Iconos

Iconos
Volcán Popocatépetl

domingo, 23 de marzo de 2025

Another night of horror in Gaza, another day of global silence

Ahmed Najar

19 March 2025 

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/gaza-another-night-horror-another-day-global-silence

As Israel resumes its genocidal campaign, wiping out entire Palestinian families, the world justifies the slaughter, ignores the suffering, and silences those who speak out.

It was 4am when I stumbled out of bed, half-asleep, to get a glass of water - a simple, thoughtless act. As I reached for my phone, I hesitated. Checking it might keep me awake. I wish I had resisted.

The screen lit up. My feed was drowning in horror - again. Gaza. Another massacre.

At first, the numbers were uncertain. A hundred dead. Then 200. Then 300. But I knew. The number always rises. And this time, it wouldn't stop...350...400...450.

In just two hours, Israel had obliterated more than 450 innocent lives.

My head pounded. My chest tightened. A wave of nausea hit me as I stared at the images - bodies wrapped in white shrouds, children covered in dust and blood, fathers clutching their lifeless sons, mothers screaming into the night, their grief swallowed by the silence of a world that refuses to care. These are the kinds of images that should shake humanity to its core, but somehow, they never do.

Unending horror

My hands trembled as I started making calls. It's what I always do when Gaza is under attack. It's what every Palestinian with family there does. We call. We check. We beg for an answer. 

My heart pounded. The anxiety, the helplessness - it was back, like a wound that had barely begun to close before being torn open again.

No one picked up.

I tried again. And again. Still nothing. My stomach twisted into knots. Were they safe? Was their home still standing? Had the bombs reached them? The worst part is, I knew they had nowhere to run. There is no shelter. No safe zone. No escape.

Finally, after what felt like an eternity, my mother answered. Her voice was steady, but I could hear the exhaustion beneath it.

"What can we do?" she said. "We are here. There is nowhere to run."

She had been trying to reach my sisters. No answer. My heart clenched. I tried calling them myself - nothing. I tried again - still nothing. The silence was deafening. And yet, somehow, I was expected to carry on with my day. To function as if everything were normal.

But how can anything be normal when 450 people are massacred in a single night? When entire families are wiped out? When parents are left digging through the rubble with their bare hands, searching for their children? How can anything be normal when my people are being starved, bombed, and slaughtered - and the world still refuses to see us as human?

And as I sat there, staring at the rising death toll, I wondered - since it is such a staggering number of innocent lives lost - will I wake up to an email calling for a minute of silence in their memory? Will world leaders rush to condemn this crime? Will social media be flooded with solidarity? Will landmarks light up in the colours of the Palestinian flag? Will 10 Downing Street project our flag in mourning?

Of course not.

Instead, we will witness the silence of the complicit. The West will justify the slaughter, twist reality, and dehumanise the victims. Palestinian lives will be belittled, erased - treated as if they do not matter.

When will this stop? Gaza has been starved, its people deprived of food, water, and medicine - and now, they are massacred in their sleep. Bombs rain down on their homes, on the schools where they seek shelter, and on the hospitals where they fight to survive. Everything is being destroyed, and still, the world refuses to act.

Complicit world

How much more will it take?

How many more mothers will have to bury their children? How many more fathers will have to pull their babies from the rubble? How many more mass graves must be dug before the world finally opens its eyes?

We see it. We see the double standards. We see the hypocrisy. We see how Palestinian blood is cheap in the eyes of the world. And we see how the same governments that preach about human rights, about democracy, about the rule of law, are the same ones arming and defending our oppressors.

The injustice is unbearable. The cruelty is unspeakable. And it's not just Palestinians in Palestine who suffer this injustice. Speak about Palestine in the West, and you risk being arrested, deported, accused of terrorism and antisemitism, or even losing your job. The silencing is global. The oppression is global.

I do not know if my sisters are safe. I do not know if my family will survive the next air strike. I do not know how many more nights I will wake up to the news of another massacre.

But I do know this: no matter how much the world tries to silence us, we will not stop speaking. No matter how much they try to erase us, we will not disappear. No matter how much they try to break us, Palestine will live.

Even if the world refuses to see us - we are here. And we will not be forgotten.

Stop bombing us. Stop killing us. Stop erasing us. The world cannot continue to look away.

Ahmed Najar is a Palestinian political analyst and a playwright who uses theatre to tell the stories of Palestine, blending personal experience with broader political commentary.

sábado, 22 de marzo de 2025

Reflections within Europe need to be reflected more at the decision-making level: Global Times editorial

By Global Times

Published: Mar 22, 2025

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202503/1330618.shtml

Amid the complex and changing international situation, Europe's self-positioning and the development of China-Europe relations have drawn significant attention. However, a series of recent actions and statements from the European side have been puzzling. First, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas claimed that if the US and Europe engage in a trade war, China would "laugh on the side." Then, European Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security Maros Sefcovic said that if Chinese electric vehicle (EV) and battery manufacturers want to invest in the EU, they should be prepared to transfer technology. Moreover, latest reports indicate that the EU is probing "whether China provided unfair subsidies for a BYD electric car plant in Hungary."

Meanwhile, five years after the release of the "EU's 5G cybersecurity toolbox," which urged member states to ban Huawei and ZTE from their networks, surveys indicate that 17 EU countries, including the biggest economies, have not fully implemented its provisions. In addition, Europe's 5G network deployment has clearly fallen behind North America and the Asia-Pacific region, leading to increasing discussions within Europe about strategic missteps in 5G development. Spain announced on Thursday that Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez will visit China and Vietnam next month, stating his intention to contribute to the rapprochement between the EU and "other powers and regional blocs" in the current "highly changing geopolitical context." Clearly, there is a gap between the European Commission's stance on China and the views held by some European countries, the European business community, and insightful individuals.

It is not difficult to see that behind the European Commission and the European Parliament's perplexing stance on China, several prevailing mindsets are at play. The first mindset is that, under the threat of Washington's tariff war, there is a desire to shift blame and deflect attention by promoting the narrative that "China benefits from the US-EU trade war." The second mindset, anchored in maintaining transatlantic relations, seeks to use improved ties with China as a bargaining chip in negotiations with Washington. The third mindset is more awkward, with the belief that China has seen an opportunity in the discord between the US and Europe, but Brussels should not allow Beijing to profit without paying the price; instead, it should approach Beijing more cautiously and strategically. The fourth mindset is shaped by a heightened defensive posture, especially after seeing China's industrial and technological advancements, leading to the attempt to cling even more stubbornly to the already struggling "de-risking" strategy.

Looking back at Europe's mindset over the past few years, from the Russia-Ukraine conflict to the current crisis in the transatlantic relationship, Europe's anxiety about its own vulnerabilities has been growing rapidly. In many policy areas, there is an increasing trend toward "pan-securitization." What stands out even more is that some in Europe instinctively point the finger at China, essentially crafting so-called "de-risking" against China, and formulating a variety of other toolkits such as "anti-coercion tools" that have profoundly affected the economic and trade relations between China and Europe. But who really poses the greatest threat to Europe's economic security? Some Europeans previously entertained the illusion that the losses caused by reducing cooperation with China could be compensated elsewhere. In reality, not only has compensation failed to materialize, but Europe has also faced even greater pressure from those supposed alternatives.

The wrong prescription not only fails to address the EU's structural problems but actually highlights its short-sightedness and passivity in global competition. Europe should find ways to overcome its anxiety rather than be trapped by it or pushed into a dilemma by reactive impulses. In fact, more and more voices of reflection are emerging within Europe. For example, a recent Belgian media article noted that China in the past accumulated automotive expertise from cooperation with European players, and it seems that Europe should draw inspiration from this in the field of batteries and it's time to return to the path of cooperation with a humble attitude. Most pragmatic professionals in the European business community recognize the opportunities that come with cooperating with China. They hope to further strengthen forward-looking collaboration with China in fields such as technology and new energy. These pragmatic voices should be reflected in Europe's decision-making.

While most EU countries find it practically impossible to "cut ties" with Chinese products, those European nations that have already deepened cooperation with China are reaping the benefits. For example, Chery Automobile and Spain's Ebro-EV Motors have established a joint venture in Barcelona, creating over 1000 local jobs. After CATL set up factories in Germany and Hungary, it partnered with Stellantis to establish a large-scale lithium iron phosphate battery plant in Spain, providing European consumers with higher-quality, longer-lasting, and more affordable EVs. This year, XPeng Motors and Volkswagen intensified their collaboration to build an ultra-fast charging network, while Hesai Technology secured an exclusive long-term project with a top European OEM. These developments demonstrate the countless opportunities emerging from China-Europe cooperation.

Europe has reached a point where it needs to rebalance its approach. Addressing Europe's vulnerabilities and fostering better development require cooperation with China, not the opposite. China-Europe cooperation is not merely a convergence of economic interests; it is also a strategic choice aimed at jointly addressing global challenges. On issues such as climate change, digital security, and public health, both sides share common interests and responsibilities. Strengthening cooperation in these areas would not only enhance their respective capabilities but also inject new vitality into global governance. China has no intention of exploiting others' difficulties or bullying anyone, and Europe, too, should pursue sincere communication and cooperation with China on the basis of equality and mutual respect.

viernes, 21 de marzo de 2025

The Zionists Within

Patrick Lawrence • March 18, 2025

https://www.unz.com/plawrence/the-zionists-within/

During Donald Trump’s first four years in the White House, the stranger to Washington’s infernal ways got nothing done: That cabal of various Deep State appendages — the Democratic Party’s upper echelons, the intelligence apparatus, the Justice Department and the F.B.I., and corporate media — made sure of that.

Trump seems to have thought this through during his four years playing golf at Mar-a–Lago. He returned to the White House two months ago this week with a full-dress plan to get done what he couldn’t first time around.

And now look. Donald Trump the subverted, we have to conclude, was better than Donald Trump the empowered. Who’d’a thunk it? The more Trump does this time around the more one looks back with a weird fondness to the subterfuge of the Trump I regime, unlawful and corrosive of our ailing republic as all that was.

Simplicius, the always stimulating commentator who takes his name from the sixth century Neoplatonist, posted an interesting summation of the present state of affairs the other day. “Trump,” he wrote, “now wallows in a post-euphoric doldrums phase of his floundering second term, when virtually every one of his campaign promises has faltered or flopped.”

Floundering presidents tend to make messes. The mess to which Simplicius refers concerns the Ukraine war and Washington’s relations with Moscow. Ending the former and repairing the latter was the biggest of Trump’s many big promises during last year’s campaign season.

Trump has been all over the place on this key question. The man who stood squarely against the war has now resumed supplying Ukraine with weapons and battlefield intelligence. This past week he had Marco Rubio, who comes over more as a schoolboy than a secretary of state, offering Moscow a ceasefire deal with the Kiev regime as if — one either laughs or does the other thing — the U.S. is the honest broker rather than the principal belligerent in the proxy war former President Joe Biden recklessly provoked.

It is the same wherever one looks — north to Canada, south to Mexico, across the Atlantic to Europe, across the Pacific to China. Altering the direction of policy is one thing, very often what is warranted; creating crises is another, and usually the mark of diplomatic incompetence.

Tariffs that have people recalling the consequences of the Smoot–Hawley Act back in the 1930s, relations with Beijing drifting from tension to hostility, the silly talk of owning Greenland, invading Mexico, repossessing the Panama Canal, and on and on: It is tempting to say Trump is starting to make Joe Biden look good — a feat that would surpass all men’s believing.

But no, we must turn to Israel and the Zionists’ campaign of terror against the Palestinians of Gaza and now the West Bank. And as we do we must forget about anyone making Joe Biden look good — not now, not in the histories yet to be written.

Taking Over From Biden on Israel

With the Israelis Trump is not floundering. He is picking up just where his genocidal predecessor left off and so getting done exactly what he wants. The two of them are just the same as they face “the Jewish state.” Just as Joe Biden was, Trump is acutely careful never to put a foot wrong with the Zionists.

Steven Witkoff, Trump’s “special envoy” in West Asia — in real life another property developer from New York with no apparent idea of how to conduct diplomacy — supposedly brokered a multi-phased ceasefire between Israel and Hamas soon after Trump took office. I say “supposedly” because we do not know what transpired between Witkoff and the Israelis and we may never. We have an official account with curb appeal for Trump as he poses as statesman for peace.

Since then Witkoff has organized — let’s stay with “supposedly,” as Tel Aviv probably dictated its terms — a seven-week extension of this first phase just as the second phase was due to start. This is not diplomacy, in my read: It is sequenced choreography.

Net: Trump’s man got a ceasefire signed, then arranged for its breach as the Israelis openly plan to resume their campaign of terror. It only looks like floundering, as I say.

Israel has resumed blocking humanitarian aid into Gaza, this time water as well as food, tents and other essentials to survival. I read over the weekend that Israel is now preventing record numbers of doctors and aid workers from entering the Strip.

From the White House in response to these straight-out war crimes: No sound.

Over the weekend Trump authorized large-scale airstrikes against Yemen; Reuters reports this is the most extensive U.S. military operation since Trump assumed office. Trump, you will recall, once opposed America’s military escapades abroad. Yemen, you will also recall, is one theater in the “seven-front war” to which Bibi Netanyahu committed Israel last year.

I think of these things and then think of the numerous reports we have had over many months that Trump accepted $100 million during his 2024 political campaign from Miriam Adelson, who carries on the arch–Zionist activities of her late husband. Trump’s ties — his debts, indeed — to the Adelsons and other Israel-über-alles obsessives like them lie beyond question.

And lately I think of something else — something it is time we all thought more about.

Mahmoud Khalil & the Attack on Universities

I know few people who have not been shocked by the arrest without charge — there being nothing to charge — of Mahmoud Khalil, the recent graduate of the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University, S.I.P.A., and the spokesman of those who have demonstrated against Israel’s genocide and America’s support of it this past year. Those who stand for the Palestinian cause, constitutional lawyers, ordinarily toothless media commentators: All view Khalil’s detention and the Trump administration’s plan to deport him as egregiously over the line.

The Khalil arrest is part of a full-scale attack on Columbia and the opening shot of a campaign against numerous other universities. Trump cut off $400 million in established government grants more or less simultaneously as Immigration and Customs cops stuffed Khalil into a van weekend before last.

The New York Times ran a curious commentary on Trump’s now-obvious blitz against higher education in its Sunday editions. Meghan O’Rourke lectures in English at Yale. This is the pith of the argument she makes under the headline, “The End of the University as We Know It”:

“What is really happening here is an attack on the American faith in knowledge as a value and a public good that has served us well….

If the battle over universities were only about budgets, the fight might be different. But what is being targeted is something more profound: the ability of institutions to sustain the freedoms that form the foundation of our democracy.”

Meghan O’Rourke speaks the truth but not the whole truth. Trump’s operation against America’s institutions of higher learning, while it has a lengthy history among conservatives, is prompted by this administration’s obsession with anti–Semitism — I mean “anti–Semitism,” to be clear. This is the obsession Zionists have purposely cultivated for decades; Trump, with his Adelson money and his indulgence of Israeli terror, merely brings this to a new phase of aggression.

Not once does Meghan O’Rourke mention this, not once the Khalil case. Meghan O’Rourke is effectively a symptom of precisely the advanced cancer she declines to name.

While I was contemplating, along with many, many others, the grossly unjust case of Mahmoud Khalil and all that lies behind it, a report that caused my jaw to collide with the edge of my desk arrived from MintPress News. This was Alan MacLeod’s piece under the headline, “Professor at Center of Columbia University Deportation Scandal Is Former Israeli Spy.” It appeared three days after Khalil was taken from his apartment near Columbia.

In an instant, the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil acquired vast new depths of implication. MacLeod has a habit of adding ballast to reported events in this way: He is among the best investigative journalists now publishing in independent media.

He writes in part:

“Dr. Keren Yarhi–Milo, the Columbia dean at the center of the university’s student purge, is a former Israeli military intelligence officer. Now, she stands accused of helping orchestrate the deportation of a Palestinian student leader and silencing campus dissent against Israel’s war on Gaza….

Khalil’s dean, … head of the School of International and Public Affairs, is a former Israeli military intelligence officer and official at Israel’s Mission to the United Nations. Yarhi–Milo played a significant role in drumming up public concern about a supposed wave of intolerable anti-Semitism sweeping over the campus, thereby laying the groundwork for the extensive crackdown on civil liberties that has followed the protests.”

It is a long, detailed piece, thoroughly reported, and it caused me to think yet again. How did a former I.D.F. officer on the intelligence side find her way to directing Columbia’s equivalent of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard? O.K., Israeli spookery to the Israeli Mission to the U.N. is a plausible progression. But how did Yarhi–Milo get from there to Columbia’s S.I.P.A.? What could have been the journey?

MacLeod links usefully to one of those puff pieces alumni magazines publish about illustrious graduates, in this case The Owl. Therein we read that the young Yarhi–Milo, raised outside Tel Aviv, read Columbia’s course catalog the way other girls her age read The Bobbsey Twins.

While at the U.N. Mission, she applied to S.I.P.A. and the dean soon afterward called her. In a subsequent interview, Yarhi–Milo reported, “We completely hit it off.” They had “a deep conversation,” and the spook-cum-aspiring scholar was accepted.

Happens all the time, of course. I was for a time a graduate student at S.I.P.A., and I am here to tell you I never had a call from the dean and never had a deep conversation with anyone other than my faculty adviser.

You get the drift here, I trust. By all available evidence, and with my bullshit detectors just back from the shop, this is a too-cute cover story apparently intended to gloss the appointment of a Zionist plant atop a major institution at a major American university.

As Alan MacLeod makes perfectly plain, Yarhi–Milo has acted in behalf of the Zionist cause since her arrival at S.I.P.A. six years ago. She has, indeed, tacitly approved of Khalil’s arrest, having made — his dean for heaven’s sake — no comment since he was forcibly detained.

Donald Trump is the all-to-public measure of how Zionists have penetrated the very highest levels of the U.S. government. This phenomenon is not new, of course. Trump will now serve to demonstrate the extent to which the countless appendages of the Zionist cause demand America sacrifice itself — its institutions, its laws, its very intelligence — to protect the barbarities of “the Jewish state” from criticism.

The journey of Keren Yarhi–Milo from an Israeli intelligence unit to the top of a leading American institution of higher learning tells us something else. The insidious penetration of Zionists into the very fabric of American life is very extensive, incalculably so. It would be difficult to overstate the consequences of this reality — the corruptions, the compromises, the duplicities, the degradations to which our polity is subjected.

White House: Trump ‘Fully Supports’ Israel’s Gaza Slaughter

The State Department said the US 'stands with Israel in every circumstance'

by Dave DeCamp March 20, 2025 

https://news.antiwar.com/2025/03/20/white-house-trump-fully-supports-israels-gaza-slaughter/

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that President Trump “fully supports” Israel’s renewed massive bombing campaign in Gaza, which has killed at least 200 children since Tuesday.

“The president made it very clear to Hamas that if they did not release all of the hostages, there would be all hell to pay. Unfortunately, Hamas chose to play games in the media with lives,” Leavitt told reporters.

The US and Israel are blaming Hamas for the lack of a continued ceasefire and hostage releases. But it was Israel that repeatedly violated the deal signed in January, which would have led to the release of all Israeli captives, a permanent truce, and Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.

Leavitt said that President Trump “fully supports Israel and the IDF and the actions that they’ve taken in recent days.”

On Wednesday, the State Department also affirmed the administration’s unconditional support for Israel. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said the US will “stand with Israel in every circumstance.”

When asked about the massive child casualties in the Israeli bombing, Bruce pinned the blame on Hamas. “So it’s a shame that Hamas has allowed this to occur, but look nowhere else other than the people who have facilitated this suffering from the beginning,” she said.

Bruce claimed that the administration wants peace, but President Trump has emboldened Netanyahu and his government by supplying huge amounts of military aid and repeatedly calling for the permanent expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza instead of pressuring Israel to implement the deal it signed in January.

 

 

jueves, 20 de marzo de 2025

Most Republicans support the right to protest — unless it’s against Israel, poll finds

By Brendan Rascius

March 19, 2025

https://archive.vn/VJnAZ

Most Republicans support the right to protest — unless it’s against Israel, according to new polling.

In the latest Economist/YouGov survey, a strong majority of GOP respondents, 73%, said they support Americans’ ability to protest against actions they view as unjust. Just 12% said they oppose this, and 14% said they weren’t sure.

But, when asked if it should be legal or illegal to protest “against Israeli actions in Gaza,” less than half of Republicans, 42%, said it should be legal. Meanwhile, 23% said this kind of public demonstration should be illegal, and 35% said they were not sure.

The poll — conducted March 16-18 with 1,618 U.S. adults — found support for protests was more consistent among Democrats and independents.

Eighty-six percent of Democrats and 81% of independents said they backed the right to demonstrate against actions perceived as unjust, while less than 20% of both groups said they opposed this or were unsure.

When it came to anti-Israel protests, 73% of Democrats said they should be legal, while 5% said they should be outlawed and 22% said they weren’t sure. A majority of independents, 57%, also said they should be legal, while 9% said they should be illegal and 34% said they didn’t know.

The right to protest is enshrined in the First Amendment of the Constitution, which states that no laws shall be made that prohibit “the right of the people peaceably to assemble.”

The poll — which has a margin of error of 3.4 percentage points — also found views on the sympathies of anti-Israel protesters differed greatly by party.

A majority of Republicans said they believe all (13%), most (25%) or half (14%) of the people who protest against Israeli actions in Gaza support Hamas, which is designated as a terrorist group by the U.S.

In contrast, a small fraction of Democrats believe support for Hamas is widespread among anti-Israel demonstrators in the U.S. Just 2% said they believe all of the protestors support Hamas, and 8% said most or all of them do.

A slightly larger share of independents — but still a minority — said they believe all (4%), most (16%) or half (9%) of those protesting against Israeli actions support Hamas.

More on protesters and the war in Gaza

The poll comes after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student and green card holder who participated in campus protests against Israel, on March 8.

“This is the first arrest of many to come,” President Donald Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “We know there are more students at Columbia and other Universities across the Country who have engaged in pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic, anti-American activity, and the Trump Administration will not tolerate it.”

On March 19, a federal judge in New York ruled that Khalil — who is being held in Louisiana — can challenge his detention, according to the Associated Press.

The case calls for careful review, the judge said, noting that it will need to be determined if the government “violated the law.”

The poll also comes after the Israeli military renewed strikes on Gaza following a two-month ceasefire brokered with the assistance of the Trump administration.

In a March 18 statement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the strikes were initiated after Hamas refused to hand over Israeli hostages.

The resumption of hostilities marks the continuation of a yearslong conflict in Gaza, which began Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas militants invaded Israel and killed about 1,200 civilians and took 251 hostages, according to U.S. officials.

Since the outbreak of the war, about 46,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, most of whom were women, older people and children, according to Reuters, citing Palestinian authorities.

The Israeli military campaign has also led to the displacement of some 1.9 million Gazans, many of whom have gone without access to adequate food, water and electricity, according to the United Nations.

miércoles, 19 de marzo de 2025

Palestinian Political Prisoner Mahmoud Khalil Releases Statement from Louisiana ICE Detention Center

Mahmoud Khalil • March 18, 2025

https://www.unz.com/article/palestinian-political-prisoner-mahmoud-khalil-releases-statement-from-louisiana-ice-detention-center/ 

Mahmoud Khalil, a green card holder with permanent residency, has released his first public statement since his arrest on March 8. He was taken into custody by plainclothes Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officers in the lobby of his Columbia University apartment complex due to his alleged connection to Hamas. His statement, released Tuesday, was dictated by phone to family members from an ICE center in Louisiana.

Khalil, who has not yet been charged with a crime, said he is a “political prisoner” and expressed concern with the political and social climate in the United States that led to his arrest. He and his lawyers argue that his arrest and detainment violate his constitutional rights to free speech and due process.

Khalil’s wife, who was present at the time of his arrest, is eight months pregnant and unsure if he will be present for the birth of their child.

His full unedited statement reads as follows:

My name is Mahmoud Khalil and I am a political prisoner. I am writing to you from a detention facility in Louisiana where I wake to cold mornings and spend long days bearing witness to the quiet injustices underway against a great many people precluded from the protections of the law.

Who has the right to have rights? It is certainly not the humans crowded into the cells here. It isn’t the Senegalese man I met who has been deprived of his liberty for a year, his legal situation in limbo and his family an ocean away. It isn’t the 21-year-old detainee I met, who stepped foot in this country at age nine, only to be deported without so much as a hearing.

Justice escapes the contours of this nation’s immigration facilities.

On March 8, I was taken by DHS agents who refused to provide a warrant, and accosted my wife and me as we returned from dinner. By now, the footage of that night has been made public. Before I knew what was happening, agents handcuffed and forced me into an unmarked car. At that moment, my only concern was for Noor’s safety. I had no idea if she would be taken too, since the agents had threatened to arrest her for not leaving my side. DHS would not tell me anything for hours — I did not know the cause of my arrest or if I was facing immediate deportation. At 26 Federal Plaza, I slept on the cold floor. In the early morning hours, agents transported me to another facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey. There, I slept on the ground and was refused a blanket despite my request.

My arrest was a direct consequence of exercising my right to free speech as I advocated for a free Palestine and an end to the genocide in Gaza, which resumed in full force Monday night. With January’s ceasefire now broken, parents in Gaza are once again cradling too-small shrouds, and families are forced to weigh starvation and displacement against bombs. It is our moral imperative to persist in the struggle for their complete freedom.

I was born in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria to a family which has been displaced from their land since the 1948 Nakba. I spent my youth in proximity to yet distant from my homeland. But being Palestinian is an experience that transcends borders. I see in my circumstances similarities to Israel’s use of administrative detention — imprisonment without trial or charge — to strip Palestinians of their rights.

I think of our friend Omar Khatib, who was incarcerated without charge or trial by Israel as he returned home from travel. I think of Gaza hospital director and pediatrician Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, who was taken captive by the Israeli military on December 27 and remains in an Israeli torture camp today. For Palestinians, imprisonment without due process is commonplace.

I have always believed that my duty is not only to liberate myself from the oppressor, but also to liberate my oppressors from their hatred and fear. My unjust detention is indicative of the anti-Palestinian racism that both the Biden and Trump administrations have demonstrated over the past 16 months as the U.S. has continued to supply Israel with weapons to kill Palestinians and prevented international intervention. For decades, anti-Palestinian racism has driven efforts to expand U.S. laws and practices that are used to violently repress Palestinians, Arab Americans, and other communities. That is precisely why I am being targeted.

While I await legal decisions that hold the futures of my wife and child in the balance, those who enabled my targeting remain comfortably at Columbia University. Presidents Shafik, Armstrong, and Dean Yarhi-Milo laid the groundwork for the U.S. government to target me by arbitrarily disciplining pro-Palestinian students and allowing viral doxing campaigns — based on racism and disinformation — to go unchecked.

Columbia targeted me for my activism, creating a new authoritarian disciplinary office to bypass due process and silence students criticizing Israel. Columbia surrendered to federal pressure by disclosing student records to Congress and yielding to the Trump administration’s latest threats. My arrest, the expulsion or suspension of at least 22 Columbia students — some stripped of their B.A. degrees just weeks before graduation — and the expulsion of SWC President Grant Miner on the eve of contract negotiations, are clear examples.

If anything, my detention is a testament to the strength of the student movement in shifting public opinion toward Palestinian liberation. Students have long been at the forefront of change — leading the charge against the Vietnam War, standing on the frontlines of the civil rights movement, and driving the struggle against apartheid in South Africa. Today, too, even if the public has yet to fully grasp it, it is students who steer us toward truth and justice.

The Trump administration is targeting me as part of a broader strategy to suppress dissent. Visa-holders, green-card carriers, and citizens alike will all be targeted for their political beliefs. In the weeks ahead, students, advocates, and elected officials must unite to defend the right to protest for Palestine. At stake are not just our voices, but the fundamental civil liberties of all.

Knowing fully that this moment transcends my individual circumstances, I hope nonetheless to be free to witness the birth of my first-born child.

Mr. Trump, you would've been lucky to have Dan Davis on your team

The retired Army Lt. Colonel was reportedly up for a top job with Tulsi but was the target of a smear campaign

Kelley Beaucar Vlahos

Mar 12, 2025

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/daniel-davis/?

Earlier today the Jewish Insider magazine ran a story saying that the White House tapped retired Lt. Col. Danny Davis for Deputy Director of National Intelligence, working under the newly confirmed DNI Tulsi Gabbard. It was a hit piece by a pro-Israel platform that primarily focused on Davis's critical views — published only in articles and on his popular podcast — on Gaza and Iran.

Within hours, he was informed there would be no job, Responsible Statecraft has confirmed. "Investigative journalist" Laura Loomer celebrated. We are sure neoconservative radio jock Mark Levin, who helped spread the Insider story to his 4.9 million followers on Wednesday, celebrated. We should not. President Trump should not.

Danny is a friend whose astute, informed military analysis has graced these pages over the last four years. I've had the pleasure of interviewing him countless times since 2009 when on active duty he sent a report to Congress and published an article excoriating the Afghanistan War generals— including the much vaunted Stanley McChrystal — for essentially lying to the American people.

In 2009 he had just returned from an inspection tour of the country and was pretty much shocked when what he saw there didn't line up with what the military was telling Congress and the mediahere. "I did not need to witness dramatic improvements to be reassured, but merely hoped to see evidence of positive trends, to see companies or battalions produce even minimal but sustainable progress."

"Instead, I witnessed the absence of success on virtually every level."

From his explosive Armed Forces Journal article, which is well worth reading today:

When it comes to deciding what matters are worth plunging our nation into war and which are not, our senior leaders owe it to the nation and to the uniformed members to be candid — graphically, if necessary — in telling them what’s at stake and how expensive potential success is likely to be. U.S. citizens and their elected representatives can decide if the risk to blood and treasure is worth it.

That is the very essence of civilian control of the military. The American people deserve better than what they’ve gotten from their senior uniformed leaders over the last number of years. Simply telling the truth would be a good start.

Today, more than 20 years later, everything he said about the war has been born out. The truth was out there and our military and civilian leadership tried to keep it from us — until they couldn't.

It may be obvious but that is exactly what Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and DNI Gabbard said they wanted to bring to the table — a refreshing, dramatic shift from the status quo, which had become sclerotic, secretive, and punishing of dissent. Gabbard herself is an Iraq War-era veteran who risked her career to tell uncomfortable truths about American foreign policy and war. Her very public statements about bad Washington policies and the special interests leading us unto unnecessary wars aligned well with Danny's important work over the last several years.

So it is not surprising that the most strident voices in the War Party, particularly pro-Israel hawks trying desperately to manage the remembered history of the 9/11 wars, had it in for him. He is an anathema to everything they have stood for over the last two decades: he is against the U.S. trying to impose its interests and values on the world via foreign regime change, he believes the military is overextended and needlessly placed in harm's way overseas, and he has criticized the military industrial complex for risking troop readiness and basic conventional warfighting capabilities by deferring to the war profiteers in the industry. He has also echoed George Washington's warning about entangling alliances in his own warnings about unconditional aid to Israel and Ukraine.

Just recently he told me that the entire current generation of generals and admirals need to be replaced so that the military can reform itself, which begins with promoting officers based on merit, not politics and risk aversion.

To me this is the kind of America First guy that the administration needed. He is a Christian conservative with a stern moral compass and had been hopeful for the new administration and its early foreign policy moves. He risked his reputation in 2009, losing out on a typical post-military career in some cushy sinecure mucking it up with other establishmentarians planning the next war, or worse, a board seat at Lockheed or Northrop Grumman. Instead, he has been toiling away at the truth. And this is how the system rewards him. Shame.