Iconos

Iconos
Volcán Popocatépetl

miércoles, 30 de abril de 2025

“The masters of the universe are Jews,” former US Senator declares in Israel

Wyatt Reed· April 28, 2025

https://thegrayzone.com/2025/04/28/masters-universe-jews-us-senator-israel/

Ex-GOP Senator and Republican Jewish Coalition chair Norm Coleman proclaimed with a straight face that Jews control the world during a Jerusalem conference featuring a speech by Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. 

Former US Senator Norm Coleman has raised eyebrows by declaring that “the masters of the universe are Jews” at a major Zionist lobby event in Jerusalem. In an address to a summit hosted by the Adelson-funded Jewish News Syndicate on April 27, Coleman pointed to various major technology firms founded by Jews, suggesting the shared religion of the companies’ creators should translate into a greater zeal for censoring criticism of Israel.

“And when you think about it, the Masters of the Universe are Jews! We’ve got Altman at OpenAI, we’ve got [Facebook founder Mark] Zuckerberg, we’ve got [Google founder] Sergey Brin, we’ve got a group across the board. Jan Koum, y’know, founded WhatsApp. It’s us.”

The remarks came as Coleman lamented that pro-Israel propagandists are “losing the digital war” in battle for the hearts and minds of younger generations, and called for more stringent censorship of pro-Palestinian speech.

“A majority or Gen Z have an unfavorable impression of Israel. And, my friends, I think the reason for that is that we’re losing the digital war. They’re getting their information from TikTok, and… and we’re losing that war.”

As numerous polls show young Americans are increasingly skeptical of Israel – with a recent survey showing 71% of Democrats and 50% of Republicans under age 49 now hold an unfavorable view of Israel – establishment politicians have consistently blamed TikTok’s algorithm for the decline in enthusiasm for genocide. In February, the top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, Mark Warner, revealed that the bill forcing China’s ByteDance to sell TikTok was motivated by the visibility of pro-Palestine content on the app.

For Coleman, though, it appears this wasn’t enough. “We have to figure out a way to win the digital battle,” he told summit attendees. “We’ve got to get our digital sneakers on, so that the truth can prevail over the lies. And when we do that, the future of Israel will be stronger because a majority of all Americans will support Israel. We’ll make that happen, we have to make it happen. Thank you, Baruch hashem.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took the stage directly after Coleman’s speech, highlighting Tel Aviv’s interest in the event, which was billed as the “Inaugural JNS Policy Summit to address Israel’s pressing strategic issues.”

An archetypal neoconservative, Coleman started off as an anti-war activist who once worked as a roadie for Jethro Tull, and was suspended from Hofstra University for leading a sit-in. “I went to Woodstock, and I inhaled!” he boasted at the JNS summit. After first taking office as a member of the Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, Coleman wound up narrowly losing his Senate seat to Al Franken in 2008 as a Republican.

In addition to serving as the national chairman of the Republican Jewish Coalition and founder of the Congressional Leadership Fund super PAC, Coleman now works as a top lobbyist for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 

Amnesty International: Israel Carrying Out ‘Live-Streamed Genocide’ in Gaza

The rights organization says Israel is committing genocide by 'inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about Palestinians' physical destruction'

by Dave DeCamp April 29, 2025

https://news.antiwar.com/2025/04/29/amnesty-international-israel-carrying-out-live-streamed-genocide-in-gaza/

Amnesty International said in its annual human rights report that Israel is carrying out a “live-streamed genocide” as the world looks on.

“Since 7 October 2023 – when Hamas perpetrated horrific crimes against Israeli citizens and others and captured more than 250 hostages – the world has been made audience to a live-streamed genocide,” Amnesty Secretary-General Agnes Callamard said in an introduction to the report.

“States watched on as if powerless, as Israel killed thousands upon thousands of Palestinians, wiping out entire multigenerational families, destroying homes, livelihoods, hospitals, and schools,” Callamard added.

The report said that Israel was committing the crime of genocide by “killing Palestinian civilians, causing serious bodily or mental harm, and deliberately inciting conditions of life calculated to bring about Palestinians’ physical destruction by causing mass forced displacement, obstructing or denying lifesaving aid, and by damaging or destroying life-sustaining infrastructure.”

Amnesty first concluded Israel was committing genocide in Gaza in a report published in December 2024. The US has rejected the conclusion and has opposed the genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice since US officials are implicated due to US military aid and other types of support for Israel.

The new Amnesty report criticized some aspects of the domestic situation in the US and the US government’s support for Israel. “The continued supply of munitions to Israel violated US laws and policies regarding the transfer and sale of arms, intended to prevent arms transfers that risk contributing to civilian harm and violations of human rights or international humanitarian law,” Amnesty said.

Amnesty said that it had identified US-made bombs used in “unlawful deadly airstrikes by the Israeli military on residential homes and a makeshift camp for displaced people in the occupied Gaza Strip.”

martes, 29 de abril de 2025

Trump Is the Symptom, U.S. Imperialism Is the Disease

U.S. Peace Council Statement
April 15, 2025

Popular resistance to the Trump administration’s erratic, anti-people, and dangerous domestic and foreign policies is growing every day as seen with the massive demonstrations held throughout the country on and after April 5. We welcome these protests and the popular demands raised by them, but we must criticize significant flaws that block the political changes we desperately need.

Criticism is personalized against President Trump, Elon Musk, and the “billionaires” for actions that have been the hallmark of bipartisan policies for decades. Monied interests — not as individuals but as a class, and regardless of their political party — have always been in control of the U.S. government and have prioritized their interests over the interests of the majority, only limited by the organized people’s movements.

Personalizing the criticism and solely blaming the present administration for the problems created by both parties is tantamount to siding with one group of “billionaires” (Democrat) against the other (Republican). Such is the nature of the two-party duopoly as a system, regardless of personnel changes in the White House. Meanwhile, the entire U.S. body politic lurches from one administration to the next on a rightward trajectory toward fascism.

Largely organized by the Democratic party-based group Indivisible, the “Hands Off!” protests were silent about the U.S.’s bipartisan militaristic foreign policy and focused solely on domestic issues, except for “Hands Off NATO”. Revealingly, “Hands Off Palestine” was omitted from the official demands, though grassroots activists raised it.

This intentional silence on foreign policy, and its arbitrary separation from domestic issues, hide the fact that many domestic problems result from a militaristic foreign policy imposed on our country. Trillions of dollars of much needed funds are redirected from human needs to war mongering in Ukraine, West Asia, and Asia-Pacific. Achieving popular power can be most effectively galvanized if it is informed by politically and consciously recognizing the class basis of war and militarism. In contrast, official demands of the “Hands Off!” mobilization, with its embrace of NATO but silence on genocide in Gaza, obscures the class basis of war.

While official lawlessness did not start with Trump, the new president is bent on changing the present post-war imperialist order with another one that gives the empire even more impunity. The U.S. ruling class as a whole has been accelerating the tendency for the U.S. to operate outside the bounds of both national and international law, regardless of who is in office.

The West’s proxy war on Russia continues in Ukraine, while war clouds are gathering around creating another proxy war with the People’s Republic of China using Taiwan and South Korea. And, all the while, the U.S./Israel genocide continues against Palestine and its allies. The imminent war with Iran, supported by both parties, is yet another pressing issue that can best be explained within the framework of imperialism.

On top of all this, is a bipartisan commitment to enhance the repressive apparatus of the state domestically — from cop-cities to the repression on campuses, the criminalization of speech and assembly, restrictions on truthful education, and the further weaponization of the judicial system itself. Intensification of domestic austerity programs, deregulation and destruction of all government organizations that protect and enhance the lives of working people, and attacks on trade unions are the flip side for maintaining a militaristic empire.

All this should make clear that neither of the two billionaire-controlled parties will or can be the urgently needed opposition to imperialism. Current world conditions necessitate building an opposition movement to war and militarism that is even more materially focused on anti-imperialism. This requires understanding the clear link between the empire’s foreign and domestic policies and calling for an end to militarism and redirection of resources to human needs.

Instead of looking for the lesser of two evils, we urge joining people’s independent campaigns to cut the military budget, to close U.S. and NATO foreign military bases, to establish Zones of Peace in our region, and to stop the militarization of police and domestic repression. An anti-imperialist understanding is key to the success of our people’s struggle for peace and a more just society.

***

U.S. Peace Council • P.O. Box 3105, New Haven, CT 06515 • (203) 387-0370 • USPC@USPeaceCouncil.org
• https://uspeacecouncil.org • https://www.facebook.com/USPeaceCouncil/ • @USPeaceCouncil

lunes, 28 de abril de 2025

Trump Says US Will Be ‘Leading the Pack’ in Any Attack on Iran

Netanyahu also repeated his call for Iran's civilian nuclear program to be completely dismantled

by Dave DeCamp April 27, 2025

https://news.antiwar.com/2025/04/27/trump-says-us-will-be-leading-the-pack-in-any-attack-on-iran/

President Trump has said that the US would be “leading the pack” in an attack on Iran if a deal isn’t reached on Tehran’s nuclear program.

Trump made the comment in an interview with Time Magazine that was published on Friday, when asked about the possibility of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dragging the US into a war with Iran.

“You asked if he’d drag me in, like I’d go in unwillingly. No, I may go in very willingly if we can’t get a deal. If we don’t make a deal, I’ll be leading the pack,” Trump said.

The president has been threatening to bomb Iran if a nuclear deal isn’t reached, even though there’s no evidence Tehran is working to build a nuclear weapon, a fact recently confirmed by US intelligence agencies.

Trump said in the interview that he believes he can reach a deal with Iran. Since starting the talks earlier this month, the US and Iran have held three rounds of negotiations, and both sides continue to say there’s been progress.

Netanyahu has been working against the possibility of a deal, saying any agreement must completely dismantle Iran’s civilian nuclear program, an unacceptable condition for Tehran.

Netanyahu said on Sunday that any agreement must eliminate “all the infrastructure of Iran’s nuclear program” and that Israel “cannot live with anything short of that—anything short of that could bring you the opposite result.”

The Israeli leader has repeatedly invoked the “Libya model,” referring to when former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi agreed to dismantle his nuclear infrastructure in 2003. Only eight years later, in 2011, Gaddafi was brutally killed by US-backed militants after a NATO airstrike hit his convoy amid a US-NATO bombing campaign.

domingo, 27 de abril de 2025

How the Holocaust is weaponised to repress anti-genocide voices

Mark Etkind

23 April 2025 

As a descendent of a Holocaust survivor, I have marched in pro-Palestine protests - and watched UK opponents try to smear us.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/holocaust-weaponised-repress-anti-genocide-voices-how

Israel's Holocaust Remembrance Day, Wednesday and Thursday this week, will likely see Israeli and US politicians use the opportunity to suggest that their destruction of Gaza is somehow about protecting Jews from another Holocaust - and that anyone who protests against this destruction is really motivated by antisemitism.

That’s certainly what happened last year, when both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former US President Joe Biden made such claims. In response, 10 Holocaust survivors issued a letter, stating: “To use the memory of the Holocaust like this to justify either genocide in Gaza or repression on college campuses is a complete insult to the memory of the Holocaust.”

It’s not just Netanyahu and Biden who have misused the Holocaust in this way. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was clearly referring to the pro-Palestine movement when he talked about antisemitism on university campuses and “hatred marching on our streets” in a speech at the Holocaust Educational Trust last September.

This misuse of the Holocaust and antisemitism to discredit opponents of the Gaza genocide has now paved the way for the UK government to announce a new law banning protests near places of worship, including synagogues. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper’s justification for this was that several London synagogues had been “disrupted” by pro-Palestine protests on “too many occasions”.

What she didn’t mention was that there hasn’t been a single reported incident of any threat to a synagogue linked to any pro-Palestine demonstration. This is consistent with my own experience as someone who has, along with many others, carried signs highlighting my Jewish heritage at numerous pro-Palestine demonstrations.

My sign reads: “This son of a Holocaust survivor says stop the genocide in Gaza.” Along with other survivor descendants, I am not just warmly welcomed, but often cheered by thousands of our fellow demonstrators. 

Of course, synagogues deserve to be safe from any real threats. But the fact that some synagogue attendees have strong political disagreements with opponents of the Gaza genocide does not mean that anyone’s right to protest should be repressed.

Victory for pro-Israel campaigners

Unfortunately, as in the US and Germany, the UK government’s priority is not to defend the rights of its citizens, but to defend its support for seemingly endless wars in the Middle East. The fact that police recently questioned Holocaust survivor Stephen Kapos over his participation in a pro-Palestine protest on 18 January is just one indicator of this very worrying trend towards more war and repression

Organisers of the 18 January protest had originally intended to march from the BBC headquarters to Whitehall. But the march was banned on the pretext that it was a threat to a local synagogue - a building that wasn’t even on the march route.

The Jewish Chronicle did claim that the rabbi of this synagogue said that he’d heard chants of “genocide of Jews” at a previous protest. But Ben Jamal, director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, says he discussed the issue with police, and the slogan the rabbi was referring to was merely: “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” 

In other words, it seems police took the unprecedented step of banning a major demonstration based on a misinterpretation of a single slogan.

This marked a clear victory for pro-Israel campaigners, who had been trying to stop our protests for some time. A year ago, their strategy included the following shocking assertion from the head of the Campaign Against Antisemitism, Gideon Falter: "Instead of addressing [the] threat of antisemitic violence, the Met’s policy instead seems to be that law-abiding Jewish Londoners should not be in the parts of London where these marches are taking place. In other words, that they are no-go zones for Jews.”

Falter made these widely publicised comments after being prevented from walking towards a pro-Palestine march by the Metropolitan police in April 2024, with one officer saying his “openly Jewish” appearance could antagonise the marchers.

The story, however, proved to be rather  more complicated as the officer also said, he’d seen Falter "deliberately leave the pavement and walk against the march". Not only that, our group of “openly Jewish” Holocaust survivor descendants were actually standing just a few metres away from Falter throughout his interactions with the police. This all seemed to contradict his claims that he was just trying to "cross the road" and that the area was a no-go zone for Jews.

The Falter story eventually faded, only for the media to push an even more absurd story, asserting that during another pro-Palestine march in April, the Hyde Park Holocaust Memorial was covered with a tarpauline amid concerns that it could be vandalised by an “antisemitic mob”.

Naturally, these reports failed to mention that Stephen Kapos was on the march’s front line, or that, once in Hyde Park, participants listened in awed silence to his descriptions of his Holocaust experiences. This was a crowd that had come together to oppose a genocide, not to attack a genocide memorial.

Manufactured stories

In his speech last September, Starmer said: “Just as I fought to bring my party back from the abyss of antisemitism, I promise you I will do the same in leading the country. So yes, we will build that national Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre. And build it next to Parliament.”

This new memorial would make sense if we had equally prominent memorials for the tens of millions of victims of wars, famines and massacres perpetrated by the British Empire. But of course, there are no plans to build huge monuments next to Parliament for these equally worthy victims.

The British establishment’s fixation on one genocide over all others led Starmer to announce in January that every student should listen to Holocaust survivor testimony. This respect for Holocaust survivors, however, does not seem to extend to those who criticise Israel. 

When in 2018, it was reported that people were removed for "shouting", journalists and politicians weren't at all concerned about this disruption - even though the main speaker at the event was an Auschwitz survivor. Instead, they fixated on how the meeting’s chair, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, had allowed this particular survivor to compare Israel’s policies to those of the Nazis.

This was just one among many largely manufactured stories about the Labour Party’s supposed antisemitism problem - a 'problem' that was hugely exaggerated by Corbyn's enemies in the Parliamentary Labour Party simply to discredit his leadership.

It’s therefore not surprising that when Kapos disagreed with Starmer at a meeting of Labour delegates, saying he’d never experienced any antisemitism in the party, Starmer accused him of dividing the party - and they never spoke again.

In 2023, Labour threatened to discipline Kapos if he spoke at a Holocaust Memorial Day event organised by the proscribed Socialist Labour Network. Unwilling to have his voice suppressed in this fashion, Kapos then resigned from the party.

This misuse of antisemitism and the Holocaust, as well as the mistreatment of Holocaust survivors, is shocking. But perhaps we shouldn't be so shocked. After all we're not shocked when Vladimir Putin uses the memory of Nazi atrocities to justify his war in Ukraine.

Misusing history is just what politicians do. The only really shocking thing is that so many supposedly intelligent journalists and political commentators are still so uncritical and credulous. One day this may change.

Until then we just have to keep protesting both against genocide and its misuse.

sábado, 26 de abril de 2025

Israel Is Using U.S. Bombs in Lebanon to Commit Alleged War Crimes

The families of Lebanese civilians killed with American “bunker busters” want to hold both Israel and the U.S. accountable

Hind Hassan

Apr 24, 2025

https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/lebanon-unitedstates-israel-weapons

Mohammad Haidar, 21, says his parents, Fatima Fekiyeh and Abbas Haidar, spent twenty years trying to have a child before he was born. Five years later, they had his sister, Hasnah, who completed their small family. They lived in southern Lebanon, in a house near the village of Seksekiyeh. Fatima and Abbas marked forty years of marriage last year in the village, where, Mohammad says, their life was idyllic, only sharing the land with horses and chickens.

Everything has been upended by Israeli bombardment.

Hezbollah began firing rockets and artillery at Israeli military posts one day after Israel began its assault on Gaza in October 2023. Israel bombed Lebanon, mostly in the south, with the low-level cross border attacks continuing for nearly a year. In September, Israel escalated the conflict into an all-out war. Bombs began raining down on large parts of Lebanon, including the south, causing widespread devastation and leaving entire towns in ruins. In total, more than 4,000 Lebanese people were killed and 1.2 million displaced.

Mohammad said his family planned to flee to Beirut on September 23. That same day, Israel launched one of the most intense aerial bombardment campaigns in recent warfare. The family never made it to the capital.

Mohammed recounted his attempts to flee from this ongoing bombardment to Al Jazeera English’s documentary program Fault Lines. “My father went to pick up our relatives so we can all leave for Beirut,” he said. “We wanted to escape the planes. I went to the third floor, and I had just finished eating. I was just about to get up when suddenly I saw the entire house collapsing.” He continued, “it was like a rainstorm, but the color was gray. As soon as I hit the ground, I was gone. I was unconscious. At first I had no idea what happened. I didn't think it was a missile or anything like that. But, then, I woke up, I started to scream, tried to move. I realized I could not get up.”

Mohammad was trapped underground for seven hours. “Death is easier than being stuck under rubble,” he recalled, “you can’t breathe, you can’t move, all of the stones are on top of you.” As people arrived to help, he could hear his father’s voice through the chaos, alongside the relentless sound of bombs falling nearby. “My father was asking me if my mother and sister were next to me. I said I didn't know, and then I was unconscious. I was coming in and out of consciousness because I was having a hard time breathing.”

When Mohammad was finally pulled from the wreckage, emergency workers rushed him to a hospital. Initially, news of his mother and sister’s fate was kept from him. He learned the next day that both had been killed, after seeing a memorial photo of his 15-year-old sister, Hasnah, posted online. Her body had been found three hours after the initial strike, but his mother’s body has never been recovered. “My mother, may God rest her soul, she’s still inside the stones,” he said, “we haven’t found her. Not even a single part of her. Maybe the missile fell on her and she evaporated. No one knows.” For months, Mohammad documented the ongoing search for her body in videos he posted on TikTok.

He says it’s taken a toll on his father, who remains trapped in a constant state of shock. “He cannot accept what happened. Every single day he comes to search,” Mohammed told Fault Lines, “when he reaches here, he starts to cry. His home, his sweat and tears, his family—it’s all gone.”

Evidence for War Crimes

No one has explained to Mohammad or his father why his home was bombed. The Israeli military has repeatedly claimed, on social media and in public statements, that it targets Hezbollah facilities and fighters, but it has not commented on this specific attack. Mohammad says his family are not Hezbollah members or fighters, and there’s no evidence to suggest otherwise.

“As you can see, it’s a normal house. We have nothing to do with anyone; we’re living alone here. They convey to the media that these are Hezbollah targets. But in reality, that’s not true.”

Only the frame of Mohammad’s house remains—lying in ruin among rocks, stones, and twisted metal—and stands alone in the center of their once-gated land. The destruction of the civilian home did not unveil any tunnels, reveal any weapon storage facilities, or unearth any militant activity.

Among the debris, Fault Lines found shrapnel and large metal casings, which were photographed and sent to forensic investigators at Airwars, a watchdog tracking civilian harm in conflict-affected nations. They partnered with Armament Research Services to analyze the munitions.

Emily Tripp, Airwars’s director, says the footage showed evidence of a JDAM (Joint Direct Attack Munition) kit: it's a piece of material that attaches onto a specific munition and allows it to hit a very particular coordinate. So from that, we know that there must have been coordinates essentially plugged into the targeting system in order for that bomb to have been dropped.”

JDAMs are American-made, as are most of the bombs attached to them. U.S.-manufactured weapons used by Israel in Lebanon have killed many civilians, including Mohammad’s mother and sister. Airwars identified the weapon that struck Mohammed’s house as a BLU-109, a 2,000 pound bomb in a category known as “bunker busters.” These bombs can penetrate hardened structures—including concrete, steel, and rock—before detonating, and they have been used by the U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq, and by Israel in Gaza—with devastating consequences.

The BLU-109 is considered a “dumb bomb,” meaning it cannot navigate once released, but when paired with a JDAM, it becomes a “precision-guided munition,” capable of adjusting course mid-flight using GPS coordinates to hit a specific location. This suggests that Mohammad’s home was intentionally targeted.

Tripp adds: “We have found no evidence, based on our review of the online information environment, around connections between this family and Hezbollah. This is a typical situation in that a military will make a decision, drop a bomb, and assume that nobody will say anything afterwards.”

We shared our findings and evidence with Dearbhla Minogue, a senior lawyer at the UK-based Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), an independent organization whose work includes pursuing cases involving serious human rights violations. Minogue confirmed that, based on the available evidence and without an explanation from Israel, the attack could constitute a war crime.

Mohammad’s story is just one of many in a war that has resulted in widespread civilian casualties, often caused by U.S.-supplied munitions.

Fault Lines emailed the Israeli military’s press office to ask why Mohammad Haidar’s home—a civilian residence—was struck. They did not respond.

America’s Role

In the United States, the Leahy Law prohibits the U.S. government from providing military assistance to foreign military units credibly accused of gross human rights violations. Human Rights watchdogs, like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, have called for Israel to be investigated for war crimes, and accused it of committing genocide during its assault on Gaza. Despite this, Israel continues to receive more U.S. weapons annually than any other country.

For years, massive arms shipments to Israel have received wide bipartisan support in Washington. The Trump administration has approved around $12 billion worth of arms to Israel since January alone, while just months earlier, the Biden administration authorized the export of thousands of JDAMs—like the one found at Mohammad Haidar’s home.

Democratic Senator Mark Kelly has repeatedly spoken in favor of providing these weapons to Israel. Fault Lines spoke to him on his way to a committee meeting in February and asked him about his advocacy for the sale of JDAMs. He explained that: “JDAM is a much more precise weapon, helps you hit the target and to avoid collateral damage.”

However, Josh Paul, a former State Department official who resigned over U.S. arms transfers to Israel in October 2023, argues that Gaza serves as evidence that Israel has no interest in that type of precision, and he underscored American responsibility: “The reality is that every bomb dropped, every tank that rolls through Gaza, and every missile fired from U.S.-made aircraft carries with it the weight of American policy decisions. And, in many cases, we are complicit in those actions, whether we want to acknowledge it or not.”

In his role, Paul worked on vetting arms sales. He says the process changed when weapons were sold to Israel after October 7th: “Any space for debate, discussion, for remediating possible bad outcomes went away, because the whole process was flipped on its head […] it wasn't, we are not going to be asking you for your approval. It was, ‘you must approve this’, and there were deadlines.”

The bombs were approved and widely used: the type of 2,000-pound bomb that destroyed Mohammad Haidar’s home was also reportedly dropped on Lebanon’s capital Beirut—just days later.

Celebrated by Leaders, The Strike That Killed a Family

At around 6 p.m., on September 27, 2024, Amira Zaydan stood on her balcony in Beirut when she saw smoke rising in the distance. The smoke was drifting from the southern suburb of Dahiyeh, where her mother, father, and brother lived in an apartment. Turning to her husband she said, “I think my family is dead.”

A series of “bunker buster” bombs had been dropped by the Israeli military on the Haret Hreik municipality. Israel later claimed it had struck Hezbollah’s "central headquarters,” allegedly located "under residential buildings.” The strike killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and was celebrated by then-U.S. President Joe Biden, who called it “a measure of justice.”

But this was the same attack that killed Amira’s family.

She rushed to the site of the bombing. “When I got there after the strikes, I was just screaming because the site was catastrophic. The Red Cross wanted to take me to the hospital because I fell to the ground a few times.”

Emergency crews, overwhelmed by the scale of the destruction left by the 2,000-pound American-made bombs, could not locate her family. That night, Amira returned to the site, and she found her uncle holding a flashlight, digging with his bare hands and calling out her father’s name. It took five days for their bodies to be recovered.

Her brother, 22-year-old Mohammad Zaydan, was found first. “They asked me if I wanted to identify the body, and I agreed. I wasn't prepared for what I was about to see. I entered the room, and as soon as they opened the bag he was in, I glanced quickly and started to scream. I didn't want to see if it was him or not. My uncle came and started to rub [my brother’s] head, but then his skin came off. At first, I said it wasn’t my brother. I didn't want to accept that this was him.”

“We tried to lift his eyelids to see if it was him, but we didn’t find any eyeballs. His eyes had exploded.”

The next day, emergency workers found her father, Wissam Zaydan, and then her mother, Mona Al Shaker. “My uncle told the rescue workers to work delicately. Once they recovered the couch, they found my mother sitting on it. When they tried to move her, the top of her head fell off, it had melted.”

Her tone is fast and detached, Amira recounted the details as though they belong to someone else, until she broke down when recalling her final exchange with her mother. “That morning I sent her a message telling her to forgive me if anything happened to me. She said don’t speak like this. I swear, I felt like something was going to happen. I told her I wanted to go over there.”

She added: “Israel did this. They say that they had warned us, but they didn’t. They didn’t warn us about that initial strike on September 27.”

Amira says there were other families living in the building who also died. The total number of civilians killed remains unclear, but Fault Lines has verified that at least seven civilians were killed in the same attack.

Absence of Accountability

Despite the immense loss and grief, Amira is not expecting justice.

“We say God-willing whoever did that to our parents and other people will feel this pain and more. If he’s [Joe Biden] saying that we achieved justice by assassinating Hassan Nasrallah—what justice could they have achieved by killing civilians? He killed innocent and oppressed people, like my family.”

Both Israel and the U.S. are not parties to the International Criminal Court (ICC). Additionally, the U.S. holds veto power at the United Nations Security Council, and Israel does not cooperate fully with international bodies. As a result, Amira and Mohammad are unlikely to bring accountability to fruition through international mechanisms.

Mohammad Haidar is also not expecting answers, but he does have a message for the U.S. government.

“The weapons being sent to Israel are killing innocent people as you have seen. Boys, girls—they’re killing everything. Elderly people, animals. They’re uprooting the trees. This isn’t right. They should not be selling them any weapons, or give them anything else.”

viernes, 25 de abril de 2025

Elon Musk leaves legacy of self-destruction at DOGE


Zachary Basu

https://www.axios.com/2025/04/25/elon-musk-doge-legacy

Elon Musk arrived in Washington as the most powerful political outsider ever, brimming with Silicon Valley swagger and bipartisan buy-in for his goal of streamlining the federal government.

  • He's leaving with his reputation wounded, relationships severed, companies in crisis, fortune diminished — and little to show for DOGE but chaos and contested savings.

Why it matters: Musk may not have achieved his audacious goal of cutting $2 trillion from America's debt, but the disruption he unleashed inside the federal government — for better or for worse — will reverberate for decades.

Zoom in: Musk has publicly acknowledged the enormous toll that DOGE — which he's characterized as a patriotic, existential project — has taken on his private life.

  • He's still beloved by President Trump, but his favorability ratings have plummeted amid scrutiny of DOGE's mass layoffs, sweeping program cuts, and unprecedented access to Americans' personal data.
  • For Wisconsin's Supreme Court election this month, Democrats painted Musk — who poured $25 million into the race — as a corrupt, unelected oligarch with his eyes set on dismantling Social Security. The message stuck, and Musk's GOP-backed candidate lost.

By the numbers: Tesla, battered by boycotts, protests and even firebombingssaw its net income plunge 71% in the first quarter — triggering Musk's decision this week to scale back his involvement in DOGE.

  • Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives, a longtime Tesla bull, celebrated the end of "this dark chapter," but warned: "The brand damage caused by Musk in the White House/DOGE over the past few months will not go away."
  • Musk's net worth has declined by a staggering $122 billion this year — nearly matching the $160 billion in government savings claimed by DOGE, which budget experts believe is wildly inflated.
  • Musk, who bankrolled Trump's campaign to the tune of $288 million, still remains the world's richest man.

Zoom out: Inside the government, Musk's slash-and-burn campaign has fundamentally reshaped how federal agencies operate — and in some cases, whether they operate at all.

In some cases, DOGE has exposed seemingly frivolous examples of government spending, like a $360,000 grant to reduce social discrimination of recyclers in Bolivia.

  • The administration's aggressive marketing of these findings has helped reinforce the widely held view that Washington is bloated, inefficient and overdue for reform.
  • But the DOGE team's credibility has repeatedly been undermined by mistakes, duplications and false assumptions uploaded — then quietly deleted — on its online "wall of receipts."
  • Even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — one of several Cabinet officials to clash with Musk — accused the billionaire of overpromising and under-delivering in a West Wing shouting match last week.

What they're saying: "DOGE's verified savings have been less than 1/10 of 1% of federal spending," says Jessica Riedl, a senior fellow and budget expert at the conservative Manhattan Institute.

  • "There have been embarrassing accounting errors, lots of public statements that turned out to be false or misleading, or actions slapped back by the courts."

Between the lines: Republicans have celebrated as DOGE has slashed wasteful contracts, canceled leases and fired unproductive employees. But its cuts to the IRS threaten to reverse any progress made on reducing the deficit.

  • "The spending savings are so small that they will be undoubtedly overwhelmed by the significant tax revenue losses which result from gutting IRS tax enforcement," Riedl tells Axios.
  • "It makes a mockery of claims that DOGE is really just about cutting deficits."

The bottom line: Musk will remain a force in American politics long after his DOGE days are over, especially with his acolytes strategically installed in high-profile positions throughout the federal government.

  • "I can't speak more highly about any individual," Trump told reporters Wednesday, heaping praise on his billionaire adviser and top donor.
  • "He was treated very unfairly by — I guess you'd call it the public, some of the public," Trump added. "He loves the country. He doesn't need to do this."