correspondent Elizabeth Landers. 

Meanwhile, Pakistani officials have called for “restraint.” 

miércoles, 8 de abril de 2026

NYT: Trump Launched Iran War After Being Briefed by Netanyahu at the White House

The Israeli leader insisted Iran was ripe for regime change

by Dave DeCamp | April 7, 2026

https://news.antiwar.com/2026/04/07/nyt-trump-launched-iran-war-after-being-briefed-by-netanyahu-at-the-white-house/

President Trump launched the war against Iran a little more than two weeks after he was briefed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, The New York Times reported on Tuesday.

Sources told the Times that the briefing took place in the White House Situation Room during Netanyahu’s visit to Washington on February 11.

“Mr. Trump sat down, but not in his usual position at the head of the room’s mahogany conference table. Instead, the president took a seat on one side, facing the large screens mounted along the wall. Mr. Netanyahu sat on the other side, directly opposite the president,” the report reads.

Other senior Israeli officials, including Mossad chief David Barnea, appeared on the screens behind Netanyahu during the hour-long briefing, where the Israeli leader made the “hard sell” for the US and Israel to launch another war against Iran.

The report said Netanyahu made a series of predictions about the potential war that proved to be wrong, including the idea that Iran was ripe for regime change, that its ballistic missile program could be destroyed within weeks, that it would be too weak to close the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran’s missile strikes on US interests in regional countries would be minimal.

Israeli officials also said that the Mossad assessed that an uprising against the government could start, with the help of Mossad operations on the ground, and that airstrikes could help topple the government. Netanyahu also presented several possibilities of people who could take power in Tehran, including Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s last shah, who had been pushing hard for the US and Israel to launch the war.

The briefing was the opposite of what US intelligence agencies concluded around the same time: that a major US-Israeli war would not result in regime change and would likely harden the Islamic government in Tehran, which is what has happened since the start of the conflict on February 28.

The Times report said that even Trump’s senior officials, including CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, told the president that they were skeptical of Israel’s claims. Sources told the paper that US officials assessed that the US and Israel could kill Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and cripple Iran’s ability to project power, but did not think there would be an uprising or regime change.

The report said that Trump asked Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, what he thought about Israel’s claims. “Sir, this is, in my experience, standard operating procedure for the Israelis. They oversell, and their plans are not always well-developed. They know they need us, and that’s why they’re hard-selling,” the general reportedly said.

Despite the advice, the report said that Trump was very hawkish on the issue and closely aligned with Netanyahu for many months. Sources told the Times that Vice President JD Vance was the administration’s most vocal opponent of the war, but he told the president he would support any decision he made.  Publicly, Vance has not criticized the conflict and has backed Trump’s threats to escalate.

 

martes, 7 de abril de 2026

An eclectic, bipartisan group suddenly calls for removing Trump using the 25th Amendment

Aaron Blake

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/07/politics/25th-amendment-trump-iran-war

The 25th Amendment talk is back.

Lawmakers have repeatedly floated the method for removing a president, as laid out in the Constitution, in recent years. And Donald Trump’s Cabinet apparently discussed the option more earnestly than many initially realized after the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack.

To successfully remove Trump, a majority of his Cabinet and his vice president would have to be supportive. And there are no indications any Cabinet officials are considering it right now, or that Vice President JD Vance would be on board. But Trump’s comment Tuesday morning that a “whole civilization will die tonight” unless Iran makes a deal spurred increasing calls — among a somewhat odd amalgamation of voices — to invoke the amendment.

Less than two hours before his 8 p.m. deadline for Iran, Trump announced he’d agreed to a two-week ceasefire, conditional on Tehran opening the Strait of Hormuz.

Democratic lawmakers and right-wing voices had spent the previous 24 hours expressing concerns about just how far the president was willing to take things in the Iran war. His threats to strike power plants and other civilian infrastructure have been decried as war crimes, and some even said they feared the administration’s threats alluded to the potential use of nuclear weapons (which the White House has denied considering).

It’s mostly Democrats who have called to invoke the amendment — dozens of them, in fact. That includes potential presidential hopefuls like Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker. (Of course, they have little to no power at the moment to initiate removal proceedings.)

But notably, some conservatives and other recent Trump allies have taken up the call, as well.

How do we 25th Amendment his ass?” conspiracy theorist Alex Jones asked his guest on Monday’s show.

By Tuesday morning, right-leaning advocates for the step spanned from more-extreme influencers to former Trump White House official Anthony Scaramucci to more-moderate Never Trumpers.

25TH AMENDMENT!!!” former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, posted on X about an hour after Trump’s post about Iran’s civilization dying. She called it “evil and madness.”

Some congressional Democrats re-posted Greene’s words.

“The 25th amendment needs to be invoked,” right-wing podcaster Candace Owens added later in the morning.

Scaramucci, who served briefly as Trump’s communications director during his first term, advocated for Trump’s removal and claimed Trump was threatening to use nukes.

“Wake up: he is calling for A NUCLEAR STRIKE,” Scaramucci said. “Seek his removal immediately.”

When others suggested online that Vance had implied Tuesday morning that Trump could order a nuclear strike, the White House denied he was saying anything of the sort. The vice president had talked about using “tools in our toolkit that we so far haven’t decided to use.”

Some Never Trump conservatives like New York Times columnist David French were also calling for the 25th Amendment.

“This is obvious 25th Amendment territory, but people are so desensitized that they can’t see it,” French said.

Others didn’t go quite so far, but have begun raising new levels of concern about Trump’s intentions.

One of them is former Trump ally Tucker Carlson, who on his show Monday criticized Trump like never before. The former Fox News host said Trump was threatening to commit “a war crime, a moral crime” in Iran by attacking infrastructure in ways that would lead to mass death, and he even seemed to suggest Trump might be the antichrist.

Also on Tuesday, GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has been a loyal Trump ally in Congress, told the Wall Street Journal that Trump “loses me if he attacks civilian targets” like infrastructure. Johnson signaled he saw such attacks as indeed illegal.

None of it means the 25th Amendment is around the corner. The option is difficult to invoke, requiring those closest to Trump to determine he is unfit for office and opt to remove him against his will. Vance happened to be in Hungary on Tuesday, and he called Trump on the phone so the president could address a political rally.

But it’s significant even as a brushback pitch from some erstwhile Trump allies and from Democrats. They seem to be saying that Trump had better think carefully about his next actions in the war.

It’s also worth reflecting on where things stand now.

When this was floated in Trump’s first term, it was almost universally the domain of Democrats. When some in his Cabinet apparently considered it after January 6, they did so quietly. The public didn’t find out until much later how seriously they’d been weighing it.

Today, even some recent former Trump allies have apparently been so fearful of what he might do that they’re publicly calling to oust him.

With his 'Stone Age' threat to Iran, Trump has unleashed a new age of savagery

Soumaya Ghannoushi

7 April 202

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/with-his-stone-age-threat-iran-trump-unleashed-new-age-savagery

So US President Donald Trump wants to return Iran to the "Stone Ages where it belongs".

A line intended to project force and intimidate.

Instead, it reveals something far more telling: not strength, but a profound illiteracy of history, of civilisation, and of the very region he threatens to dismantle.

Little does the brutish real estate mogul, confined to the shallow logic of deals and property, understand that Iran, historically Persia, was shaping the foundations of organised civilisation long before the modern West existed in any meaningful form, and centuries before the United States was born.

This is not rhetorical flourish. It is a historical fact.

In the sixth century BCE, under Cyrus the Great, Persia established one of the largest empires the world had ever seen, stretching from Central Asia to the Mediterranean. It developed systems of governance, taxation, infrastructure, and communication that would later shape imperial models, including Rome. 

The Cyrus Cylinder articulated principles of religious tolerance and the protection of communities, concepts that stand in stark contrast to the language of annihilation now being invoked.

Engines of civilisation

Persia did not vanish with antiquity. It endured conquest, absorbed upheaval, and regenerated itself with remarkable continuity. The campaigns of Alexander the Great did not erase it. Nor did the devastation wrought by Genghis Khan.

What was shattered was rebuilt. What was fractured was reassembled.

It found new expression under the Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258 CE), within the orbit of a rising and radiant Islamic civilisation. Baghdad may have been the imperial capital, but its energy coursed through a constellation of Persian cities at the forefront of human development. Nishapur, Rayy, Merv, Balkh, Tus, and Isfahan were not peripheral outposts. They were engines of civilisation.

They produced scholars, physicians, poets, and mathematicians who shaped entire disciplines. Poet, mathematician, and astronomer Omar Khayyam in Nishapur, Abu Bakr al-Razi in Rayy, and Ferdowsi in Tus represent only a fragment of this intellectual landscape.

These cities were bound not merely by trade routes, but by the circulation of ideas, manuscripts, and scholars, forming a dense and dynamic ecosystem of knowledge.

At the heart of this world stood institutions such as Bayt al-Hikma (the House of Wisdom), where Greek, Persian, and Indian knowledge was translated, studied, critiqued, and expanded, later helping to form the foundations of the European Renaissance.

It was here that Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi formalised algebra and gave the modern world the concept of the algorithm. Ibn Sina produced medical works that would dominate European universities for centuries. Al-Farabi and Al-Ghazali engaged deeply with Aristotle and reshaped his thought.

At a time when Baghdad, Nishapur and Merv sustained complex urban life through advanced systems of water management, healthcare, and learning, much of medieval Europe remained rudimentary, defined by poor sanitation, overcrowding, and fragile infrastructure.

This is not polemic. It is a historical fact. And yet, this is the civilisation Trump aims to reduce to the "Stone Age".

The danger lies not in the phrase itself, but in the logic that follows. Because this "Stone Age" is not metaphor, it is method.

A systematic destruction

It is already being ruthlessly enacted. Research centres lie in ruins. At Shahid Beheshti University, a major scientific hub in Tehran, advanced laboratories have been struck.

Across the country, universities, including leading engineering institutions such as the Iran University of Science and Technology, have been bombed.

Medical infrastructure has not been spared. The Pasteur Institute of Iran, central to vaccine development and public health, has been hit.

Laboratories, universities, and medical centres are not incidental casualties. They are targets. This is not accidental destruction. It is systematic.

A strategy not simply to weaken a state, but to dismantle the foundations of civilian life itself. To drag a society backwards by design.

In Israeli media spaces, the unthinkable is increasingly aired with disturbing ease. Panels have entertained, even joked about, the use of nuclear or neutron weapons against Iran, with the chilling premise that populations could be eliminated while infrastructure remains intact.

This is not strategy. It is the normalisation of annihilation.

The objective is not only the destruction of the present, but the erasure of the past. It is the demolition of history itself, and its rewriting.

In this worldview, Palestine is not the exception. It is the model.

The destruction of Palestine has always been accompanied by a narrative, a myth: "a land without a people for a people without a land".

A place dense with history, culture, and civilisation recast as empty and waiting to be claimed. This is not historical error. It is colonial strategy.

This is how erasure works.

Not only by changing reality and redrawing maps, but by wiping out the past, rewriting history, and reconstructing memory.

Military power alone is never enough. It advances hand in hand with mythology. The logic of Amalek, not merely to defeat an enemy but to exterminate it.

A demonising discourse

At a recent White House gathering of evangelical leaders, the Book of Esther was invoked, casting modern Iranians as the heirs of an ancient enemy, before declaring that God has raised up Trump for this moment: to annihilate the wicked Persians and fulfil divine prophecy, Trump has gone further by justifying the destruction of civilian infrastructure by dismissing Iranians as "animals"; the same people he claims to liberate with his bombs.

Of course, once you strip a people of their humanity, anything you do to them becomes justifiable.

Two decades ago, during the Iraq war, the same demonising discourse was used of Arabs. Two years ago, during the Gaza genocide, of Palestinians. Today, of Iranians.

The war machine does not simply fight enemies. It manufactures them. It produces and reproduces its demons, its monsters; each one necessary to justify the brutality that follows.

Nor is this merely a reaction to Iranian defiance. A week into the war, Trump spoke casually of Iranians having "horrible genes", not like "our own", resurrecting the most violent language of racial extermination.

Layered onto all this is the old colonial doctrine once called the white man’s burden. Today, it is recast as an American and Israeli civilising mission imposed upon a region framed as backward, subhuman, chaotic, and expendable.

Trump draws from this instinctively.

To him, the Middle East is not a civilisation, but a ledger: oil, energy, trillions to be extracted.

And wherever there are centres of history, knowledge, and continuity, they are to be demolished, returned to the "Stone Age".

And this logic does not stop at Iran.

Because to destroy Iran’s infrastructure, its energy systems, industrial base, and scientific institutions is to wreck the entire Gulf region, supposedly America’s ally and the guardian of its dollar.

Modern Gulf states, built on the oil boom of the 1970s, depend on deeply interconnected systems: energy flows, trade routes, financial markets, and infrastructure networks.

Strike Iran, and the shock reverberates around: ports, pipelines, markets, supply chains; all exposed. Not Iran alone, but its neighbours too are threatened with being dragged into the same abyss. 

And if Iran, the state Trump threatens to demolish, is millennia old, these states are recent constructs, far more fragile, and far more vulnerable.

In the Middle East, "America First" is a myth.

The operative logic is "Israel first".

A vision of managed collapse

American power is deployed in service of a broader regional vision articulated by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his defence minister Israel Katz, and his national security minister, Itamar Ben Gvir.

A vision of fragmentation and managed collapse. A region broken into pieces.  A landscape of wrecked entities where Tel Aviv rises as everything around it is driven into ruin, a single "city on a hill", expanding in every direction, a "New Jerusalem" monopolising prosperity, while everything else lies shattered. 

And yet, this model has already revealed its limits.

The United States toppled Saddam Hussein in three weeks. And then spent years trapped in the chaos it created.

What forced its withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan was not defeat in battle. It was the disorder it unleashed.

The United States and Israel have demonstrated that they are capable of immense destruction. They can assassinate, bomb, and level entire cities. But destruction is not success, or victory, nor is it worthy of applause.

You can pulverise a city, but you cannot subdue a people.

To speak of returning Iran to the Stone Age is not a mark of strength. It is a confession of political failure and moral bankruptcy.

Trump cannot return Iran to the Stone Age, because it has not been there for thousands of years.

What he is doing instead is dragging America into one. 

Into an age of savagery.

Into the logic of the Stone Age.