Iconos

Iconos
Volcán Popocatépetl

jueves, 6 de febrero de 2025

Israeli Settler Leaders Welcome Trump’s Call for Ethnic Cleansing in Gaza

Ben Gvir said he'll rejoin the Israeli government if Trump's plan is implemented

by Dave DeCamp

February 5, 2025

https://news.antiwar.com/2025/02/05/israeli-settler-leaders-welcome-trumps-call-for-ethnic-cleansing-in-gaza/

Israeli settler leaders have welcomed President Trump’s call for Palestinians to be removed from the Gaza Strip, which would amount to ethnic cleansing, and are calling for his plans to be implemented.

On Tuesday, Trump had called for Palestinians to be removed from Gaza “permanently” before announcing a plan for a US “takeover” of the Strip. The White House walked his plan back slightly, saying the idea was for “temporary relocation,” but it’s unlikely Israel would let Palestinians return.

According to The Times of Israel, Israel Ganz, head of a settler Group known as the Yesha Council, said Trump’s plan amounted to “declaring an end to the Palestinian dream to destroy Israel through Gaza or the establishment of a Palestinian state in the heart of the land of Israel.”

Ganz said Israel would “adopt Trump’s vision today, and translate it into action” and called for the plan also to include the Israeli annexation of the Israeli-occupied West Bank. President Trump said on Tuesday that he was making a decision on the potential annexation within the next four weeks.

Itamar Ben Gvir, a West Bank settler and leader of Israel’s Jewish Power party, said he would rejoin the Israeli government if Trump’s plan is implemented. Ben Gvir quit Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government over the Gaza ceasefire plan.

“I haven’t sewn a new ministerial suit yet, but there is no doubt that the chances of Jewish Power returning to the government have increased,” he said. “The ball is now in the hands of the prime minister. As soon as we start and there is an intention to implement it – I’m back.”

Ben Gvir is a major proponent of Gaza and the establishment of Jewish settlements in the Strip. Nachala, another settler organization, called for the building of settlements if Trump’s plan is implemented.

“On the assumption that Trump’s declaration about transferring Gazans to other countries is translated into practical action, settlements should be quickly built across the entire Gaza Strip,” Nachala said.

miércoles, 5 de febrero de 2025

Trump's Gaza shock wave stuns Middle East and some in White House

Barak Ravid

https://www.axios.com/2025/02/05/trump-gaza-plan-reaction-israel-middle-east

President Trump's stunning declaration that the U.S. could "take over" Gaza surprised many of his own advisers, thrilled right-wing Israelis, and deeply alarmed the governments in Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan, sources in Washington and around the region tell Axios.

Friction point: Trump's plan to displace two million Palestinians came at a very sensitive point of the Israel-Hamas ceasefire and hostage deal. It could even embolden both Hamas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to resume the war.

Driving the news: After an Oval Office meeting with Netanyahu, Trump presented his proposal to turn Gaza — largely destroyed by Israel in its war with Hamas — into what he called the "Riviera of the Middle East" and invite "the world's people" to move there.

  • The sense of shock was palpable among the 150 journalists in the room.
  • Very few people on Trump's team knew in advance that he would go so far as to pronounce the U.S. would "own" the war-scarred enclave — a highly interventionist endeavor for a long-time critic of U.S. nation-building around the world.

Zoom in: Some members of Netanyahu's delegation left the room almost jubilant.

  • The visit was "truly historic" and "exceeded all of our expectations and dreams," one senior Israeli official gushed. "Trump raised genius solutions to problems that Israel has faced since its establishment."
  • Trump's displacement plan was praised by members of the Israeli far-right as a "green light" for full Israeli occupation of Gaza and the building of settlements.
  • A source close to Trump said that's not his intention.

Zoom out: Leaders in Egypt, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority were already horrified by Trump's repeated comments over the last two weeks about expelling Palestinians from Gaza. They will be even more nervous now.

  • Trump's comments also shocked Saudi Arabia — a country which the president described Tuesday as a key partner in implementing his plans in the region, a U.S. source close to the Saudis told Axios.
  • The Saudis were also upset about Trump's claim at the top of his meeting with Netanyahu that the kingdom won't condition normalization of relations with Israel on Palestinian statehood.
  • Although it was around 4 a.m. in Riyadh, the Saudi Foreign Ministry issued a strongly worded statement rejecting that claim and opposing Trump's plan for displacing Palestinians.
  • "The Saudi crown prince doesn't want to be seen as being part of what Trump is talking about," the U.S. source said.

Behind the scenes: It's not clear how Trump settled on the idea of a U.S. takeover of Gaza.

  • One source close to the president said it was Trump's own idea and he had been thinking about it for at least two months.
  • Trump was genuinely moved by the scope of the destruction of Gaza, and realizes it could take 15 years to rebuild, another source with knowledge of Trump's thinking said.
  • A U.S. official said Trump presented his plan because he came to the conclusion that no one else had any new ideas for Gaza.
  • A day before Trump's remarks, deputy White House Middle East envoy Morgan Ortagus told a group of Arab ambassadors who came to express opposition to expelling Palestinians from Gaza that Trump doesn't want their leaders to just say "no," but to come up with their own solutions, a second U.S. official said.

Between the lines: Trump also sees the Gaza Strip as prime real estate that could be at the center of a regional deal involving Saudi Arabia, Israel and other countries.

  • But his plan doesn't grapple with the deep historic trauma of displacement for the Palestinians and for countries in the region.
  • "He is a disruptor. He wanted to challenge the discourse," a source close to Trump said.

What to watch: Trump's plan could prove disruptive for the Gaza ceasefire deal, with the sides currently implementing the first phase of the deal and beginning to negotiate the second phase.

  • Trump emphasized Tuesday that he still wants to bring back all remaining hostages held by Hamas.
  • But Trump's plan could increase support for Hamas inside Gaza and push the group to stop implementing the hostage deal.
  • Meanwhile, Netanyahu was already looking for a rationale to resume the war when the initial 42-day ceasefire ends.

What's next: King Abdullah II of Jordan will arrive in Washington next week and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi the week after that for what should be dramatic meetings with Trump.

martes, 4 de febrero de 2025

Netanyahu decides the fate of the Middle East and Trump has no say

As we have said for years on this blog, the world superpower is a lackey of Israel.

The first leader Donald Trump received 14 days after taking office as president of the United States is his mentor, Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel.

At the joint press conference they held at the White House after their meeting, in addition to announcing the 1 billion dollars that the United States will provide Israel in weapons, it was pointed out that Gaza is so destroyed that its population, that is, the Palestinians, must go to other countries so that the area can be rebuilt and turned into a “Mediterranean Riviera.”

According to Donald Trump, who sounded more like a real estate developer taking advantage of the opportunity to get a good deal than a head of state trying to resolve an international conflict, the Arab countries of the Middle East must bear the responsibility of giving asylum to 2.5 million Palestinians, after Israel devastated their homes.

The cynicism of Trump and Netanyahu is overwhelming. The stupid monarchs and presidents of the Arab and Sunni countries of the Middle East now must take responsibility for the 2.5 million people that Israel massacred and left homeless; and according to Trump and Netanyahu that would be a great humanitarian deed by these Middle Eastern countries.

While Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia have already rejected this Israeli-American “solution” to the “Palestinian problem”, it remains to be seen how Washington and Tel Aviv will pressure these countries to shoulder a responsibility that does not correspond to them, and also to accept new diplomatic and economic agreements with Israel, as if nothing had happened after the Zionist regime devastated Gaza and is carrying out ethnic cleansing in the West Bank.

Unfortunately, neither the UN, the European Union, the Arab League, Russia, China, Africa, nor Latin America, are willing to support the Palestinians, who have been left alone, abandoned by the world, at the mercy of the genocidal, war criminals of the United States and Israel.

Mass Displacement and Unprecedented Tragedy: Gaza’s War in Numbers

February 2, 2025

https://www.palestinechronicle.com/mass-displacement-and-unprecedented-tragedy-gazas-war-in-numbers/

The Government Media Office in Gaza reported on Sunday that Israel’s genocidal war on the Gaza Strip has resulted in the deaths of more than 61,000 Palestinians and the displacement of over two million people, many of whom have been forcibly displaced multiple times. 

Officials described the scale of destruction as an unprecedented tragedy in modern history.

Speaking at a press conference, the office confirmed that 61,709 Palestinians have been killed, including 47,487 whose bodies have reached hospitals. Another 14,222 remain trapped under rubble or on roads, inaccessible to rescue teams.

The number of wounded has climbed to 111,588, while more than 6,000 Palestinians have been detained, many of whom have been subjected to severe abuse and torture, with dozens reportedly dying in Israeli custody.

The Government Media Office stated that Israel has carried out 9,268 massacres, leading to the total extermination of 2,092 families from the civil registry. 

Additionally, 4,889 families were reduced to a single surviving member, highlighting what officials describe as a campaign of systematic ethnic cleansing.

Children and women have borne the brunt of the violence. At least 17,881 children have been killed, including 214 infants born and lost during the war. The number of women killed has reached 12,316, leaving 38,000 children orphaned—17,000 of whom lost both parents.

Humanitarian personnel have also been targeted, with 1,155 medical workers, 205 journalists, and 194 civil defense personnel killed. Additionally, 736 aid workers and over 3,500 government employees have lost their lives.

The war has crippled Gaza’s infrastructure, knocking 34 hospitals out of service and damaging more than 150,000 housing units. Initial estimates put direct economic losses across multiple sectors at over $50 billion, with damage in the transportation sector alone surpassing $1.5 billion.

The Government Media Office described the situation in Gaza as an ongoing genocide, calling on the international community to take immediate action to stop the assault.

Israel launched its war on Gaza following the October 7, 2023, Operation Flood of Al-Aqsa carried out by the Palestinian resistance. 

For months, Israeli forces have employed relentless bombardment, fire belts, and indiscriminate shelling, destroying homes, hospitals, schools, and shelters.

Following repeated rounds of stalled negotiations and amid mounting international pressure—including warnings from US President Donald Trump about securing a ceasefire before his inauguration—an agreement was finally reached and took effect on January 19.

 

lunes, 3 de febrero de 2025

After Meeting with Rubio, Panama’s President Says ‘No Real Threat’ From US To Seize Canal

Rubio told Panama it needs to reduce 'Chinese influence' over the canal, a reference to a Hong Kong-based company that manages two ports

by Dave DeCamp February 2, 2025

https://news.antiwar.com/2025/02/02/after-meeting-with-rubio-panamas-president-says-no-real-threat-from-us-to-seize-canal/

Secretary of State Marco Rubio was in Panama on Sunday on his first foreign trip since being sworn in and met with President José Raúl Mulino to discuss the Panama Canal.

President Trump had been threatening to “take back” the Panama Canal, but Mulino said after meeting with Rubio that he did not see a serious threat of US military action despite some strong comments.

“I don’t feel that there is any real threat at this time against the treaty, its validity, or much less of the use of military force to seize the canal,” Mulino told reporters after the meeting.

Trump has set his sights on the Panama Canal over claims that it’s controlled by China, an accusation that lacks evidence and that Panamanian officials have strongly denied.

The US claim appears to be based on the fact that two ports on either side of the canal are operated by CK Hutchinson, a company based in Hong Kong. Other nearby ports are run by companies based in the US, Taiwan, and Singapore.

Panamanian officials suspect Trump’s real motive is to reduce Chinese investments in Panama to make opportunities for US companies and potentially negotiate cheaper transit fees for US ships. According to the State Department, Rubio warned the US would take action if Panama didn’t reduce “Chinese influence” in the canal.

“Secretary Rubio informed President Mulino and Minister Martínez-Acha that President Trump has made a preliminary determination that the current position of influence and control of the Chinese Communist Party over the Panama Canal area is a threat to the canal and represents a violation of the Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal,” the State Department said in a readout of the meeting.

“Secretary Rubio made clear that this status quo is unacceptable and that absent immediate changes, it would require the United States to take measures necessary to protect its rights under the Treaty,” the statement added.

According to The Associated Press, Mulino did say that Panama wouldn’t renew its agreement with China on Beijing’s global infrastructure project, known as the Belt and Road Initiative. Panama joined the BRI in 2017 after it severed diplomatic relations with Taiwan and opened up with Beijing under President Juan Carlos Varela.

domingo, 2 de febrero de 2025

TRUMP APPLIES TARIFFS TO MEXICO AND WITH THIS STARTS A TRADE WAR

President Donald Trump signed an executive order invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives him the power to raise tariffs because he considers the entry of illegal immigrants and drugs that “kill our citizens, including fentanyl”, to be a “major threat” to the country.

We reproduce the post on his Truth Social network where he announces this measure.

Today, I have implemented a 25% Tariff on Imports from Mexico and Canada (10% on Canadian Energy), and a 10% additional Tariff on China. This was done through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) because of the major threat of illegal aliens and deadly drugs killing our Citizens, including fentanyl. We need to protect Americans, and it is my duty as President to ensure the safety of all. I made a promise in my Campaign to stop the flood of illegal aliens and drugs from pouring across our Borders, and Americans overwhelmingly voted in favor of it.

Trump also accused a “tariff lobby” led by “globalists” mainly from the Wall Street Journal, who lobby in favor of Mexico, Canada, and China, countries on which Trump has imposed tariffs.

The “Tariff Lobby,” headed by the Globalist, and always wrong, Wall Street Journal, is working hard to justify Countries like Canada, Mexico, China, and too many others to name, continue the decades long RIPOFF OF AMERICA, both with regard to TRADE, CRIME, AND POISONOUS DRUGS that are allowed to so freely flow into AMERICA. THOSE DAYS ARE OVER! The USA has major deficits with Canada, Mexico, and China (and almost all countries!), owes 36 Trillion Dollars, and we’re not going to be the “Stupid Country” any longer. MAKE YOUR PRODUCT IN THE USA AND THERE ARE NO TARIFFS! Why should the United States lose TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN SUBSIDIZING OTHER COUNTRIES, and why should these other countries pay a small fraction of the cost of what USA citizens pay for Drugs and Pharmaceuticals, as an example? THIS WILL BE THE GOLDEN AGE OF AMERICA! WILL THERE BE SOME PAIN? YES, MAYBE (AND MAYBE NOT!). BUT WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AND IT WILL ALL BE WORTH THE PRICE THAT MUST BE PAID. WE ARE A COUNTRY THAT IS NOW BEING RUN WITH COMMON SENSE — AND THE RESULTS WILL BE SPECTACULAR!!!

The government of President Claudia Sheinbaum had managed to stop the imposition of tariffs in the first days of the Trump administration, by accepting all the demands on migration. From what is now known, there was already a permanent negotiation with the State Department to see what measures the Mexican government would take on this issue and in the fight against drug trafficking. There was a certain confidence in the Mexican authorities that the willingness of the Mexican government to cooperate on both issues with the Trump administration would avoid the imposition of tariffs, but that has not been the case.

In addition, Trump accused the Mexican government (in the executive order he signed) of being in collusion with drug cartels, a very harsh and unusual accusation in the history of relations between Mexico and the United States, especially since the free trade agreement between both countries and Canada came into force on January 1, 1994; and its successor, the USMCA, on July 1, 2020.

President Sheinbaum responded by denying her government's relationship with the cartels, and in turn, accusing the armories in the United States that provide weapons to drug cartels of being in collusion with these criminal organizations.

Likewise, Sheinbaum said that the main problem is drug consumption in the United States that is not addressed, as well as the distribution and sale of drugs on the streets of the main cities of the United States, which, along with money laundering from these activities, is also not addressed by the United States authorities in its territory.

Sheinbaum reiterated her willingness to dialogue and negotiate with the Trump government on matters of security and migration, but also instructed the Secretary of Economy, Marcelo Ebrard, to respond with "tariff and non-tariff measures" to the imposition of tariffs by the United States government, which will begin to apply starting next February 4.

For his part, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that he would respond with 25% tariffs on imports from the United States and that he will coordinate with the Mexican government to provide a joint response to the Trump administration.

However, anticipating this response from Mexico and Canada, Trump included in his executive order that if Mexico, Canada, and China apply tariffs to the United States, the response will be a new increase in tariffs, which implies an escalation of retaliation and counter-retaliation, that is, an open trade war between the United States and its two main trading partners.

WHY IS TRUMP DOING THIS?

For allied governments of the United States, a significant part of the business sector of that country, specialists, academics, intellectuals, etc. it is neither economically nor strategically sensible to engage in a trade and diplomatic conflict with its neighbors and main trading partners, including military ally Canada.

What then explains these measures, statements, and attitudes of Trump towards Mexico and Canada?

In the case of Mexico, it is clear that since his first presidential term, both Trump and the social base that supports him have seen it as the main source of problems for the society and economy of the United States: illegal immigrants who put pressure on services such as education and health in communities; they are also a source of insecurity (rapists, criminals, thieves); they are poorly qualified and therefore receive very low salaries that put downward pressure on the salaries of Americans; they later bring their families, who do not contribute to the economy, but are a burden; they may be linked not only to criminal organizations but to terrorist groups; they bring a culture, language and customs different from those of the Americans.

In terms of security, drug cartels dominate up to a third of Mexican territory and are protected in collusion with the Mexican government itself; they send dangerous drugs, such as fentanyl, which cause the death of more than 100,000 Americans per year; cartels are already present in almost all states of the American Union, allying themselves with local gangs, generating even more violence and insecurity in the cities.

In economic terms, cheap labor and very lax environmental and labor regulations, added to the free trade agreement between both countries, have caused thousands of manufacturing companies from the United States to establish themselves in Mexico, leaving many states of the American Union deindustrialized; and the trade agreement has generated a huge trade deficit with Mexico, which affects the finances of the United States.

Thus, for Trump, his close circle, and his social base, Mexico is practically the main threat to the United States in terms of security and economic matters.

Hence, the only way to stop and reverse these negative consequences for the United States is to punish the Mexican government where it hurts the most, that is, in the economic aspect, not only so that Mexico remains the main barrier, the true wall that stops illegal migration to the United States, but also to stop the flow of drugs to the United States, because the Trump government is very aware that it does not have the capacity and perhaps not even the will to reduce the insatiable consumption of drugs in its country, so it passes the responsibility of reducing this problem to its southern neighbor.

The other reason is that the Trump government wants to form a homogeneous front against the China-Russia duo. That is, countries that consider themselves allies of Washington, such as Mexico and Canada, must strictly follow Washington's guidelines in the global strategic competition that is mainly with China.

The Mexican government has a trade deficit with China of 120 billion dollars, that is, practically half of the trade surplus that Mexico has with the United States ends up in Chinese pockets. This is because a large part of the supply chain begins in China and/or Southeast Asia, continues their journey to Mexico, where the products are manufactured or partially or fully assembled, and finally arrives, without tariffs (thanks to the USMCA), in the United States.

The Trump administration no longer wants China to be the one that ends up benefiting from the USMCA, nor does it want Chinese investments to compete with the United States in the Mexican market, so the tariffs are an announcement to Mexico that it must cut economic relations with China, something that seems impossible given that the supply chains would be seriously disrupted; unless said chains start in Mexico, that is, the factories that provide many of the inputs are relocated to Mexico (nearshoring).

The latter is precisely what the Mexican government proposes, but the Trump administration not only wants those factories to leave China and cross the Pacific, but to be established in the United States; and, similarly, that American factories that are in Mexico be relocated to the United States.

The latter would put an end to any free trade agreement between Mexico and the United States, and to Mexico's attractiveness as a platform for exporting to the United States.

Thus, Trump is demanding the impossible from Mexico: that it stop the flow of migrants from all over the world and accept all deportees, of all nationalities, that the United States sends to it; that it stop all drug flows to the United States (knowing that the Mexican government is in collusion with the cartels, which would force it to cut those ties, something that the Mexican political class is not willing to do); that it cut its economic ties with China, but at the same time that the American, European and Asian companies that take advantage of the USMCA to export from Mexico to the United States without tariffs, relocate to the United States, which would leave Mexico without any attraction for foreign investment.

In short, Sheinbaum is between a rock and a hard place, and there is no way she can come out unscathed, since if the trade war continues for several months, it is estimated that Mexico would lose 2% of its GDP this year, when it was estimated that it would grow by just 1%, meaning it would end 2025 with a decrease of -1%.

Finally, the United States can withstand a trade war against Mexico and Canada for longer but adding China and perhaps later the European Union (which Trump has also threatened with tariffs) could be catastrophic for the American economy.

sábado, 1 de febrero de 2025

White House: No delay to Canada or Mexico tariffs, Feb. 1 still the target

Courtenay Brown

https://www.axios.com/2025/01/31/trump-tariffs-canada-mexico-feb-1-march-1

The White House said it will still roll out 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada, alongside 10% tariffs on China, on Feb. 1 — and threatened future tariffs on other imports from around the globe.

Why it matters: The tariffs would likely spark retaliation of an unknown magnitude, risking economic pain for businesses and consumers.

What they're saying: "There could be some temporary, short-term disruption, and people will understand that," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Friday when asked if tariffs would raise prices — which he said they do not.

  • Many economists say the opposite is true: New analysis by the Tax Foundation said the proposed tariffs on China, Canada and Mexico would be an effective tax increase on U.S. households of $830 this year alone.
  • Asked whether he was worried how financial markets would react to tariffs, Trump said simply: "No."

Between the lines: Trump also said he would "absolutely" impose tariffs on the European Union, though he offered few details.

  • He said that the administration would "eventually" put tariffs on chips, steel, aluminum, copper and pharmaceuticals.

Catch up quick: Reuters reported earlier on Friday that the White House would push off tariff implementation on China, Mexico and Canada until March 1 — leaving a window for negotiation that could kill the plan altogether.

  • "I saw that report and it is false," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a press briefing.

The big picture: There was whiplash across financial markets Friday after the report of the delay, the denial and then Trump's Oval Office statements.

  • The U.S. dollar, which weakened on the initial delay report, immediately surged against both the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso as Leavitt spoke.
  • Tariffs lead to a stronger dollar, and the currency pairs have been incredibly sensitive to headlines in recent days.

What to watch: Trump's moves would further rattle trade relations with the top U.S. trade partners in one fell swoop. It is unclear which imports might be excluded, though Trump said crude oil from Canada would likely face lower tariffs.

  • "Probably going to reduce the tariff a little bit on that," Trump said.
  • A U.S. tariff would "set aside" the free trade agreement with Mexico and Canada known as USMCA, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum reportedly told a news conference.